| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Co counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
L.M., E.W., Jane Doe
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Unknown |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Narrator
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
S.R.
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
C.W. "Bill" Young
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Larry Visoki
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Alleged conspirator denied |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
T.M. Griffith
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cassell
|
Co plaintiffs co counsel |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Bradley Edwards files motion accusing Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz. | West Palm Beach court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a legal motion accusing Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz. | West Palm Beach court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Anticipated Trial | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of abuse of process claim | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein settled three cases handled by Edwards. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Alan Dershowitz where he denies allegations. | Legal setting | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's state court plea hearing, where Bradley Edwards began representing Jane Doe #2. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Edwards and Cassell request to add Virginia Giuffre (Jane Doe No. 3) to the case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Motion for Summary Judgment | Court (likely Florida) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bradley Edwards joining Scott Rothstein's firm. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of civil suits against Epstein | Unknown | View |
| 2025-12-04 | N/A | Case in state court pitting Bradley Edwards against Epstein | Palm Beach County | View |
| 2018-12-04 | N/A | Epstein settles defamation lawsuit with Bradley Edwards. | West Palm Beach, Fla. | View |
| 2018-12-04 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein agrees to settle a civil case brought by Bradley Edwards. | Unknown | View |
| 2018-12-04 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein agreed to settle a civil case brought by attorney Bradley Edwards. | Unknown | View |
| 2018-12-04 | N/A | Scheduled start of civil trial regarding Edwards' allegations of malicious prosecution by Epstein. | Palm Beach County Court | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Meeting | Meetings took place between attorneys for accusing witnesses and SDNY prosecutors concerning or r... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2017-09-01 | N/A | Court documents filed revealing settlement amounts ('filed last week' relative to Oct 3, 2017). | Court | View |
| 2017-01-01 | Litigation | CVRA (Crime Victims' Rights Act) litigation during which victims' attorney Bradley Edwards filed ... | N/A | View |
| 2016-04-10 | N/A | Publication of article regarding settlement between Dershowitz and Edwards/Cassell. | N/A | View |
| 2016-04-08 | N/A | Settlement of defamation claims between Edwards/Cassell and Dershowitz. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2016-04-08 | N/A | Settlement of lawsuits between Dershowitz, Edwards, and Cassell. | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Meeting | Meetings took place where certain attorneys for accusing witnesses met with SDNY prosecutors to a... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2015-10-01 | N/A | Alan Dershowitz appears at a Florida courthouse regarding defamation suits involving Bradley Edwa... | Florida courthouse | View |
| 2015-03-24 | N/A | Motion entered on FLSD Docket. | Broward County, Florida | View |
This document is page 3 of Edwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). It argues that Epstein dismissed an abuse of process claim against Edwards just before a hearing and asserts that Epstein filed claims without probable cause to hinder legitimate discovery. The text references depositions of Bradley Edwards from 2013 and an order by Judge Crow from 2012.
This document is page 2 of Bradley Edwards' opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's motion for summary judgment in a civil case. It argues that Epstein's lawsuit against Edwards was a bad-faith intimidation tactic designed to drain resources and deter legitimate claims, asserting that Epstein knew he had actually molested Edwards' clients and had no intention of waiving his Fifth Amendment rights to allow for proper discovery. The footnotes list various evidentiary exhibits, including depositions of Epstein (2012), Edwards (2010), and Scott Rothstein (2012), as well as a transcript of a telephone interview with Virginia Roberts.
This document, stamped with House Oversight identifiers, appears to be a printout of a news article detailing a lawsuit between Jeffrey Epstein and his former lawyers. It highlights allegations of orgies and sex trafficking involving minors at Little St. James and discusses Epstein's connections to high-profile figures, specifically noting Bill Clinton's flight history on Epstein's jet (2002-2005) and Prince Andrew's 2010 stay at Epstein's NY mansion. The text also references the 2005 investigation initiated by a mother in Palm Beach and mentions a specific victim identified as Jane Doe 102.
A 2017 Palm Beach Post article reveals that Jeffrey Epstein paid a total of $5.5 million to settle lawsuits with three young women (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) represented by attorney Bradley Edwards. The specific settlement amounts ($1M, $2M, and $2.5M) were disclosed in court documents after Epstein's attorneys compelled Edwards to answer questions in a related lawsuit. The document is stamped as part of a House Oversight Committee release.
A Virgin Islands Daily News article from December 2018 details Jeffrey Epstein's settlement of a defamation lawsuit with attorney Bradley Edwards just before trial. The article discusses the renewed scrutiny on Epstein's 2008 plea deal approved by Alexander Acosta, mentions his connections to high-profile figures like Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Prince Andrew, and notes ongoing efforts by victims to nullify the original non-prosecution agreement.
This document is the final page (Page 9) of a legal letter dated September 12, 2013, written by attorney Jack Scarola. The text argues against the use of 'litigation privilege' to hide a 'life of perversion' and states that 'Epstein’s day of public reckoning is inevitable.' The letter references an upcoming mediation and copies several attorneys involved in the Epstein legal cases, including Bradley Edwards and Jack Goldberger.
This document is page 7 of a legal filing dated September 12, 2013, arguing that Jeffrey Epstein's use of the Fifth Amendment and obstructionist tactics (including securing lawyers for staff who recruited girls) creates an adverse inference of guilt. It states that attorney Bradley Edwards was pursuing discovery to prove Epstein was a 'serial molester' and discusses the admissibility of evidence regarding Epstein's abuse of other minors to establish modus operandi. The document cites case law supporting the use of adverse inferences in civil cases when a party refuses to testify.
This document, dated September 12, 2013, appears to be a legal filing or summary defending attorney Bradley Edwards against claims made by Jeffrey Epstein. The text refutes Epstein's allegations that Edwards was involved in a Ponzi scheme run by Scott Rothstein, noting that Epstein failed to provide evidence during deposition and instead invoked attorney-client privilege. It also details that Edwards represents three victims (L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) in civil suits against Epstein for sexual abuse.
A legal letter from Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley P.A. to mediator Alvin Capp regarding the case 'Edwards, Bradley adv. Epstein.' The letter defends attorney Bradley Edwards against a lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Epstein, characterizing Epstein's suit as a 'vengeful assault' and 'extortion.' It details Epstein's allegations that Edwards conspired with Scott Rothstein to use sexual assault cases (involving victims L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe) to fuel a Ponzi scheme.
This document is a page from a legal affidavit (likely by Paul Cassell) discussing the legal strategies and settlements involving Virginia Giuffre, Bradley Edwards, and Alan Dershowitz. The narrator refutes Dershowitz's claims that a previous settlement exonerated him, clarifying that Giuffre stands by her allegations and that the settlement was a tactical decision regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act case. It also explicitly denies Dershowitz's allegations that attorneys David Boies and Sigrid McCawley were involved in an 'extortion plot' against Les Wexner in 2014.
This document is a 'Counsel List' exhibit filed on March 24, 2015, in the Florida Southern District Court (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM), related to the state case 'Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz' (Case No.: CACE 15-000072). It lists contact information for Thomas Emerson Scott, Jr. of the law firm Cole Scott & Kissane P.A., identifying him as the attorney for the Defendant (Dershowitz). The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
This document appears to be an excerpt from a news article (likely the Miami Herald) presented as evidence in a House Oversight investigation. It details the 2008 plea deal negotiations and sentencing of Jeffrey Epstein, highlighting a specific quote from prosecutor Villafaña about hiding other crimes and co-conspirators from the judge. It also documents false statements made in court regarding victim notification and includes comments from victims' attorney Bradley Edwards suggesting higher-ups directed the prosecutors' actions. The document includes a footer with contact details for Epstein's lawyer, Darren K. Indyke.
This document appears to be an email sent by attorney Darren K. Indyke in 2019 (based on copyright), containing the text of a news article or report reviewing the 2008 sentencing of Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights the courtroom exchange where prosecutor Belohlavek misled Judge Pucillo about victim notification and agreement with the plea deal. It also references Alex Acosta's defense of the deal, the Labor Department's statement, and attorney Bradley Edwards' assertion that prosecutor Villafaña was directed by superiors to keep victims uninformed.
This document appears to be an email sent by attorney Darren K. Indyke (likely in 2019) containing the text of a news article reviewing the 2008 plea deal of Jeffrey Epstein. The text highlights the failure to inform victims about the plea agreement, citing court transcripts between Judge Pucillo and prosecutor Belohlavek, and includes comments from victim attorney Bradley Edwards suggesting prosecutors were directed by superiors to settle. The document includes Indyke's signature block with contact details redacted and bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
This document is page 5 of a legal letter dated February 25, 2015, regarding discovery disputes in the case Edwards and Cassell v. Dershowitz. The text criticizes the Defendant (Dershowitz) for providing evasive, incomplete, or legally unfounded responses to interrogatories concerning his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, statements made about Bradley Edwards, and potential witnesses. It specifically notes that Dershowitz refused to provide details based on flight logs or the deposition status of Jane Doe #3, and lists Thomas and Joanne Ashe as individuals identified by the Defendant.
This document is a Certificate of Service page from a legal filing in the case of Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). It certifies that attorney Jack Scarola sent a copy of the Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Documents via E-Serve on March 2, 2015. The document includes Scarola's contact information at Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A., and bears a House Oversight stamp.
This document is page 6 of a Motion to Compel Production of Documents filed by Bradley Edwards against Alan Dershowitz in March 2015. The plaintiffs argue that Dershowitz failed to produce documents proving he never met Jane Doe No. 3, despite claiming to the media he possessed such proof, and failed to file a privilege log while asserting blanket privileges. The motion requests the court to order immediate production of materials, declare privileges waived due to the lack of a log, and award attorneys' fees.
This document is page 5 of a 'Motion to Compel Production of Documents' in the case of Bradley Edwards vs. Alan Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072), filed in federal court on March 24, 2015. The text details a dispute over discovery delays, noting that on February 11, 2015, Dershowitz's legal team (specifically a paralegal from Cole, Scott & Kissane) promised documents that were then retracted by an attorney. By February 23, 2015, Dershowitz had produced zero documents, offering only 'evasive' standard responses objecting to requests for the 'absolute proof' he referenced in a sworn declaration.
This document is a page from a legal motion filed by Bradley Edwards against Alan Dershowitz in March 2015. It details Dershowitz's public denial of sexual abuse allegations made by 'Jane Doe No. 3' (Virginia Giuffre) and his claims on Fox Business that he possesses records proving his innocence and her dishonesty. The text outlines the timeline of legal filings in early January 2015, including Dershowitz's motion to intervene and Edwards' subsequent request for the production of the specific exculpatory records Dershowitz claimed to hold.
This document page outlines the factual background for a motion to compel production of documents in the case Bradley Edwards vs. Dershowitz. It details Jane Doe No. 3's attempts to join a case regarding Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, her allegations of being trafficked to Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz, and Dershowitz's subsequent alleged defamatory media statements against attorneys Edwards and Cassell.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Bradley Edwards | $0.00 | Settlement of three cases handled by Edwards. E... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Bradley Edwards | $0.00 | Epstein paid significant sums in settlement of ... | View |
| 2018-12-04 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Bradley Edwards | $0.00 | Settlement for defamation lawsuit (undisclosed ... | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Bradley Edwards | $0.00 | Settlement of lawsuit in Palm Beach. | View |
| 2008-07-01 | Received | N/A | Bradley Edwards | $0.00 | Bradley Edwards was working pro bono; the suit ... | View |
"And I wrote that to you, something that you have falsely denied."
Attorney Bradley Edwards stated that Ghislaine Maxwell was the 'main facilitator' for Jeffrey Epstein's activities.
Edwards denied knowing Rothstein was marketing Epstein cases.
Filed a motion on behalf of two unnamed women accusing Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz of participating directly in Epstein’s illegal activities.
Denied Epstein's allegations and called claims frivolous.
Epstein apologized and agreed to pay an undisclosed amount to settle defamation lawsuit.
Victims' attorney Bradley Edwards called Villafaña to ask about the stage of the investigation. Villafaña replied that it was an 'on-going active investigation' but could not provide more details.
Initial objection to RFP 19 and RFP 20 claiming production would be a 'burden'.
Email correspondence regarding service of Subpoena Duces Tecum for Mr. Edwards (Exhibit R)
Deposition of Bradley Edwards
Deposition of Bradley Edwards
Dershowitz claims this conversation is alleged to have happened secretly, but denies its truth.
Counsel conferred in a good faith effort to resolve issues contained within the Defendant's Motion to Strike (D.E. 20).
Edwards informed Knight that someone at Epstein's NY residence had accepted service.
Informed Edwards he was determined to be a victim (or potential victim) of Scott Rothstein's federal crimes and outlined his rights.
Informed Edwards he was a victim or potential victim of Scott Rothstein's federal crimes.
Visoki admitted specific high-profile passengers were on board while young girls were present, but swore he did not suspect sexual activity.
Visoki admitted various high-profile figures were on the plane with young girls present but denied suspecting sexual activity.
Urged vigorous enforcement but contained no demand for relief requested in the Emergency Petition. Received by AUSA on July 7, 2008.
Notified Edwards of the plea hearing scheduled for June 30, 2008.
Edwards informed AUSA he represented victims and asked to meet.
Motion filed on behalf of two unnamed women accusing them of participating in illegal activities.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity