| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Professional conflict |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mike Edmondson
|
Superior subordinate |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Chief Reiter
|
Professional conflict |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Professional adversarial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Birkenfeld
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
DETECTIVE RECAREY
|
Professional conflict |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Accused prosecutor |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
sender
|
Professional endorsement |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Adversarial professional conflict |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Unknown |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein's lawyers
|
Influenced by |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Detective Joe Recarey
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Adversarial professional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Adversarial negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Recarey
|
Conflict obstruction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Professional adversary |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Palm Beach County state attorney
|
Leader organization |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
dershowitz
|
Professional adversarial negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Conflict professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alexander Acosta
|
Professional different jurisdictions |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Dershowitz, Krischer, and Recarey where defense investigations into victims were ... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Krischer's office decided to delay the grand jury session for several months following a meet... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Substitution of Barry as trustee. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | State Attorney Barry Krischer sent the Epstein case to a grand jury instead of filing charges dir... | Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | State Attorney Barry Krischer declined to prosecute Epstein on unlawful sex acts with minors, ins... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting where Barry Krischer discussed the timetable for a plea agreement and information for a c... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Private meeting between Alan Dershowitz and Krischer. | Unknown (Dershowitz 'flew d... | View |
| N/A | Interviews | OPR conducted more than 60 interviews of witnesses. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Convening of Grand Jury | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein entered a plea deal, pleading guilty to felony solicitation of prostitution and procuring... | Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Initial in-person meeting between Michael Reiter and Barry Krischer regarding the Epstein case. | Unknown (likely Florida) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prosecutors delay approval of subpoenas. | Palm Beach County State Att... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Estate plan refresh | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Substitution of Trustee | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Dershowitz, Krischer, and Recarey where Dershowitz shared investigation results t... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Obstruction of investigation process (delaying subpoenas/dodging calls). | Palm Beach County | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Dershowitz, Krischer, and Recarey regarding victim credibility. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein agreed to a plea deal, pleading guilty to felony solicitation of prostitution and procuri... | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prosecutors (Krischer/Belohlavek) obstruct investigation by ignoring calls and delaying subpoenas. | Palm Beach County | View |
| N/A | Communication | Jack sent a note to Barry providing Acosta's phone number and instructions regarding a follow-up ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Swearing-in ceremony of Barry Krischer | Unknown | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Barry Krischer contacted via telephone regarding Epstein. | Unspecified | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Epstein expresses his decision to stop interviewing, recommending, or vetting new hires and disav... | unknown | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | Barry Krischer left the state attorney's office. | Palm Beach County | View |
| 2008-06-30 | N/A | Plea Conference | Unknown | View |
A 2006 Palm Beach Post article detailing allegations that Alan Dershowitz provided damaging information about teenage accusers to the State Attorney's Office to defend Jeffrey Epstein. The article notes police frustration with the handling of the case, mentioning that Epstein was indicted on a single solicitation charge despite police believing there was probable cause for more serious crimes involving minors.
This document is an FBI clipping preservation form containing a July 26, 2006 article from The Palm Beach Post. The article details the indictment of Jeffrey Epstein on solicitation charges following a long investigation by the Palm Beach Police Department, which included surveillance of his home and private jet. The text highlights a conflict between Police Chief Michael Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer, noting that police believed there was probable cause for more serious charges involving minors.
This document appears to be a page from a personal essay, blog post, or manuscript discussing relationship psychology, specifically focusing on the concepts of 'arranged' vs. 'love' marriages and the role of uncertainty in attraction. The author references pop culture (Friends, Sex and the City) and Monica Ali's novel 'Brick Lane' to explore these themes, concluding with thoughts on 'strategic ambiguity' in flirting and briefly mentioning S&M. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was collected as part of a congressional investigation, though no specific connection to Epstein is visible in the text of this specific page.
This document is a page from a James Patterson book (likely 'Filthy Rich') included in House Oversight records. It details former State Attorney Barry Krischer's life after the Epstein case and describes a December 2009 RICO lawsuit filed by Jeffrey Epstein against Ponzi schemer Scott Rothstein, attorney Bradley Edwards, and a victim identified as 'L.M.' The text outlines Epstein's allegations that Edwards knew about Rothstein's Ponzi scheme and claims that the victim 'L.M.' had credibility issues involving drug use and changing stories.
This document contains pages 276 and 277 from the book 'Filthy Rich' (likely by James Patterson), stamped as House Oversight evidence. It details Virginia Roberts's allegations against Prince Andrew, including her sworn statement that she was instructed by Jeffrey Epstein to 'exceed' expectations and give the Prince whatever he wanted. The text also covers legal maneuvers, such as Buckingham Palace refusing letters, a Florida judge striking allegations from the record as 'lurid details,' and Barry Krischer refusing to comment on Epstein in 2016.
This document appears to be a scanned page (276) from a book, likely James Patterson's 'Filthy Rich', stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. It details the scandal surrounding Prince Andrew in early 2015, specifically Virginia Roberts's allegations of sexual contact and the Prince's subsequent denials issued from Davos and Buckingham Palace. It also touches on real estate transactions involving the Prince and a Kazakh billionaire, as well as a brief mention of State Attorney Barry Krischer's refusal to comment on Epstein in 2016.
This newspaper article from February 28, 2019, details the sexual abuse committed by Jeffrey Epstein, focusing on the testimony of Michelle Licata and the controversial non-prosecution agreement. It highlights the efforts of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiner and Detective Joseph Recarey to pursue the case despite pressure, and the role of Epstein's high-profile legal team, including Alan Dershowitz and then-U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, in securing a lenient deal. The article also touches on the defense's tactics to discredit victims and the broader context of Epstein's influence given his wealth and connections.
These pages from the book "Filthy Rich" describe Chief Reiter's frustration with the handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, leading him to contact the FBI and federal prosecutor R. Alexander Acosta. The text details Reiter's initial hope in Acosta, Acosta's background working under Ken Starr and clerking for Samuel Alito, and the pushback Reiter received for pursuing the investigation so aggressively.
This document contains two pages from the book 'Filthy Rich' (stamped as House Oversight evidence). Page 176 details police investigator Recarey seeking warrants for Epstein and Sarah Kellen, and noting that he was being aggressively tailed by a private investigator named Zachary Bechard. Page 177 recounts a story by journalist Tim Malloy about tracking Epstein's private 727 to Palm Beach International Airport and using a traffic helicopter to film him, which resulted in Epstein spotting the chopper and requesting to speak to the reporter.
This document contains pages 176-177 of a book (likely James Patterson's 'Filthy Rich') stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. It details the friction between Palm Beach Police (Detective Recarey) and the State Attorney's office (Barry Krischer/ASA Belohlavek) regarding the issuance of arrest warrants for Epstein, Sarah Kellen, and Wendy Dobbs. It also describes aggressive surveillance tactics used against a victim's father by a private investigator, and a specific incident where TV newscaster Tim Malloy used a helicopter to film Epstein at the airport, causing Epstein to flee back onto his plane.
This document contains pages 174 and 175 from a narrative book (likely James Patterson's 'Filthy Rich') included in House Oversight records. It details events in May 2006 regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, specifically focused on State Attorney Barry Krischer refusing to recuse himself and the removal of Assistant State Attorney Daliah Weiss from the case. The text highlights conflicts of interest, noting that Epstein's new lawyer, Jack Goldberger, was friends with Krischer and that an associate of Goldberger was married to Weiss.
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' containing the deposition testimony of Michael Reiter regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. Reiter testifies that he believed State Attorney Barry Krischer lacked objectivity in handling the case and describes how both he and his detective were ignored by the State Attorney's office (specifically Krischer and Lanna Belohlavek) when attempting to communicate. Reiter details writing a letter (Exhibit 3, referenced May 1, 2006) urging Krischer to step aside and have the governor appoint a different prosecutor due to the serious nature of the crimes and the high profile of the suspect.
This document is a partial transcript from the videotaped deposition of Michael Reiter on November 23, 2009, related to a civil lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein. Reiter discusses sending a letter to State Attorney Barry Krischer in May 2006, following prior conversations, because he felt the handling of the case by the state attorney's office was unusual and that there was a lack of objectivity.
This document appears to be an excerpt from a book (likely 'Filthy Rich') included in House Oversight records, detailing the controversial plea deal negotiations for Jeffrey Epstein. The text describes a specific moment where Epstein's attorney, Guy Fronstin, accepts a lenient plea offer (1 count Aggravated Assault, probation, adjudication withheld) from ASA Belohlavek, effectively calling off a grand jury. The narrator, likely a police investigator, expresses strong disapproval of the deal and the lack of consultation, noting that the victims' families were being ignored by the State Attorney's Office.
This document is an excerpt from a book (likely by James Patterson given the header) that reproduces a Palm Beach Police Department Incident Report filed by Detective Joseph Recarey on July 25, 2006. The report details Recarey's repeated frustrated attempts in April 2006 to contact Assistant State Attorneys Weiss and Belohlavek to schedule victim testimony for a Grand Jury. It culminates in Recarey physically visiting the State Attorney's Office, where he is informed by ASA Belohlavek that a plea offer had been made to Epstein's defense attorney, Guy Fronstin.
This document is a page from James Patterson's book (likely 'Filthy Rich') presented as an exhibit in a House Oversight investigation. It details the conflict between Police Chief Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer, with Reiter suspecting Krischer of protecting Epstein. The text includes excerpts from a police report by Detective Recarey, noting that Epstein's lawyer claimed the massages were 'therapeutic and spiritually sound' and citing a $100,000 donation to the Ballet of Florida for massages as evidence.
This document appears to be a scanned excerpt from the book 'Filthy Rich' presented as evidence to the House Oversight Committee. It details the conflict between the Palm Beach Police Department (Chief Reiter and Detective Recarey) and State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. The police wanted to file immediate felony charges against Epstein and accomplices Wendy Dobbs and Sarah Kellen, but Krischer opted for the unusual step of convening a grand jury, citing doubts about victim credibility.
This document is a page from a book by James Patterson (likely 'Filthy Rich') contained within House Oversight files. It details the background of State Attorney Barry Krischer, specifically focusing on sexual harassment allegations filed against him in 1992 by his former secretary, Jodi Bergeron, which were dismissed. The text juxtaposes Krischer's legal troubles with Chief Reiter's investigations into both Rush Limbaugh and Jeffrey Epstein, mentioning potential felony charges and a case titled 'B.B. vs. Epstein'.
This document contains pages 162 and 163 from a book (likely a narrative non-fiction like 'Filthy Rich') detailing the background of State Attorney Barry Krischer and incidents related to the Epstein investigation. Page 162 describes witness intimidation involving a woman named Alison being offered money to refuse cooperation, and mentions a private investigator named Ivan Robles monitoring visitors. Page 163 provides a biographical overview of Barry Krischer, noting his career history, awards from figures like Jeb Bush, and his reputation for prosecuting high-profile cases like Rush Limbaugh.
This document is a page from James Patterson's book (likely 'Filthy Rich') stamped as a House Oversight document. It details Detective Recarey's investigation into witness intimidation in the Epstein case around July 2006. Specifically, it describes a private investigator named Ivan Robles harassing the family of a victim named Mary, and an attempt to bribe a victim named Alison to stop cooperating with police. The text also notes Recarey's suspicion that the State Attorney's office (led by Barry Krischer) might be complicit.
This document appears to be a page from a book or narrative report (Chapter 40, page 159) included in House Oversight records. It details the state of the Epstein investigation in January 2006 from the perspective of Police Chief Michael Reiter, who believed his team (including Detective Recarey) had built an 'airtight' case. It describes Reiter's coordination with State Attorney Barry Krischer, who reportedly assured Reiter that his office would support the investigation fully.
This document is a page from a legal brief or court opinion (sourced from Westlaw) regarding litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. It argues for the reversal of dismissals for the Saudi Joint Relief Committee, Saudi Red Crescent Society, and National Commercial Bank based on the precedent set in 'Doe v. Bin Laden' regarding the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA). The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee, though the text itself does not mention Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a page from a Table of Authorities, likely from a legal brief or court opinion related to litigation surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks (specifically 2012 WL 257568). It lists various legal precedents (case law) alphabetically from 'Abrahams' to 'Chambers', including high-profile cases such as 'Ashcroft v. Iqbal' and several cases involving 'Obama' regarding detainees. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to the House Oversight Committee, though the page itself contains no direct references to Jeffrey Epstein.
This document is a highly aggressive correspondence (likely from Jeffrey Epstein to Leon Black) appearing to be a printed email or draft. The sender critiques the recipient's family office management, referring to it as a 'bomb of colored string' created by 'retarded children,' and demands a fee of $40 million per year to fix the estate, tax, and organizational issues. The text outlines specific staffing changes (firing John, retaining Joslin/Tom temporarily), asset sales (Artspace, Regan Arts), and strict payment terms involving upfront millions.
This document contains two emails forwarded to Melanie Spinella in 2016, likely written by Jeffrey Epstein to Leon Black. The emails detail extensive family office restructuring, including the firing of staff (Ada, Eva, Joslin Castrucci), criticism of Brad Wechsler's management, and tax planning strategies involving trusts and foreign funds. The sender specifically mentions that 'Donald' (likely Trump, post-election) might render a foreign funds repatriation plan obsolete.
Asking Krischer to recuse himself from the case.
Multiple calls ignored by Krischer.
Multiple requests for comment
Asking Krischer to recuse himself from the case.
Krischer told police he would convene a grand jury rather than approve an arrest.
Private meeting described by Recarey as involving 'shenanigans'.
Reiter attempted to call Krischer, but calls were not returned.
In-person discussion where Reiter informed Krischer about the serious nature of the case, multiple victims, and the high profile of the suspect.
Recarey describes this meeting as involving 'shenanigans'.
Described by Recarey as involving 'shenanigans'.
Multiple requests for comment
Dershowitz met privately with Krischer to discuss the case.
Questioning the unusual course of the office's handling and suggesting disqualification.
Krischer refused to be dragged into the conversation.
Discusses confidentiality provisions in the Non-Prosecution Agreement, a letter sent to Epstein's defense counsel regarding a request/suit by the Shiny Sheet, and the failure of defense counsel to file the complete agreement with the Court.
Krischer stated Epstein was eligible for work release because registration hadn't taken place.
Confirmed Epstein would serve 15 months; mentioned he could serve time at 'the stockade'. Includes quote: 'Glad we could get this worked out for reasons I won’t put in writing.'
Informed Villafaña of defense proposal regarding registration.
According to Villafaña, Acosta called to say registration was non-negotiable. (Note: Krischer did not recall this interaction).
Inquired about 'gain time' and ensuring Epstein serves a specific amount of time in jail.
Epstein ready to agree to terms except sexual offender registration; proposed deferred registration.
Email discussing plea negotiations for Mr. Epstein, the defense's change of mind to only plead to state charges, the need for a non-prosecution agreement by tomorrow afternoon, and an agreement verbally worked out with Krischer's office by Monday. Villafana believes Epstein is having second thoughts about jail time and damages to victims. She mentions leaving a voicemail for Claudette Hughes.
Memo written due to anger over State Attorney Barry Krischer's handling of the case.
Memo written due to anger over State Attorney Barry Krischer's handling of the case.
Defense requesting informal agreement or no charges, arguing lack of sexual allegations and attacking victim credibility.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity