Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Juror 50

Person
Mentions
685
Relationships
152
Events
331
Documents
332
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.
152 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person the defendant
Legal representative
17 Very Strong
24
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Legal representative
14 Very Strong
14
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Juror defendant
12 Very Strong
8
View
person MAXWELL
Legal representative
12 Very Strong
22
View
person defendant
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
17
View
person the defendant
Juror defendant
11 Very Strong
7
View
organization The Court
Legal representative
11 Very Strong
12
View
organization The Court
Juror judge
10 Very Strong
7
View
location court
Legal representative
10 Very Strong
8
View
person Ms. Maxwell
Legal representative
9 Strong
5
View
person MAXWELL
Juror defendant
9 Strong
5
View
person Annie Farmer
Social media interaction
9 Strong
4
View
organization The government
Legal representative
9 Strong
5
View
person MAXWELL
Defendant juror
8 Strong
4
View
person Juror 50’s counsel
Professional
8 Strong
2
View
person Juror 50's mother
Family
7
3
View
organization The Court
Judicial
7
2
View
person TODD A. SPODEK
Client
7
2
View
location court
Judicial
7
3
View
person Counsel
Client
7
3
View
person second juror
Co jurors
7
3
View
person Juror 50's stepbrother
Family
7
3
View
person TODD A. SPODEK
Legal representative
7
2
View
person Mr. Spodek
Professional
6
2
View
person the defendant
Adversarial
6
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Legal proceeding Voir dire process where Juror 50 was selected. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding The Government proposes a limited evidentiary hearing to determine if Juror 50 answered Question ... N/A View
N/A Jury selection Juror 50 filled out a questionnaire amidst distractions, which he later testified about. N/A View
N/A Hearing An 'upcoming hearing' is mentioned where Juror 50 intends to assert the Fifth Amendment privilege. USDC SDNY View
N/A Hearing The Court questioned Juror 50 under oath regarding his prior personal experience with sexual abus... N/A View
N/A Jury selection Prospective jurors, including Juror 50, were asked questions on a questionnaire and during voir d... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Juror 50's request to intervene in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE to protect his privacy rights and asser... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding A Post-Verdict Hearing where the court limited the scope of questions for Juror 50. N/A View
N/A Jury deliberation Juror 50 disclosed to the jury that he was a victim of sexual assault, which influenced other jur... N/A View
N/A Questionnaire completion Juror 50 completed a juror questionnaire, where he allegedly answered Question 48 and Question 25... N/A View
N/A Legal testimony Juror 50 provided testimony to explain his answers on the juror questionnaire. Court View
N/A Legal argument A defendant argues that Juror 50 should be excused for implied bias based on alleged similarities... Second Circuit View
N/A Jury selection Juror 50 participated in oral voir dire, where he gave assurances of his impartiality. Court View
N/A Trial The criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, referenced as 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell'. United States Courthouse View
N/A Legal proceeding The Defendant's trial, where Juror 50 served on the jury. N/A View
N/A Trial The Ghislaine Maxwell trial, which was widely covered by the press and subject to a massive media... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Voir dire process during which Juror 50 was questioned and allegedly gave a false answer. Court View
N/A Jury selection Juror 50 filled out a questionnaire, during which he admitted to being distracted and not diligent. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding A hearing where Juror 50 testified about his conduct during the questionnaire and voir dire. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding The voir dire process, during which Juror 50 answered the Court's questions in person and affirme... N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding The trial, during which Juror 50 was observed by the Court to be attentive. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Jury selection process where the impartiality of Juror 50 was considered. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding Voir dire of Juror 50, during which an allegedly inaccurate answer was given. N/A View
N/A Legal proceeding The jury selection process, known as voir dire, where Juror 50 allegedly failed to give truthful ... N/A View
N/A Hearing A hearing was held where Juror 50 provided an explanation for his nondisclosure on the questionna... Court View

DOJ-OGR-00009809.jpg

This document is page 9 (filed as page 11 of 49) of a government filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It analyzes post-trial media interviews given by 'Juror 50' to Reuters and The Independent regarding his failure to disclose his own sexual abuse history on the jury questionnaire. The text argues that despite this omission, Juror 50 remained impartial, citing his skeptical approach to evidence and specific reasons for convicting on some counts while acquitting on others (specifically regarding victim 'Jane').

Legal filing (government response/motion)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009786.jpg

This document is a single page from a court filing (Document 612-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It appears to be a blank lined page intended for notes or a questionnaire response for Juror ID 50, containing no handwritten content other than the Juror ID.

Court filing (juror form / notes page)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009785.jpg

This document is page 28 of a legal filing (Document 643-1) from Case 20-cr-00039-AEN, filed on March 24, 2022. It is a blank continuation page from a questionnaire for Juror ID 50, providing space for additional answers. The Bates number 'DOJ-OGR-00009785' suggests it is a Department of Justice record.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009783.jpg

This document is a page from a juror questionnaire (Juror ID 50) filed on March 24, 2022, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The juror answers 'No' to Question 51, indicating that they do not require any of their answers to remain confidential or private from the public record.

Juror questionnaire / court filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009780.jpg

This document is a page from a juror questionnaire for case 20-cr-00039-AEN, filed on March 24, 2022. Juror 50 indicates that neither they nor a family member have ever been involved in activism related to sex trafficking or similar issues. The juror also states they would have no difficulty assessing the credibility of a law enforcement witness fairly.

Juror questionnaire
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009779.jpg

This document is page 22 of a juror questionnaire for a legal case (20-cr-00039-AEN), filed on March 24, 2022. Juror ID 50 answers questions regarding the nature of the charges, which involve sex crimes against underage girls. The juror indicates that neither the nature of the case, their views on consent laws, nor their opinion on federal sex trafficking laws would prevent them from being a fair and impartial juror.

Juror questionnaire
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009777.jpg

This document is a juror questionnaire from a case involving Ms. Maxwell, filed on March 24, 2022. Juror 50 states they have not formed any opinions about Ms. Maxwell that would prevent them from being impartial. The juror confirms they had previously heard about Jeffrey Epstein from CNN, specifically recalling reports of his death and that he was in jail awaiting trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009776.jpg

This document is page 19 of a jury selection questionnaire (Juror ID 50) filed on March 24, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The juror indicates they have heard about the case via CNN.com, specifically noting they read that Maxwell was Jeffrey Epstein's girlfriend, but affirms they have not formed an opinion on her guilt.

Jury selection questionnaire / court filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009775.jpg

This document is a portion of a juror questionnaire for case 20-cr-000389-AEN, filed on March 24, 2022. The respondent, identified as Juror ID 50, attests that they do not personally know and have had no dealings with any of the listed defense attorneys or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The juror's negative responses indicate no known conflicts of interest with the key legal figures in the case.

Juror questionnaire
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009774.jpg

This document is a page from a juror questionnaire (Juror ID 50) filed on March 24, 2022, for case 20-cr-00330-ABN. The juror responds to a series of questions about their personal relationships with key case participants. The juror explicitly denies having any personal knowledge of or dealings with defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, or any of the named prosecutors from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.

Juror questionnaire
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009772.jpg

This document is page 15 of a juror questionnaire (Juror ID: 50) for a legal case, filed on March 24, 2022. The prospective juror denies having any professional, business, or social associations with the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York or the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI).

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009771.jpg

This document is page 14 of a juror questionnaire for Juror ID 50, filed as part of a court case on March 24, 2022. The juror denies having any financial disputes with the government and also denies that they, any family members, or close friends work in law, law enforcement, the justice system, or the courts. The responses on this page indicate no declared conflicts of interest related to these specific topics.

Juror questionnaire
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009769.jpg

This document is page 12 of a juror questionnaire for Juror ID 50, filed on March 24, 2022, as part of a legal case. The juror responds 'No' to questions asking if they, a relative, or a close friend have ever been subpoenaed for an investigation or arrested/charged with a crime. The responses indicate no prior experiences in these areas that would prevent them from being a fair and impartial juror.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009767.jpg

This document is a page from a juror questionnaire for Juror 50 in case 2:20-cr-00030-ABN, filed on March 24, 2022. The juror indicates they have no feelings or opinions about law enforcement searches or expert witnesses that would affect their impartiality. The juror also affirms they have no reservations about their ability to follow strict instructions to avoid all media and not discuss the case outside the courtroom.

Juror questionnaire
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009765.jpg

This document is page 8 (filed as page 7 of 30) of a completed juror questionnaire for Juror ID 50 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The juror confirms they have no beliefs preventing them from rendering a verdict, agrees to follow the judge's instructions on the law, and accepts the presumption of innocence and burden of proof.

Juror questionnaire / court filing
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009763.jpg

This is a juror questionnaire for Juror ID 50, assessing their ability to serve in a trial. The juror indicates they have no unmovable commitments during the jury selection period (November 16-19, 2021) or the estimated trial period (November 29, 2021, to January 15, 2022). The juror also confirms they have no international travel plans or circumstances that would cause serious hardship or extreme inconvenience.

Juror questionnaire
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009746.jpg

This legal document argues that Ms. Maxwell was denied a fair trial due to material omissions by a juror, identified as Juror 50. The juror failed to disclose his own claimed victim status during jury selection, which prevented the defense from exercising a peremptory challenge and would have been grounds for dismissal for cause. The argument is bolstered by citing the juror's later statements to the media, where he claimed his memory "was like a video" and that he would advocate for the alleged victims' credibility, revealing a bias that tainted the trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009745.jpg

This document is page 53 of a legal filing (Document 642) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on March 11, 2022. The text argues that Ms. Maxwell was denied a fair trial because 'Juror 50' made material misstatements by failing to disclose they were a victim of sexual abuse and misrepresenting their social media status. The defense contends that had this information been known, they would have exercised a peremptory challenge to remove Juror 50.

Legal filing (motion/memorandum of law)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009687.jpg

This document is page 26 of a legal filing (Document 638) from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 9, 2022. It is a blank continuation page for Juror ID 50, likely part of a juror questionnaire, providing space for additional answers. The page includes a Department of Justice (DOJ) control number at the bottom.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009683.jpg

This document is page 22 of a filing (Document 638, internal page 24) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on March 9, 2022. It contains the responses of Juror ID 50 to a voir dire questionnaire. The juror indicates 'No' to having difficulty assessing the credibility of sexual abuse witnesses (Q47) and 'No' to having ever been a victim of sexual harassment or assault personally or via family/friends (Q48).

Court document (juror questionnaire)
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009682.jpg

This document is a juror questionnaire for Juror ID 50, filed on March 9, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The prospective juror indicates they have not been involved in activism related to sex trafficking or similar issues and state they would have no difficulty assessing the credibility of a law enforcement witness fairly.

Juror questionnaire
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009679.jpg

This document is a juror questionnaire for Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 9, 2022. Juror 50 states they have not formed an opinion about Ms. Maxwell that would impede impartiality, but they have heard about Jeffrey Epstein from CNN. Specifically, the juror recalls hearing about Epstein's death and that he was in jail awaiting trial.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009677.jpg

This document is a portion of a juror questionnaire from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 9, 2022. Juror ID 50 attests that they do not know and have no past or present dealings with any of the listed defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Bobbi Sternheim) or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The responses indicate no declared conflicts of interest between the potential juror and the key legal figures in the case.

Juror questionnaire
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009673.jpg

This document is a portion of a juror questionnaire for Juror ID 50, filed on March 9, 2022, as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The juror denies ever having a financial dispute with the government and also denies that they, their family, or close friends work in law, law enforcement, the justice system, or the courts. The responses suggest no conflicts of interest based on the questions asked on this page.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009671.jpg

This document is page 10 of a juror questionnaire for Juror ID 50, filed on March 9, 2022, as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The potential juror answers 'No' to questions about whether they, a relative, or a close friend have ever been subpoenaed for an investigation or arrested/charged with a crime.

Juror questionnaire
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
2 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
2 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Unknown Entities Juror 50 $0.00 Hypothetical 'receipt of financial payment for ... View
N/A Received Media outlets (im... Juror 50 $0.00 Hypothetical compensation for post-trial interv... View
As Sender
122
As Recipient
28
Total
150

Juror experience / Sexual abuse history

From: Juror 50
To: Laura Collins (Daily M...

Juror 50 disclosed his sexual abuse history and realized he may have misanswered questionnaire Question 48.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Service

From: Juror 50
To: media

Statements made by Juror 50 to the media about his jury service.

Media statements
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Screening

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Document Juror 50 is seeking a copy of.

Jury questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Deliberations

From: Juror 50
To: The Independent

Discussed why the jury did not convict on count two (regarding Jane) but convicted on others.

Media interview
N/A
Communication Source

Explanation of questionnaire answers

From: Juror 50
To: Court

Testimony regarding why he answered 'No' to questions about family abuse.

Hearing testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Deliberations

From: Juror 50
To: media

Statements regarding personal experiences and deliberations.

Media interview
N/A
Communication Source

Verdict

From: Juror 50
To: Media/Public

Proclaimed the guilty verdict was 'for all the victims'.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Documents containing answers regarding prior experience with sexual assault.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Production of communications

From: The Court/Defense
To: Juror 50

Compelling production of Juror 50's communications and other information.

Subpoenas
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection Questions (25, 48, 49)

From: Court
To: Juror 50

Questions regarding history of crime victimization and sexual harassment/abuse accusations.

Jury questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Interview

From: Juror 50
To: Paramount Plus

Unreleased interview mentioned in a trailer.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Juror experience/questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: media

Juror 50 appeared surprised that the questionnaire asked about sexual abuse history.

Interview
N/A
Communication Source

Experience as a juror

From: Juror 50
To: Media/Public

Described identifying with witnesses and convincing other jurors based on personal trauma.

Interviews
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror 50
To: Government witness

Juror felt compelled to contact a witness.

Contact
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Selection

From: Juror 50
To: Court/Counsel (Primary...

Omissions regarding personal history of abuse.

Voir dire
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Bias / Sexual Abuse History

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Juror 50 testified that his history of sexual abuse would not affect his impartiality.

Hearing testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Gratitude for conviction

From: Juror 50
To: public

Social media posts expressing appreciation for statements of gratitude received for telling his personal story of abuse and convicting Ms. Maxwell.

Social media
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Juror 50
To: Annie Farmer

Thanked her for sharing her story.

Social media comment
N/A
Communication Source

Sexual Abuse History

From: Juror 50
To: international media ou...

Juror 50 revealed his sexual abuse history publicly.

Interviews
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Responses regarding impartiality, burden of proof, and media consumption (CNN).

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Unsworn statements

From: Juror 50
To: Chinese-language media...

Statements made by Juror 50 to media outlets post-trial.

Media statements
N/A
Communication Source

Juror misconduct inquiry

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Statements about a second juror.

Testimony
N/A
Communication Source

Juror Questionnaire

From: Juror 50
To: THE COURT

Referenced as 'Juror 50's Questionnaire'

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Post-verdict statements

From: Juror 50
To: Public/Media

Referenced as 'Juror 50's Public Statements Following the Verdict'

Public statements
N/A
Communication Source

Jury Questionnaire (Question 48 and 25)

From: THE COURT
To: Juror 50

Questions regarding history of sexual abuse or being a victim of crime.

Questionnaire
N/A
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search