witness
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
AJ Discala
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Client |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Investigator
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Acquaintance |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Ex-boyfriend
|
Romantic |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI special agent
|
Investigator witness |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Subordinate superior |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffery Epstein
|
Communication |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Recipient
|
Coordination |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Berger
|
Employee |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Tatiana
|
Acquaintance |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GM
|
Victim abuser |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (Boyfriend)
|
Abusive relationship |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Contact |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JE
|
Victim abuser |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Vladmir Yudashkin
|
Abusive |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffery Epstein
|
Abuser victim |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Mr. Jenne
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted] (Canadian Woman)
|
Friend |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
CAROLYN
|
Likely same person |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Legal deposition/testimony | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony regarding sexual abuse | New Mexico | View |
| N/A | N/A | Grand Jury Testimony | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Symposium on cleaning homes. | Santa Fe, New Mexico | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | SDNY | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness brought to Epstein by traffickers | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness raped by Jeffery Epstein | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness trafficked to other men by Epstein | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Encounter on plane | Airplane | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial/GJ Prep Meeting | SDNY (at 1 p.m.) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness met Ghislaine Maxwell about 10 times at Epstein's house. | Epstein Palm Beach residence | View |
| N/A | N/A | Alleged travel by witness with Epstein and Maxwell at age 14/15. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Car ride | Car | View |
| N/A | N/A | Events at Mr. Epstein's house | Mr. Epstein's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Massage | The House (upstairs room wi... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Missing person incident | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Baseball game | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Current testimony/deposition taking place in Florida. | Florida | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness provided massages to JE; JE showered/steamed and invited witness to join | JE's residence (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition testimony regarding procedural rules for answering questions. | Legal setting | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness taken to underground location, kept in stall, judged by Epstein and other men, and raped ... | Underground location (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Deposition/Interview recording | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Violent outburst where Zack punched a wall next to the witness's face. | Unspecified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness visited Jeff's house with Haley. | Jeff's house | View |
| N/A | N/A | Meeting with Investors | Unknown | View |
DOJ-OGR-00009422.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness by Mr. Schoeman. The testimony details a conversation between the witness and Ms. Trzaskoma while walking across Foley Square, concerning Juror No. 1 (Ms. Conrad). They discussed a disbarred lawyer with the same name as the juror but concluded it was a different person because the juror's educational background did not include law school.
DOJ-OGR-00009341.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on February 24, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness by an attorney named Brune. The witness recounts a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein while heading to 52 Duane, where they speculated that 'Juror No. 1' might be a suspended lawyer, referencing a personal injury suit in the Bronx and legal concepts like vicarious liability.
DOJ-OGR-00004730.jpg
This legal document, filed on May 25, 2021, details the discovery provided by the Government to the defense in a case involving Epstein and Minor Victim-4. The evidence includes seized message pads, phone records, Federal Express shipment records, and flight records related to Epstein, his employees, and Minor Victim-4, all pertaining to charges in Counts Five and Six. The document indicates that further details about abuse and interactions will come from witness testimony, focusing on approximate timeframes due to the events occurring over a decade ago.
DOJ-OGR-00033064.jpg
This document is page 76 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates. Mr. Tein questions a witness regarding a car ride with an individual named Hayley and another unidentified person described as 'dark like a Spanish girl.' The witness denies knowing a specific redacted individual (alleged to be a good friend) and denies lying to the police. The witness acknowledges speaking about the case with their twin sister (name redacted) but claims the sister does not have an email address.
DOJ-OGR-00014588.jpg
This document is a page from a jury charge in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. A judge is instructing the jury on how to properly interpret courtroom proceedings, specifically warning them not to draw inferences from lawyers' objections, the judge's rulings, or sidebar discussions. The judge emphasizes that the jury's own recollection of the facts is what governs their decision-making and that they are the sole determiners of fact.
DOJ-OGR-00005561.jpg
This legal document, filed on October 29, 2021, argues that the defense in a federal criminal case is improperly relying on civil case law regarding pseudonyms for plaintiffs. It asserts that the current case involves crime victims, who are entitled to statutory protections under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, unlike civil plaintiffs who are generally required to identify themselves. The document criticizes the defense for ignoring relevant precedent from high-profile sex abuse trials and for citing irrelevant civil cases.
DOJ-OGR-00033034.jpg
This is page 46 of a deposition transcript involving an unnamed witness, questioned by Mr. Tein and defended by Mr. Leopold. The witness confirms that attorney Jeffrey Herman was the lawyer who first sued Jeffrey Epstein on their behalf. The questioning turns to whether Herman advanced the witness's family any money, at which point Mr. Leopold objects on the grounds of attorney-client privilege.
DOJ-OGR-00033018.jpg
This document is a transcript from a 2017 deposition where an unidentified witness is questioned about their interactions with Jeffrey Epstein. The witness confirms they had contact with Epstein but denies any prior communication via email, text, or chat before meeting him. The witness states they visited Epstein's house only once, approximately three years prior, and never told him they were under 18.
DOJ-OGR-00033013.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an unidentified witness is being questioned about potential grooming or recruitment for sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein. The questioning focuses on whether individuals named Hayley, Zack Bryan, or Anthony Figueroa, or anyone else, communicated via phone or internet to persuade the witness to engage in sexual acts before they arrived at Epstein's house. The witness denies any such communications occurred and states they do not know who Anthony Figueroa is.
DOJ-OGR-00005116.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically an excerpt from a subpoena form (AO 89B) filed in a criminal case. It outlines sections of the Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17, detailing the legal requirements for producing documents, serving subpoenas, the geographic scope of service, and the consequences of non-compliance, such as being held in contempt of court. The rules also provide protections for victims when their personal information is sought.
DOJ-OGR-00033105.jpg
This document is a page from a deposition transcript marked 'Page 117' and 'Page 2792'. It captures a heated exchange between attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold regarding procedural rules and objections. Mr. Tein aggressively questions a witness, asserting that the witness's parents, who filed a police report, are 'liars,' prompting Mr. Leopold to instruct the witness not to answer and to state for the record that the question was inappropriate and misleading.
DOJ-OGR-00008783.jpg
This document is page 77 of 83 from a court filing dated December 19, 2021, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It outlines Jury Instruction No. 57, explaining 'Stipulations,' instructing the jury that they must accept agreed-upon facts as true and accept that stipulated witnesses would have given specific testimony, though the weight of that testimony remains for the jury to decide.
DOJ-OGR-00008715.jpg
This document is a jury instruction, designated as Instruction No. 4, from a legal case filed on December 19, 2021. The judge directs the jury to base their verdict solely on their own recollection of the evidence, not on the arguments of the lawyers for the Government or the Defendant. It clarifies that statements from counsel, the judge's comments, legal objections, and side-bar conferences are not evidence and should not influence their determination of the facts.
DOJ-OGR-00008687.jpg
This document is a jury instruction, specifically Instruction No. 47, from legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on December 18, 2021. It directs the jury on how to consider expert testimony, stating that while experts can offer opinions, the jury must independently weigh their credibility and evidence using their own judgment. The instruction emphasizes that the final determination of facts rests exclusively with the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00008685.jpg
This document is page 147 of 167 from a court filing (Document 563) dated December 18, 2021, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains Jury Instruction No. 45 regarding the credibility of witnesses and impeachment by prior inconsistent statements, instructing jurors on how to weigh testimony when a witness contradicts previous statements.
DOJ-OGR-00017458.jpg
This is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between the judge, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Comey. They agree on a method for presenting exhibits to the jury using paper copies to protect the anonymity of witnesses who may testify under pseudonyms. The exhibits in question are to be offered under seal by the defense.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017516.jpg
This document is a deposition transcript (pages 102-105) where a witness, likely Scott Rothstein, admits to using the 'Epstein case' as a 'fake product' to drive his Ponzi scheme. He testifies that he sold 'purportedly confidential settlements' to investors and needed to create fictions around the Epstein case to secure an influx of money. The witness confirms consulting with his co-conspirator, Russell Adler, to gain enough knowledge about the Epstein case to successfully pitch it to investors.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017503.jpg
This document contains pages 50-53 of a deposition transcript, likely of Scott Rothstein (implied by RRA and Ponzi scheme references). The witness is questioned by Ms. Haddad about his interactions with investors (Discala/Clockwork Group) in 2009 and his use of the Epstein case files to legitimize a Ponzi scheme. The witness admits to stealing money from investors and mentions specific lawyers involved in the Epstein case at the RRA firm, including Brad Edwards and Russ Adler, and notes looking at a flight manifest at Adler's direction.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017495.jpg
This is a condensed deposition transcript (pages 18-21) involving an unnamed senior lawyer/partner testifying about the hiring of an attorney named Brad. The witness discusses their prior knowledge of the 'Epstein case,' describing Jeffrey Epstein as a 'billionaire' and an 'extremely collectible pedophile' representing significant financial value. The witness confirms discussing the case with Russ Adler, and possibly Farmer and Jaffe, before hiring Brad, but denies hiring Brad solely for the Epstein case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021946.jpg
This page is a transcript of a deposition (marked Rough Draft) from a House Oversight investigation. Mr. Simpson questions a witness about a civil complaint styled 'Jane Doe 102 versus Epstein,' confirming that Jane Doe 102 is Virginia Roberts. The questioning focuses on whether the witness asked Virginia Roberts' lawyer, Bob Josefsburg, if the term 'academicians' in said complaint included Alan Dershowitz. Attorney Ms. McCawley asserts privilege regarding communications between Virginia Roberts and her counsel.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021934.jpg
This document is page 111 of a rough draft deposition transcript, likely from a House Oversight investigation. The witness testifies about unsuccessful attempts to depose an individual (implied to be Alan Dershowitz) in 2009, 2011, and 2013. The witness characterizes Dershowitz and 'Epstein's organization' as having a pattern of evading information requests and using stall tactics, specifically citing an incident involving the Palm Beach Police Department.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021893.jpg
This document is a page from a rough draft legal transcript (page 70) marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. It records a contentious exchange between attorneys Mr. Scarola and Mr. Simpson regarding the conduct of Alan Dershowitz. Scarola complains that Dershowitz has been repeatedly 'jumping up' during testimony over the last two days, while Simpson attempts to downplay the disruptions, stating he only saw Dershowitz approach him once.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021868.jpg
This document is page 45 of a rough draft deposition transcript bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. Attorney Mr. Simpson asks a witness if, as of December 30, 2014, anyone (other than Virginia Roberts) had told them that Alan Dershowitz abused minors. Attorney Mr. Scarola objects and instructs the witness not to answer, citing attorney-client and work product privileges.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021862.jpg
This document is page 39 of a rough draft deposition transcript marked with a House Oversight Bates stamp. Attorney Mr. Simpson questions a witness regarding the existence of a written 'common interest agreement' as of December 30, 2014. The witness confirms a written agreement exists and states that the parties involved include Virginia Roberts and her attorneys.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021860.jpg
This document is page 37 of a rough draft deposition transcript stamped by House Oversight. The witness is being questioned by Mr. Simpson regarding which attorneys they held a 'common interest privilege' with as of December 30, 2014. The witness identifies Brad Edwards, attorneys from Boies Schiller (representing Virginia Roberts), and Mr. Scarola (representing Brad Edwards).
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Jeffrey Epstein/S... | witness | $1,000.00 | Petty cash given, required to type up report to... | View |
| N/A | Received | He (subject) | witness | $0.00 | Cash payment given immediately after the massag... | View |
| N/A | Paid | witness | Marshall's | $0.00 | Witness denies spending money at Marshall's, th... | View |
| N/A | Received | Henri Bendel | witness | $0.00 | Offer of a full-time position shortly after mee... | View |
| N/A | Received | Unknown | witness | $0.00 | Offer of money to refuse cooperation with polic... | View |
| N/A | Received | JE | witness | $300.00 | Received approximately $300 the first time she ... | View |
| N/A | Received | JE | witness | $0.00 | Money for sex with the 'fat bald man' at JE's h... | View |
| N/A | Received | Former associate ... | witness | $0.00 | Woman offered compensation if she didn't cooper... | View |
| 2021-08-19 | Paid | witness | Hotel/Food Service | $0.00 | Discussion regarding reimbursement for room ser... | View |
| 2005-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | witness | $300.00 | Extra payment for sexual acts ('extra 300.00').... | View |
| 2005-01-01 | Received | Private Investiga... | witness | $0.00 | Investigator asked if witness wanted money; wit... | View |
| 2005-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | witness | $200.00 | Initial offer for 45 minute massage | View |
| 2002-01-01 | Paid | witness | Recruiter [Redacted] | $100.00 | Shared referral fee for bringing her in | View |
| 2002-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | witness | $200.00 | Payment for first two massage sessions | View |
| 2002-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | witness | $300.00 | Payment for subsequent massage sessions | View |
| 2001-01-01 | Received | GM/JE | witness | $200.00 | Hourly rate for 'secretary work' and massages. ... | View |
| 2001-01-01 | Received | GM | witness | $0.00 | Cash for movie tickets at City Place Theater. | View |
Abuse Claim
Claimed that Epstein holding her hand constituted sexual abuse.
College Applications
Discussion across a desk regarding witness's college applications.
Interview regarding the case
An interview given by the witness where sexual abuse was discussed.
Debrief
Haley asked 'how did it go, what did you do' and the witness explained the massage.
Current situation
Witness informed boss about what was going on; boss offered help.
Deposition Preparation
Preparation for the deposition testimony.
Trip Logistics
Negotiation over hotel room size ('sweet' vs regular) and room service payments.
Juror experience and sexual abuse history
Witness spoke publicly about their experience as a juror and their history of sexual abuse.
Social media posts
Friends commented on posts or texted the witness, apparently unaware the trial was happening.
Epstein case
Discussion regarding the Epstein case and likely the hiring of Brad.
Ongoing investigation
A witness stated she had several telephone conversations with Epstein's assistants regarding the ongoing investigation.
Unknown prior statement
The transcript discusses a prior statement a witness made to an FBI agent, which the witness now claims not to recall.
Jane's interactions with Jeffrey Epstein.
Jane told the witness that the presence of a woman at Jeffrey Epstein's house made her feel more comfortable. This conversation occurred around 2009.
Fifth Amendment Invocation
A witness wrote to the Court stating they planned to invoke their Fifth Amendment rights.
Unknown
Mr. Simpson asks if the witness refuses to answer questions about communications with Miss Roberts.
Visit to house
Two ladies and two guys visited the witness's house.
Legal representation
Conversations regarding potential financial advances (subject to privilege objection).
Investment in settlements
Witness showed investors legitimate Epstein case files to prove the case existed, then left the room to let them look at privileged info.
Sexual activity with Epstein
Question asks if Hayley said anything on the phone about sexual activity; Witness answers 'No'
Sexual activity with Epstein
Question asks if Hayley sent a message over the internet about sexual activity; Witness answers 'No'
Inducement to engage in sexual activity
Question asks if anyone called or emailed to induce sexual activity; Witness answers 'No'
Cooperation
Jenne told witness someone in the office was acting as a confidential informant.
Flight Manifest
Adler told witness about the flight manifest.
Jury Questionnaire
Witness filled out a questionnaire where they allegedly failed to disclose a history of sexual abuse.
Juror experience
Witness gave an interview ('press interviews') about their experience.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity