Department of Justice (DOJ)

Organization

Mentions

2467

Relationships

Events

Documents

1208

Relationship Network

Network Depth

Loading... nodes

Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

26 total relationships

Sort by:

Connected Entity	Relationship Type	Strength (mentions)	Documents	Actions
organization Congress	Advisory lobbying	9 Strong	1	View
organization Department of Homeland Security (DHS)	Inter agency collaboration	9 Strong	2	View
organization Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)	Interagency collaboration	8 Strong	1	View
organization Department of Homeland Security (DHS)	Interagency collaboration	8 Strong	1	View
organization Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)	Inter agency collaboration	7	1	View
organization Department of Homeland Security (DHS)	Inter agency disagreement and deference	7	1	View
organization Congress	Advisory legislative commentary	7	1	View
organization United States Government	Advisory policy recommendation	7	1	View
organization Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)	Inter agency jurisdictional dispute collaboration	6	1	View
organization Department of Homeland Security (DHS)	Inter agency policy disagreement and cooperation	6	1	View
organization Congress	Adversarial collaborative	6	1	View
person Attorney General	Hierarchical	6	1	View
organization Congress	Adversarial collaborative	5	1	View
organization Department of Homeland Security (DHS)	Inter agency coordination and jurisdictional negotiation	5	1	View
organization Human Trafficking Task Forces	Funder and trainer	5	1	View
person Proposed legislation (Mann Act expansion, Sections 222, 223)	Unknown	5	1	View
organization Department of State	Inter agency disagreement	5	1	View
organization Non-government organizations (NGOs)	Potential conflict of interest	5	1	View
person HHS and DHS	Collaborative	5	1	View
person FBI, DOL, DHS	Inter agency collaboration jurisdiction	5	1	View
person DHS/FBI/DOL	Inter agency coordination	5	1	View
organization Department of Homeland Security (DHS)	Inter agency collaboration jurisdiction	5	1	View
person US States	Legal representative	5	1	View
person National Advocacy Center, National Center for Missing and Exploited Children	Business associate	5	1	View
organization Human Trafficking Task Forces	Business associate	5	1	View

Date	Event Type	Description	Location	Actions
N/A	N/A	DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ...	N/A	View
N/A	N/A	DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing confli...	N/A	View
N/A	N/A	DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22...	N/A	View
N/A	N/A	DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are i...	N/A	View
N/A	N/A	The DOJ recommends adding 'endeavor to' after 'shall' in subsection (c)(3)(A)(ii) to avoid creati...	Not applicable	View
N/A	N/A	DOJ analysis and response to proposed legislative changes in Sections 202 and 203 of a bill relat...	Not specified	View
N/A	N/A	The Department of Justice's analysis and recommendations on proposed legislative changes in Secti...	Not applicable	View
N/A	N/A	The DOJ opposes extending continued presence for trafficking victims for the duration of a civil ...	Not applicable	View
N/A	N/A	The DOJ opposes language in Section 202(a) that would legislate the existence of the 'Trafficking...	Not applicable	View
N/A	N/A	The DOJ opposes the 120-day deadline in Section 202(f) as unreasonable.	Not applicable	View
N/A	N/A	The DOJ opposes language in Section 203 that would remove the Attorney General's role in determin...	Not applicable	View
N/A	N/A	Annual conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed.	N/A	View
N/A	N/A	Annual conferences where human trafficking laws concerning minor victims are discussed.	Not specified	View
N/A	N/A	Conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed.	Not specified	View
N/A	N/A	DOJ training on human trafficking, including discussion on using various criminal statutes.	National Advocacy Center an...	View
N/A	N/A	DOJ training on using various criminal statutes in human trafficking cases.	Annual conferences, the Nat...	View
N/A	N/A	The DOJ expresses opposition to expanding the Mann Act to federalize criminal prosecution of pand...	N/A	View
N/A	N/A	The DOJ opposes a proposed subsection (g) that would expand sex tourism offenses to include illic...	N/A	View
N/A	N/A	The DOJ states its belief that the addition of 18 U.S.C. § 2423A is unnecessary.	N/A	View
N/A	N/A	The DOJ opposes the expansion of jurisdiction over offenses involving non-Americans committed out...	N/A	View
N/A	N/A	The DOJ criticizes Section 223, which relates to 'pimping' an alien, for removing a requirement f...	N/A	View
N/A	N/A	DOJ analysis of and opposition to proposed legislative changes in Sections 205, 211, and 213 of a...	Not specified	View
N/A	N/A	The Department of Justice's analysis and statement of opposition/deference regarding proposed leg...	Not applicable	View
N/A	N/A	DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi...	N/A	View
N/A	N/A	DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi...	N/A	View

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012381.jpg

This document is a commentary from the Department of Justice (DOJ) expressing opposition to proposed legislative changes outlined in Sections 224, 231, 232, and 233 related to human trafficking laws. The DOJ argues that the proposed changes are unnecessary, burdensome, or based on a misunderstanding of existing laws and departmental procedures. The document defends current practices, including the use of a wide range of statutes like the Mann Act and collaborations with various organizations for training and enforcement.

Department of justice (doj) commentary on proposed legislation

2025-11-17

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012380.jpg

This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) memorandum arguing against proposed legislative changes that would expand federal jurisdiction over prostitution, pimping, and adult sex tourism. The DOJ contends that such an expansion is unnecessary, would strain federal resources, and would divert law enforcement from its core anti-trafficking mission, particularly the prosecution of child sex tourism. The document analyzes specific sections of a bill, consistently opposing the federalization of crimes it believes are better handled at the state and local level.

Department of justice (doj) legislative analysis/memorandum

2025-11-17

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012379.jpg

This Department of Justice (DOJ) document outlines the department's opposition to several proposed legislative amendments concerning human trafficking, specifically sections 214 and 221 of an unspecified bill. The DOJ argues that the changes are redundant, create legally problematic strict liability offenses without an affirmative defense, and improperly federalize crimes like pandering and pimping that are historically handled at the state level. The DOJ asserts that its existing authority under laws like the Mann Act is sufficient for prosecuting federal trafficking crimes.

Department of justice (doj) legislative analysis

2025-11-17

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012378.jpg

This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis and opposition to Section 214 of a proposed bill concerning trafficking victims, likely from around 2008. The DOJ argues the bill's grant authorizations are redundant, create conflicts of interest with NGOs, improperly involve the Department of State in domestic issues, and wrongly extend victim benefits to prostitutes under the Mann Act who do not meet the legal definition of a victim unless under 18.

Doj legislative analysis memo

2025-11-17

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012377.jpg

This document is a legal analysis from the Department of Justice (DOJ) expressing opposition to proposed legislative changes in Sections 205, 211, and 213 of a law concerning human trafficking, likely the Immigration and Nationality Act. The DOJ argues against changes that would limit the discretion of the Secretary of Homeland Security, remove the Attorney General from the victim certification process, and delay law enforcement's involvement in identifying victims. The document, marked 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012377', does not contain any mention of Jeffrey Epstein or related individuals.

Governmental legal analysis / commentary on legislation

2025-11-17

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012376.jpg

This document, page 5 of a submission to House Oversight, is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis of proposed legislative changes regarding human trafficking. The DOJ opposes several provisions, such as extending a victim's 'continued presence' during a civil suit and removing the Attorney General's role in T-visa eligibility. The DOJ also recommends specific textual changes to avoid creating new legal liabilities for the government and to consolidate authority under the Attorney General rather than a new task force.

Legislative analysis document from the department of justice, part of a house oversight collection.

2025-11-17

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012375.jpg

This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis of proposed legislative changes related to human trafficking. The DOJ opposes certain sections, such as naming specific hotlines (Section 110) and granting the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) sole authority over 'extreme hardship' determinations (Section 201). While deferring to DHS on some T-visa eligibility changes, the DOJ argues for its own inclusion in key decisions and provides a more accurate description of the nature of threats made by traffickers against victims.

Government legislative analysis / memo

2025-11-17

Analysis Source

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012373.jpg

This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis of proposed anti-trafficking legislation, marked as page 2 of a collection from 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'. The DOJ raises concerns about several sections, recommending amendments to ensure U.S. international standards mirror domestic policies that prioritize both sex and labor trafficking. The department also advocates for greater flexibility in partnering with aid organizations and in allowing the Secretary of State to evaluate foreign governments' anti-trafficking efforts on a case-by-case basis, especially concerning cases with lenient sentences for cooperating defendants.

Government legislative analysis / recommendation memo

2025-11-17

Analysis Source

Total Received

$0.00

0 transactions

Total Paid

$0.00

0 transactions

Net Flow

$0.00

0 total transactions

No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

As Sender

As Recipient

Total

No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search