[Redacted Name]
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Mendelson
|
Romantic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Bachner
|
Professional correspondence meeting scheduling |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Name]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Netflix Executive Producer
|
Contact |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Dawn Hughes
|
Potential expert witness prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor defendant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Acquaintance |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Contact |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jona A. Noel
|
Significant other |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Nadia Marcinkova
|
Financial |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | [Redacted Name] gave Mr. Dershowitz a massage on the beach at Little St. James, then went with hi... | Beach at Little St. James, ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | [Redacted Name] went to Miami for the weekend, returned and told Mr. Epstein she met a man who, w... | Miami | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Epstein introduced [Redacted Name] to Mr. Dershowitz. Epstein and Dershowitz argued against h... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dinner with Mr. Epstein and Mr. Dershowitz to discuss [Redacted Name]'s case. Dershowitz said lit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual encounter involving [Redacted Name] and Mr. Epstein, followed by Mr. Dershowitz entering a... | Mr. Epstein's bedroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Several nude girls were having lunch at the pool, Mr. Dershowitz was present. [Redacted Name] sta... | Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach ho... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged sexual encounter between a 17-year-old victim and Prince Andrew. | London | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Ransome was called to Mr. Epstein's mansion. Mr. Epstein, Mr. Dershowitz, and [Redacted Name]... | Mr. Epstein's mansion | View |
| 2020-11-04 | N/A | Afternoon call/meeting between Dawn Hughes and redacted party regarding expert testimony. | N/A | View |
| 2020-11-02 | N/A | Dawn Hughes sends CV and engagement agreement. | N/A | View |
| 2020-11-02 | N/A | Correspondence about availability for a call on Wednesday after 2:00 PM. | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Proposed meeting at 3:30 PM at 1 St. Andrews. | 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, New Y... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Proposed reverse proffer meeting at 1 St. Andrew's at 6 PM. | 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, New Y... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Proposed meeting at 11 AM or 10:30 AM for a reverse proffer. | Michael Bachner's office | View |
| 2009-08-10 | N/A | Potential deposition of [Redacted Name] | Unknown | View |
| 2005-05-19 | N/A | Traffic stop involving Craig Eaton's daughter | Lake Clarke Shores | View |
EFTA00014026.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2008 involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney and several defense attorneys (Josefsberg, Ezell, Edwards, etc.) regarding Jeffrey Epstein's work release conditions. The discussion focuses on the 'exclusionary zones' programmed into Epstein's GPS monitoring system to protect victims. The AUSA confirms, via Captain Sleeth of the Palm Beach Sheriff's Office, that while Epstein's GPS will alert if he nears a prohibited location, the specific addresses and identities of the victims will remain confidential and unknown to Epstein.
EFTA00013922.pdf
This document is an email thread from July 2008 forwarding previous correspondence from November 2007. An Assistant U.S. Attorney (name redacted) forwards a 'Victim Notification Letter' to Alex Acosta, noting that this letter—originally sent to defense attorney Jay Lefkowitz—was 'objected to by the defense' and is being referenced in a draft declaration. The document highlights the legal friction regarding victim notification procedures in the Epstein case.
EFTA00013696.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 18, 2007, involving US Attorney Alex Acosta, attorney Jay Lefkowitz (Kirkland & Ellis), and USAFLS staff. The emails discuss scheduling Jeffrey Epstein's 'change of plea' hearing, ultimately agreeing on November 20, 2007. The correspondence reveals a personal rapport between Acosta and Lefkowitz, noting a recent breakfast meeting, and discusses ensuring the date change does not impact when Epstein begins serving his sentence.
EFTA00013616.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 2007 between Jay Lefkowitz (Epstein's counsel) and a federal prosecutor (USAFLS) negotiating specific terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement. The text outlines a mechanism where an independent third party selects an attorney representative for '40 potential complainants,' with Epstein agreeing to pay their hourly legal fees provided they negotiate settlements rather than file contested lawsuits under 18 U.S.C. 2255. The prosecutor's reply accepts most of Lefkowitz's draft but deletes a clause that would have restricted the government from communicating with the independent third party.
EFTA00013515.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails from October 2007 between Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Jay Lefkowitz, and officials from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAFLS), including references to US Attorney Alex Acosta. The correspondence details tense negotiations regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement, specifically focusing on the selection of a 'Special Master' or attorney representative for the victims, the compensation limits (150k vs 50k), and language allowing for the 'veracity of the victims' claims' to be tested. The government sets a strict deadline for a deal, stating they have made their final concessions.
EFTA00011495.pdf
This document is an email chain containing two messages. The earlier message, dated November 12, 2020, is from an individual at OPR (Office of Professional Responsibility) transmitting the final report on the Jeffrey Epstein matter. The later message, dated January 29, 2021, is a reply requesting a meeting early the following week to discuss the matter.
EFTA00011177.pdf
This document is a character reference letter dated November 2, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's bail application. The redacted sender describes a decades-long friendship with Maxwell, attesting to her integrity and stating they would trust her to look after their children (implied by context) at any time. The sender argues Maxwell is not a flight risk and offers to provide financial surety for her bail.
EFTA00010445.pdf
This document contains excerpts from depositions of Ghislaine Maxwell taken on April 22, 2016, and July 22, 2016. Maxwell denies knowingly inviting underage girls (other than friends' children) to Epstein's homes, denies knowledge of sex toys at Epstein's properties, and denies recruiting girls for sexual massages. She specifically denies giving a massage to a redacted individual (likely Virginia Giuffre) and claims her sexual involvement with Epstein was limited to him and two other specific women.
EFTA00010334.pdf
This document contains an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and attorneys Brad Edwards and Brittany Henderson of Edwards Pottinger LLC. The correspondence, dating between September 2019 and January 2020, concerns the transfer of evidence—specifically emails and 'photo booth' style photographs—related to a witness who had encounters with Jeffrey Epstein. The prosecutor mentions needing the photos to attach to an FBI '302' interview report.
EFTA00010321.pdf
This document is an email chain from August and September 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Blackfords LLP, the legal team representing the Duke of York (Prince Andrew). The correspondence details a stalemate in negotiations regarding the Duke's cooperation with the investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The Duke's lawyers offer a written witness statement limited primarily to the 1994-1997 period, citing concerns that the US views him as a 'subject' rather than a witness. The SDNY rejects this offer, declaring the written statement insufficient, and informs the defense they will proceed with a Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA) request to the UK authorities (UKCA) to seek a compelled interview.
EFTA00010045.pdf
This document is a subpoena issued by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team in November 2021, commanding the production of records from the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program (EVCP). The subpoena seeks all materials submitted by accusers, communications between the EVCP and accusers, records of payments, and executed releases. Attached to the subpoena is the 'Protocol' for the EVCP dated May 29, 2020, which outlines the independent program's purpose, eligibility requirements, claims administration process, and confidentiality rules for compensating victims of Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00009970.pdf
This document contains an email chain from September 2019 between unidentified government officials (likely DOJ/prosecutors given the phrase 'before we charged'). The discussion concerns a request from an executive producer of an upcoming 4-part Netflix series on Jeffrey Epstein, who is a friend of one of the officials, asking for an interview with 'the office.' The officials discuss coordinating with the press office and leadership ('brass') to address the request, though they anticipate the answer will be no.
EFTA00009965.pdf
An email chain from September 12, 2019, between officials at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. They are discussing a New York Post article regarding a victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence confirms that the office has previously spoken to and interviewed the specific victim mentioned in the article, with one official asking how much of the article's content was covered in their interview.
EFTA00003061.pdf
This document is an Emergency Contact Form for LSJE, LLC (Little St. James Enterprise) regarding employee Michael J. Glidden. Glidden is listed as an Engineer with a start date of April 20, 2018, and lists his address as 'GSJ' (likely Great St. James). The form includes redacted contact details for his son and brother.
DOJ-OGR-00000795.jpg
This document is page 12 of a government legal filing from July 18, 2019, arguing for the pretrial detention of Jeffrey Epstein. It details evidence found during a July 6-7, 2019 FBI search of Epstein's NYC mansion, specifically a 'vast trove' of CD's containing thousands of nude photographs of underage girls and women, which the government labels as 'photographic trophies.' The prosecution argues this evidence, along with his 2008 conviction, demonstrates that Epstein poses an ongoing danger to the community.
DOJ-OGR-00015728.jpg
A handwritten journal entry by a young female student (referencing high school track and college) reflecting on an interaction with an older male. The writer rationalizes the man's behavior as 'fatherly' or 'flirting' rather than 'weird' to avoid portraying him in a bad light, noting she cannot tell a redacted female associate because that woman 'worships him.' The entry transitions to discussing summer plans for Africa and a general sense of optimism about the future.
DOJ-OGR-00015726.jpg
A handwritten diary entry recounting a trip to New York City to see 'Phantom of the Opera' and visit The Plaza, followed by a trip to a cabin with a group of four. The author describes meeting Jeffrey Mendelson (boyfriend of a redacted individual) and his 25-year-old brother Eric, noting they went cross-country skiing and watched the movie 'Sleuth'. The document contains significant redactions hiding other events or individuals.
DOJ-OGR-00030515.jpg
A letter from attorney Alan Dershowitz to Palm Beach Detective Joseph Recarey regarding the 'Epstein matter.' Dershowitz defends his private investigators against accusations that they impersonated police officers (specifically Recarey) while attempting to interview a witness. Dershowitz argues the impersonation is impossible because one investigator has a speech impediment, and attempts to discredit the witness (whose name is redacted) by citing her nickname 'pimp juice,' her marijuana usage/arrest, and her desire 'to be rich.'
DOJ-OGR-00030512.jpg
A letter from attorney Guy Fronstin to Assistant State Attorney Lanna Belohlavek dated February 17, 2006. Fronstin submits evidence attempting to discredit a witness/accuser (whose name is redacted) by documenting thefts at Victoria Secret and providing a receipt for a sex toy purchase to demonstrate the individual was over 18 and acting voluntarily. The letter also alleges that Detective Recarey is spreading misinformation regarding the Epstein investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00033075.jpg
This is a page from a deposition transcript (Page 87) involving attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. The text captures a contentious exchange between the lawyers regarding objections and procedure. Mr. Tein questions a witness (whose name is redacted) about whether they or their mother have spoken to or received money from reporters; the witness answers 'No' to the questions regarding themselves.
DOJ-OGR-00032853.jpg
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report details a March 30, 2005, interview with a minor female victim at the High Ridge Family Center. The victim admits that Jeffrey Epstein used a vibrator on her over her underwear while they were alone on the second floor of his property. The report also notes the victim's behavioral changes, mentions an associate named 'Haley' who worked for Epstein, and documents an attempted controlled call to an individual named Robson.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018978.jpg
This Palm Beach Police Department incident report details investigative actions regarding Jeffrey Epstein. It describes the technical enhancement of recorded calls between a victim and a redacted suspect, the correction of a subpoena for Cingular Cellular records to track calls between a suspect, a victim, and Epstein, and two 'trash pulls' conducted at Epstein's residence at 358 El Brillo in September 2005. The first trash pull yielded four bags of documentation turned over to Detective Recarey, while the second attempt found empty receptacles.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018931.jpg
This document is a newspaper clipping from the Palm Beach Post featuring a headline about Epstein's legal team stymying detectives. It includes a photo and description of Epstein's Manhattan townhouse, noting its size and security features. A sidebar titled 'Women in his life' profiles Ghislaine Maxwell and a redacted woman who admitted to police that she recruited underage girls for Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026204.jpg
This document is a printed email chain from September 2017 between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias email 'jeevacation@gmail.com') and a redacted individual acting as an intermediary for an unnamed 'boss'. The conversation discusses logistics for a potential meeting between Epstein and the 'boss' in either New York (where there is 'less pomp') or Kuwait. The thread also mentions Epstein's upcoming travel to Paris on October 6 and references a fondness for Cuba.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026198.jpg
This document is an email thread from September 2017 between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias 'jeevacation') and a redacted associate representing an unnamed 'boss' or 'old man'. The conversation coordinates potential meetings in New York and implies a future visit to Kuwait, while also referencing Epstein's affection for Cuba and upcoming travel to Paris. The redacted sender refers to Epstein as 'sheik jeffrey' and notes that Epstein has previously hosted them.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Unspecified (impl... | [Redacted Name] | $15,000.00 | Alleged payment for sexual encounter with Princ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Reporters | [Redacted Name] | $0.00 | Inquiry regarding whether the individual receiv... | View |
Media contact
Inquiry if the individual spoke to reporters (Witness answered 'No').
RE: Expert Testimony
Thanks very much – we appreciated speaking with you this afternoon.
Re: Expert testimony
You can contact Roberta Kaplan, Esq. Roberta Kaplan | Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP
RE: Expert Testimony (implied)
Yes. I would be happy to speak with you all. I have some open time on Wednesday after 2:00. Let me know what works for you. Best, Dr. Hughes
RE: Expert Testimony (implied)
Dr. Hughes, Thanks very much. We are free at 2 p.m. on Wednesday, and if that works for you we can use this conference line
RE: Expert Testimony (implied)
Great. We will speak then. I have attached my CV and standard engagement agreement for your review.
Expert Testimony (implied)
Dr. Hughes, Together with colleagues, I'm one of the federal prosecutors handling the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, which is scheduled to go to trial on July 12, 2021 in the Southern District of New York. We would be interested in speaking with you about your availability to testify as an expert witness at trial. Are you available for a call tomorrow or next week to discuss? Thanks very much.
Unknown (Inquiry in body)
The purpose of this email is to inquire as to whether or not inmate Epstein, Jeffrey #76318-054 is mentally capable of proceeding with the disciplinary process. Thanks in advance.
Re: Epstein investigation
Asks Michael Bachner to suggest times for a meeting over the next two or three days to include [REDACTED NAME].
Re: Epstein investigation
Confirms 2:00 PM meeting time.
Re: Epstein investigation
Suggests 2:00 PM for a meeting.
RE: Epstein investigation
Proposes meeting times: Tomorrow or Wednesday at 11 or 3:30, or Thursday any time after 11:30 to 4.
Re: Epstein investigation
Notifies recipient that a client was arrested for RICO and suggests meeting at 4 PM or on Wednesday due to a conflict with a 3:30 PM arraignment.
Re: Epstein investigation
Asks for updates on dates.
Re: Epstein investigation
Asks about Thursday afternoon availability.
RE: Epstein investigation
Confirms meeting for tomorrow at 3:30 PM at 1 St. Andrews, asking to provide name to security.
Re: Epstein investigation
Proposes 7/16 at around 6 PM for a reverse proffer at their office at 1 St. Andrews.
Re: Epstein investigation
States that 6 o'clock is somewhat late and mentions the client lives in [REDACTED LOCATION].
Re: Epstein investigation
States availability for reverse proffer next week (15-18), with a 2 PM meeting on 16th and 17th, suggesting 11 AM or 10:30 AM on those days.
Response
yes
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity