ALISON J. NATHAN
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judge defendant |
54
Very Strong
|
90 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant judge |
24
Very Strong
|
33 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial |
21
Very Strong
|
66 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Defendant judge |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
40 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
46 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Judicial |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Judicial |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Paula Speer
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
organization
U.S. government
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Prosecutor judge |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial authority |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Judicial |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judicial assignment |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey S. Pagliuca
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
United States Government
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Judge defendant |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Judge defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
organization
The government
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-29 | N/A | Judgment of conviction of Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | Sentencing | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Date of sentencing for Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Scheduled date for sentencing. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Ghislaine Maxwell was sentenced. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | The scheduled sentencing for the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States Courthouse, S... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | The Court scheduled the sentencing for Ghislaine Maxwell for June 28, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing proceeding for Ghislaine Maxwell before Judge Alison J. Nathan. | SDNY Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | A sentencing proceeding for Ghislaine Maxwell is scheduled for Tuesday, which may need to be post... | United States District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing hearing | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in the case USA v. Maxwell. | United States District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Date of Sentence | SDNY | View |
| 2022-06-27 | Court filing | A letter from Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan was electronically filed with the court. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-26 | Court order | The Court issued an Order to which the Government's letter is a response. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-26 | Legal filing | The court order (Document 684) was filed. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-25 | Court action | The Court contacted the Warden for MDC regarding the Defendant's access to legal materials. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-25 | N/A | Order filed and signed by Judge Nathan | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-06-24 | N/A | Filing of Court Order | S.D.N.Y. | View |
| 2022-06-24 | Legal filing | Filing of court order regarding victim statements at sentencing. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-24 | Legal filing | Filing of Document 682 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-06-24 | Court order | The Court denied the Defendant's request for redactions. | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Letter submitted regarding Victim Impact Statement | New York, NY | View |
| 2022-06-21 | N/A | Order signed and filed | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-06-21 | Legal filing | The court order (Document 665) was filed. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001636.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing dated July 21, 2020, addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan. It details Local Criminal Rule 23.1(a), which was established by the Court to prevent prejudicial publicity from interfering with fair trials. The document lists seven specific categories of information that lawyers, law firms, and government agents are prohibited from publicly disseminating due to the high likelihood of prejudicing the due administration of justice.
DOJ-OGR-00001635.jpg
This is a legal letter dated July 21, 2020, from Jeffrey Pagliuca of Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.C., to Judge Alison J. Nathan of the Southern District of New York. The attorney, representing defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, requests that the court issue an order prohibiting the U.S. Government and its affiliates from making extrajudicial statements about the case, arguing such statements are prejudicial and violate Maxwell's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial.
DOJ-OGR-00001634.jpg
This is a court order issued on July 21, 2020, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. The order states that the court has received numerous letters and messages from non-parties but will not consider or docket them as they are procedurally improper or irrelevant. The court will apply this same treatment to any future correspondence of this nature.
DOJ-OGR-00001633.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated July 15, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order, issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan, establishes a schedule for legal proceedings, including deadlines for discovery and motions, and sets the trial date for July 12, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00001632.jpg
This is a legal waiver filed on July 14, 2020, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). Maxwell, through her attorney Christian R. Everdell, waives her right to be physically present at an upcoming conference due to the COVID-19 pandemic, provided she can communicate privately with her counsel. The document is signed by Everdell on behalf of Maxwell and accepted by Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00001562.jpg
This is a court order from United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated July 9, 2020, for case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The order establishes procedures for court proceedings amidst the COVID-19 pandemic, limiting seating to approximately 60 people on a first-come, first-served basis and outlining how counsel and the press can make seating requests. The document strictly prohibits any photographing, recording, or rebroadcasting of the proceedings, warning that violations may result in fines, sanctions, or denial of entry to future hearings.
DOJ-OGR-00001561.jpg
This is a court order filed on July 9, 2020, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-330), issued by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The order sets the logistics for a remote arraignment, initial conference, and bail hearing scheduled for July 14, 2020. It provides specific dial-in instructions for the press, public, and international callers, and instructs the US Attorney's Office to coordinate the participation of alleged victims who wish to be heard.
DOJ-OGR-00001560.jpg
This is the second page of a legal document filed on July 8, 2020, in case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The document concludes a statement regarding attorneys being subject to the court's local rules and is signed by United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00001542.jpg
A court order from Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on July 7, 2020. The document addresses victim notification regarding detention hearings and excludes specific time periods from the Speedy Trial Act due to delays in transferring the defendant and logistical issues with remote proceedings. It also references the need for a protective order regarding discovery.
DOJ-OGR-00001540.jpg
This document is a court order filed on July 7, 2020, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20-CR-330). It schedules an arraignment, initial conference, and bail hearing for July 14, 2020, to be conducted via remote video due to COVID-19 protocols. The order outlines specific restrictions on video participation to essential parties only, while noting that public viewing will be available at the Daniel Patrick Moynihan Courthouse due to the high public interest in the case.
DOJ-OGR-00001539.jpg
Page 2 of a court filing (Document 9) dated July 7, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Assistant United States Attorneys (Rossmiller, Moe, Comey) inform Judge Nathan that they have conferred with defense counsel (Everdell and Cohen), who consent to a request regarding the timeline for discovery production.
DOJ-OGR-00001538.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated July 7, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution proposes a briefing schedule for Maxwell's detention hearing following her arrest on July 2, 2020, and renews its request to exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act. The letter confirms the parties are available for a remote hearing on July 14, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00001536.jpg
This document is a letter dated July 6, 2020, from attorneys Mark S. Cohen and Christian R. Everdell (Cohen & Gresser LLP) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense informs the court that they finally made contact with Maxwell at the Metropolitan Detention Center that evening and she has waived her physical presence for upcoming proceedings. The defense and prosecution have agreed to schedule the remote arraignment and bail hearing for the morning of July 14, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00001534.jpg
This document is a 'Waiver of Right to be Present at Criminal Proceeding' filed on July 6, 2020, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, which corresponds to United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The form allows a defendant to waive their physical presence at arraignments or bail hearings, specifically citing the COVID-19 pandemic as a justification for remote proceedings. The specific image shows the blank form/template included in the court filing.
DOJ-OGR-00001533.jpg
This is the signature page (page 2 of 4) of a court order filed on July 6, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Judge Alison J. Nathan orders the submission of a letter proposing a date for proceedings and a revised schedule for the Defendant's bail application. The document bears a DOJ production stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00001532.jpg
A court order filed on July 6, 2020, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The order addresses the scheduling of an arraignment and bail hearing, proposing remote proceedings due to COVID-19 safety concerns. It outlines specific time slots available for video appearances from the Metropolitan Detention Center (July 9 or July 14) and orders counsel to confer and file a joint letter by 9:00 p.m. that night.
DOJ-OGR-00001498.jpg
This document is the second page of a legal letter filed on July 5, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The US Attorney's office requests Judge Nathan exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act to allow for the transportation of the defendant from another district and to facilitate discussions regarding a protective order to shield the identities of victims and third parties during discovery. Defense counsel consented to this request.
DOJ-OGR-00001497.jpg
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests the scheduling of an arraignment and bail hearing for July 10, 2020, following the defendant's arrest in New Hampshire, and discusses Speedy Trial Act time exclusions.
DOJ-OGR-00001442.jpg
This legal document is a preliminary statement outlining the timeline of Ghislaine Maxwell's indictment and arrest in the summer of 2020. It details the six counts against her, including conspiracy to entice minors and perjury, and notes that United States District Judge Alison J. Nathan denied her bail following a hearing on July 14, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00001438.jpg
This legal letter, sent from attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan, protests the detention conditions of her client, Ghislaine Maxwell, at the MDC. The letter argues that the 15-minute flashlight checks are disruptive and based on spurious justifications, such as 'enhanced security'. Sternheim refutes the government's claim that Maxwell possesses a contraband eye mask and provides evidence from an intake form showing Maxwell did not express safety concerns about being in the general population, contradicting the MDC's assertions.
DOJ-OGR-00001435.jpg
This document is a status letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated May 5, 2021, regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details the protocols for flashlight security checks at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC), explaining that checks are generally conducted every 30 minutes in the SHU and hourly in the general population. However, the letter specifies that Ghislaine Maxwell is subject to checks every 15 minutes because she is on an 'enhanced security schedule,' though not on suicide watch.
DOJ-OGR-00001428.jpg
In this court order from May 14, 2021, Judge Alison J. Nathan denies Ghislaine Maxwell's request to override the Bureau of Prisons' security protocols regarding frequent safety checks and the prohibition of eye masks at the MDC. The Judge rules the request unsubstantiated but urges the MDC to consider reducing sleep disruption and ensures Maxwell is only subjected to necessary security protocols consistent with similarly situated detainees. The order is part of Case 1:20-cr-00330.
DOJ-OGR-00001427.jpg
This is a court order filed on May 14, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document addresses complaints from Maxwell's defense counsel regarding sleep deprivation caused by guards shining flashlights into her cell every 15 minutes. The Government responded that these checks are routine safety measures, though Maxwell receives more frequent checks due to being housed alone and the nature of her charges.
DOJ-OGR-00001398.jpg
This is a legal letter dated April 7, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter responds to a government filing from the previous day and complains about unsanitary conditions at the MDC, specifically detailing a 'pervasive stench of sewage' in Maxwell's isolation unit caused by unused drains and overflowing toilets from the cellblock above.
DOJ-OGR-00001367.jpg
This is a Motion Information Statement filed on April 15, 2021, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Attorney Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP is requesting to withdraw as counsel of record for Ghislaine Maxwell because she has retained new counsel, David Oscar Markus of Markus/Moss PLLC, for her appeal. The motion is unopposed by the United States, represented by AUSA Maurene Comey.
Response Deadline
Order to respond to Defendant's letter by 5:00 p.m. on Oct 15, 2021.
Order on Redactions
Judge adopts proposed redactions for specific motions.
Order referenced as Dkt. No. 89
A previous court order from December 7, 2020, which the Defendant's filing was in accordance with.
Endorsement on Letter Motion
The Court sees no basis for sealing this letter. Defendant must justify sealing by Dec 2, 2020, or file publicly.
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Legal arguments regarding 'The Material' and subpoena service issues.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity