UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
21 | |
|
person
PAUL M. DAUGERDAS
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Legal representative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Dashawn Robertson
|
Adversarial defendant vs plaintiff |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
TOVA NOEL
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Thomas
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEXANDER ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALISON J. MOE
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE R. COMEY
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Todd Blanche
|
Professional employment representation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
GEOFFREY S. BERMAN
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Appeal | The document pertains to an appeal (Case 20-3061) before the United States Court of Appeals for t... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| N/A | Oral argument request | Request for oral argument in case 20-3061, with a preference for it only if another party also re... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| N/A | Legal case | Court proceedings for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. | Southern District | View |
| N/A | Legal proceeding | Upcoming pre-trial proceedings and trial for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Ma... | courthouse | View |
| N/A | Legal filing | Instructions for filing a bill of costs in the case United States of America v. Maxwell, Docket #... | United States Court of Appe... | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Legal proceeding | Sentencing | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | Legal deadline | Government sentencing submission due | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-06 | Legal deadline | Government response due | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2021-06-02 | Court proceeding | The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an order denying Ghislaine Maxwe... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2021-04-27 | Legal proceeding | The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held a term and issued an order affirmi... | Thurgood Marshall United St... | View |
| 2021-03-26 | Legal filing | Filing of a Declaration of Sigrid S. McCawley in Support of Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2021-02-04 | Pretrial conference | The Court discussed Dashawn Robertson's motion at length with the parties and the USPO. | N/A | View |
| 2020-12-02 | Deadline | Deadline for the Government to respond to the Defendant's November 25, 2020 letter request and th... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2012-02-15 | Legal proceeding | A court proceeding for the case of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v PAUL M. DAUGERDAS, ET AL. | SOUTHERN DISTRICT | View |
DOJ-OGR-00021083.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court filing dated February 28, 2023, presents a series of case law citations to support the legal argument that a plea agreement made by an Assistant U.S. Attorney (AUSA) binds the entire United States government. The cited cases establish that the U.S. government is considered a single entity across all districts, and therefore, an agreement made by one of its attorneys in one location (e.g., West Virginia) is enforceable against federal prosecutors in another (e.g., South Dakota).
DOJ-OGR-00021048.jpg
This document is the cover page of a legal filing, specifically a 'BRIEF AND SPECIAL APPENDIX FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT', submitted to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on February 28, 2023. The filing is for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426-cr), where Maxwell is the Defendant-Appellant. The document lists her legal representation from the law firm Aidala, Bertuna & Kamins PC.
DOJ-OGR-00021046.jpg
This document is a formal Notice of Appeal filed on July 7, 2022, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. The notice, submitted by her counsel Bobbi C. Sternheim, indicates Maxwell's intent to appeal her conviction and sentence, which were officially entered on June 29, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The appeal is directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
DOJ-OGR-00020827.jpg
This document is the cover page for an appendix (Volume 2 of 2) filed on February 28, 2023, in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, case number 22-1426-cr. The case involves the United States of America vs. Ghislaine Maxwell (Defendant-Appellant), who is being represented by the law firm Aidala Bertuna & Kamins PC.
DOJ-OGR-00020810.jpg
District Judge Alison J. Nathan denies all pending pretrial motions filed by defendant Ghislaine Maxwell seeking to dismiss the S2 superseding indictment and compel discovery. The court specifically rejects the argument that the charges are barred by Jeffrey Epstein's non-prosecution agreement, reaffirming that the agreement does not bind the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00020760.jpg
This is an Opinion & Order filed on April 16, 2021, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document outlines the procedural history, including the initial June 2020 indictment and subsequent superseding indictments regarding charges of facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minors, Mann Act violations, and perjury. The order states it resolves Maxwell's pending pretrial motions regarding the S1 indictment, excluding motions to suppress evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00020759.jpg
This document is the cover page for a superseding indictment filed on March 29, 2021, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The case is United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, who is named as the defendant. The indictment was presented by United States Attorney Audrey Strauss and signed by the grand jury foreperson.
DOJ-OGR-00020736.jpg
This document is the first page of a Superseding Indictment filed on March 29, 2021, in the Southern District of New York against Ghislaine Maxwell. It outlines Count One, charging a conspiracy to entice minors to travel for illegal sex acts between 1994 and 2004. The text alleges Maxwell facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's abuse by recruiting and grooming victims as young as 14.
DOJ-OGR-00020619.jpg
This document is the cover page for Volume 1 of the Appendix filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case of the United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426-cr). Dated February 28, 2023, it lists the legal counsel for Maxwell as Arthur L. Aidala, Diana Fabi Samson, and John M. Leventhal of the firm Aidala Bertuna & Kamins PC. The document bears a DOJ bates stamp number DOJ-OGR-00020619.
DOJ-OGR-00020611.jpg
A court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated January 18, 2023 (Docket No. 22-1426). Circuit Judge Michael H. Park granted Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to file an oversized principal brief of up to 20,000 words for her appeal.
DOJ-OGR-00020610.jpg
A court order from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dated January 17, 2023, in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). Judge José A. Cabranes granted Maxwell's motion to extend the deadline for filing her brief and appendix to February 28, 2023.
DOJ-OGR-00020607.jpg
This document is an affirmation filed on January 16, 2023, by attorney John M. Leventhal in the US Court of Appeals Second Circuit regarding the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket 22-1426). Leventhal requests permission to file an oversized brief and outlines the procedural history, including previous scheduling requests and a pending motion to extend the deadline to February 28, 2023. He notes that the US Attorney's Office for the SDNY has no objection to the time extension.
DOJ-OGR-00020603.jpg
This document is a legal affirmation filed on January 12, 2023, by John M. Leventhal, an attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. He is requesting an extension of time to file an appellate brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The reasons provided for the delay are the law firm's heavy workload due to another complex case and a serious health condition affecting one of the appellate attorneys on the team.
DOJ-OGR-00020602.jpg
This is a Motion Information Statement filed on January 12, 2023, in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Case 22-1426). Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, John M. Leventhal, is requesting an unopposed extension of time to file her appellate brief, moving the deadline from January 30, 2023, to February 28, 2023, citing unforeseen circumstances.
DOJ-OGR-00020598.jpg
This is a Notice of Appearance filed on July 28, 2022, in the case United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). Lara Pomerantz of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York is entering the case as additional counsel, serving as co-counsel alongside Won S. Shin for the Appellee (USA). The document certifies her admission to the court renewed on December 3, 2020.
DOJ-OGR-00020595.jpg
This legal document, dated July 15, 2022, is a notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case of "United States of America v. Maxwell" (Docket # 22-1426). The notice states that the case manager assigned to the matter has been changed. It provides a phone number for any inquiries related to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00020592.jpg
This is a court order from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated July 15, 2022, regarding the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Docket No. 22-1426). The order grants a motion by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to be relieved as counsel for Maxwell because Maxwell has retained new counsel for her appeal. The document is signed by the Clerk of Court, Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe.
DOJ-OGR-00020583.jpg
This is a legal declaration filed on July 15, 2022, by attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Sternheim states she was assigned to represent Ghislaine Maxwell for her appeal, recounts Maxwell's conviction and sentencing (20 years imprisonment and a $750,000 fine), and files this declaration in support of a motion to be relieved as counsel. The document is part of Case 22-1426, United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00020486.jpg
This document is a formal "Notice of Record on Appeal Filed" from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated July 8, 2022. It confirms that the electronic index for the record on appeal has been filed in the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket # 22-1426). The notice is issued under the authority of Chief Judge Debra Ann Livingston and Clerk of Court Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe.
DOJ-OGR-00020478.jpg
This document is a Judgment in a Criminal Case from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, filed on June 29, 2022. It states that the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, was found guilty on counts 1, 3, 4, 5, and 6, including conspiracy to transport minors for criminal sexual activity, an offense which ended on July 30, 2004. The judgment was signed by U.S. Circuit Judge Alison J. Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00020387.jpg
This document is a formal Notice of Appeal filed on July 7, 2022, on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell. Filed by her attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, it declares Maxwell's intent to appeal the judgment, conviction, and sentence entered on June 29, 2022, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The appeal is directed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
DOJ-OGR-00018863.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on December 8, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It lists the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and identifies the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present from agencies like the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00018599.jpg
This document is the cover page for the court transcript of the jury trial in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The trial took place on December 7, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, with Judge Alison J. Nathan presiding. The document lists the appearances of the legal counsel for both the prosecution and the defense, as well as other individuals present.
DOJ-OGR-00016111.jpg
This document is the cover page of a court transcript for the jury trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, held on November 29, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It identifies the case number, the presiding judge (Hon. Alison J. Nathan), and lists the legal counsel for both the prosecution (United States of America) and the defense, as well as other individuals present from the FBI and NYPD.
DOJ-OGR-00015540.jpg
This document is a legal stipulation from the case of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York. In it, both the prosecution, led by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams, and the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell agree that certain government exhibits are authentic photocopies of pages from a larger exhibit. This agreement is intended to streamline the admission of evidence in court.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity