U.S. Attorney's Office
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Defense counsel
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jane Doe Number One
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sunny Drescher
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Employment affiliation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
witness
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sunny Drescher
|
Employee |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alicia Valle
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Referral |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Bureau of Prisons
|
Institutional friction |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BOP
|
Institutional conflict |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
THOMAS
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein's counsel
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BOP
|
Professional interagency |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Two Guards
|
Subject of deferred prosecution agreement agreed to interviews |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
BOP
|
Governmental administrative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutorial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
|
Institutional conflict |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial collusive plea deal |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
Bureau of Prisons
|
Governmental organizational |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
BOP
|
Inter agency |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Boies Schiller Flexner LLP
|
Informant collaborator |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Agreement regarding Epstein's charges, sentencing, and victim representation. Includes terms for ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein agreed to plead guilty in Florida state court to soliciting minors for prostitution and s... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interviews of two guards with U.S. Attorney's Office and DOJ-OIG as part of an ongoing OIG invest... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Opening of the case/Investigation | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's attorneys approached U.S. Attorney's Office to resolve federal investigation. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Non-prosecution agreement granting immunity | Federal Court/DOJ | View |
| N/A | N/A | U.S. Attorney's Office agreed not to charge Epstein with federal crimes and not to bring criminal... | Southern District of Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Negotiation of non-prosecution agreement. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office officially identified 36 women as victims. | N/A | View |
| 2021-10-05 | N/A | Transfer of discovery production | U.S. Attorney's Office SDNY | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Government Discovery Production 7 | USAfx (Digital Upload) | View |
| 2021-04-14 | N/A | Discovery Production 7 | SDNY (via Email/USAfx) | View |
| 2020-08-01 | N/A | Grand Jury Investigation into the conduct of the defendant and other possible co-conspirators of ... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-08-01 | N/A | Grand Jury Investigation | Unknown | View |
| 2019-08-10 | N/A | Jeffrey Epstein death / suicide attempt | Federal Prison / Hospital | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Bail submission due date (referred to as 'due Friday' relative to the email date of Thursday, Jul... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-02-21 | N/A | District Judge in Miami issues opinion finding victims' rights were violated in the Epstein case ... | Miami | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Epstein charged in SDNY; Epstein death at MCC; dismissal of case against Epstein. | SDNY / MCC | View |
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | A victim met with the U.S. Attorney's Office. | Unknown | View |
| 2012-11-08 | N/A | Sen. Alvin Williams Jr. was arrested by federal agents. His chief of staff, Kim Blackett, was als... | St. Thomas, V.I. | View |
| 2012-11-08 | N/A | Sen. Alvin Williams Jr. and his chief of staff, Kim Blackett, were arrested by FBI agents. A fede... | St. Thomas, V.I. | View |
| 2011-09-01 | N/A | Judge Kenneth Marra rules that U.S. Attorney's Office should have notified victims. | Federal Court | View |
| 2010-08-01 | N/A | Investigation into Jeffrey Epstein's activities involving molestation of underage girls. | Palm Beach | View |
| 2010-07-20 | N/A | Narrator received victim notification letter regarding Rothstein case. | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2008-07-10 | N/A | Final list of thirty-two victims provided to Mr. Goldberger via certified mail. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00003283.jpg
This document details discussions among prosecutors regarding Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 non-prosecution agreement (NPA). It covers the rationale behind a broad non-prosecution provision for co-conspirators and focuses on communications from September 21, 2007, between prosecutor Villafaña and State Attorney Krischer, who were finalizing Epstein's sentence and confirming that sexual offender registration was a non-negotiable term.
DOJ-OGR-00002974.jpg
This legal document argues that the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Epstein was strictly limited to the Southern District of Florida (SDFL). It cites a 2013 brief from the USAO-SDFL, an OPR Report, and Department of Justice guidelines to establish that the USAO-SDFL did not have the authority to, and did not intend to, prevent Epstein's prosecution in any other federal district. The central theme is that the NPA was not a 'global resolution' and did not provide nationwide immunity.
DOJ-OGR-00004714.jpg
This page is from a government legal filing (Document 295) in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on May 25, 2021. The text argues against the defendant's motion to dismiss charges based on a prior Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFL). Citing the *Annabi* precedent, the government asserts that plea agreements are generally only binding in the specific district where they are signed, not universally across all federal districts.
DOJ-OGR-00004651.jpg
This document is a page from a plea agreement outlining the terms for a case against Epstein in Palm Beach County. Epstein agrees to plead guilty to solicitation of prostitution and another offense requiring sex offender registration. In return, a binding sentence of 18 months in county jail followed by 12 months of community control is recommended, and Epstein waives his right to appeal.
DOJ-OGR-00005533.jpg
This document outlines the terms of a plea agreement between Epstein and the State Attorney's Office for a case in Palm Beach County. Epstein agrees to plead guilty to solicitation of prostitution and solicitation of minors, requiring him to register as a sex offender. In exchange, a binding recommendation is made for a 30-month sentence, consisting of 18 months in county jail followed by 12 months of community control.
DOJ-OGR-00014484.jpg
This document is a page from the defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense argues that the witnesses (specifically naming Jane and Annie) were motivated by financial gain, noting they hired lawyers like Robert Glassman and communicated with firms like Boies Schiller to file civil suits and claims with the Epstein Victims Compensation Fund. Menninger emphasizes that cooperation with the government was advised as a way to help their civil cases, resulting in them receiving millions of dollars.
DOJ-OGR-00005274.jpg
A court order filed on October 22, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20-CR-330). The document outlines procedures for jury selection, including the administration of screening questionnaires in early November and the anonymization of jurors using assigned numbers. It mandates that the prosecution and defense confer to categorize prospective jurors into four lists regarding their eligibility for voir dire or excusal.
DOJ-OGR-00011666.jpg
This document is the cover page for the court transcript of the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on November 29, 2021. The trial took place in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present.
DOJ-OGR-00002880.jpg
This document is a legal letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against a subpoena issued by the Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) to the law firm BSF. The author argues that requests for materials related to the Epstein Victim's Compensation Program (EVCP) and communications between BSF and the U.S. Attorney are irrelevant to the charges, protected by work-product privilege, and constitute a 'fishing expedition' intended to support a false narrative of collusion. The document specifically details Requests 1, 3-5, 8, and 12.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019231.jpg
This is the final page (page 8) of a letter dated May 19, 2008, sent by attorneys Kenneth Starr and Joe Whitley to the Honorable Mark Filip. The attorneys are requesting that the Department of Justice discontinue federal involvement in the case (implied to be Epstein's) to allow the State to handle it, arguing issues of federalism and prosecutorial selectivity. They also request a meeting with Filip to discuss these matters.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019227.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal memorandum dated May 19, 2008, addressed to Honorable Mark Filip. It argues against the federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, asserting that his conduct was 'purely local,' 'consensual,' and did not meet the thresholds for federal statutes regarding human trafficking (§ 1591), internet predation (§ 2422), or sex tourism (§ 2423). The text critiques a CEOS review and U.S. Attorney Acosta's potential use of discretion, claiming that federal involvement would be an unprecedented overreach into state jurisdiction.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031429.jpg
This document is a printout of a news article (likely Miami Herald) detailing the reassignment of the Epstein case to U.S. Attorney Byung J. Pak following a ruling by Judge Kenneth Marra. The article highlights that former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by concealing a non-prosecution agreement from Epstein's victims, granting immunity to Epstein and accomplices despite a 53-page federal indictment draft. It also notes the 'Perversion of Justice' investigation and the misleading of victims regarding the status of the FBI case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031408.jpg
This document, seemingly a printout of a Miami Herald article included in House Oversight records, details the reassignment of the Epstein case to U.S. Attorney Byung J. Pak following a ruling by Judge Kenneth Marra. The article highlights the findings of the 'Perversion of Justice' investigation, noting that former U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta broke the law by concealing a plea deal from victims, granting Epstein and accomplices immunity despite a ready 53-page federal indictment. It describes how prosecutors misled victims into believing an FBI investigation was ongoing when it had been secretly closed.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022016.jpg
This document appears to be an excerpt from James Patterson's book 'Filthy Rich' (marked as House Oversight evidence) detailing the aggressive legal defense mounted by Jeffrey Epstein. The text describes a 'year-long assault' on prosecutors by an 'army of legal superstars' including Alan Dershowitz and Ken Starr, noting that the defense investigated prosecutors' families to find grounds for disqualification. It chronicles the negotiations leading up to the June 30, 2008 guilty plea, where the prosecution insisted on two years imprisonment and sex offender registration.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017768.jpg
This document is a printout of an Axios article dated April 15, 2019, filed as a court exhibit. It details an interview with Alan Dershowitz in which he admits he is still technically Jeffrey Epstein's lawyer and receives calls from him regarding legal issues, though he denies social contact. The article also references the 'sweetheart plea deal' brokered by Alexander Acosta and the recent Miami Herald investigation into the suppression of the FBI probe.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016508.tif
This newspaper article from February 28, 2019, details the sexual abuse committed by Jeffrey Epstein, focusing on the testimony of Michelle Licata and the controversial non-prosecution agreement. It highlights the efforts of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiner and Detective Joseph Recarey to pursue the case despite pressure, and the role of Epstein's high-profile legal team, including Alan Dershowitz and then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, in securing a lenient deal. The article also touches on the defense's tactics to discredit victims and the broader context of Epstein's influence given his wealth and connections.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017966.jpg
This document is a page from a Miami Herald article filed as a court exhibit in April 2019. It features an interview with Courtney Wild (Jane Doe No. 1), a victim of Jeffrey Epstein, who discusses being misled by prosecutors regarding Epstein's plea deal and her subsequent lawsuit against the federal government for violating the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The text also references Alexander Acosta's role as the prosecutor who oversaw the lenient non-prosecution agreement.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017803.jpg
This document is a court filing (Case 1:19-cv-03377) containing a printed Miami Herald article from April 2019. It focuses on Courtney Wild (Jane Doe No. 1), a victim of Jeffrey Epstein, who is suing the federal government for violating the Crime Victims' Rights Act by keeping victims uninformed about Epstein's plea deal. The article implicates Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta, noting that prosecutors under his authority gave Epstein a lenient deal, despite Acosta's claims to lawmakers.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017629.jpg
This document is a page from a legal journal article (likely by David Schoen, produced to House Oversight) analyzing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and the Victim Rights and Restitution Act (VRRA). It specifically critiques the Department of Justice's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, noting that on June 7, 2007—months before the non-prosecution agreement—Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafana sent a letter to Jane Doe #1 confirming the investigation and asserting she had specific rights, including the right to confer with prosecutors. The text argues this proves the DOJ initially believed CVRA rights applied pre-charging, only to reverse its position later during litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017611.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a legal journal article discussing the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), specifically arguing that victim rights should apply before formal charges are filed. It uses the Jeffrey Epstein case as a primary example of failure in the system, noting that federal prosecutors negotiated a secret non-prosecution agreement with Epstein that barred federal charges for sex offenses against dozens of victims without informing them. The text highlights the outrage of victims 'Jane Doe Number One' and 'Jane Doe Number Two' upon discovering their rights to object had been bargained away secretly.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017610.jpg
This document details the contentious plea negotiations involving Jeffrey Epstein, where the U.S. Attorney's Office agreed to a non-prosecution agreement without informing the victims, leading to a lawsuit under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). The text highlights the government's argument that CVRA rights do not attach without formal federal charges and frames the central legal issue regarding when these rights apply. It includes numerous footnotes citing media reports and legal filings related to the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017491.jpg
This document is a four-page excerpt (pages 2-5) of a deposition transcript for witness Scott Rothstein. The transcript lists appearances by attorneys including Jack Goldberger (representing Jeffrey Epstein) and Jack Scarola (representing Brad Edwards). Notably, Darryn Indyke is present and identified as Epstein's in-house counsel. The questioning begins regarding a 'scheme' at Rothstein's firm that allegedly started in 2005 or 2006.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018024.jpg
This document is a printout of a Law.com interview with Alan Dershowitz, filed as a court exhibit on April 16, 2019. In the interview, Dershowitz vigorously denies sexual allegations made by 'Jane Doe No. 3' (Virginia Giuffre), characterizing his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein as strictly professional and academic. He admits to visiting Epstein's properties in New Mexico, Palm Beach, and the Caribbean island but claims this was 'lawyer profiling' used to target him to void Epstein's plea agreement. He also attacks the credibility of the accuser and the motivations of the opposing counsel, Paul Cassell.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010600.jpg
This document page details allegations that Jeffrey Epstein violated judicial no-contact orders by hiring a private investigator to harass and intimidate a witness ('Jane Doe') prior to a scheduled civil trial in July 2010. It describes a specific incident where an investigator stalked Jane Doe and flashed lights into her home, forcing her to be moved to a secure location by a retired police officer. It also notes that attorney Edwards filed civil cases on behalf of L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe regarding sexual abuse of children.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010582.jpg
This document, page 17 of a legal filing marked with House Oversight bates stamps, details the legal proceedings surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 plea deal. It outlines his guilty plea to state charges in Palm Beach County on June 30, 2008, and the controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement with the Federal Government that shielded him from federal charges while acknowledging potential compensation for approximately 34 victims. The text also references an attorney named Edwards filing a motion regarding a CVRA (Crime Victims' Rights Act) action and a victim (Jane Doe) appearing on television to criticize the leniency of the plea.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity