Palm Beach
LocationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00019487.jpg
This document is page 16 of a legal indictment filed on July 8, 2020, detailing Count Six (Perjury) against Ghislaine Maxwell. It alleges that during a deposition on July 22, 2016, Maxwell knowingly gave false testimony by denying any knowledge of sex toys or devices at Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach house or in his possession. The document quotes the specific questions and her negative responses that form the basis of the perjury charge.
DOJ-OGR-00019096.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness, Mr. Rodgers, by an attorney, Mr. Everdell. The questioning focuses on confirming the location of Jeffrey Epstein's residence at 358 El Brillo Way in Palm Beach and establishing that Epstein temporarily relocated to a nearby rental property during a period of renovation.
DOJ-OGR-00019091.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses first on a photograph of Eva Dubin and whether she appeared pregnant, then shifts to examining Government Exhibit 662 (flight logs). Specifically, the questioning confirms a flight (number 878) that took place on August 18, 1996, traveling from Teterboro to Palm Beach.
DOJ-OGR-00019087.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely a pilot). The testimony confirms flight patterns between Teterboro/JFK and Palm Beach, specifically noting that Ghislaine Maxwell was not always present. It specifically identifies a flight on May 4, 2002, from JFK to Palm Beach where the passengers were Jeffrey Epstein and Shelly Lewis.
DOJ-OGR-00019086.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers recounts their personal history, stating they met Jeffrey Epstein while living near Columbus, Ohio, then lived in Manhattan for a year before moving to West Palm Beach in 1994. The testimony also establishes that Epstein maintained residences in both New York and Palm Beach.
DOJ-OGR-00019075.jpg
This document is a court transcript page (Cross-examination of witness Rodgers) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a specific flight (Flight 1480) that occurred on March 31, 2001, traveling from Santa Fe to Palm Beach. The testimony confirms the passenger list included Jeffrey Epstein (JE), Ghislaine Maxwell (GM), Virginia Roberts, Adam Perry Lang (identified as Epstein's chef), Marvin Minsky, Henry Drecky, and a victim referred to as 'Jane'.
DOJ-OGR-00019074.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on identifying the passengers of a flight (1105) that took place on May 3, 1998, from Palm Beach to Teterboro. The witness confirms the identities of several passengers, including Emmy Taylor as Ghislaine's assistant, Glenn and Eva Dubin with their children, and Gwendolyn Beck as a friend of Jeffrey's.
DOJ-OGR-00019070.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony verifies details from a flight log dated November 11, 1996 (Flight 916 from Palm Beach to Teterboro). The text identifies passengers including Jeffrey Epstein ('JE'), Jeff Shantz, Eva, Russ, and specifically identifies Sophie Biddle as one of Epstein's professional masseuses who traveled with him.
DOJ-OGR-00017172.jpg
This document is a transcript of a defense summation by Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The attorney argues for Maxwell's acquittal by claiming a lack of concrete evidence, such as phone records, and emphasizing that mere presence at a location or knowledge of a plan without participation is insufficient for a conviction. She reminds the jury that suspicion is not proof beyond a reasonable doubt and that Maxwell is presumed innocent.
DOJ-OGR-00017162.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the closing arguments (summation) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense argues that Maxwell was not Epstein's 'right-hand woman' in all matters and that Epstein actively kept secrets from her, including relationships with other women like Frances Jardine, Celina Midelfart, and Sherry Lewis. The text cites testimony from staff (Mr. Alessi, Cim) and flight logs to demonstrate that Epstein often traveled without Maxwell and removed her photos when other women were present.
DOJ-OGR-00017160.jpg
This document is a page from the closing arguments (summation) by defense attorney Ms. Menninger in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Menninger argues against the government's claim that financial transfers to Maxwell were payments for facilitating abuse, stating that transfers like the $7.4 million for a helicopter via 'Air Ghislaine' were standard asset protection strategies used by the wealthy. She draws a parallel to Epstein placing cars in Palm Beach under pilot Larry Visoski's name to show that Epstein frequently put assets in employees' names.
DOJ-OGR-00017120.jpg
This document is a page from the summation transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), delivered by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. The defense is attacking the credibility of a witness (referred to as 'she') by contrasting her testimony—that she was poor ('didn't have lunch money') and that Epstein paid for her schooling—with documentary evidence from 1995 and 1996. The evidence cited includes Interlochen applications where she denied receiving individual funding and CBP records showing extensive international travel to Italy and Europe.
DOJ-OGR-00017112.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation by Ms. Menninger. She attempts to discredit the prosecution's case by questioning the logic of Epstein's alleged actions with a girl named Jane on flight logs and by highlighting the prosecution's failure to produce promised witnesses from Palm Beach to testify about a 'culture of silence'. She specifically attacks the credibility of one witness, Juan Alessi, calling him a burglar with a 'deeply flawed memory'.
DOJ-OGR-00017084.jpg
This document is a transcript of a prosecutor's (Ms. Moe) summation in a criminal trial, filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecutor outlines the evidence for Count Five, a sex trafficking conspiracy charge spanning 2000-2004, detailing how the defendant (identified as Maxwell) and co-conspirator Epstein recruited and trafficked victims Carolyn and Virginia Roberts. The prosecutor explains to the jury that they only need to find one instance of agreement and one step taken to carry out the conspiracy to find the defendant guilty.
DOJ-OGR-00017076.jpg
This document is a transcript of a prosecutor's (Ms. Moe) summation in a criminal trial against a defendant named Maxwell. The prosecutor argues that Maxwell was complicit in crimes with an associate named Epstein, citing her living arrangements in Palm Beach, her knowledge of his preferences, and the millions of dollars she received from him. The prosecutor introduces the legal theory of 'aiding and abetting' as a basis for the jury to find Maxwell guilty on specific counts.
DOJ-OGR-00017075.jpg
This document is a transcript of a legal summation by 'Ms. Moe', arguing for Ghislaine Maxwell's continued and deep involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's criminal activities. The speaker refutes the defense's claim that Maxwell's relationship with Epstein ended around 2004 by citing evidence such as a 2005 household manual, Maxwell's stationery found in Epstein's home in 2005, and a $7.4 million payment from Epstein to Maxwell in 2007. The summation concludes that Maxwell was a knowing and key participant in Epstein's sexual abuse of children.
DOJ-OGR-00017074.jpg
This document is a legal summation from a court case, outlining Ghislaine Maxwell's role in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking operation from 1995 to 2004. It details how Maxwell recruited, groomed, and abused multiple young women, including Jane, Annie Farmer, Virginia Roberts, and Carolyn, across various locations like New Mexico and Palm Beach. The text also highlights significant financial payments from Epstein to Maxwell, totaling over $23 million, and describes the evolution of the abuse into a 'pyramid scheme' where victims were incentivized to recruit others.
DOJ-OGR-00017066.jpg
This page is a transcript of a closing argument (summation) by prosecutor Ms. Moe in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor summarizes evidence regarding Epstein and Maxwell's abuse of minors, specifically mentioning victims Jane, Annie, Virginia Roberts, and Carolyn. The text details sexual acts, flight records, and FedEx records (Government Exhibits 801 and 803) proving Epstein sent packages to Carolyn when she was 15.
DOJ-OGR-00017063.jpg
This document contains a page from a court transcript of a summation given by Ms. Moe in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The text details testimony from a witness named Carolyn regarding interactions with Virginia, Maxwell, and Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach, describing sexual acts that occurred in a massage room. The speaker also describes the physical layout of the room, including nude drawings and furniture, characterizing it as a site of sexual abuse.
DOJ-OGR-00017049.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation by prosecutor Ms. Moe (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). She details flight logs from May 1997 and April 1998 showing Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein traveling with a minor victim referred to as 'Jane' (aged 16 and 17 at the times). Ms. Moe argues against the defense's attempt to confuse the jury with photos of an adult assistant also named Jane, citing pilot and DMV testimony to clarify the victim's identity.
DOJ-OGR-00017048.jpg
This document is page 27 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), specifically the prosecution's summation regarding flight logs (Government Exhibit 662). The prosecutor argues that flight records confirm testimony from 'Jane' and Juan Alessi that Jane, a minor (16 years old in Nov 1996), was transported from Palm Beach to Teterboro/New York by Epstein and Maxwell. The text highlights how Epstein and Maxwell avoided listing minors' names on logs but points to specific entries proving their presence.
DOJ-OGR-00017043.jpg
This document is a page from the government's summation in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Prosecutor Ms. Moe describes how Maxwell and Epstein groomed a victim identified as 'Jane' beginning at a summer camp in 1994 when she was in middle school. The text details the 'older sister' dynamic Maxwell employed, the use of shopping and money, and a specific instance of sexual abuse by Epstein in a pool house.
DOJ-OGR-00017035.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (summation by Ms. Moe) filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecutor argues that Ghislaine Maxwell was fully aware of and managed the abuse in Epstein's Palm Beach home, citing a 2002 document authored by 'G. Max' listing massage oils, and testimony from Mr. Alessi regarding the cleaning and storage of sex toys in Maxwell's closet.
DOJ-OGR-00017033.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (summation by Ms. Moe) filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecutor argues that photographs show a sexual partnership between Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, specifically describing an image of Maxwell massaging Epstein's foot with her breasts. The text details the luxury lifestyle Maxwell enjoyed via Epstein's properties (NY, NM, Palm Beach, Paris, USVI) and cites testimony from house manager Juan Alessi establishing Maxwell as the 'lady of the house' starting in the early 1990s.
DOJ-OGR-00016990.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between the judge and attorneys. The judge notes the defense's strategy of questioning witnesses about victims' ages to challenge whether the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, had knowledge of their ages. An attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, begins to raise a related evidentiary issue concerning testimony about multiple females at Palm Beach.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity