UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Dashawn Robertson
|
Adversarial defendant vs plaintiff |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
TOVA NOEL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Thomas
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEXANDER ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. MOE
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE R. COMEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Todd Blanche
|
Professional employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GEOFFREY S. BERMAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Appeal | The document pertains to an appeal (Case 20-3061) before the United States Court of Appeals for t... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| N/A | Oral argument request | Request for oral argument in case 20-3061, with a preference for it only if another party also re... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| N/A | Legal case | Court proceedings for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. | Southern District | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... | courthouse | View |
| N/A | Legal filing | Instructions for filing a bill of costs in the case United States of America v. Maxwell, Docket #... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | Sentencing | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | Legal deadline | Government sentencing submission due | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-06 | Legal deadline | Government response due | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-06-02 | Court proceeding | The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an order denying Ghislaine Maxwe... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2021-04-27 | Legal proceeding | The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held a term and issued an order affirmi... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Legal filing | Filing of a Declaration of Sigrid S. McCawley in Support of Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Pretrial conference | The Court discussed Dashawn Robertson's motion at length with the parties and the USPO. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-02 | Deadline | Deadline for the Government to respond to the Defendant's November 25, 2020 letter request and th... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2012-02-15 | Legal proceeding | A court proceeding for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. | SOUTHERN DISTRICT | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001368.jpg
This legal document is an affirmation filed on April 15, 2021, by attorney Christian R. Everdell of the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP. Everdell is seeking to be relieved as counsel for the defendant-appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in her case before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The affirmation notes that Maxwell has retained new counsel, David Oscar Markus of Markus/Moss PLLC, who filed a notice of appearance on April 1, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00001366.jpg
This document is the cover page for a sealed supporting exhibit filed on April 13, 2021, for the legal case United States of America v. Maxwell. The document is identified by case numbers 21-770 and 21-58, and has a Department of Justice control number.
DOJ-OGR-00001365.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated April 13, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order grants a motion by the appellee (United States of America) to file a supporting exhibit under seal. This exhibit is in opposition to the appellant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) motion for bail.
DOJ-OGR-00001349.jpg
A court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, dated December 8, 2020. The Judge denies Maxwell's request to summon Warden Heriberto Tellez to answer questions about her confinement conditions. However, the Court orders the Government to provide written status updates every 60 days regarding Maxwell's access to legal materials, counsel, and the frequency of searches conducted on her.
DOJ-OGR-00001318.jpg
This document is a legal affirmation filed on April 12, 2021, by Assistant U.S. Attorney Lara Pomerantz to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The filing formally opposes the appeal made by Defendant-Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell regarding two prior District Court orders, dated December 28, 2020, and March 22, 2021, which denied her requests for pre-trial release.
DOJ-OGR-00001314.jpg
This legal document, dated April 5, 2021, is a notice of appearance filed by attorney David Oscar Markus of the firm Markus/Moss PLLC. He is formally entering his appearance as the lead counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket No. 21-770/21-58). The document confirms the attorney's contact information and certifies his admission to practice before the court.
DOJ-OGR-00001310.jpg
This document is a 'Notice of Defective Filing' issued by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 5, 2021, regarding the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket 21-58). The notice indicates that a 'Notice of Appearance as Additional Counsel' submitted by the United States (Appellee) did not comply with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) or Local Rules, though the specific reason is not checked in the visible list. The document lists Judge Debra Ann Livingston and Clerk Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe as court officials.
DOJ-OGR-00001309.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on April 1, 2021, in the case of United States v. Maxwell (Case 21-770). Thomas McKay of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York formally enters the case as additional counsel for the Appellee (United States), serving as co-counsel alongside Won Shin.
DOJ-OGR-00001291.jpg
This document is a Memorandum Opinion and Order from the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico regarding Defendant Dashawn Robertson's motion for reconsideration of his detention order. After reviewing various filings and holding a pretrial conference on February 4, 2021, the Court ordered Mr. Robertson's release under strict conditions to La Pasada Halfway House on February 5, 2021. The decision was made to ensure his appearance in court and community safety, and to facilitate his trial preparation, which was hindered by the COVID-19 pandemic affecting communication with his attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00001274.jpg
This document is page 1 of a Court Order from the Southern District of New York, filed on March 22, 2021, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text outlines the charges against Maxwell (including sex trafficking of minors and perjury) and summarizes the procedural history of her multiple denied attempts to secure bail due to being deemed a flight risk. The document serves as an introduction to a ruling on her third motion for release filed in February 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00001268.jpg
This document is page 4 of a legal filing (Exhibit 120-2) authored by attorney William Julié. It outlines legal arguments regarding extradition requests between the United States and France, specifically focusing on the 'nationality protection' clause in the 1996 Extradition Treaty and the French Code of Criminal Procedure. The text argues that extradition should not be granted if the person sought holds French nationality at the time of the offense.
DOJ-OGR-00001255.jpg
This is the cover page for a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330). The document is a Reply Memorandum supporting Maxwell's third motion for bail, filed on March 22, 2021. It lists the defense legal team, including attorneys from firms in New York and Denver.
DOJ-OGR-00001233.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal memorandum filed on February 23, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 20 Cr. 330). It supports Ghislaine Maxwell's third motion for release on bail. The document lists the defense legal team, including Bobbi C. Sternheim, Christian R. Everdell, Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, and Laura A. Menninger.
DOJ-OGR-00001210.jpg
This document is page 1 of an Opinion and Order filed on December 28, 2020, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the Southern District of New York. The document denies Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, reiterating that she poses a significant flight risk and that arguments presented were largely addressed in the previous July 14, 2020 hearing. It lists the specific federal charges against Maxwell, including conspiracy to entice minors and perjury.
DOJ-OGR-00001186.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, dated June 23, 2020. It is a 'Reply Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell in Support of Her Renewed Motion for Bail' for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document lists the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, and her legal counsel from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00001184.jpg
This document is a formal statement from Philippe Jaeglé of the Office for the International Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters, explaining that under Article 3 of the 1996 Bilateral Extradition Treaty and French law, France refuses to extradite its nationals to the United States. It clarifies that while France extradites nationals within the EU due to political integration and shared human rights standards (European arrest warrant), it has never deviated from the non-extradition principle for countries outside the EU. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp and a court filing header dated December 18, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00001146.jpg
This document is the first page of the Government's Memorandum in Opposition to Ghislaine Maxwell's renewed motion for release on bail, filed on December 18, 2020. The Government argues that the Court's previous July 2020 ruling—that Maxwell poses a serious flight risk and has extensive financial resources/foreign ties—remains correct and should not be reversed. The prosecution asserts that the new motion merely repackages prior arguments and that no combination of conditions can ensure her appearance in court.
DOJ-OGR-00001143.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing from the U.S. Government in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Filed on June 25, 2020, in the Southern District of New York, it is a memorandum opposing Maxwell's renewed motion for release. The document lists the prosecuting attorneys, including Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss.
DOJ-OGR-00001097.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, case number 20 Cr. 330 (AJN), in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Filed on June 23, 2021, it is a memorandum submitted by Maxwell's legal team in support of her renewed motion for bail. The document lists her attorneys from three different law firms.
DOJ-OGR-00000986.jpg
This legal document is a reply memorandum filed by the U.S. Government in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The government argues for her continued detention, asserting she is a significant flight risk due to her citizenship in a non-extraditing country and her access to considerable wealth. The memorandum emphasizes that her release would deny justice to the victims of her alleged sexual exploitation crimes.
DOJ-OGR-00000985.jpg
This document is the cover page for the Government's Reply Memorandum in Support of Detention in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 20 Cr. 330). It was filed on July 13, 2020, in the Southern District of New York. The filing lists Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant US Attorneys Alison Moe, Alex Rossmiller, and Maurene Comey as counsel for the prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00000946.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing titled "THE GOVERNMENT'S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF DETENTION" in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Filed on July 5, 2020, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, the memorandum was submitted by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and her team of Assistant U.S. Attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00000942.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing dated April 1, 2021, submitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. It is an appendix to a motion for pretrial release for the appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell, in her appeal against the United States of America. The filing was prepared by attorney David Oscar Markus of the law firm MARKUS/MOSS PLLC.
DOJ-OGR-00000912.jpg
This document is the cover page for a legal filing, specifically 'Appellant Ghislaine Maxwell's Motion for Pretrial Release', submitted to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 1, 2021. The motion is part of an appeal from a case in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in the matter of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The filing was made by attorney David Oscar Markus of the Miami-based law firm MARKUS/MOSS PLLC.
DOJ-OGR-00000908.jpg
This legal document is a Notice of Appearance filed on April 1, 2021, by attorney David Oscar Markus of the firm Markus/Moss PLLC. He is formally notifying the court that he will be serving as additional counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket No. 21-770/21-58), acting as co-counsel alongside Christian R. Everdell of Cohen & Gresser LLP.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity