| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Mendelson
|
Romantic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Bachner
|
Professional correspondence meeting scheduling |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Name]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Netflix Executive Producer
|
Contact |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Dawn Hughes
|
Potential expert witness prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor defendant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Acquaintance |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Contact |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jona A. Noel
|
Significant other |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Nadia Marcinkova
|
Financial |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | [Redacted Name] gave Mr. Dershowitz a massage on the beach at Little St. James, then went with hi... | Beach at Little St. James, ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | [Redacted Name] went to Miami for the weekend, returned and told Mr. Epstein she met a man who, w... | Miami | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Epstein introduced [Redacted Name] to Mr. Dershowitz. Epstein and Dershowitz argued against h... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dinner with Mr. Epstein and Mr. Dershowitz to discuss [Redacted Name]'s case. Dershowitz said lit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual encounter involving [Redacted Name] and Mr. Epstein, followed by Mr. Dershowitz entering a... | Mr. Epstein's bedroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Several nude girls were having lunch at the pool, Mr. Dershowitz was present. [Redacted Name] sta... | Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach ho... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged sexual encounter between a 17-year-old victim and Prince Andrew. | London | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Ransome was called to Mr. Epstein's mansion. Mr. Epstein, Mr. Dershowitz, and [Redacted Name]... | Mr. Epstein's mansion | View |
| 2020-11-04 | N/A | Afternoon call/meeting between Dawn Hughes and redacted party regarding expert testimony. | N/A | View |
| 2020-11-02 | N/A | Dawn Hughes sends CV and engagement agreement. | N/A | View |
| 2020-11-02 | N/A | Correspondence about availability for a call on Wednesday after 2:00 PM. | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Proposed meeting at 3:30 PM at 1 St. Andrews. | 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, New Y... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Proposed reverse proffer meeting at 1 St. Andrew's at 6 PM. | 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, New Y... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Proposed meeting at 11 AM or 10:30 AM for a reverse proffer. | Michael Bachner's office | View |
| 2009-08-10 | N/A | Potential deposition of [Redacted Name] | Unknown | View |
| 2005-05-19 | N/A | Traffic stop involving Craig Eaton's daughter | Lake Clarke Shores | View |
This document is a log of electronic messages from May 8, 2019, between 'e:jeeitunes@gmail.com' (an address associated with Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation covers disparate topics including legal concerns mentions of 'contempt perjury' and 'pardon', geopolitical commentary on Iran and 'Shia', and scheduling a meeting in Berlin for the 11th or June. The document originates from a House Oversight Committee investigation.
This document is a digital message log from July 1, 2018, obtained by the House Oversight Committee, showing a conversation between Jeffrey Epstein (using the alias jeeitunes@gmail.com) and a redacted individual (contextually likely Steve Bannon). The two discuss 'Jared' (Kushner) and 'djt' (Donald Trump), with the redacted sender refusing to mediate with Jared to avoid validating Trump as the 'center of gravity' of their political movement. Both parties speak disparagingly of Jared Kushner, with Epstein calling him the 'idiot son in law.'
An email thread from January 9, 2015, between Jeffrey Epstein (using 'jeevacation') and an unidentified pilot/associate. They are collaborating on a drafted response to public allegations, with the recipient suggesting fewer 'personal attacks.' The conversation includes flirtatious banter, with the recipient joking about preferring the role of 'sex slave' to 'copilot.'
This document is a page from a House Oversight report (marked 010480) displaying a collage of evidentiary photographs related to Jeffrey Epstein. It includes photos of Epstein with Ghislaine Maxwell at Mar-a-Lago (1995), Epstein with Alan Dershowitz (2004), and Prince Andrew with Maxwell and a redacted minor in London. The document also features photos of redacted young women (ages 15 and 17) allegedly taken by Epstein at various locations including New York, London, and Zorro Ranch, citing affidavits from the US District Southern Court of Florida.
In this July 2011 email thread, Jeffrey Epstein urges publicist Peggy Siegal to use her connection with Arianna Huffington to discredit the woman accusing Prince Andrew of sexual abuse. Epstein claims the accuser is a 'fraud' and a 'liar' comparable to the accuser in the Dominique Strauss-Kahn case, and alleges she worked for Donald Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Siegal agrees to forward the information if Epstein corrects his grammar, while also sharing gossip about Prince Albert of Monaco.
This document is a chain of emails between Jeffrey Epstein and his legal team (Fred Haddad, Tonja Haddad Coleman) regarding a media inquiry from Sharon Churcher of The Mail on Sunday. The journalist is requesting comment on a lawsuit by Bradley Edwards, specifically regarding a witness who intends to testify that Epstein flew her to London to have sex with Prince Andrew at age 17 for $15,000. The internal responses between Epstein and his lawyers are redacted as privileged.
An email chain from October 2013 involving Darren Indyke, Fred Haddad, and Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com). The chain discusses a high-priority request for comment from 'The Mail on Sunday' regarding a lawsuit by Bradley Edwards. The journalist's email outlines allegations that Epstein flew a 17-year-old girl (name redacted) to London to have sex with Prince Andrew for $15,000.
This document is an email chain from October 2013 involving Jeffrey Epstein's legal team discussing a media inquiry from The Mail on Sunday. The journalist, Sharon Churcher, requests comment on a lawsuit by Bradley Edwards, citing specific allegations that a witness was trafficked by Epstein to have sex with Prince Andrew in London for $15,000 while underage. The inquiry also mentions allegations that Epstein flew young women to entertain President Clinton.
This document is an email chain from October 2013 in which Tonja Haddad Coleman forwards a media inquiry from Sharon Churcher (The Mail on Sunday) to Jeffrey Epstein and Darren Indyke. The inquiry requests comment on a lawsuit by Bradley Edwards and specific allegations that a witness (name redacted) was trafficked by Epstein to have sex with Prince Andrew in London for $15,000 while underage. It also mentions allegations that Epstein flew young women to entertain President Clinton.
This document is an email thread from December 5, 2017, between Jeffrey Epstein (using the email jeevacation@gmail.com) and an unidentified individual. They are attempting to coordinate a meeting in Europe; the other party proposes dinner in Geneva on December 8th before returning to Kuwait, while Epstein suggests a meeting in Paris due to flight difficulties out of Geneva at night. The document includes standard legal disclaimers associated with 'JEE' and bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.
This document is a printout of an email chain between Jacquie Johnson and paralegal Jessica Cadwell from August 2009 regarding a 'Jane Doe' case. The correspondence focuses on scheduling depositions, specifically explicitly requesting a date for the deposition of 'Mr. Epstein' and inquiring about the status of a deposition for a redacted individual. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
This is page 4 of an FBI FD-302a report dated March 20, 2008. It details an interview with a witness who worked at Jeffrey Epstein's office and had massaged him. The document describes coordination between multiple redacted women regarding visits to Epstein's house, confirming phone numbers via caller ID, and mentions that 'other girls' continued to visit Epstein's house. Significant portions of the narrative describing the events at the house are redacted.
This FBI document from 2008 details the 'series of events' occurring at Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach home, describing how girls were recruited via telephone (often through a redacted associate), entered through the kitchen, and performed massages and sexual acts for money. It highlights that crucial evidence, specifically computer CPUs, was removed from the home prior to the execution of a PBPD search warrant and never recovered. The document also references recovered telephone message pads containing explicit solicitations like 'I have a female for him.'
This document is page 4 of an FBI FD-302 interview report dated January 18, 2007. A redacted male witness describes his observations of Jeffrey Epstein's interactions with female companions, stating that Epstein appeared jealous and wanted to be the center of attention. The witness also expresses a cynical view of the females' ambitions, believing they were trying to 'make something of themselves' but were 'accomplishing nothing.'
This document is a phone call log labeled 'Plaintiff's Exhibit 26' and marked 'Confidential' and 'House Oversight', covering the period of September 3, 2005, to September 21, 2005. It details incoming and outgoing calls for a redacted individual, showing frequent communication with Jeffrey Epstein (six calls listed) and contacts with T.A. Rofano and S Rosen. The majority of the phone numbers listed utilize the 561 area code, indicating activity centered around Palm Beach, Florida.
This document outlines multiple allegations and events related to Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz. It details alleged sexual encounters involving Dershowitz at Epstein's properties, including his New York mansion and Palm Beach home, and on Little St. James. The document also mentions a legal settlement, Dershowitz's representation of an alleged victim, and repeated attempts to verify these accounts with Mr. Epstein.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Unspecified (impl... | [Redacted Name] | $15,000.00 | Alleged payment for sexual encounter with Princ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Reporters | [Redacted Name] | $0.00 | Inquiry regarding whether the individual receiv... | View |
Inquiry if the individual spoke to reporters (Witness answered 'No').
Thanks very much – we appreciated speaking with you this afternoon.
You can contact Roberta Kaplan, Esq. Roberta Kaplan | Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP
Yes. I would be happy to speak with you all. I have some open time on Wednesday after 2:00. Let me know what works for you. Best, Dr. Hughes
Dr. Hughes, Thanks very much. We are free at 2 p.m. on Wednesday, and if that works for you we can use this conference line
Great. We will speak then. I have attached my CV and standard engagement agreement for your review.
Dr. Hughes, Together with colleagues, I'm one of the federal prosecutors handling the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, which is scheduled to go to trial on July 12, 2021 in the Southern District of New York. We would be interested in speaking with you about your availability to testify as an expert witness at trial. Are you available for a call tomorrow or next week to discuss? Thanks very much.
The purpose of this email is to inquire as to whether or not inmate Epstein, Jeffrey #76318-054 is mentally capable of proceeding with the disciplinary process. Thanks in advance.
Notifies recipient that a client was arrested for RICO and suggests meeting at 4 PM or on Wednesday due to a conflict with a 3:30 PM arraignment.
Confirms meeting for tomorrow at 3:30 PM at 1 St. Andrews, asking to provide name to security.
Proposes meeting times: Tomorrow or Wednesday at 11 or 3:30, or Thursday any time after 11:30 to 4.
Asks Michael Bachner to suggest times for a meeting over the next two or three days to include [REDACTED NAME].
Asks for updates on dates.
Asks about Thursday afternoon availability.
Suggests 2:00 PM for a meeting.
Confirms 2:00 PM meeting time.
States that 6 o'clock is somewhat late and mentions the client lives in [REDACTED LOCATION].
States availability for reverse proffer next week (15-18), with a 2 PM meeting on 16th and 17th, suggesting 11 AM or 10:30 AM on those days.
Proposes 7/16 at around 6 PM for a reverse proffer at their office at 1 St. Andrews.
yes
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity