Teresa Helm
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Client |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Legal representative |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq.
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Accused accuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Perpetrator victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
|
Legal representative |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Joshua I. Schiller
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
EST
|
Litigation |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Accuser accused |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
RICHARD D. KAHN
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Sigrid McCawley
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
David Boies
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Estate of Jeffrey Epstein
|
Litigation |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged victim abuser |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Sigrid S. McCawley
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
EST
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Sabina Mariella
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY E. EPSTEIN
|
Accuser accused |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Darren K. Indyke
|
Plaintiff vs executor defendant |
1
|
1 | |
|
organization
EST
|
Plaintiff vs defendant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN
|
Victim perpetrator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
SARAH KELLEN
|
Victim perpetrator co conspirator |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Interaction | Multiple individuals allegedly interacted with Epstein and Ms. Maxwell during the period of charg... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Teresa Helm was sexually trafficked by Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Ghislaine Maxwell. She was recr... | N/A | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2020-10-15 | N/A | Joint Stipulation for Dismissal filed | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-06-26 | N/A | Plaintiff Teresa Helm submitted her claim to the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. | N/A | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Plaintiff Teresa Helm seeks to participate in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program. | N/A | View |
| 2020-06-12 | N/A | Filing of Joint Stipulation to stay the action for 60 days. | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-05-21 | N/A | Filing of Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-04-16 | N/A | Defendants served responses and objections to Plaintiff's discovery requests. | N/A | View |
| 2020-03-20 | N/A | Filing of letter requesting oral argument in Helm v. Indyke et al. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2020-03-10 | N/A | Plaintiff served 68 Requests for Production and 14 Interrogatories on Defendants. | N/A | View |
| 2020-03-09 | N/A | Proposed new deadline for Plaintiff's opposition. | Court | View |
| 2020-03-09 | N/A | New deadline for Plaintiff's opposition (extended from March 6). | New York, NY | View |
| 2020-03-06 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance by Andrew Villacastin representing Teresa Helm | New York, New York | View |
| 2020-03-06 | N/A | Deadline for Plaintiff's opposition | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-01-23 | N/A | Parties exchanged initial Rule 26 disclosures. | N/A | View |
| 2019-11-20 | N/A | Filing of Notice of Appearance by David Boies | New York, New York | View |
| 2019-11-12 | N/A | Filing of Summons in Civil Action Case 1:19-cv-10476-PGG-DCF | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2019-11-12 | N/A | Filing of Civil Cover Sheet for Case 1:19-cv-10476-PGG-DCF | SDNY (Southern District of ... | View |
| 2019-11-12 | N/A | Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants. | Daniel Patrick Moynihan Uni... | View |
| 2002-06-01 | N/A | The 'Relevant Time Period' defined by Defendants for discovery, during which Plaintiff alleges sh... | New York, NY | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Epstein sexually assaulted Teresa Helm during a massage in New York. | New York | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Trafficking of Ms. Teresa Helm | Not specified in text | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Trafficking of Teresa Helm | Unspecified | View |
| 2002-01-01 | N/A | Alleged interaction between Plaintiff and Epstein in New York where he made intimidating statements. | New York, NY | View |
017.pdf
This document is a Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice filed on February 13, 2020, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-10476-PGG-DCF). Attorney Mary 'Molly' S. DiRago of Troutman Sanders LLP requests permission to represent Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, the Co-Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein, in a civil suit brought by Teresa Helm. The filing includes DiRago's affidavit of good standing and certificates from the Supreme Court of Illinois and the Northern District of Illinois confirming her bar status.
015.pdf
This document is a Discovery Plan and Proposed Scheduling Order filed on February 6, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. The Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff outlines broad discovery requests, including Epstein's flight logs, helicopter logs, financial records, Amazon order history, and communications with government officials and co-conspirators. The Co-Executors attempt to limit the scope of discovery strictly to the alleged abuse of the plaintiff and her damages, and the document outlines conflicting proposed deadlines for the discovery process.
014.pdf
This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of New York, dated January 30, 2020, in the case of Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein). Judge Paul G. Gardephe sets a scheduling order for the Defendants' motion to dismiss, with deadlines spanning February and March 2020.
013.pdf
Legal correspondence from Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to Judge Gardephe regarding the case Helm v. Indyke et al. The letter argues against the Defendants' anticipated motion to dismiss, asserting that Plaintiff Teresa Helm's claims are timely under NY CPLR § 215(8)(a) due to the recent termination of Epstein's criminal case (August 2019) and the doctrine of equitable estoppel based on Epstein's intimidation and manipulation tactics. The letter also argues that challenges to punitive damages are premature at this stage of litigation.
012.pdf
Attorneys for the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein request a pre-motion conference to dismiss a lawsuit filed by Teresa Helm. The defense argues that Helm's claims of assault from 2002 are barred by the statute of limitations and that exceptions based on Epstein's criminal indictment do not apply because Helm was an adult (22) at the time, while the indictment focused on minors. Additionally, the defense argues that punitive damages cannot be legally awarded against a deceased person's estate under New York law.
009.pdf
A Waiver of the Service of Summons filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York on November 27, 2019, in the case of Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke et al. Attorney Bennet Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP signed the waiver on November 25, 2019, on behalf of defendants Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, acknowledging receipt of the complaint from plaintiff's attorney David Boies.
008.pdf
This document is a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated November 25, 2019. It grants the motion for attorney Sigrid S. McCawley of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to appear Pro Hac Vice as counsel for plaintiff Teresa Helm in her case against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The order is signed by Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman.
006.pdf
This document is a court order from the Southern District of New York in the civil case of Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate). Filed on November 21, 2019, Judge Paul G. Gardephe orders the case referred to a designated Magistrate Judge for general pretrial purposes, including scheduling, discovery, and settlement.
005.pdf
A Notice of Appearance filed on November 20, 2019, in the Southern District of New York. Attorney David Boies of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP formally enters the case to represent plaintiff Teresa Helm in her lawsuit against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn.
004.pdf
This document is a civil summons issued on November 13, 2019, by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in the case of Teresa Helm v. Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn (Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein). The summons notifies the defendants that a lawsuit has been filed against them and instructs them to respond within 21 days. The second page contains a blank Proof of Service form.
003.pdf
This document is a Summons in a Civil Action filed on November 12, 2019, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:19-cv-10476). The plaintiff, Teresa Helm, is suing Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of the Estate of Jeffrey Edward Epstein. The summons directs the defendants to serve an answer to the complaint on the plaintiff's attorney, Joshua Schiller of Boies Schiller Flexner LLP, within 21 days.
002.pdf
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet filed on November 11, 2019, in the Southern District of New York for a lawsuit brought by Teresa Helm against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The defendants named are Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn in their capacities as executors of Epstein's estate. The nature of the suit is classified as 'Other Personal Injury' under Torts, and the plaintiff demands a jury trial.
001.pdf
This document is a legal complaint filed by Teresa Helm against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn, alleging sexual abuse and trafficking by Epstein and his co-conspirators. The complaint details Epstein's extensive sex trafficking network, previous legal proceedings, and his personal statements regarding his actions, seeking damages for battery and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
042.pdf
A letter filed on April 15, 2020, by attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz of Troutman Sanders LLP to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman. The letter requests a 30-day extension on various discovery and filing deadlines in three cases involving the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein (Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1000, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant) due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Judge signed and ordered the request on the same day.
015.pdf
A letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Lorna G. Schofield dated January 2, 2020, regarding the case of Jane Doe 1000 v. the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The letter requests the referral of the case to Magistrate Judge Debra C. Freeman for general pretrial proceedings, noting that the plaintiff consents and that similar cases (specifically citing Teresa Helm and Juliette Bryant) have already been referred to her.
028.pdf
Legal correspondence dated May 8, 2020, from Matthew J. Aaronson (Troutman Sanders LLP) to Judge Debra C. Freeman. The letter represents the Co-Executors of the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Indyke and Kahn) and objects to the Plaintiffs' request for a pre-motion conference regarding discovery disputes. The defense argues the request is premature as the parties were still in the 'meet-and-confer' process, and requests either a denial of the conference or permission to respond by May 13, 2020.
026.pdf
A letter dated April 15, 2020, from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Debra C. Freeman requesting a 30-day extension for various deadlines in lawsuits filed by Jane Doe 1000, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein. The request cites the ongoing pandemic as the reason for the delay and notes the consent of the plaintiffs. The document is signed 'SO ORDERED' by Judge Freeman on the same date.
025.pdf
This document is a letter from attorney Bennet J. Moskowitz to Judge Debra C. Freeman dated April 15, 2020. It requests a 30-day extension for various discovery and filing deadlines in civil cases brought by Jane Doe 1000, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant against the Estate of Jeffrey Epstein, citing delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
010.pdf
A joint letter dated January 10, 2020, from legal counsel representing plaintiffs (victims) and defendants (Epstein Estate executors) to Judge Debra Freeman. The letter provides a status update on discovery schedules and settlement discussions, specifically noting the development of a Victims' Compensation Program awaiting approval in the US Virgin Islands. The parties request a court conference in early February 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00014750.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the sentencing hearing of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 22, 2022. The Court lists various documents reviewed for sentencing, including support letters for Maxwell, a forensic psychiatric evaluation, a letter from an MDC inmate regarding Maxwell's tutoring, and numerous victim impact statements from individuals including Annie Farmer, Virginia Giuffre, and Sarah Ransome. Counsel for both sides confirm the record of submissions before the court.
DOJ-OGR-00020724.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the Southern District of New York covering proceedings related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell in late June 2022. It records Judge Nathan's orders permitting specific victims (Annie Farmer, Kate, Virginia Giuffre, Sarah Ransome, Teresa Helm, and Elizabeth Stein) to read oral statements at sentencing, noting that Giuffre's counsel would read hers due to a medical issue preventing Giuffre's physical presence. The document also records the sentencing hearing held on June 28, 2022, listing the attorneys present for both the defense and the prosecution, and grants a motion by the NY Times Company to unseal juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00020577.jpg
This document is a court docket page from June 2022 detailing the final proceedings leading up to and including the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It records orders permitting specific victims (including Virginia Giuffre and Annie Farmer) to present impact statements, notes Giuffre's absence due to medical issues, and confirms the sentencing hearing took place on June 28, 2022. It also includes an order granting the NY Times' motion to unseal juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00020476.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from June 2022 covering the sentencing phase of US v. Ghislaine Maxwell. It details orders permitting specific victims (including Virginia Giuffre, Annie Farmer, and 'Kate') to provide impact statements, notes Giuffre's medical inability to attend in person, records the sentencing hearing held on June 28, 2022, and grants a motion by the NY Times to unseal juror questionnaires.
DOJ-OGR-00010745.jpg
This document is a court order from the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Judge rules that while the Defendant challenges whether Maria Farmer, Sarah Ransome, Teresa Helm, and Juliette Bryant meet the statutory definition of 'crime victims' under the CVRA, the Court has broad discretion under 18 U.S.C. § 3661 to consider information at sentencing. Consequently, the Court permits these four women to provide written submissions for the sentencing record but denies their requests to make in-person statements.
DOJ-OGR-00010674.jpg
This document is a letter filed on June 24, 2022, from attorney Sigrid S. McCawley to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell. It serves to submit a written victim impact statement from Teresa Helm, who identifies herself as a victim trafficked by Maxwell in 2002 at the age of 22. Helm's statement directly addresses Maxwell, describing the grooming process, the psychological trauma endured, and the devastating long-term effects on her self-worth and life trajectory.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-15 | Received | Epstein Victims' ... | Teresa Helm | $0.00 | Offer of compensation accepted by Plaintiff res... | View |
Unknown
Thanking her for visiting New York and letting her know they would need to decide whether or not they wanted to hire her.
Job Offer
Discussing possibility of working as a 'traveling masseuse' for a 'wealthy couple' involving lavish parties, expensive clothes, and international travel.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity