Bradley Edwards
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
15
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Virginia Roberts
|
Client |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Co counsel |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Paul Cassell
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
L.M., E.W., Jane Doe
|
Client |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Client |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Unknown |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Narrator
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
S.R.
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Virginia Giuffre
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
C.W. "Bill" Young
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Kate
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Larry Visoki
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN
|
Alleged conspirator denied |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
T.M. Griffith
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Cassell
|
Co plaintiffs co counsel |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Bradley Edwards files motion accusing Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz. | West Palm Beach court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of a legal motion accusing Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz. | West Palm Beach court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Anticipated Trial | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dismissal of abuse of process claim | Court | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein settled three cases handled by Edwards. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition of Alan Dershowitz where he denies allegations. | Legal setting | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's state court plea hearing, where Bradley Edwards began representing Jane Doe #2. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Edwards and Cassell request to add Virginia Giuffre (Jane Doe No. 3) to the case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Motion for Summary Judgment | Court (likely Florida) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Bradley Edwards joining Scott Rothstein's firm. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Filing of civil suits against Epstein | Unknown | View |
| 2025-12-04 | N/A | Case in state court pitting Bradley Edwards against Epstein | Palm Beach County | View |
| 2018-12-04 | N/A | Epstein settles defamation lawsuit with Bradley Edwards. | West Palm Beach, Fla. | View |
| 2018-12-04 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein agrees to settle a civil case brought by Bradley Edwards. | Unknown | View |
| 2018-12-04 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein agreed to settle a civil case brought by attorney Bradley Edwards. | Unknown | View |
| 2018-12-04 | N/A | Scheduled start of civil trial regarding Edwards' allegations of malicious prosecution by Epstein. | Palm Beach County Court | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Meeting | Meetings took place between attorneys for accusing witnesses and SDNY prosecutors concerning or r... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2017-09-01 | N/A | Court documents filed revealing settlement amounts ('filed last week' relative to Oct 3, 2017). | Court | View |
| 2017-01-01 | Litigation | CVRA (Crime Victims' Rights Act) litigation during which victims' attorney Bradley Edwards filed ... | N/A | View |
| 2016-04-10 | N/A | Publication of article regarding settlement between Dershowitz and Edwards/Cassell. | N/A | View |
| 2016-04-08 | N/A | Settlement of defamation claims between Edwards/Cassell and Dershowitz. | Broward County, Florida | View |
| 2016-04-08 | N/A | Settlement of lawsuits between Dershowitz, Edwards, and Cassell. | N/A | View |
| 2016-01-01 | Meeting | Meetings took place where certain attorneys for accusing witnesses met with SDNY prosecutors to a... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2015-10-01 | N/A | Alan Dershowitz appears at a Florida courthouse regarding defamation suits involving Bradley Edwa... | Florida courthouse | View |
| 2015-03-24 | N/A | Motion entered on FLSD Docket. | Broward County, Florida | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023020.jpg
This document is a forwarded email chain originating from Sharon Churcher at The Mail on Sunday, requesting comment from Jeffrey Epstein's legal team regarding a lawsuit filed by Bradley Edwards. The journalist outlines allegations that will be published, including claims by a witness that she was trafficked to London by Epstein to have sex with Prince Andrew while underage.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023018.jpg
This document is an email chain from October 2013 in which Tonja Haddad Coleman forwards a media inquiry from Sharon Churcher (The Mail on Sunday) to Jeffrey Epstein and Darren Indyke. The inquiry requests comment on a lawsuit by Bradley Edwards and specific allegations that a witness (name redacted) was trafficked by Epstein to have sex with Prince Andrew in London for $15,000 while underage. It also mentions allegations that Epstein flew young women to entertain President Clinton.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023014.jpg
This document is a timeline, likely from a news article, detailing legal events surrounding Jeffrey Epstein between roughly 2016 and 2018. It highlights Bradley Edwards' legal battles with Epstein, Alexander Acosta's confirmation hearing where the Epstein plea deal was questioned, and a settlement between a plaintiff named Roberts and Ghislaine Maxwell. The text includes a quote from Edwards criticizing the plea negotiation process.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015640.jpg
This document is a 'Counsel List' (Page 20 of 20) from a court filing in the case of 'Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz' (Case No. CACE 15-000072). It provides contact information for attorneys representing the parties involved, including addresses, emails, and phone numbers for law firms such as Boies Schiller & Flexner, Cole Scott & Kissane, and Wiley Rein. The document contains apparent clerical errors, as it lists nearly all attorneys—including the plaintiff Bradley Edwards and his counsel—under the label 'Attorneys for Alan M.Dershowitz, Esquire'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015637.jpg
This document is page 17 of a court filing in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz, specifically a response to Dershowitz's motion to seal records. It quotes Alan Dershowitz attacking attorneys Edwards and Cassell and their client Virginia Giuffre during a CNN interview, accusing them of being unethical and motivated by money. The filing concludes by requesting the court deny Dershowitz's motion to seal documents regarding Giuffre's allegations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015636.jpg
This document is page 16 of a legal response filed by Edwards and Cassell in a defamation case against Alan Dershowitz. It cites a January 3, 2015, BBC Radio 4 interview where Dershowitz publicly claims he wants all evidence released and aggressively attempts to discredit his accuser. In the transcript, Dershowitz denies allegations against himself, Bill Clinton, and Prince Andrew, asserting that Secret Service records will prove Clinton was never on Epstein's island.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015635.jpg
This page is from a legal response by Edwards and Cassell against Dershowitz (Case CACE 15-000072). It documents Dershowitz's public media statements in January 2015 (on the Today Show and in the Miami Herald) where he categorically denies allegations, claims an 'academic relationship' with Epstein, and accuses the opposing lawyers and Ms. Giuffre of lying and fabrication. He specifically threatens that the lawyers will be disbarred and will 'rue the day' they filed the motion.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015634.jpg
This document is page 14 of a legal response filed by Edwards and Cassell in the case Edwards v. Dershowitz. The text argues that Dershowitz selectively uses parts of Virginia Giuffre's affidavit while attempting to seal the rest, preventing a fair assessment of his claims that her statements are 'preposterous.' The document includes a transcript of a BBC interview from January 2015 where Dershowitz categorically denies the allegations, claims he does not know Giuffre, and threatens the opposing lawyers with defamation suits and disbarment proceedings.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015633.jpg
This document is page 13 of a legal response in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). It contains a transcript excerpt from a deposition where Alan Dershowitz questions Ms. McCawley's standing, followed by legal commentary regarding a statement released by Ms. McCawley on behalf of David Boies concerning privileged settlement discussions. The document references depositions of Alan Dershowitz from 2015 and 2016.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015632.jpg
This document is a page from a legal response in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz, likely part of a House Oversight review. It contains a transcript of Alan Dershowitz's deposition where he vehemently denies ever meeting or touching Virginia Giuffre (Roberts) and denies witnessing Jeffrey Epstein abuse anyone. An attorney, Ms. McCawley, interrupts to object when Dershowitz mentions David Boies and potential settlement discussions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015631.jpg
This document is page 11 of a legal response in the case of Edwards vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). Attorneys Edwards and Cassell argue against sealing court records, claiming that Alan Dershowitz selectively reveals confidential information to misrepresent facts while trying to prevent them from correcting the record. The text specifically cites a deposition where Dershowitz allegedly brought up an affidavit by Virginia Giuffre regarding him watching her perform oral sex on Jeffrey Epstein, and subsequently misrepresented settlement discussions involving attorney David Boies.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015630.jpg
This document is page 10 of a legal response in the defamation case *Edwards v. Dershowitz* (CACE 15-000072). The filing argues against Dershowitz's motion for confidentiality, citing previous orders by Judge Marra in a federal CVRA case. The text explicitly mentions allegations of sexual abuse by Dershowitz against Ms. Giuffre and asserts that previous court orders allow for these factual details to be presented if properly supported.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015628.jpg
This document is page 8 of a legal response in the case of Edwards v. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). It details a motion filed on December 30, 2014, by Virginia Giuffre (Jane Doe No. 3) and Jane Doe No. 4 to join the case as victims under the CVRA, explicitly alleging that Jeffrey Epstein trafficked Giuffre to Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew for sexual purposes while she was a minor. The text also notes Dershowitz's subsequent aggressive media response, in which he called Giuffre a 'serial liar' and the opposing attorneys 'sleazy' and 'unprofessional.'
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015627.jpg
This document is page 7 of a response in the case Edwards v. Dershowitz (CACE 15-000072). It details discovery disputes between victims' counsel (Edwards and Cassell) and the Government regarding the production of documents and the attempt to add Virginia Giuffre (Jane Doe No. 3) to the case in 2014. The text highlights the Government's delay tactics and eventual refusal to stipulate the addition of new victims.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015625.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal response filed by Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell in a lawsuit against Alan Dershowitz. The text argues that Dershowitz cannot seal court records containing allegations that he sexually abused Jane Doe #3, particularly because he previously quoted those same allegations in his own counterclaim. It further alleges that Dershowitz, as Epstein's lawyer, negotiated a Non-Prosecution Agreement specifically to secure immunity for himself and other coconspirators regarding crimes committed in Florida.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015624.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal response by Edwards and Cassell in a case against Alan Dershowitz, arguing that sexual abuse allegations are inherent to the lawsuit and not peripheral. The text references legal precedents regarding confidentiality and cites Dershowitz's own counterclaim, which quotes specific allegations that Epstein forced a minor (Jane Doe #3) to have sexual relations with Dershowitz in various locations.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015623.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal response filed by Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell against Alan Dershowitz's Motion to Determine Confidentiality of Court Records. The text outlines legal exceptions for confidentiality under Florida Judicial Administration rules, arguing that none apply because the case is a defamation action where disclosure is inherent to the proceedings. The filing cites precedents such as Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers and Carnegie v. Tedder to support the argument that defamatory material cannot be sealed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015622.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal response filed by Edwards and Cassell in the case Edwards vs. Dershowitz (Case No. CACE 15-000072). The document argues against Dershowitz's motion to seal court records, pointing out the hypocrisy of his public statements calling for transparency while legally attempting to seal documents. It cites Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 and the case Barron v. Florida Freedom Newspapers, Inc. to establish the heavy burden of proof required to deny public access to court records.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015584.jpg
This document is an email from Mary E. Pirrotta to Lindsay Isaac (at Turner) dated January 22, 2015. It provides requested legal documents, specifically a complaint for Case No. CACE 15-000072 (Edwards vs. Dershowitz) and a letter from Mr. Scarola addressed to The Duke of York. The document bears Bates stamps BE-000029 and HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015584.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015028.jpg
This document is a printout of a Palm Beach Post news article dated August 26, 2017, discussing the legal efforts to reopen the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein nearly 10 years after his 2008 plea deal. The article details how attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell, representing two victims, are arguing that the federal government violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by not informing victims of the non-prosecution agreement. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013430.jpg
A 2009 Evening Standard article reporting that Jeffrey Epstein's pilot, Larry Visoki, was deposed by attorney Bradley Edwards. Visoki admitted that Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Kevin Spacey, and other high-profile figures flew on Epstein's plane while young girls were present, though he denied knowledge of sexual misconduct. The article also notes Epstein transferred a Ferrari to Visoki, possibly to hide assets or pay legal bills.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013403.jpg
This document is a LexisNexis printout of a 2009 Evening Standard article titled 'City Spy'. The article reports that Jeffrey Epstein transferred a Ferrari worth $159,000 to his pilot, Larry Visoki, potentially to hide assets or pay bills. It details Visoki's deposition where he admitted that Bill Clinton, Prince Andrew, Kevin Spacey, and other high-profile figures flew on Epstein's plane while young girls were present, though Visoki denied suspecting sexual misconduct.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013356.jpg
This legal document outlines legal conflicts between Jeffrey Epstein and attorney Bradley Edwards in 2010. It confirms that Edwards was officially designated a victim of the Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme by the U.S. Attorney's Office, and that a Florida Bar complaint filed by Epstein against Edwards regarding Rothstein was dismissed. The document also details Epstein's March 17, 2010 deposition where he repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about his specific allegations against Edwards and about individuals in California Edwards sought to depose.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013316.jpg
This document is page 13 of Bradley Edwards' legal opposition to Jeffrey Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment in a civil case (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG). Edwards argues that Epstein cannot seek affirmative relief (damages/summary judgment) while simultaneously invoking the Fifth Amendment to refuse discovery, citing the 'sword and shield' legal doctrine. The document concludes by requesting the denial of Epstein's motion.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013309.jpg
This document is page 6 of Bradley Edwards' Opposition to Epstein's Motion for Summary Judgment. It argues that Edwards was justified in seeking discovery from high-profile figures like Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, and Prince Andrew (implied by context of others listed) based on Virginia Roberts' testimony. Furthermore, it highlights Epstein's refusal to answer questions during 2010 and 2012 depositions regarding his allegations against Edwards, invoking the Fifth Amendment, which Edwards argues should lead to negative inferences against Epstein.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Bradley Edwards | $0.00 | Settlement of three cases handled by Edwards. E... | View |
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Bradley Edwards | $0.00 | Epstein paid significant sums in settlement of ... | View |
| 2018-12-04 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Bradley Edwards | $0.00 | Settlement for defamation lawsuit (undisclosed ... | View |
| 2018-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Bradley Edwards | $0.00 | Settlement of lawsuit in Palm Beach. | View |
| 2008-07-01 | Received | N/A | Bradley Edwards | $0.00 | Bradley Edwards was working pro bono; the suit ... | View |
Motion for Summary Judgment
Denied Epstein's allegations and called claims frivolous.
Statement about Ms. Maxwell's role
Attorney Bradley Edwards stated that Ghislaine Maxwell was the 'main facilitator' for Jeffrey Epstein's activities.
Knowledge of Rothstein
Edwards denied knowing Rothstein was marketing Epstein cases.
Accusations against Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz
Filed a motion on behalf of two unnamed women accusing Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz of participating directly in Epstein’s illegal activities.
Denial of witnessing abuse
"And I wrote that to you, something that you have falsely denied."
Defamation Lawsuit Settlement
Epstein apologized and agreed to pay an undisclosed amount to settle defamation lawsuit.
Status of the Epstein investigation
Victims' attorney Bradley Edwards called Villafaña to ask about the stage of the investigation. Villafaña replied that it was an 'on-going active investigation' but could not provide more details.
Motion to Quash
Initial objection to RFP 19 and RFP 20 claiming production would be a 'burden'.
Service of Subpoena Duces Tecum
Email correspondence regarding service of Subpoena Duces Tecum for Mr. Edwards (Exhibit R)
Exhibit I
Deposition of Bradley Edwards
Exhibit J
Deposition of Bradley Edwards
Sexual contact allegations
Dershowitz claims this conversation is alleged to have happened secretly, but denies its truth.
Resolution of issues regarding Defendant's Motion to Strike
Counsel conferred in a good faith effort to resolve issues contained within the Defendant's Motion to Strike (D.E. 20).
Service of Process
Edwards informed Knight that someone at Epstein's NY residence had accepted service.
Victim Status Notification
Informed Edwards he was a victim or potential victim of Scott Rothstein's federal crimes.
Victim Status Notification
Informed Edwards he was determined to be a victim (or potential victim) of Scott Rothstein's federal crimes and outlined his rights.
Epstein's plane passengers
Visoki admitted specific high-profile passengers were on board while young girls were present, but swore he did not suspect sexual activity.
Epstein litigation / plane passengers
Visoki admitted various high-profile figures were on the plane with young girls present but denied suspecting sexual activity.
Enforcement of federal laws
Urged vigorous enforcement but contained no demand for relief requested in the Emergency Petition. Received by AUSA on July 7, 2008.
Plea Hearing Notification
Notified Edwards of the plea hearing scheduled for June 30, 2008.
Representation of victims
Edwards informed AUSA he represented victims and asked to meet.
Accusations against Prince Andrew and Alan Dershowitz
Motion filed on behalf of two unnamed women accusing them of participating in illegal activities.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity