| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
This document details aspects of Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement (NPA) in Florida, where he pleaded guilty to soliciting minors for prostitution and served 18 months in jail. The NPA included a controversial provision where the U.S. Attorney's Office agreed not to charge Epstein federally or his 'potential co-conspirators,' a point criticized by the OPR as 'poor judgment.' The document also discusses Ghislaine Maxwell's contention that the NPA bars her prosecution as Epstein's co-conspirator, a claim the Court rejects based on Second Circuit precedent and the scope of the NPA.
This document outlines an agreement involving Epstein, detailing terms of his sentence, including restrictions on gain time and an obligation to provide an accounting of gain time earned. It also addresses the anticipated non-disclosure of the agreement, with provisions for notification to Epstein if a FOIA request or compulsory process mandates disclosure, and specifies Epstein's obligations concerning the State Attorney's Office and convincing the 15th Judicial Circuit Judge to accept his sentencing recommendation.
This document outlines five types of criminal activities related to minor females and commercial sex acts, referencing specific sections of Title 18 U.S. Code. It then states that Epstein is seeking to resolve his state and federal criminal liability through an agreement, requiring him to comply with its terms and undertake actions with the State Attorney's Office, following an investigation by state and federal law enforcement agencies and consultation with the State Attorney's Office, considering the interests of the United States and the State of Florida.
This document discusses the scope and negotiation history of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) involving Epstein and the USAO-SDFL, examining whether it was intended to bind other districts like USAO-SDNY. It cites the United States Attorney's Manual regarding the approval process for agreements and notes that the Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division denied having a role in Epstein's NPA. The document also mentions that prosecution in Florida was deferred in favor of state prosecution, provided Epstein adhered to the agreement's conditions.
This document is an excerpt from a legal filing, discussing the interpretation of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and plea agreements. It argues that ambiguities in such agreements should be resolved against the government, citing several court cases. The document specifically contends that the NPA in question was intended to bind the Southern District of New York, contrary to a Second Circuit conclusion that suggested it only bound the Southern District of Florida.
This document details the legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, focusing on the scope and limitations of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It explains how a co-conspirator clause was broadened to cover the entire United States, Epstein's 2008 Florida plea, his 2019 indictment in New York for sex trafficking, and his subsequent death, followed by Maxwell's indictment as his co-conspirator.
This document outlines the procedural background of Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) from September 2007, where he agreed to plead guilty to state charges in Florida and serve an eighteen-month sentence, in exchange for the U.S. agreeing not to prosecute him for offenses from 2001-2007 and not to charge potential co-conspirators. It also highlights a legal inconsistency regarding the enforceability of such agreements across different circuit courts, referencing a motion to dismiss by Maxwell that would have been granted under different circumstances.
This document is an excerpt from a court transcript for a plea conference involving Jeffrey Epstein as the defendant in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit in Palm Beach County, Florida. The conference took place on June 30, 2008, at 8:40 a.m. at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, with JI Goldberger appearing on behalf of the defendant, and Phyllis A. Dames serving as the Official Court Reporter.
This document is the cover page for the deposition of Jane Doe #4 in the case of Jane Doe No.2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, filed in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, on September 16, 2009. The deposition was reported by Cynthia Hopkins of Prose Court Reporting, and the document also lists several related case numbers.
This document is the second page of a court filing related to 'Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein'. It contains a notarization statement by Jessica Cadwell, a Notary Public for the State of Florida, certifying that Mark T. Luttier appeared before her on September 17, 2009, to acknowledge an Affidavit. The document indicates that Mark T. Luttier was personally known to the notary.
This document is the second page of an affidavit filed in the case 'Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein' on September 17, 2009. The affiant, Igor Zinoviev, states under oath that he did not see Mr. Epstein speak or gesture to anyone near the front door, nor did he himself speak with individuals at the main entrance. The affidavit was notarized by Sheryll L. Mahoney in Palm Beach County, Florida.
This document is a notarization record from September 17, 2009, in Palm Beach County, Florida. Notary Public Sheryll L. Mahoney certified that Jeffrey E. Epstein personally appeared before her and acknowledged executing an Affidavit. The document also notes that an oath was/was not taken, and the notary's commission expires on May 28, 2010.
This document is a legal letter dated August 27, 2009, from Robert D. Critton, Jr. of Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, LLP to Stuart S. Mermelstein, Esq. of Herman & Mermelstein, P.A. It concerns the case Jane Doe No. 4 v. Epstein, informing Mermelstein that Mr. Epstein intends to be present at his client's deposition as a party-defendant, but will not engage in conversation with Mermelstein's client.
This document is a court record from a plea conference for Jeffrey Epstein in the Circuit Court of the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County, Florida. The conference took place on June 30, 2008, at 8:40 a.m. at the Palm Beach County Courthouse, with Judge Deborah Dale Pucillo presiding. Attorneys Barry E. Krischer and Lanna Belohlavek represented the State, while Jack Goldberger from Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. represented the defendant, Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a DHL shipping label indicating a package sent to the FBI at 505 S. Flagler Drive, West Palm Beach, FL 33401, USA. The shipment, weighing 2 lbs and containing 1 piece, was dispatched on February 5, 2007, with a service type of GDS THU and tracking number 45603437972. It also contains various internal codes and redactions.
This document from MetroPCS provides information for Law Enforcement Agencies regarding procedures and fees for obtaining customer data. It details the services offered by the Subpoena Compliance Group, retention policies for call records, voicemails, and text messages, and a fee schedule for various data requests. The document specifies that email is the preferred method for submitting requests and receiving results.
This document is a webpage from the Palm Beach County Health Department, dated July 28, 2006, detailing the location of birth and death certificates and listing various health-related services and publications. It includes links to different health programs and agencies, emphasizes the availability of online resources, and provides information about required software for viewing documents.
This document is a list of professional activities and speaking engagements from 1994 and 1995, likely from a CV. It details conferences, seminars, grand rounds, and workshops with their host organizations and locations across the US, Canada, Europe, and Asia. Key themes include psychology, law, trauma, memory, and sexual abuse.
This document is a General Release related to claims against Mr. Epstein, the Epstein Entities, and the Epstein Estate (collectively, 'Releasees'). It broadly releases all claims, including those related to acts of sexual abuse by Mr. Epstein, regardless of their geographic origin. The document also notes that the Releasor is familiar with California Civil Code Section 1542 regarding unknown claims.
This document is a page from an index or concordance, listing words alphabetically along with page and line numbers where they appear. It includes entries for terms such as 'flight', 'flights', 'flown', and 'flying', as well as proper nouns like 'France', 'Francisco', and 'Florida'. The document also contains the logo for MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES and a DOJ-OGR number at the bottom.
This document is an excerpt from an interview transcript, likely a deposition or testimony, involving Ghislaine Maxwell and Todd Blanche, with a brief interjection from David Markus. The discussion covers Jeffrey Epstein's alleged ties to intelligence agencies, his relationships with various individuals including Ehud Barak and his brother Mark Epstein, his health conditions (heart and testosterone use), and questions surrounding his legal plea deal in Florida involving Bill Barr and Mr. Acosta, as well as his death.
This document is a transcript of a legal deposition or interrogation involving Ghislaine Maxwell, Todd Blanche, and David Markus. The discussion primarily revolves around Jeffrey Epstein's legal cases, including a 2007-2009 investigation in the Southern District of Florida, his non-prosecution agreement, and Maxwell's knowledge and involvement in these matters. Maxwell denies direct knowledge of certain events, her contact with law enforcement, or direct discussions with Epstein about his legal deals.
This document is a transcript of a legal proceeding, likely a deposition or interview, involving Ghislaine Maxwell. She is questioned by Todd Blanche about her knowledge and recollection of Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution deal with the U.S. Attorney in Florida, stating she had no direct memory of him discussing it with her and implying she was not involved in those discussions.
This document, an excerpt from a report, discusses OPR's investigation into whether Epstein's status, wealth, or associations improperly influenced the outcome of his case. It concludes that OPR found no evidence of such influence, despite news reports in 2006 identifying Epstein as wealthy and connected to prominent figures like William Clinton, Donald Trump, and Kevin Spacey. The report notes that FBI personnel initially unfamiliar with Epstein later became aware of his connections, including those who had been on his plane, and that his legal team's mention of Clinton in pre-NPA letters was contextual.
This document is an excerpt from a legal report, specifically discussing Florida Rules of Professional Conduct (FRPC) 4-8.4, which addresses conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, including dishonesty, fraud, and misrepresentation. It cites two Florida Bar cases, Frederick (2000) and Shankman (2010), to illustrate how these rules apply, particularly noting that an attorney's actions leading to delayed case resolution and increased client costs can violate FRPC 4-8.4(d). The document also references OPR's examination of FRPC 4-3.8 and the non-binding nature of American Bar Association (ABA) standards for prosecutors.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity