U.S. Attorney's Office
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe Number One
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sunny Drescher
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Employment affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witness
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sunny Drescher
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alicia Valle
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Referral |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Bureau of Prisons
|
Institutional friction |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BOP
|
Institutional conflict |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
THOMAS
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein's counsel
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BOP
|
Professional interagency |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Two Guards
|
Subject of deferred prosecution agreement agreed to interviews |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOP
|
Governmental administrative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutorial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
|
Institutional conflict |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial collusive plea deal |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Bureau of Prisons
|
Governmental organizational |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BOP
|
Inter agency |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Informant collaborator |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Agreement regarding Epstein's charges, sentencing, and victim representation. Includes terms for ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein agreed to plead guilty in Florida state court to soliciting minors for prostitution and s... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interviews of two guards with U.S. Attorney's Office and DOJ-OIG as part of an ongoing OIG invest... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Opening of the case/Investigation | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's attorneys approached U.S. Attorney's Office to resolve federal investigation. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-prosecution agreement granting immunity | Federal Court/DOJ | View |
| N/A | N/A | U.S. Attorney's Office agreed not to charge Epstein with federal crimes and not to bring criminal... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of non-prosecution agreement. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office officially identified 36 women as victims. | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-05 | N/A | Transfer of discovery production | U.S. Attorney's Office SDNY | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Government Discovery Production 7 | USAfx (Digital Upload) | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Discovery Production 7 | SDNY (via Email/USAfx) | View |
| 2020-08-01 | N/A | Grand Jury Investigation into the conduct of the defendant and other possible co-conspirators of ... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-08-01 | N/A | Grand Jury Investigation | Unknown | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein death / suicide attempt | Federal Prison / Hospital | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Bail submission due date (referred to as 'due Friday' relative to the email date of Thursday, Jul... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-02-21 | N/A | District Judge in Miami issues opinion finding victims' rights were violated in the Epstein case ... | Miami | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Epstein charged in SDNY; Epstein death at MCC; dismissal of case against Epstein. | SDNY / MCC | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | A victim met with the U.S. Attorney's Office. | Unknown | View |
| 2012-11-08 | N/A | Sen. Alvin Williams Jr. was arrested by federal agents. His chief of staff, Kim Blackett, was als... | St. Thomas, V.I. | View |
| 2012-11-08 | N/A | Sen. Alvin Williams Jr. and his chief of staff, Kim Blackett, were arrested by FBI agents. A fede... | St. Thomas, V.I. | View |
| 2011-09-01 | N/A | Judge Kenneth Marra rules that U.S. Attorney's Office should have notified victims. | Federal Court | View |
| 2010-08-01 | N/A | Investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's activities involving molestation of underage girls. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2010-07-20 | N/A | Narrator received victim notification letter regarding Rothstein case. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2008-07-10 | N/A | Final list of thirty-two victims provided to Mr. Goldberger via certified mail. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018599.jpg
This document is the cover page for the court transcript of the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The trial took place on December 7, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, with Judge Alison J. Nathan presiding. The document lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present.
DOJ-OGR-00016111.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on November 29, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number, the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense, as well as other individuals present from the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00002342.jpg
This document is a letter dated January 25, 2021, from the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) in Brooklyn to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The MDC argues that inmate Ghislaine Maxwell has been provided ample resources and time to review discovery materials and communicate with her lawyers, contrary to her defense counsel's claims, and requests the court vacate a prior order from January 15, 2021. A stamped order on the document, dated February 2, 2021, shows that Judge Nathan considered the request and ultimately denied it.
DOJ-OGR-00002273.jpg
This document is a letter from the Federal Bureau of Prisons (MDC Brooklyn) to Judge Alison J. Nathan dated January 25, 2021. The letter requests the court vacate a previous order regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement, arguing that the facility provides her with significant access to discovery materials (13 hours/day via laptop) and legal counsel (3 hours/day), which the facility claims exceeds the time allotted to other inmates.
DOJ-OGR-00002273(1).jpg
A formal letter from the Federal Bureau of Prisons (MDC Brooklyn) to Judge Alison Nathan requesting the vacating of a court order regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The MDC argues that Maxwell already has significant access to discovery materials (via a dedicated laptop provided in Nov 2020) and extensive communication with her legal counsel, exceeding that of other inmates. The letter refutes defense claims that her confinement conditions are limiting her ability to prepare for trial.
DOJ-OGR-00021990.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a hearing on December 19, 2019. An attorney, Mr. Figgins, successfully requests a one-week extension to secure cosigners for his client, Mr. Thomas, a process which requires an interview by the U.S. Attorney's Office. Subsequently, another attorney, Ms. Donaleski, requests that time be excluded from trial calculations, which the court grants under the Speedy Trial Act.
DOJ-OGR-00021967.jpg
This is page 9 of a court transcript from Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT, filed on December 16, 2019. The Judge is addressing counsel regarding the release conditions for a defendant named Ms. Noel. The Judge clarifies that while the defense and government have reached an agreement, the Court has final authority, and discusses a specific pretrial service policy regarding firearms, noting that the case involves allegations about documents, not violence.
DOJ-OGR-00021949.jpg
This document is a bail disposition and arraignment sheet for Tova Noel, dated November 19, 2019, related to Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. Noel pled not guilty and was released on a $100,000 personal recognizance bond with travel restrictions and a requirement for mental health evaluation. A specific handwritten condition prohibits her from contacting her co-defendant (implied to be Michael Thomas) unless counsel is present.
DOJ-OGR-00021930.jpg
This legal document, filed on November 19, 2019, in the Southern District of New York, outlines the bail conditions for defendant Tova Noel. She was released on a $100,000 personal recognizance bond with several conditions, including travel restrictions, surrender of travel documents, and a specific prohibition against contacting her co-defendant without counsel present. The document also schedules future court dates, including a conference on November 25, 2019, and a preliminary hearing on December 19, 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00021685.jpg
This document is page 38 of a legal filing (Case 22-1426) dated June 29, 2023. It contains legal arguments rejecting Ghislaine Maxwell's claim that a U.S. Attorney's Office in one district is bound by a plea agreement made in another, citing Eleventh Circuit precedent (San Pedro v. United States) and 28 U.S.C. § 547 regarding the limitation of a U.S. Attorney's authority to their own district. A footnote discusses and dismisses Maxwell's argument regarding an 'inter-circuit exclusionary rule.'
DOJ-OGR-00021682.jpg
This legal document is a filing that refutes claims made by Maxwell regarding a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The filing argues that Maxwell's assertion of senior-level Justice Department approval for the NPA is a mischaracterization of the record, stating that any review by offices like the Deputy Attorney General's occurred only after the NPA was signed and in response to Epstein's actions, and did not constitute an approval of the agreement itself.
DOJ-OGR-00021550.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 22-1426) concerning the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. The proceedings cover the confirmation of victim notification postings on the U.S. Attorney's website. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim and the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, both confirm on the record that they have reviewed the presentence report and discussed it. Ms. Sternheim notes that co-counsel Mr. Everdell will handle objections.
DOJ-OGR-00021546.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The hearing took place on June 28, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present at the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00021266.jpg
This page from a DOJ OPR report details the internal confusion and negotiations regarding Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal in September 2007. It highlights the lack of clarity on why Epstein's sentence was reduced from 24 to 18 months, with Assistant U.S. Attorney Villafaña admitting the reduction happened 'somehow' during the 'flip flop' between state and federal charges. The document also documents Acosta's delegation of negotiation authority and communications between the USAO and Epstein's lawyer, Jay Lefkowitz.
DOJ-OGR-00021241.jpg
This document contains an excerpt from a report (likely by the OPR) detailing internal conflicts within the prosecution team regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. It features a contentious email from prosecutor Villafaña to supervisor Menchel, accusing him of undermining the case, violating the Ashcroft memo and victims' rights, and showing weakness by offering a plea with no federal conviction. The text also includes Menchel's justification to OPR, stating that while he understood Villafaña's anxiety to file charges, her tone was disrespectful to U.S. Attorney Acosta, who sought a more 'dispassionate' approach.
DOJ-OGR-00019574.jpg
This document is a legal reply from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Jeffrey Pagliuca, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 24, 2020. It supports a request to modify a protective order to allow Maxwell to disclose to an adversary in a separate civil litigation that said adversary has already provided materials to the U.S. Attorney's Office via subpoena. The document argues against the government's stance that the civil litigation is unrelated and that disclosure would jeopardize the criminal investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00019273.jpg
This document is a page from a court docket for Case 20-3061, detailing filings between July 28 and July 30, 2020, involving Ghislaine Maxwell. It includes an affidavit by Alex Rossmiller, correspondence regarding a protective order, and a detailed Memorandum Opinion & Order by Judge Alison J. Nathan establishing the terms of that protective order. The order addresses disputes over Ms. Maxwell's ability to publicly reference alleged victims and restrictions on the use of discovery materials.
DOJ-OGR-00019125.jpg
This document is the cover page for a court transcript from the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 9, 2021. The trial took place in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, with Judge Alison J. Nathan presiding. The document lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present at the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00017105.jpg
This page contains a portion of a defense summation (Ms. Menninger) arguing that witnesses colluded and were motivated by financial gain. The attorney highlights that a witness named Jane hired lawyer Robert Glassman two weeks before speaking to the FBI in September 2019, specifically to help her civil case. It alleges that law firms like Boies Schiller helped establish the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund, which paid out millions without rigorously testing claims, trapping witnesses in their stories.
DOJ-OGR-00010517.jpg
This page from a forensic-psychiatric report details Ghislaine Maxwell's complaints regarding her confinement at the MDC since July 2020. It documents allegations of sexual harassment by guards (specifically a breast grab in Jan 2021), sleep deprivation due to 15-minute flashlight checks justified by U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss, and physical deterioration including weight loss and hair loss. The report notes a decline in her mental state from coherence in Oct 2020 to manifesting depressive symptoms over time.
DOJ-OGR-00019837.jpg
This page from a legal filing (dated April 1, 2021) argues that the indictment against Ghislaine Maxwell is solely a result of Jeffrey Epstein's death and the subsequent media frenzy, claiming she is being used as a scapegoat. The text highlights that Maxwell was not charged in the 2008 Florida case or the 2019 SDNY case while Epstein was alive, and criticizes the government's lack of evidence during detention hearings regarding her flight risk. A footnote notes that the indictment was superseded on March 29 to include allegations from a fourth anonymous accuser dating back to 2001-2004.
DOJ-OGR-00019835.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (dated April 1, 2021) presenting facts about Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest and detention. It argues that Maxwell, a 59-year-old citizen with no prior criminal history, was subjected to an unnecessary SWAT raid in July 2020 despite being in contact with authorities. The text details her 'nightmarish' prison conditions, comparing them to those of 'Hannibal Lecter,' citing isolation, sleep deprivation, and invasive searches.
DOJ-OGR-00017305.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The trial took place on December 27, 2021, in the Southern District of New York, with the Honorable Alison J. Nathan presiding as District Judge. The document lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present at the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00017279.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 21, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number, the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense, as well as other individuals present from the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00009425.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 24, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a former Assistant U.S. Attorney named Schoeman. The questioning centers on what Schoeman knew about allegations that Juror No. 1, Catherine Conrad, was a suspended attorney, referencing a potential Westlaw report and an internal firm email he claims not to have seen. Schoeman maintains he was unaware of the specific information and only took action by asking about the voir dire.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity