Trove
Sign In Sign Up

[Redacted Name]

Person
Mentions
267
Relationships
11
Events
16
Documents
116
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
11 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Jeffrey Mendelson
Romantic
5
1
View
person Michael Bachner
Professional correspondence meeting scheduling
1
1
View
person [Redacted Name]
Business associate
1
1
View
person Netflix Executive Producer
Contact
1
1
View
person Dawn Hughes
Potential expert witness prosecutor
1
1
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Prosecutor defendant
1
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Friend
1
1
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Acquaintance
1
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Contact
1
1
View
person Jona A. Noel
Significant other
1
1
View
person Nadia Marcinkova
Financial
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A [Redacted Name] gave Mr. Dershowitz a massage on the beach at Little St. James, then went with hi... Beach at Little St. James, ... View
N/A N/A [Redacted Name] went to Miami for the weekend, returned and told Mr. Epstein she met a man who, w... Miami View
N/A N/A Mr. Epstein introduced [Redacted Name] to Mr. Dershowitz. Epstein and Dershowitz argued against h... N/A View
N/A N/A Dinner with Mr. Epstein and Mr. Dershowitz to discuss [Redacted Name]'s case. Dershowitz said lit... N/A View
N/A N/A Sexual encounter involving [Redacted Name] and Mr. Epstein, followed by Mr. Dershowitz entering a... Mr. Epstein's bedroom View
N/A N/A Several nude girls were having lunch at the pool, Mr. Dershowitz was present. [Redacted Name] sta... Mr. Epstein's Palm Beach ho... View
N/A N/A Alleged sexual encounter between a 17-year-old victim and Prince Andrew. London View
N/A N/A Ms. Ransome was called to Mr. Epstein's mansion. Mr. Epstein, Mr. Dershowitz, and [Redacted Name]... Mr. Epstein's mansion View
2020-11-04 N/A Afternoon call/meeting between Dawn Hughes and redacted party regarding expert testimony. N/A View
2020-11-02 N/A Dawn Hughes sends CV and engagement agreement. N/A View
2020-11-02 N/A Correspondence about availability for a call on Wednesday after 2:00 PM. N/A View
2019-07-16 N/A Proposed meeting at 3:30 PM at 1 St. Andrews. 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, New Y... View
2019-07-16 N/A Proposed reverse proffer meeting at 1 St. Andrew's at 6 PM. 1 St. Andrew's Plaza, New Y... View
2019-07-16 N/A Proposed meeting at 11 AM or 10:30 AM for a reverse proffer. Michael Bachner's office View
2009-08-10 N/A Potential deposition of [Redacted Name] Unknown View
2005-05-19 N/A Traffic stop involving Craig Eaton's daughter Lake Clarke Shores View

EFTA00032720.pdf

An email chain from October 22, 2021, involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). Jacklyn Thrapp, a reporter for the National Enquirer, emailed the office asking for confirmation on a rumor that a specific (redacted) individual would not be called to the stand during the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Internal staff forwarded the email, and one individual confirmed they would handle the response.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00031984.pdf

This is a legal declaration filed in the SDNY case Jane Doe v. Darren Indyke. A pilot who worked for Epstein starting in 1991 provides testimony regarding his flight logs from 1994-1997. The pilot confirms two specific flights (Nov 11, 1996, and May 9, 1997) involving a specific female passenger (name redacted) traveling between West Palm Beach, Teterboro, and Santa Fe, noting that he used generic descriptions like 'Baby' or 'Nanny' when names were unknown.

Legal declaration (court filing)
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030893.pdf

This document is an email from attorney Jack Scarola dated February 13, 2021, regarding evidence in the Epstein case. Scarola attaches a photo of a victim taken around the time of her abuse and notes her recollection that critical topless photos were also taken. The document includes a standard legal disclaimer from the law firm Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030692.pdf

This document is a chain of emails between the U.S. Department of Justice (SDNY) and Gary Bloxsome of Blackfords LLP in early January 2020. The DOJ formally requests a voluntary law enforcement interview with Bloxsome's client, HRH The Duke of York (Prince Andrew), regarding his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence confirms Blackfords' representation of the Duke and arranges a preliminary telephone discussion for January 10, 2020.

Email correspondence / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030529.pdf

This document is an email chain from late October and early November 2020 concerning the potential expert testimony of Dawn Hughes, a Clinical and Forensic Psychologist, for the federal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Federal prosecutors contacted Dr. Hughes to inquire about her availability to testify, leading to discussions about scheduling and the exchange of her CV and engagement agreement. Roberta Kaplan, Esq. is also mentioned as a contact.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030504.pdf

An email chain between USANYS officials dated June 26, 2020, discussing the legal strategy for the Ghislaine Maxwell indictment. The prosecutors debate whether the current language is sufficient to prove the 'interstate travel component' of the charges and whether to include a specific (redacted) name in the indictment.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029619.pdf

This document is an internal DOJ email chain from July 2, 2021, discussing the imminent release of Epstein-related materials to the New York Times via FOIA. The correspondence involves the SDNY U.S. Attorney's Office, Main Justice, and the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) coordinating media strategy and agreeing that SDNY will handle press inquiries. There is specific mention of interest from the Attorney General's Office regarding the release.

Email correspondence / internal doj communications
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00029310.pdf

This document is an email dated September 12, 2019, likely between staff members of a prosecutor's office (implied by the phrase 'before we charged'). The sender discusses a friend who is an executive producer for an upcoming 4-part Netflix series about Jeffrey Epstein. The producer is seeking an interview with someone from the office. The sender anticipates the request will be denied but wants to inform the recipient and 'chiefs' about the upcoming series.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00028285.pdf

This document is an email chain from March 2020 between the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) and the District of the Virgin Islands (USVI). The USVI office informs SDNY that they are opening an investigation into the Jeffrey Epstein Estate and Southern Country International Bank in conjunction with the FBI and IRS-CI. The chain concludes with SDNY US Attorney Geoffrey Berman expressing annoyance at receiving a direct email from a 'line assistant' at USVI regarding coordination, prompting an internal SDNY discussion to resolve the communication channel.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00028284.pdf

An email chain between officials at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (including Geoffrey Berman) dated August 27, 2019. An Assistant US Attorney reports on a court hearing that day where Epstein's victims were allowed to speak, noting positive feedback from NGOs and a powerful atmosphere in the courtroom. A superior replies, confirming that victims repeatedly thanked the Epstein prosecution team.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00027926.pdf

This document is an email chain from February 2019 involving Geoffrey Berman, the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York. The Chief of the Public Corruption Unit proposed providing detailed briefing memos on several subjects, explicitly including 'Epstein'. In response, Geoffrey Berman replied with the instruction, 'You can leave off Epstein,' removing him from the briefing agenda.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00026794.pdf

This document is an email chain from February 2020 between Jill Greenfield, a partner at the UK law firm Fieldfisher, and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. They are negotiating the terms for an interview with Greenfield's client, a former employee of Ghislaine Maxwell and potential victim of Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence covers logistics, the client's request for anonymity, the presence of a US lawyer friend, and the U.S. government's assurance that the client is considered a witness/victim rather than a suspect. The U.S. Attorney explains the FBI interview process (Form 302) and offers to travel to London for the meeting.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00025501.pdf

This document is an email thread between Sigrid McCawley (Boies Schiller Flexner) and an Assistant US Attorney from the SDNY regarding a witness in the Epstein investigation. The correspondence, spanning January to May 2020, coordinates the handover of 1995-1996 journal entries and photographs, and schedules a second interview with the witness. The prosecution explicitly states they have 'no doubts whatsoever' about the witness's candor and truthfulness.

Email correspondence / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00025342.pdf

This document is an email chain from October 2019 involving Alex Conlon of Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP and the FBI Victim Services Division. The correspondence concerns the coordination of two briefings for victims of Jeffrey Epstein, scheduled for October 15 in Miramar, FL, and October 23 in New York, NY. The FBI requests security information (including SSNs) for attorneys accompanying victims to these federal buildings.

Email thread
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00025037.pdf

This document is an email chain from October 2021 between the defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell (Christian Everdell, Bobbi Sternheim, etc.) and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). The correspondence concerns the scheduling and procedure for filing a 'request to charge' (jury instructions) with Judge Nathan. The parties discuss extensions, the possibility of filing separate requests rather than a joint one, and agree to a schedule where the Government files first, followed by the Defense's redline or separate filing in early November.

Email chain / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00024716.pdf

An internal email dated February 26, 2019, between USANYS personnel (including a contractor) attempting to schedule a 30-minute 'brass meet' (meeting with high-ranking officials) regarding Epstein for that same day. The requestor's name is redacted.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00024529.pdf

This document is an email chain from March 20, 2020, between attorney Robert Glassman and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York. They are verifying the timeline of a victim's 'first trip to New York' by cross-referencing her memory of seeing 'The Lion King' with flight records. The AUSA notes a discrepancy between the musical's 1997 release and the movie's 1994 release, which conflicts with the believed date of the first trip. Glassman clarifies that the victim specifically remembers a Broadway play where Epstein bragged about getting tickets from a famous friend. Glassman also makes a disparaging remark about Ghislaine Maxwell suing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Email correspondence / legal communication
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00024512.pdf

This document contains an email thread from December 2019 between the United States Attorney's Office (implied) and legal counsel for the Jeffrey Epstein Estate (Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP). The estate's counsel requests search warrant inventories for Epstein's New York and New Mexico properties and proposes a meeting to discuss the government's potential forfeiture claims. The government response notes that the criminal case is 'now-defunct,' directs them to discovery previously provided to defense counsel (referencing specific Bates numbers), and clarifies that the government had not searched the New Mexico property.

Email correspondence / legal communication
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00023936.pdf

This document is an email chain dated November 5, 2019, with the subject line 'Epstein'. The correspondents discuss a meeting scheduled for the following day. One participant notes that a previous email was accidentally sent to a '[Redacted]s doppelganger at BOP' (Bureau of Prisons), to which the recipient responds, 'How bizarre.'

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00023783.pdf

This document is a chain of emails between Gary Bloxsome (counsel for Prince Andrew/Duke of York) and an Assistant U.S. Attorney from the Southern District of New York in July 2020. The correspondence concerns negotiations for Prince Andrew to provide a voluntary interview to US authorities regarding the Epstein investigation. The US side threatens a compelled interview via MLAT if no voluntary date is set, while the UK side complains about leaks, 'media circus', and seeks strict confidentiality assurances before agreeing to an interview.

Email correspondence / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00023418.pdf

This document is an email chain from November 23, 2021, discussing updates on Epstein-related FOIA requests. The Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is receiving many new requests following a 'Times' article about Epstein's incarceration and death and plans to release records quickly. A FOIA specialist at BOP has been trying to contact Mark Epstein for about a month regarding his communications, but he has not responded, and the sender is seeking alternative contact information for him.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00023410.pdf

This document contains an email chain from February 26, 2020, among US Department of Justice (SDNY) officials discussing a press inquiry. The inquiry concerns Barclays CEO Jes Staley's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and investigations by UK regulators (FCA and Prudential Regulation Authority). The journalist asks specifically if SDNY's investigation into Epstein's enterprise is continuing and if SDNY is collaborating with UK authorities on the Staley matter.

Email thread
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00023128.pdf

This document contains an email chain between attorney John H. Reynolds and an Assistant US Attorney for the Southern District of New York regarding the SDNY investigation into Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence, dating from July to September 2020, confirms that Reynolds represents a client (name redacted) who is cooperating with the investigation and is expected to be called as a witness at the Maxwell trial. The emails also involve scheduling calls and sharing a NY Post article relevant to the case.

Email correspondence / legal correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00023032.pdf

An email exchange dated May 4, 2021, between an Assistant United States Attorney from the Southern District of New York and Martin Druyan (of Druyan law). The AUSA informs Druyan that the trial date for 'US v. Ghislaine Maxwell' has been adjourned to the fall of 2021. Druyan replies acknowledging the update and comments on reading about the AUSA's 'exploits in the Times'.

Email correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00021745.pdf

This document is an email chain from August 2019 regarding the case 'U.S. v. Epstein'. Michael Miller of Steptoe & Johnson LLP sent a letter to the Southern District of New York (SDNY), and an Assistant United States Attorney (name redacted) acknowledged receipt. The correspondence involves several other copied individuals, likely members of the legal defense team.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source
Total Received
$15,000.00
2 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$15,000.00
2 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Unspecified (impl... [Redacted Name] $15,000.00 Alleged payment for sexual encounter with Princ... View
N/A Received Reporters [Redacted Name] $0.00 Inquiry regarding whether the individual receiv... View
As Sender
10
As Recipient
10
Total
20

Media contact

From: [Redacted Name]
To: Reporters

Inquiry if the individual spoke to reporters (Witness answered 'No').

Interview/conversation
N/A
Communication Source

RE: Expert Testimony

From: [Redacted Name]
To: Dawn Hughes

Thanks very much – we appreciated speaking with you this afternoon.

Email
2020-11-04
Communication Source

Re: Expert testimony

From: Dawn Hughes
To: [Redacted Name]

You can contact Roberta Kaplan, Esq. Roberta Kaplan | Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP

Email
2020-11-04
Communication Source

RE: Expert Testimony (implied)

From: Dawn Hughes
To: [Redacted Name]

Yes. I would be happy to speak with you all. I have some open time on Wednesday after 2:00. Let me know what works for you. Best, Dr. Hughes

Email
2020-11-02
Communication Source

RE: Expert Testimony (implied)

From: [Redacted Name]
To: Dawn Hughes

Dr. Hughes, Thanks very much. We are free at 2 p.m. on Wednesday, and if that works for you we can use this conference line

Email
2020-11-02
Communication Source

RE: Expert Testimony (implied)

From: Dawn Hughes
To: [Redacted Name]

Great. We will speak then. I have attached my CV and standard engagement agreement for your review.

Email
2020-11-02
Communication Source

Expert Testimony (implied)

From: [Redacted Name]
To: Dawn Hughes

Dr. Hughes, Together with colleagues, I'm one of the federal prosecutors handling the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, which is scheduled to go to trial on July 12, 2021 in the Southern District of New York. We would be interested in speaking with you about your availability to testify as an expert witness at trial. Are you available for a call tomorrow or next week to discuss? Thanks very much.

Email
2020-10-29
Communication Source

Unknown (Inquiry in body)

From: [Redacted Name]
To: Chief Psychologist [Re...

The purpose of this email is to inquire as to whether or not inmate Epstein, Jeffrey #76318-054 is mentally capable of proceeding with the disciplinary process. Thanks in advance.

Email
2019-07-23
Communication Source

Re: Epstein investigation

From: Michael Bachner
To: [Redacted Name]

Notifies recipient that a client was arrested for RICO and suggests meeting at 4 PM or on Wednesday due to a conflict with a 3:30 PM arraignment.

Email
2019-07-15
Communication Source

RE: Epstein investigation

From: [Redacted Name]
To: Michael Bachner

Confirms meeting for tomorrow at 3:30 PM at 1 St. Andrews, asking to provide name to security.

Email
2019-07-15
Communication Source

RE: Epstein investigation

From: Michael Bachner
To: [Redacted Name]

Proposes meeting times: Tomorrow or Wednesday at 11 or 3:30, or Thursday any time after 11:30 to 4.

Email
2019-07-15
Communication Source

Re: Epstein investigation

From: [Redacted Name]
To: Michael Bachner

Asks Michael Bachner to suggest times for a meeting over the next two or three days to include [REDACTED NAME].

Email
2019-07-15
Communication Source

Re: Epstein investigation

From: Michael Bachner
To: [Redacted Name]

Asks for updates on dates.

Email
2019-07-15
Communication Source

Re: Epstein investigation

From: [Redacted Name]
To: Michael Bachner

Asks about Thursday afternoon availability.

Email
2019-07-15
Communication Source

Re: Epstein investigation

From: Michael Bachner
To: [Redacted Name]

Suggests 2:00 PM for a meeting.

Email
2019-07-15
Communication Source

Re: Epstein investigation

From: [Redacted Name]
To: Michael Bachner

Confirms 2:00 PM meeting time.

Email
2019-07-15
Communication Source

Re: Epstein investigation

From: Michael Bachner
To: [Redacted Name]

States that 6 o'clock is somewhat late and mentions the client lives in [REDACTED LOCATION].

Email
2019-07-11
Communication Source

Re: Epstein investigation

From: Michael Bachner
To: [Redacted Name]

States availability for reverse proffer next week (15-18), with a 2 PM meeting on 16th and 17th, suggesting 11 AM or 10:30 AM on those days.

Email
2019-07-11
Communication Source

Re: Epstein investigation

From: [Redacted Name]
To: Michael Bachner

Proposes 7/16 at around 6 PM for a reverse proffer at their office at 1 St. Andrews.

Email
2019-07-11
Communication Source

Response

From: Chief Psychologist [Re...
To: [Redacted Name]

yes

Email reply
-2019-07-23
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search