Palm Beach
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00016854.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Dubin. The questioning focuses on the frequency of Dubin's visits to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house between 1994 and 2004, which the witness estimates was about four times per year. Dubin denies any knowledge of the day-to-day activities in the house and confirms personal details from that era, such as living in Paris in 1994 and the birth of their first child in 1995.
DOJ-OGR-00016786.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Richards, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning first establishes Richards's methods for interviewing witnesses, focusing on listening for accurate details and gathering information. The focus then shifts to Richards's work in Palm Beach around 2007, specifically their professional partnership with an Agent Nesbitt Kuyrkendall, with whom they interviewed witnesses.
DOJ-OGR-00016778.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, details a legal debate over the execution of a search at a New York residence. Attorneys argue about the specific roles of Special Agent Maguire and Agent Young, particularly concerning who was the overall search leader and who was responsible for extracting files from electronic devices. The judge actively questions the attorneys to clarify these disputed facts.
DOJ-OGR-00016718.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Hyppolite. The testimony focuses on the Palm Beach County School District's electronic record retention policies, revealing that records for regular students are kept for three years after withdrawal, while records for exceptional education students are kept for five years. The witness confirms these records are electronically searchable, even for students who attended in the 1990s and early 2000s.
DOJ-OGR-00016457.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a legal proceeding, filed on August 10, 2022. A speaker, likely a defense attorney, argues that their client, Ghislaine Maxwell, did not illegally 'entice' a witness named Jane to travel. The argument asserts that arranging a return flight does not qualify as enticement, that Jane's travel was typically handled by Jeffrey Epstein's office, and that there is no testimony Maxwell encouraged, convinced, or even offered to arrange the travel in question.
DOJ-OGR-00016456.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) where a defense attorney argues that the testimony of a witness named 'Jane' is insufficient to prove Ghislaine Maxwell's involvement in enticing travel. The attorney summarizes Jane's testimony, noting that she traveled with Epstein and Maxwell, that Maxwell sometimes made arrangements, and specifically details an incident where Maxwell helped a 15-year-old Jane board a flight from New York to Palm Beach despite having no identification.
DOJ-OGR-00013156.jpg
This document is a page from a cross-examination transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) of a witness named Carolyn in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. Carolyn testifies that Ms. Roberts (Virginia Roberts) dressed her 'sexy' and 'provocatively' to take her to meet a friend (Mr. Epstein) in Palm Beach to make money. The testimony details that Roberts drove Carolyn to the location and told her they would massage Epstein together so Carolyn wouldn't feel uncomfortable, with specific instructions about clothing removal given in the massage room.
DOJ-OGR-00013155.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a prior conversation Carolyn had with a 'Ms. Roberts' about the possibility of making 'a lot of money real fast,' which Carolyn denies occurred as stated. The transcript also includes procedural discussions between the attorneys (Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey) and the judge regarding the witness's memory versus a document.
DOJ-OGR-00013154.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning centers on a statement Carolyn allegedly made to the FBI in August 2007, claiming that a person named Virginia told her she could earn $300 by massaging a man in Palm Beach. Carolyn denies making that statement to the FBI at that time, asserting she was told about the massage opportunity later, at Mr. Epstein's house.
DOJ-OGR-00013153.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The testimony focuses on a conversation where Virginia Roberts approached Carolyn to meet an 'older man' friend in Palm Beach, potentially involving a massage for $300. Carolyn explicitly clarifies that Ghislaine Maxwell was not present during this specific conversation with Virginia.
DOJ-OGR-00013118.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Carolyn. She testifies that she attended appointments at Jeffrey Epstein's house in Palm Beach for money, which she used to buy drugs (cocaine, pain pills, marijuana, alcohol) to numb herself for the visits. She confirms she was underage at the time ('wasn't of age') and relied on drivers, cabs, a person named Shawn, or her mother to transport her from West Palm Beach.
DOJ-OGR-00013081.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony focuses on the authentication of Government Exhibits 421/421B and 422/422B. Specifically, Exhibit 421 is identified as a 'Help wanted' ad for a massage therapist in Palm Beach, and the digital metadata (Exhibit 421B) links the document's creation and saving on September 17, 2001, to a user named 'gmax'.
DOJ-OGR-00013079.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The questioning focuses on the metadata and titles of government exhibits, specifically establishing creation and modification dates in September 2002. The witness identifies the titles of two documents as "PB New Shampoo and Massage Products" (Exhibit 420) and "Palm Beach House Workers" (Exhibit 418R).
DOJ-OGR-00010558.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the prosecution arguing against the defendant's motions regarding sentencing. The prosecution asserts that the 2004 Sentencing Manual should apply, citing trial testimony that the conspiracy extended past 2004, and refutes the defendant's claim of having left the conspiracy and her association with Epstein in 2002. The document also notes that the government is prepared to present additional evidence, a message book seized by the Palm Beach Police Department, at the sentencing hearing.
DOJ-OGR-00009173.jpg
This legal document is a page from a court filing detailing a juror's (David's) explanation for Ghislaine Maxwell's acquittal on a specific charge (count two) involving the accuser 'Jane'. David clarifies to 'The Independent' that the jury's decision was based on a lack of direct evidence that Maxwell 'enticed' Jane to travel, not on a disbelief of Jane's testimony. The document also mentions corroborating evidence such as flight logs and Maxwell's 'little black book', which listed names of 'masseuses' and Palm Beach police officers.
DOJ-OGR-00008958.jpg
This legal document is a filing from the defense in the case against Epstein, arguing that their ability to challenge a witness named Jane's testimony was hampered. The defense claims that unavailable property records and the deaths of key witnesses, specifically architects Alberto Pinto and Roger Salhi, prevented them from proving that Epstein's properties were not constructed or occupied at the times Jane recalled, which would have cast doubt on her testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00008952.jpg
This document is page 28 of a legal filing (Document 600) in the case US v. Maxwell, filed on February 11, 2022. It outlines the government's theory that Epstein and Maxwell operated a single criminal conspiracy using a specific 'playbook' to groom vulnerable minors across multiple locations (NY, Palm Beach, NM, USVI). The text cites trial transcripts regarding four specific accusers (Jane, Annie, Carolyn, Kate) and describes the targeting of children from single-mother households.
DOJ-OGR-00008943.jpg
This legal document analyzes a jury's deliberation, focusing on how flight logs kept by Epstein's pilot, Dave Rodgers, were used to corroborate testimony from a victim named Jane. The jury appears to have found no corroborating evidence for Ms. Maxwell's involvement in Jane's trips to New York, but did find evidence in the flight logs that Maxwell was a passenger on a trip with Jane to New Mexico. This distinction led the jury to focus its evaluation on Ms. Maxwell's involvement in the conduct that occurred in New Mexico.
DOJ-OGR-00008942.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues that Ms. Maxwell's conviction on Count Four was likely improper. The argument centers on a note from the jury, which suggests they based the conviction on sexual abuse that victim 'Jane' experienced in New Mexico, facilitated by Maxwell. However, the charge required the intended sexual activity to be a violation of New York Penal Law, a condition the New Mexico events did not satisfy.
DOJ-OGR-00031671.jpg
This document is a letter dated February 10, 2008, from attorney Aileen Josephs to attorney Guy Lewis concerning his client, Mr. Epstein. Josephs advises Lewis against attacking the victim(s) in the case, citing concern from women in the community, and warns him about the legal realities of a potential libel suit and the lack of a valid defense for statutory rape. The letter was also copied to the State Attorney's Office and the Palm Beach Chief of Police, indicating a formal effort to put her concerns on the record with law enforcement.
DOJ-OGR-00031668.jpg
This document is a letter dated August 25, 2006, from the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office to Aileen Josephs, P.A. The letter is a formal denial of a public records request concerning Jeffrey Epstein, which was submitted on August 14, 2006. The denial is based on the grounds that the records pertain to an active criminal investigation and are therefore exempt from public disclosure under Florida law.
DOJ-OGR-00031663.jpg
This letter, dated August 25, 2006, is a formal response from the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office to Aileen Josephs, P.A. The letter, signed by LaTosha Lowe of Public Information, denies a public records request concerning Jeffrey Epstein that was made on August 14, 2006. The denial is based on the grounds that the records are part of an active criminal investigation and are therefore exempt from public disclosure under Florida law.
DOJ-OGR-00031598.jpg
This document is a sworn statement signed by Detective Michelle D. Pagan of the Palm Beach Police Department on July 15, 2005. In the statement, Detective Pagan affirms that information obtained through a State Attorney subpoena is confidential, will be used solely for the purpose of investigating a crime, and will not be disseminated to anyone outside of law enforcement.
DOJ-OGR-00031463.jpg
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report from 2006 details a complaint filed by Jeffrey Epstein on October 13, 2003. Epstein reported that his former houseman, Juan Alessi, broke into his home, stole $2,700 and attempted to steal a gun. Alessi admitted to the crime, citing marital problems and suicidal thoughts, and returned $2,000 of the money. The report includes narratives from officers who spoke with Epstein and later interviewed Alessi's wife, Mary, in an attempt to locate him.
DOJ-OGR-00031453.jpg
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report details an interview conducted on November 21, 2005, with former Epstein employees Juan and Maria Alessi. In the presence of their attorney and an Assistant State Attorney, they described their duties and observations, including the frequent arrival of young girls (appearing 16-17 years old) for massages. Juan Alessi specifically noted finding and cleaning sex toys (a vibrator and rubber penis) in the sink after these sessions and dealing with Epstein's girlfriend, Ms. Maxwell.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity