Department of Justice (DOJ)
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Congress
|
Advisory lobbying |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Interagency collaboration |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Interagency collaboration |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency disagreement and deference |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Advisory legislative commentary |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Government
|
Advisory policy recommendation |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Inter agency jurisdictional dispute collaboration |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency policy disagreement and cooperation |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Adversarial collaborative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Hierarchical |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Adversarial collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency coordination and jurisdictional negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Human Trafficking Task Forces
|
Funder and trainer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Proposed legislation (Mann Act expansion, Sections 222, 223)
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of State
|
Inter agency disagreement |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Non-government organizations (NGOs)
|
Potential conflict of interest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
HHS and DHS
|
Collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI, DOL, DHS
|
Inter agency collaboration jurisdiction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
DHS/FBI/DOL
|
Inter agency coordination |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration jurisdiction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
US States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
National Advocacy Center, National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Human Trafficking Task Forces
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing confli... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ recommends adding 'endeavor to' after 'shall' in subsection (c)(3)(A)(ii) to avoid creati... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and response to proposed legislative changes in Sections 202 and 203 of a bill relat... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and recommendations on proposed legislative changes in Secti... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes extending continued presence for trafficking victims for the duration of a civil ... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 202(a) that would legislate the existence of the 'Trafficking... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the 120-day deadline in Section 202(f) as unreasonable. | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 203 that would remove the Attorney General's role in determin... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws concerning minor victims are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on human trafficking, including discussion on using various criminal statutes. | National Advocacy Center an... | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on using various criminal statutes in human trafficking cases. | Annual conferences, the Nat... | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ expresses opposition to expanding the Mann Act to federalize criminal prosecution of pand... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes a proposed subsection (g) that would expand sex tourism offenses to include illic... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ states its belief that the addition of 18 U.S.C. § 2423A is unnecessary. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the expansion of jurisdiction over offenses involving non-Americans committed out... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ criticizes Section 223, which relates to 'pimping' an alien, for removing a requirement f... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis of and opposition to proposed legislative changes in Sections 205, 211, and 213 of a... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and statement of opposition/deference regarding proposed leg... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00020621.jpg
This document is a table of contents page (Page ii) from a court filing appendix related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 22-1426), dated February 28, 2023. It lists legal orders, memoranda, and exhibits related to the post-trial controversy surrounding 'Juror 50,' including media articles published in January 2022 and a hearing transcript from March 2022. The document tracks the judicial process overseen by Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the motion for a new trial based on juror disclosures.
DOJ-OGR-00020590.jpg
This document is the second page of a court notice regarding Case 22-1426 (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell appeal based on the date and case number format). It notifies the filing party of a defect in a previous submission and sets a strict deadline of July 19, 2022, to correct the error to avoid the document being stricken or the appeal dismissed.
DOJ-OGR-00020586.jpg
This document is a separator page or cover sheet designated as 'EXHIBIT A' for a legal filing related to Case 22-1426. It contains no substantive content other than the case header, the exhibit title, and a Department of Justice Bates stamp number.
DOJ-OGR-00020511.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from March 2021 detailing proceedings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. Key events include the denial of Maxwell's third motion for bail on March 22, 2021, and various orders regarding the redaction and sealing of documents, specifically referencing Exhibit 11 and transcripts from the civil case 'Giuffre v. Maxwell'. The docket also records a subpoena request directed at a law firm representing alleged victims, with the court requiring notice be given to those victims.
DOJ-OGR-00020484.jpg
This document is Page 7 of 8 of a Judgment in a Criminal Case filed on June 29, 2022, against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case S2 20 CR 330). It details Criminal Monetary Penalties, ordering Maxwell to pay a fine of $750,000.00 and an assessment of $300.00. No restitution was ordered on this specific sheet.
DOJ-OGR-00020407.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between January 25, 2021, and February 2, 2021. It details the defense filing twelve pre-trial motions, including requests for separate trials, dismissal of counts due to multiplicity and lack of specificity, and dismissal based on Sixth Amendment violations. The document also records a dispute involving the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and MDC Brooklyn regarding laptop access for the defendant, resulting in the Judge denying the BOP's request to vacate a previous order.
DOJ-OGR-00020400.jpg
This document is a court docket sheet from late 2020 detailing procedural filings in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It logs correspondence between the Prosecution (USA) and Defense regarding discovery deadlines, disclosure delays, and investigative files, presided over by Judge Alison J. Nathan. Key events include the dismissal of an appeal by the USCA and the extension of discovery and motion deadlines into early 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00020386.jpg
This document is the second page of a procedural instruction sheet from a US Court of Appeals (likely the Second Circuit) dated July 8, 2022. It outlines requirements for attorneys and pro se parties to update contact information via PACER or letter, explains rules for case captions under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP), and provides instructions for appellate designations.
DOJ-OGR-00019043.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony confirms that Sarah Kellen became Jeffrey Epstein's primary assistant in late 2001. It details her responsibilities, which included coordinating flight schedules with Larry Visoski and arranging luggage transfers to and from various residences.
DOJ-OGR-00019018.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers, presumably a pilot. The testimony confirms flight details from May 2001, specifically noting that Jeffrey Epstein and Virginia Roberts flew alone from San Antonio to Palm Beach on May 5th, and that Epstein, Roberts, and Ghislaine Maxwell flew together from St. Thomas to Teterboro on May 14th.
DOJ-OGR-00018979.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Prosecutor Ms. Comey is conducting a direct examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers. They are discussing Government Exhibit 662, which is identified as a logbook, and Ms. Comey asks the witness to explain the columns in the logbook, starting with the date.
DOJ-OGR-00018935.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding the admissibility of a 'spiral bound book' of message slips during the direct examination of a witness named Hesse. Pagliuca objects under Federal Rules of Evidence 801 and 803.6, arguing the witness lacks the knowledge to establish a business record foundation, while Moe counters that the authenticity of the book itself is not in dispute.
DOJ-OGR-00018915.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Shawn by Ms. Comey. The testimony focuses on a girl named Melissa, who was 16 years old when she visited Jeffrey Epstein's house accompanied by a woman named Carolyn. The witness states that after being inside for an hour, Melissa and Carolyn emerged carrying money.
DOJ-OGR-00018876.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) likely related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The judge discusses the admissibility of insurance forms under the business records exception. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell raises a minor issue regarding a 'fourth witness' identified as Mr. Rogers, and the court prepares to break until the jury arrives.
DOJ-OGR-00018849.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) covering the redirect examination of a witness named Carolyn. During this segment, defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca finishes his questioning regarding a photo exhibit (C10), after which prosecutor Ms. Comey questions Carolyn about the authorship of her civil complaint and her application to the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, to which Carolyn admits she did not write them herself. The page concludes with a question regarding an FBI interview report.
DOJ-OGR-00018650.jpg
This document is page 52 of a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley. Flatley describes the forensic process of preserving data from an old, fragile hard drive (Government Exhibit 54) using a TX1 disc duplicator and verifying the copy via hash algorithms before processing it with AccessData software. The testimony emphasizes the necessity of copying the drive to prevent data loss due to hardware failure.
DOJ-OGR-00018615.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The Judge sustains an objection to Exhibit 309 and grants a request by Ms. Moe for a sealed sidebar discussion regarding the cross-examination of an individual named Brian due to privacy concerns. Consequently, pages 1440 to 1443 of the transcript are noted as sealed.
DOJ-OGR-00018598.jpg
This document is the final page of a court filing (Document 751) from criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It appears to be an index from a court transcript, listing various numbered items and concluding with a list of defendant exhibits (B, K-8, K-10) that were received into evidence. The document was prepared by Southern District Reporters, P.C. and bears a Department of Justice Bates number.
DOJ-OGR-00018446.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Kate regarding her employment history and use of government public assistance. The questioning focuses on a period when she gave birth, was employed by a financial company, yet sought government benefits to stay home with her child.
DOJ-OGR-00016871.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Healy. The questioning establishes that Healy never visited Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house, only visited the New York residence to drop off documents without entering, visited Zorro Ranch exactly once, and never flew on Epstein's private planes or traveled with him.
DOJ-OGR-00016341.jpg
This document is page 125 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It records a brief procedural exchange immediately before a luncheon recess where the Judge (The Court) confirms with Ms. Pomerantz (Government) and Ms. Menninger (Defense) that there are no matters to discuss while the jury is not present. The header indicates that a witness named 'A. Farmer' (Annie Farmer) was previously under cross-examination.
DOJ-OGR-00016264.jpg
This page is a transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), featuring the direct testimony of Annie Farmer. Farmer describes arriving at a large property in New Mexico (presumed to be Zorro Ranch) characterized by a desert landscape and a western movie set. She testifies to meeting Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell there, describing Maxwell as an attractive woman in her thirties, and subsequently identifies Maxwell in a photograph (Government Exhibit 115).
DOJ-OGR-00016235.jpg
This document is a page from the transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It features the direct examination of Supervisory Investigator Brown by Mr. Rohrbach regarding Government Exhibit 21. The testimony establishes that a photo was taken and a nondriver ID was issued on April 28, 2004, for an unnamed individual born in 1985, highlighting that this person would have been 11 years old in 1996.
DOJ-OGR-00016231.jpg
This document is page 15 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Brown, a supervisor/investigator familiar with Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) practices. The testimony details the standard procedure for obtaining an identification card, including the requirement to provide original documentation such as social security cards, passports, and birth certificates for verification.
DOJ-OGR-00016148.jpg
This document is page 38 of a court transcript from the opening statement by Ms. Pomerantz in the trial against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The prosecutor outlines that victims, including 'Jane,' will testify about the sexual abuse they suffered, specifically highlighting the defendant's active role in grooming, touching, and facilitating the abuse alongside Jeffrey Epstein. It also addresses the fact that witnesses received financial compensation but emphasizes that the money does not negate the trauma they endured.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity