| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Professional conflict |
13
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Mike Edmondson
|
Superior subordinate |
10
Very Strong
|
2 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Chief Reiter
|
Professional conflict |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Professional adversarial |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Unknown |
7
|
1 | |
|
person
Bradley Birkenfeld
|
Business associate |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
DETECTIVE RECAREY
|
Professional conflict |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Accused prosecutor |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
sender
|
Professional endorsement |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Adversarial professional conflict |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
jeffrey E.
|
Unknown |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein's lawyers
|
Influenced by |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Detective Joe Recarey
|
Adversarial professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Adversarial professional conflict |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Adversarial negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Recarey
|
Conflict obstruction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Professional adversary |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Palm Beach County state attorney
|
Leader organization |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
dershowitz
|
Professional adversarial negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Reiter
|
Conflict professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alexander Acosta
|
Professional different jurisdictions |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Dershowitz, Krischer, and Recarey where defense investigations into victims were ... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Krischer's office decided to delay the grand jury session for several months following a meet... | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Substitution of Barry as trustee. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | State Attorney Barry Krischer sent the Epstein case to a grand jury instead of filing charges dir... | Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | State Attorney Barry Krischer declined to prosecute Epstein on unlawful sex acts with minors, ins... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting where Barry Krischer discussed the timetable for a plea agreement and information for a c... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Private meeting between Alan Dershowitz and Krischer. | Unknown (Dershowitz 'flew d... | View |
| N/A | Interviews | OPR conducted more than 60 interviews of witnesses. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Convening of Grand Jury | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein entered a plea deal, pleading guilty to felony solicitation of prostitution and procuring... | Palm Beach, Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Initial in-person meeting between Michael Reiter and Barry Krischer regarding the Epstein case. | Unknown (likely Florida) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prosecutors delay approval of subpoenas. | Palm Beach County State Att... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Estate plan refresh | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Substitution of Trustee | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Dershowitz, Krischer, and Recarey where Dershowitz shared investigation results t... | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Obstruction of investigation process (delaying subpoenas/dodging calls). | Palm Beach County | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting between Dershowitz, Krischer, and Recarey regarding victim credibility. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein agreed to a plea deal, pleading guilty to felony solicitation of prostitution and procuri... | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prosecutors (Krischer/Belohlavek) obstruct investigation by ignoring calls and delaying subpoenas. | Palm Beach County | View |
| N/A | Communication | Jack sent a note to Barry providing Acosta's phone number and instructions regarding a follow-up ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Swearing-in ceremony of Barry Krischer | Unknown | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Barry Krischer contacted via telephone regarding Epstein. | Unspecified | View |
| 2016-01-01 | N/A | Epstein expresses his decision to stop interviewing, recommending, or vetting new hires and disav... | unknown | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | Barry Krischer left the state attorney's office. | Palm Beach County | View |
| 2008-06-30 | N/A | Plea Conference | Unknown | View |
A contentious correspondence, likely from a legal or financial advisor to a client (contextually Jeffrey Epstein), refusing further work until overdue compensation is paid. The author outlines a chaotic financial situation ('procrastination produced mess'), advises shutting down entities like Regan Arts and Artspace, criticizes current staff (Joslin, Castrucci), and proposes a restructuring plan involving a new trustee named Barry. The text also references 'Donald's' tax plans complicating the author's work and mentions a fee dispute involving a $40m/year limit.
A letter, likely from Jeffrey Epstein to Leon Black (inferred from context regarding family and business holdings), critiquing Black's financial management and staff. The author advises on estate planning, including trusts (GRATs), wills, and executor appointments, while highlighting significant financial mismanagement in entities like Regan Arts and Artspace. The letter also details a dispute over advisory fees regarding a 'Phaidon payout' and mentions a complex tax issue involving 'Rowen' (Marc Rowan) and 'Athene' potentially involving 2 billion in taxes.
An email dated December 29, 2015, sent to Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com), likely from Leon Black or a close associate. The sender harshly criticizes Epstein's office staff, particularly 'Brad' and 'Eileen,' for incompetence and lack of financial transparency regarding Phaidon and Regan Arts. The email concludes with specific instructions to restructure trusts, including the 'Judy Black trust,' appoint 'Suydam' as executor, and secure protections for 'Alex and Victoria' (Black's children).
This document is an email thread from December 2015 involving Jeffrey Epstein (jeevacation@gmail.com), Brad Wechsler, and Heather Gray. The top section features a personal message from an unnamed mentor/advisor terminating a paid financial arrangement, calling Epstein their 'best student' and stating he is now capable of doing the work himself. The thread also details logistical schedules for a 'purchase and sale agreement' and trust documents, with a target closing date of December 22, 2015, involving individuals named Ada, Alan, and Leon.
This document contains a chain of emails from November 2015 involving Jeffrey Epstein, Melanie Spinella, and an unidentified advisor (likely legal or financial). The emails discuss significant financial matters, including a suspicious $100 million overseas transfer involving Gagosian without a contract, high-interest loans costing $50k/day, estate planning, and trust management with Bank of America. The sender also expresses strong opinions on staffing (suggesting Ada Clapp should be fired) and mentions FBI involvement in a list of agenda items.
This document outlines a timeline of the Epstein investigation between roughly June 2006 and September 2007, detailing the conflict between Palm Beach police and State Attorney Barry Krischer. It chronicles the escalation to a federal FBI investigation ('Operation Leap Year'), the preparation of a 53-page federal indictment, and the eventual negotiation of a non-prosecution agreement signed by Epstein on September 24, 2007, overseen by U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta.
This document appears to be an excerpt from a timeline or news report regarding the police investigation into Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach, Florida, spanning from approximately April 2005 to May 2006. It details the initial 'trash pulls' that yielded evidence, witness intimidation by an assistant, the execution of a search warrant at the El Brillo Way property on October 20th, and the eventual filing of a probable cause affidavit in May 2006 which State Attorney Barry Krischer referred to a grand jury. The document includes a photograph of the street sign for El Brillo Way and is marked with a House Oversight Committee file number.
An email sent by Darren Indyke on May 10, 2019, to Martin Weinberg and the address 'jeevacation@gmail.com'. The subject line indicates the email concerns a 'Privileged and Confidential' timeline of the Jeffrey Epstein sex abuse case published by the Miami Herald. The body of the email is heavily redacted, though the file attachments list names relevant to the case, including Virginia Roberts, Brad Edwards, and Barry Krischer.
This document is a news article from September 20, 2009, detailing various aspects of Jeffrey Epstein's legal situation and the reactions of his attorney and victims. It covers his jail time, probation, the sealing of documents, ongoing lawsuits, and the police investigation that led to charges of soliciting prostitution instead of more serious offenses.
A printed webpage from The Palm Beach Post (dated 2011, article from 2009) detailing the aftermath of Jeffrey Epstein's plea deal. The article highlights the tension between Police Chief Michael Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer, citing a 2006 letter where Reiter called the prosecutor's handling of the case 'highly unusual.' It also quotes attorneys discussing how Epstein's wealth allowed him to avoid federal prosecution through a 'back-room deal' involving high-profile lawyers like Alan Dershowitz and Kenneth Starr.
This document is an exhibit filed in court on May 25, 2017, containing a newspaper article detailing the conflict between the Palm Beach Police and State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. It highlights how Alan Dershowitz provided prosecutors with social media evidence (MySpace) to discredit accusers, leading to delays in grand jury proceedings. The text also documents Police Chief Reiter's frustration, his request for arrest warrants on May 1, and his suggestion that Krischer disqualify himself from the case.
This document, likely a news article excerpt found in House Oversight files, details the early stages of the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein starting in March 2005. It highlights the conflict between the Palm Beach Police, who sought arrest warrants based on victim testimony (including recruiter Haley Robson), and State Attorney Barry Krischer, who delayed proceedings. The text describes specific allegations of sexual acts with a 14-year-old and mentions Epstein's legal team (Lefcourt and Dershowitz) actively working to discredit accusers using MySpace data.
This document appears to be a profile or news article detailing the career of Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter, specifically focusing on his conflict with State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the Epstein investigation. It highlights Reiter's letter urging Krischer to recuse himself, his subsequent referral of the Epstein case to the FBI, and provides biographical details of his career, including high-profile investigations involving the Kennedy family. The text establishes Reiter's reputation for professionalism and integrity among his peers.
This document appears to be a compilation of media clippings, specifically from the New York Post, criticizing the plea deal Jeffrey Epstein received. It contrasts the aggressive investigation by Palm Beach Police with the State Attorney's decision to offer a lenient plea deal, attributing the outcome to Epstein's high-powered legal team (Dershowitz, Starr, Goldberger) and wealth. The text highlights that police had evidence (transcripts, phone messages) proving Epstein knew the victims' ages, but prosecutors were swayed by defense attacks on the victims' characters via MySpace logs.
This document appears to be an editorial or article criticizing the State Attorney's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, specifically the failure to charge him with crimes against minors despite police evidence. It details evidence found by police (school transcripts, trash), instances proving the girls were students (missing appointments for soccer or class), and the defense tactics used by Alan Dershowitz to discredit victims via their MySpace activity. It also mentions witness intimidation by private investigators and questions why a lenient plea deal was offered.
This document contains a Palm Beach Post article from August 2006 discussing the conflict between Police Chief Michael Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the Jeffrey Epstein case. It details Reiter's push for more serious charges against Epstein, the subsequent plea deal controversy, and personal attacks launched by Epstein's legal team against Reiter, including references to his divorce. The text criticizes the justice system's preferential treatment of wealthy defendants like Epstein.
This document, stamped by House Oversight, profiles Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter amidst the Epstein investigation. It details the conflict between Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer, with Reiter urging Krischer's disqualification and eventually referring the Epstein case to the FBI. The text also defends Reiter's professional reputation against attacks from the 'Epstein camp,' citing support from fellow police chiefs and his history of handling high-profile cases involving the Kennedy family.
This document appears to be a House Oversight Committee record containing text from an editorial criticizing the handling of the Epstein case by State Attorney Barry Krischer, followed by a New York Post article from July 27, 2006. The text details how the plea deal allowed Epstein to avoid federal investigation and serious prison time despite police evidence (phone messages, school transcripts) proving he knew the victims were underage. It highlights the discrepancy between the police investigation's findings and the grand jury's decision to only charge him with soliciting a prostitute, noting he was released on $3,000 bail.
This document is a text of a Palm Beach Post editorial from February 13, 2008, criticizing State Attorney Barry Krischer's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. It argues that the prosecution was too lenient, influenced by Epstein's defense team (including Alan Dershowitz), and failed to pursue stronger charges despite significant evidence collected by police.
This document is an editorial from the Palm Beach Post dated August 4, 2006, criticizing the prosecution's decision to only charge Jeffrey Epstein with solicitation rather than crimes against minors. It highlights evidence found by police, including school transcripts and trash searches, proving Epstein knew the victims' ages. The text also notes the defense strategy led by Alan Dershowitz to discredit the victims based on their social media activity.
This document contains an excerpt from a Palm Beach Post article dated August 14, 2006, discussing the legal battles surrounding Jeffrey Epstein and the conflict between his defense team and Palm Beach Police Chief Michael Reiter. It details allegations against Epstein involving minors, his lawyers' attempts to discredit Reiter by calling him a "nutcase" and bringing up his divorce, and Reiter's criticism of State Attorney Barry Krischer's handling of the case.
This document contains text from news coverage regarding the legal proceedings against Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach. It details the controversial plea deal negotiated by his high-profile legal team, the dropping of federal investigations, and a 2006 New York Post article discussing his light charges compared to the evidence gathered by police.
This document is a reprint of a Palm Beach Post editorial dated August 10, 2006, titled 'Massaging the system.' It heavily criticizes State Attorney Barry Krischer for referring the Jeffrey Epstein case to a grand jury rather than prosecuting directly, suggesting favoritism toward the wealthy defendant. The text details police findings, including payments to minors and physical evidence (school transcripts) found in Epstein's trash that contradicted his defense claims of ignorance regarding the victims' ages.
This document appears to be a news article or column critiquing the State Attorney's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case (circa 2006). It contrasts the overwhelming evidence collected by police—including phone messages, school transcripts, and witness testimony—against the prosecutors' reluctance to charge Epstein due to perceived victim credibility issues. The text highlights a controversial quote from a State Attorney spokesman admitting that wealth can indeed buy a different standard of justice.
This document contains a Palm Beach Post article from August 14, 2006, detailing the conflict between Police Chief Michael Reiter and State Attorney Barry Krischer regarding the prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein. It highlights Reiter's push for harsher charges (sexual activity with minors) versus the State Attorney's lighter plea deal, and documents the personal attacks launched by Epstein's legal team against Chief Reiter.
Dershowitz met privately with Krischer to discuss the case.
Asking Krischer to recuse himself from the case.
Krischer told police he would convene a grand jury rather than approve an arrest.
Multiple requests for comment
Private meeting described by Recarey as involving 'shenanigans'.
Recarey describes this meeting as involving 'shenanigans'.
Multiple requests for comment
Described by Recarey as involving 'shenanigans'.
Reiter attempted to call Krischer, but calls were not returned.
In-person discussion where Reiter informed Krischer about the serious nature of the case, multiple victims, and the high profile of the suspect.
Multiple calls ignored by Krischer.
Asking Krischer to recuse himself from the case.
Questioning the unusual course of the office's handling and suggesting disqualification.
Krischer refused to be dragged into the conversation.
Discusses confidentiality provisions in the Non-Prosecution Agreement, a letter sent to Epstein's defense counsel regarding a request/suit by the Shiny Sheet, and the failure of defense counsel to file the complete agreement with the Court.
Krischer stated Epstein was eligible for work release because registration hadn't taken place.
Inquired about 'gain time' and ensuring Epstein serves a specific amount of time in jail.
Confirmed Epstein would serve 15 months; mentioned he could serve time at 'the stockade'. Includes quote: 'Glad we could get this worked out for reasons I won’t put in writing.'
Informed Villafaña of defense proposal regarding registration.
According to Villafaña, Acosta called to say registration was non-negotiable. (Note: Krischer did not recall this interaction).
Epstein ready to agree to terms except sexual offender registration; proposed deferred registration.
Email discussing plea negotiations for Mr. Epstein, the defense's change of mind to only plead to state charges, the need for a non-prosecution agreement by tomorrow afternoon, and an agreement verbally worked out with Krischer's office by Monday. Villafana believes Epstein is having second thoughts about jail time and damages to victims. She mentions leaving a voicemail for Claudette Hughes.
Memo written due to anger over State Attorney Barry Krischer's handling of the case.
Memo written due to anger over State Attorney Barry Krischer's handling of the case.
Defense requesting informal agreement or no charges, arguing lack of sexual allegations and attacking victim credibility.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity