| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
location
Israel
|
Adversarial conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
location
United States
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
US Citizens in Kuwait
|
Torturer victim |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Destruction of Iraq's nuclear reactor by Israeli Air Force | Iraq | View |
| N/A | N/A | Eight-year war between Iraq and Iran | Iraq/Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | US withdrawal from Iraq nearing completion. | Iraq | View |
| N/A | N/A | Iraq-Iran War (eight-year war) | Iraq/Iran | View |
| N/A | N/A | Torture of several United States citizens | Kuwait | View |
| N/A | N/A | ISIS military drive on Baghdad. | Baghdad | View |
| 2003-01-01 | N/A | US-led invasion of Iraq. | Iraq | View |
| 2003-01-01 | N/A | Regime change in Iraq imposed by the United States and allies. | Iraq | View |
| 2002-11-01 | N/A | IAEA conducted 247 inspections at 147 sites in Iraq. | Iraq | View |
| 1990-01-01 | N/A | War against Iraq (Gulf War) | Middle East | View |
| 1990-01-01 | N/A | War against Iraq | Iraq | View |
| 1990-01-01 | N/A | Iraq invasion of Kuwait | Kuwait | View |
| 1990-01-01 | N/A | Iraq's invasion of Kuwait. | Kuwait/Iraq Border | View |
| 1981-06-07 | N/A | Israel destroyed an Iraqi nuclear reactor. | Iraq | View |
| 1981-06-07 | N/A | An event mentioned in a headline: 'Israel Destroys Iraqi Nuclear Reactor'. | Iraq | View |
| 1981-06-07 | N/A | Israel destroys the Iraqi Nuclear Reactor. | Iraq | View |
| 1981-01-01 | N/A | Iraq threatened Israel; Menachem Begin ordered action. | Israel/Iraq | View |
| 1981-01-01 | N/A | Israeli attacks on Iraq's weapons program. | Iraq | View |
This document appears to be a page from a policy report or geopolitical analysis (stamped by House Oversight) discussing the strategic threat posed by a nuclear-armed Iran to Gulf states. It draws parallels to the 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait and argues that Gulf states perceive a historical reluctance by the U.S. to use military force against Iran, citing lack of retaliation for events in Lebanon, Khobar Towers, and Iraq.
This document page is a geopolitical analysis discussing how political and ideological priorities often outweigh economic rationality in nations like Pakistan and Iran. It specifically analyzes the shifting dynamics in the Middle East following the Arab uprisings, noting that Gulf monarchies are likely to become less supportive of US military operations because they view the US 'abandonment' of Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak as a shock. The document bears a House Oversight stamp.
This document appears to be a single page from a larger geopolitical strategy paper or report found within a House Oversight document dump (likely related to an investigation involving Epstein associates or think tanks). The text analyzes US military interventionism, arguing that despite conventional wisdom suggesting a withdrawal from the Middle East and South Asia, future threats will require a shift in strategy. It advocates for abandoning slow military buildups in favor of 'nimble, highly-mobile, stealthy, and networked forces' to maintain contingency access in the region.
This document appears to be a page from a 'Foreign Policy' article authored by Richard L. Russell, dated February 5, 2013. The text discusses former Defense Secretary Robert Gates's warnings against future U.S. land wars in the Middle East, Asia, or Africa, referencing his speech to West Point cadets. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029714', indicating it was part of a document production for the House Oversight Committee, though the specific page contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document segment, page 26 of a larger report, discusses the role of American forces in Iraq and the implications of a continued American presence. It highlights the challenges and costs associated with maintaining a presence in Iraq and identifies Fouad Ajami as an academic affiliated with Johns Hopkins and the Hoover Institution.
This document discusses the political landscape in Iraq concerning the presence of American forces, focusing on Nuri Al Maliki's role and the Sadrists' stance. It also analyzes Barack Obama's shift in foreign policy from his campaign pledges, particularly regarding Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Guantánamo, and mentions Robert Gates' presumed role in supporting the Obama administration.
This document is an article from The New Republic by Fouad Ajami dated June 3, 2011, arguing against removing US troops from Iraq. It discusses Defense Secretary Robert Gates's observations on Iraq's emerging democracy and his past involvement with the Iraq Study Group, highlighting his shift in views on the Iraq war and his philosophical alignment with figures like Brzezinski and Scowcroft.
This document discusses geopolitical developments in the Middle East, focusing on Egypt's foreign policy, particularly its relations with Iran and Gulf countries, and its role in the Palestinian issue. It highlights Egypt's efforts to broker a reconciliation agreement between Palestinian factions and its decision to open the Rafah Crossing, which was met with mixed reactions regionally and internationally. The text also touches upon the Gulf Cooperation Council's expansion and the instability faced by several Arab nations.
This page appears to be part of a strategic briefing, speech, or political analysis regarding security in the Middle East. The text argues that regional instability is rooted in history rather than the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, citing the 'Arab Spring,' ISIS, and the collapse of Syria and Iraq as evidence of a 'tough neighborhood' where weakness is not tolerated. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document appears to be a page from a House Oversight Committee production (ID: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025932). It contains the text of a forwarded email featuring a satirical, scripted dialogue between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. The text lists numerous conservative grievances and scandals associated with the Obama/Clinton era, including Benghazi, Solyndra, the Iran Nuclear Deal, and the Uranium One deal. While the user requested 'Epstein-related' analysis, Jeffrey Epstein is not mentioned in the text of this specific page.
The document is a page from a House Oversight collection (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025923) containing a forwarded email chain or text. It features a satirical dialogue between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, where Clinton lists numerous scandals associated with her tenure and the Obama administration (Benghazi, emails, Clinton Foundation, IRS targeting, etc.) while Trump repeatedly responds 'No, the other one.' It appears to be a piece of political viral mail rather than a factual record or transcript.
This document appears to be a printed email forward or transcript containing a satirical dialogue between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump. The text lists numerous political scandals and controversies associated with the Obama/Clinton administration (including Benghazi, Solyndra, the Clinton Foundation, and IRS targeting) framed as questions from Hillary, to which Trump repeatedly replies, 'No, the other one.' The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, indicating it was likely part of a document production for a Congressional investigation.
This document appears to be a page from a foreign policy memo or meeting notes, stamped by the House Oversight Committee (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025810). It provides a critical analysis of the Obama administration's foreign policy, characterizing it as risk-averse and lacking 'big bets' compared to historical presidents like Truman, Nixon, and Reagan. The text includes specific strategic advice regarding Iran, Egypt, Syria, Saudi Arabia (KSA), and Iraq, and incorporates views from Strobe Talbott and Brent Scowcroft regarding the need for a central strategy over tactical incrementalism.
This document appears to be a transcript or minutes from a high-level foreign policy meeting (likely circa 2011-2012) discussing the geopolitical implications of the Arab Spring, oil economics, and the US 'Pivot to Asia.' Speakers including Gfoeller, 'Mehgan,' and Bob Blackwill analyze the stability of Saudi Arabia (KSA), the fall of Mubarak in Egypt, and the potential for nuclear proliferation in Iran. The document is stamped 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT,' indicating it was part of a congressional inquiry.
This document is a meeting summary or briefing paper (labeled page 12) discussing geopolitical strategy regarding Iran's nuclear program and Middle East energy production. The text outlines potential military options against Iran, asserting US superiority over Israeli capabilities, and summarizes 'Meghan O's' analysis that Middle East oil supply may decline due to internal instability, contrasting this with the US 'Energy Revolution' (shale/fracking). The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it is part of a congressional investigation.
This document contains notes from a high-level foreign policy meeting in Aspen (likely the Aspen Strategy Group around 2012). The notes, summarized by 'TJP', detail discussions on the Israel-Palestine conflict, instability in Syria and Egypt, and a significant focus on potential military action against Iran. Prominent figures like Steve Hadley, Bill Perry, and representatives for both Obama (Podesta) and Romney (Pawlenty) discussed the timeline for Iran's nuclear capabilities and the consequences of a military strike.
This document appears to be a transcript or minutes from a high-level strategic meeting (possibly the Trilateral Commission or similar forum) discussing Middle Eastern geopolitics. The conversation covers the stability of Iraq under 'NAM' (Nouri al-Maliki), tensions between Kurds, Baghdad, and Ankara, and the economic fallout of the Arab Spring, with specific commentary from 'TJP' (likely Thomas Pritzker) and Kito de Boer of McKinsey.
This document appears to be page 3 of a transcript or notes from a high-level foreign policy meeting involving Brent Scowcroft, James Steinberg, and individuals identified as JS and MO. The discussion focuses on the geopolitical dynamics between the US, Turkey, Iraq, and Iran, specifically addressing the Syrian conflict (Assad), Kurdish independence, and the influence of Shia/Sunni divides. It carries a House Oversight Bates stamp, suggesting it was part of a congressional investigation.
This document appears to be a transcript or summary of a policy discussion regarding the US withdrawal from Iraq. The dialogue, primarily between 'Maghan O’' and 'Jim Steinberg', debates whether the Obama administration did enough to secure a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) to keep residual troops in the region. The text highlights concerns about Nouri al-Maliki (NAM) consolidating power and the potential alienation of the Kurds following the US departure.
A document containing notes summarized by 'TJP' (likely Thomas J. Pritzker) from an Aspen Strategy Group meeting regarding US Policy on Arab Revolutions. The document records a debate between various foreign policy experts and former administration officials (Indyk, Feaver, Kahl, Flournoy, etc.) concerning the Obama administration's handling of the Arab Spring, specifically situations in Syria, Iraq, Libya, and Iran. The document bears a House Oversight bates stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation, likely related to the Epstein/JP Morgan probes given the known context of these document releases.
This document is an article from The Economist titled 'American foreign policy - Why it's a theory, not a doctrine', dated March 31st. It analyzes Barack Obama's foreign policy regarding Libya, stating he repudiated an older doctrine (attributed to Colin Powell and George W. Bush's administration) which advocated for war only when vital interests are threatened, an exit strategy is clear, and overwhelming force can be applied. The article contrasts this with Obama's approach in Libya, noting that vital interests are not wholly at stake, the exit strategy (Colonel Qaddafi's departure) is unclear, and military force is strictly limited (no boots on the ground).
This document is page 38 of a Merrill Lynch commodities research report (GEMs Paper #26) dated June 30, 2016. It analyzes global oil consumption, OPEC capacity growth, and geopolitical risks, with a specific focus on Saudi Arabia's crude production strategy and spare capacity. The document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016148', indicating it was produced as evidence for a Congressional House Oversight investigation, likely related to financial records subpoenas involving major banks.
This document is page 37 of a Merrill Lynch 'GEMs Paper #26' dated June 30, 2016. It contains a financial analysis of global oil markets, specifically Brent crude prices, non-OPEC production reduction, shale output forecasts, and OPEC supply requirements through 2020. While the content is strictly macroeconomic analysis, the 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016147' stamp indicates this document was part of a subpoenaed production to the House Oversight Committee, likely related to investigations into financial institutions (such as Merrill Lynch/Bank of America) and their records, potentially connected to the broader Epstein financial inquiry.
This document is a financial table titled 'Table 3: Breakdown of Saudi Arabia Net International Investment Position (US$bn)' from a Merrill Lynch report dated June 30, 2016. It details Saudi Arabia's assets and liabilities from 2007 to 2015, including holdings in US Treasuries, equities, and deposits in BIS reporting banks. The document bears the stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016119', indicating it was part of a document production for the US House Committee on Oversight and Reform.
This document is a reference list detailing extradition treaties between the United States and various countries/entities, ranging alphabetically from El Salvador to Malta. It includes dates for when treaties were signed and entered into force, along with legal citations (Stat. or UST). The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp, suggesting it was used as reference material in a congressional investigation.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity