[Redacted Name]
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Mendelson
|
Romantic |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Michael Bachner
|
Professional correspondence meeting scheduling |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Name]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Netflix Executive Producer
|
Contact |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Dawn Hughes
|
Potential expert witness prosecutor |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor defendant |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Friend |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Acquaintance |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Contact |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jona A. Noel
|
Significant other |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Nadia Marcinkova
|
Financial |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | [Redacted Name] gave Mr. Dershowitz a massage on the beach at Little St. James, then went with hi... | Beach at Little St. James, ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | [Redacted Name] went to Miami for the weekend, returned and told Mr. Epstein she met a man who, w... | Miami | View |
| N/A | N/A | Mr. Epstein introduced [Redacted Name] to Mr. Dershowitz. Epstein and Dershowitz argued against h... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Dinner with Mr. Epstein and Mr. Dershowitz to discuss [Redacted Name]'s case. Dershowitz said lit... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sexual encounter involving [Redacted Name] and Mr. Epstein, followed by Mr. Dershowitz entering a... | Mr. Epstein's bedroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Several nude girls were having lunch at the pool, Mr. Dershowitz was present. [Redacted Name] sta... | Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach ho... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged sexual encounter between a 17-year-old victim and Prince Andrew. | London | View |
| N/A | N/A | Ms. Ransome was called to Mr. Epstein's mansion. Mr. Epstein, Mr. Dershowitz, and [Redacted Name]... | Mr. Epstein's mansion | View |
| 2020-11-04 | N/A | Afternoon call/meeting between Dawn Hughes and redacted party regarding expert testimony. | N/A | View |
| 2020-11-02 | N/A | Dawn Hughes sends CV and engagement agreement. | N/A | View |
| 2020-11-02 | N/A | Correspondence about availability for a call on Wednesday after 2:00 PM. | N/A | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Proposed meeting at 3:30 PM at 1 St. Andrews. | 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, New Y... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Proposed reverse proffer meeting at 1 St. Andrew's at 6 PM. | 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, New Y... | View |
| 2019-07-16 | N/A | Proposed meeting at 11 AM or 10:30 AM for a reverse proffer. | Michael Bachner's office | View |
| 2009-08-10 | N/A | Potential deposition of [Redacted Name] | Unknown | View |
| 2005-05-19 | N/A | Traffic stop involving Craig Eaton's daughter | Lake Clarke Shores | View |
EFTA00021419.pdf
This document is an email from an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York dated July 16, 2019. It details a communication with attorney Kate Cassidy of Hafetz & Necheles, who is representing a redacted individual identified as a 'pilot for Epstein.' The email notes that the pilot has been served with a subpoena and that Cassidy inquired about his status in the investigation.
EFTA00020439.pdf
This document contains an email chain from March 2021 between defense attorney David Oscar Markus and a redacted Assistant United States Attorney regarding U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Markus introduces himself as appellate counsel for Maxwell's bail appeal and requests access to specific unredacted docket entries. The government confirms its opposition to the bail motion and notes that a protective order (ECF No. 36) is already in place.
EFTA00020342.pdf
An email from the Public Affairs office of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York dated July 17, 2019. The sender discusses conferring with two redacted individuals regarding the 'Epstein Bail Statement' and agrees with their misgivings about making any public statements regarding detention at that time.
EFTA00020341.pdf
This document is an internal email thread from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York, dated July 17, 2019. It discusses the strategy for a public statement regarding Jeffrey Epstein's bail and detention. A Public Affairs officer notes that after conferring with redacted individuals who had 'misgivings,' the office agreed not to make a statement at that time.
EFTA00019575.pdf
This document contains an email exchange between Jeffrey Pop, an attorney, and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York, dated December 23-24, 2019. The correspondence concerns an ongoing SDNY investigation related to an unnamed individual's interactions with Jeffrey Epstein, with the AUSA stating that there is currently no reason to believe the individual has criminal exposure, while Pop indicates he will consult with an associate and advise on the timing of a future attorney proffer.
EFTA00019470.pdf
An email dated July 13, 2020, from a U.S. Pretrial Services Officer in the Southern District of New York regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The email attaches a bail report (filename: 6653181._Maxwell,_Ghislaine.pdf) and notes that Maxwell is scheduled for a remote appearance the following day. It includes strict confidentiality warnings citing Local Rule 57.1 and Title 18 U.S.C. § 3153(c)(1).
EFTA00019219.pdf
An email chain from May 2021 between an Assistant US Attorney for the SDNY and attorney Martin Druyan regarding the scheduling of the US v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The correspondence confirms that jury selection was scheduled for the week of November 15, 2021, with the trial set to begin on November 29, 2021. Druyan also makes a personal comment about reading of the prosecutor's 'exploits in the Times'.
EFTA00018726.pdf
An automatic email reply dated March 10, 2021, regarding an 'Epstein victim call'. The sender, an agent, informs the recipient they are out of the office and directs them to contact another agent on the case or a Supervisory Special Agent (SSA) for assistance.
EFTA00018542.pdf
An email chain involving Geoffrey Berman (USANYS) dated May 27, 2020, discussing video clips of testimony (likely Ghislaine Maxwell's deposition). The email includes a transcript excerpt where the deponent denies ever giving massages to Jeffrey Epstein, the redacted individual, or anyone else.
EFTA00018502.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 2021 between Florence Hutner (General Counsel, OCME) and an official at the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY). The correspondence concerns the FOIA release of a redacted autopsy report (presumably Jeffrey Epstein's) to 'the Times.' The emails confirm the report was attached and that a courtesy notice was provided to Mark Epstein's attorney regarding the release.
EFTA00017939.pdf
This document is an email chain dated November 19, 2019, between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) and Stephen E. Boyd of the Office of Legislative Affairs (OLA). The correspondence confirms the filing of an indictment against two correctional officers at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) for failing to perform their duties on the night of Jeffrey Epstein's suicide.
EFTA00016959.pdf
This document is an email chain from October 20, 2021, among staff at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The discussion concerns updating the 'Maxwell victim website' (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) with information regarding a court order issued by Judge Nathan for a teleconference on jury selection set for the following day. The email includes the specific text to be posted, including public dial-in numbers for the court proceeding.
EFTA00016949.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated April 23, 2021, from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team. It serves as a formal notice pursuant to Rule 16(a)(1)(G) that the Government intends to call a clinical expert witness (name redacted) to testify about the psychology of sexual abuse, grooming, delayed disclosure, and the impact of trauma on minors. The letter outlines the scope of the expert's anticipated testimony and requests reciprocal discovery regarding any experts the defense intends to call.
EFTA00016766.pdf
This document is an email chain from January 2020 between Marc Weinstein (Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP) and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The SDNY is pressing Weinstein for the status of 'prior wills' and 'photographs and videos' requested in December. Weinstein attempts to delay a call, promising updates by Thursday, while the government emphasizes the need for the prior wills specifically.
EFTA00016449.pdf
An email chain from May 21, 2020, between an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and attorney Gloria Allred. The prosecutor requests a call to ask questions specifically relating to the Jeffrey Epstein case. They schedule a call for 6:00 PM EST that same day.
EFTA00016300.pdf
This document is an email chain spanning from July 2019 to August 2020. The core content is a July 12, 2019 email from an Assistant State Attorney in the 15th Judicial Circuit (Palm Beach, FL) to an unnamed recipient, expressing interest in information regarding crimes in Palm Beach County and seeking victims willing to make statements to local law enforcement. In August 2020, this chain was revived by USANYS personnel to identify a specific female individual discussed in the context of the investigation.
EFTA00015929.pdf
This document contains an email chain ending November 19, 2019, between attorney Teri Gibbs and an unnamed government official (likely SDNY given the case number 19 Cr. 490). Gibbs is representing two clients who allege they were assaulted by Jeffrey Epstein around June 2004. Gibbs requests confirmation if her clients appear in photos seized from Epstein's home and attempts to schedule interviews for them. The government official responds that the review of the considerable volume of seized materials is ongoing and they have no information to provide yet.
EFTA00015360.pdf
This document is an email thread from April 2021 involving Audrey Strauss and other USANYS officials regarding an 'Epstein FOIA Update.' The discussion concerns a briefing and materials related to Main Justice and a FOIA response, specifically addressing whether more documents might be produced upon reconsideration based on a Court's perception. Strauss requests materials to review over the weekend.
EFTA00014635.pdf
This document is an email dated May 14, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York regarding the case 'US v. Maxwell'. The email shares a draft joint letter seeking an extension for a pretrial schedule deadline, following a discussion held the previous day.
EFTA00014564.pdf
This document contains a series of email exchanges between Michael Bachner, a lawyer, and an Assistant United States Attorney, along with other redacted individuals, concerning the scheduling of meetings and a 'reverse proffer' related to the Epstein investigation between July 11-15, 2019. The emails discuss various proposed meeting times at different locations in New York, including Bachner's office and the US Attorney's office, with some scheduling conflicts arising from a client's arraignment on a RICO charge in Queens County.
EFTA00014560.pdf
This document contains a chain of emails from July 2019 between Jeffrey Epstein's defense attorney, Marc Fernich, and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. The correspondence primarily concerns the coordination of returning personal items (cash, effects) seized from Epstein during his arrest, while the government explicitly states they are retaining his electronic devices pursuant to a search warrant. The emails also reference the submission of a government bail memorandum to Judges Pitman and Berman.
EFTA00014450.pdf
This document is an email chain from June to August 2020 between attorney Robert Glassman (Panish Shea & Boyle LLP) and a representative of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns a 'Touhy Request' for evidence related to the case 'Jane Doe v. Indyke et al.' On August 4, 2020, the USANYS representative responded with attachments explicitly named as relating to information about Jeffrey Epstein.
EFTA00014330.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 12-14, 2019, between defense attorney Reid Weingarten and Assistant U.S. Attorneys regarding the case U.S. v. Epstein. The correspondence begins with the government filing its reply in support of detention and opposing bail. Subsequent emails discuss scheduling a meeting between counsel, with Weingarten mentioning his visit to Epstein ('the client') at the jail on the evening of July 14th.
EFTA00014146.pdf
This document is a declaration by an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of Florida responding to a victim's emergency petition regarding the Epstein case. It details the timeline of the federal investigation, the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and the government's efforts (and limitations) in notifying victims. The declaration notably reveals that attorney James Eisenberg, who represented a victim, was paid by Epstein, and explains why certain victims were not included in the federal indictment list due to credibility concerns.
EFTA00014127.pdf
An email exchange from July 30, 2008, between attorney Roy Black and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (USAFLS). The AUSA requested a discussion regarding the 'Epstein matter,' to which Roy Black replied that he was out of town and asked for details on the topic.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Unspecified (impl... | [Redacted Name] | $15,000.00 | Alleged payment for sexual encounter with Princ... | View |
| N/A | Received | Reporters | [Redacted Name] | $0.00 | Inquiry regarding whether the individual receiv... | View |
Media contact
Inquiry if the individual spoke to reporters (Witness answered 'No').
RE: Expert Testimony
Thanks very much – we appreciated speaking with you this afternoon.
Re: Expert testimony
You can contact Roberta Kaplan, Esq. Roberta Kaplan | Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP
RE: Expert Testimony (implied)
Yes. I would be happy to speak with you all. I have some open time on Wednesday after 2:00. Let me know what works for you. Best, Dr. Hughes
RE: Expert Testimony (implied)
Dr. Hughes, Thanks very much. We are free at 2 p.m. on Wednesday, and if that works for you we can use this conference line
RE: Expert Testimony (implied)
Great. We will speak then. I have attached my CV and standard engagement agreement for your review.
Expert Testimony (implied)
Dr. Hughes, Together with colleagues, I'm one of the federal prosecutors handling the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, which is scheduled to go to trial on July 12, 2021 in the Southern District of New York. We would be interested in speaking with you about your availability to testify as an expert witness at trial. Are you available for a call tomorrow or next week to discuss? Thanks very much.
Unknown (Inquiry in body)
The purpose of this email is to inquire as to whether or not inmate Epstein, Jeffrey #76318-054 is mentally capable of proceeding with the disciplinary process. Thanks in advance.
Re: Epstein investigation
Notifies recipient that a client was arrested for RICO and suggests meeting at 4 PM or on Wednesday due to a conflict with a 3:30 PM arraignment.
RE: Epstein investigation
Confirms meeting for tomorrow at 3:30 PM at 1 St. Andrews, asking to provide name to security.
RE: Epstein investigation
Proposes meeting times: Tomorrow or Wednesday at 11 or 3:30, or Thursday any time after 11:30 to 4.
Re: Epstein investigation
Asks Michael Bachner to suggest times for a meeting over the next two or three days to include [REDACTED NAME].
Re: Epstein investigation
Asks for updates on dates.
Re: Epstein investigation
Asks about Thursday afternoon availability.
Re: Epstein investigation
Suggests 2:00 PM for a meeting.
Re: Epstein investigation
Confirms 2:00 PM meeting time.
Re: Epstein investigation
States that 6 o'clock is somewhat late and mentions the client lives in [REDACTED LOCATION].
Re: Epstein investigation
States availability for reverse proffer next week (15-18), with a 2 PM meeting on 16th and 17th, suggesting 11 AM or 10:30 AM on those days.
Re: Epstein investigation
Proposes 7/16 at around 6 PM for a reverse proffer at their office at 1 St. Andrews.
Response
yes
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity