Department of Justice (DOJ)
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Congress
|
Advisory lobbying |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Interagency collaboration |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Interagency collaboration |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency disagreement and deference |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Advisory legislative commentary |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Government
|
Advisory policy recommendation |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Inter agency jurisdictional dispute collaboration |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency policy disagreement and cooperation |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Adversarial collaborative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Hierarchical |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Adversarial collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency coordination and jurisdictional negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Human Trafficking Task Forces
|
Funder and trainer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Proposed legislation (Mann Act expansion, Sections 222, 223)
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of State
|
Inter agency disagreement |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Non-government organizations (NGOs)
|
Potential conflict of interest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
HHS and DHS
|
Collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI, DOL, DHS
|
Inter agency collaboration jurisdiction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
DHS/FBI/DOL
|
Inter agency coordination |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration jurisdiction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
US States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
National Advocacy Center, National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Human Trafficking Task Forces
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing confli... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ recommends adding 'endeavor to' after 'shall' in subsection (c)(3)(A)(ii) to avoid creati... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and response to proposed legislative changes in Sections 202 and 203 of a bill relat... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and recommendations on proposed legislative changes in Secti... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes extending continued presence for trafficking victims for the duration of a civil ... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 202(a) that would legislate the existence of the 'Trafficking... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the 120-day deadline in Section 202(f) as unreasonable. | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 203 that would remove the Attorney General's role in determin... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws concerning minor victims are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on human trafficking, including discussion on using various criminal statutes. | National Advocacy Center an... | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on using various criminal statutes in human trafficking cases. | Annual conferences, the Nat... | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ expresses opposition to expanding the Mann Act to federalize criminal prosecution of pand... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes a proposed subsection (g) that would expand sex tourism offenses to include illic... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ states its belief that the addition of 18 U.S.C. § 2423A is unnecessary. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the expansion of jurisdiction over offenses involving non-Americans committed out... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ criticizes Section 223, which relates to 'pimping' an alien, for removing a requirement f... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis of and opposition to proposed legislative changes in Sections 205, 211, and 213 of a... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and statement of opposition/deference regarding proposed leg... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00004638.jpg
This document is a placeholder page from a court filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on May 25, 2021. The page is explicitly marked as intentionally left blank and bears the Bates number DOJ-OGR-00004638.
DOJ-OGR-00004633.jpg
This document is the signature page (Page 7 of 7) of the Non-Prosecution Agreement involving Jeffrey Epstein. It contains Epstein's signature and the handwritten date 9/24/07. The page also lists R. Alexander Acosta, A. Marie Villafaña, Gerald Lefcourt, and Lilly Ann Sanchez as parties to the agreement, though their signatures are not present on this specific page copy. The header indicates this document was filed in court on 05/25/21 as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
DOJ-OGR-00033070.jpg
This document is page 82 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates. A witness is being questioned about their knowledge of specific individuals, including Nick Kowalski and Patrick Thomas. The questioning touches on the witness's past behavior, including an incident where they were reported missing by their father, and allegations regarding Thomas possessing an illegal firearm. The document bears a 2017 date stamp and a DOJ production number.
DOJ-OGR-00025493.jpg
This document is an email thread from July 2019 regarding the administration of Jeffrey Epstein's legal defense while incarcerated (Inmate 76318-054). An attorney (redacted) submits an application for a new paralegal to join Epstein's case, and a government official (likely BOP or DOJ) confirms the application has been routed for processing.
DOJ-OGR-00025407.jpg
This document is a handwritten Suicide Watch Observation Log for inmate Jeffrey Epstein (Reg # 76318-054) dated July 23, 2019. It details his activities between 8:37 AM and 10:20 AM, noting him pacing, sitting on his bed, and asking for his attorney. Notably, at 8:54 AM, Epstein complains that his throat feels swollen.
DOJ-OGR-00025406.jpg
This is a suicide watch observation log for inmate Epstein, registration number 76318-054, on July 23, 2019. The log details observations from 7:00am to 8:30am, noting Epstein's behavior such as sitting pensively on his bed, sleeping, and using the toilet. During this period, Epstein made requests for a doctor, toilet paper, and to speak with his attorney.
DOJ-OGR-00025312.jpg
This document is a suicide watch observation log for inmate Epstein, Reg #76318-054, on July 23, 2019. The log records his behavior and statements from 8:37 AM to 10:20 AM, noting that he was pacing, sitting on his bed, complained of a swollen throat, and made multiple inquiries about speaking with his attorney. The log indicates a focus on his physical state and his desire for legal counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00025310.jpg
This document is an inmate history record for Jeffrey Edward Epstein (Reg No. 76318-054) from a Bureau of Prisons system, dated July 24, 2019. It details two assignments: a 'Not Medically Cleared' status that began on July 6, 2019, and a suicide watch that was active from July 23, 2019, to July 24, 2019.
DOJ-OGR-00025302.jpg
This document is the header of an email dated July 24, 2019, with the subject 'Re: Epstein #76318-054'. The sender and recipient information is redacted, and the email includes an attachment named 'TEXT.htm'. The footer contains a Bates number indicating the document is from a Department of Justice (DOJ) production.
DOJ-OGR-00014690.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), defense attorney Mr. Everdell, and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding jury instructions and the legal definition of the word 'entice,' citing cases such as Almonte, Dupigny, and Broxmeyer. Mr. Everdell notes a technical difficulty with internet access during the proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00014649.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the jury charge in the trial of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The judge instructs the jury on the requirement for a unanimous verdict, the protocol for filling out the verdict form via the foreperson, and general conduct regarding courtesy during deliberations. The transcript concludes with the judge calling for a sidebar with counsel and the court reporter before submitting the case to the jury.
DOJ-OGR-00014640.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains jury instructions regarding the admissibility and limited use of 'similar acts' evidence. The judge instructs the jury that such evidence cannot be used to prove bad character, but may be used to determine intent, lack of mistake, or the existence of a common scheme or plan.
DOJ-OGR-00014632.jpg
This document is page 232 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It contains jury instructions (the Charge) regarding the definition and weight of circumstantial evidence versus direct evidence, and Instruction No. 43 regarding inferences. The judge explicitly instructs the jury that they must be satisfied of Ms. Maxwell's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt before convicting her.
DOJ-OGR-00014621.jpg
This document is page 221 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains jury instructions (Charge) specifically explaining the legal definition of conspiracy, withdrawal from a conspiracy, and 'Instruction No. 36' regarding the 'Third Element' of Conspiracy to Violate Federal Law (Counts One, Three, and Five). The text defines the requirement of an 'overt act' beyond mere agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00014610.jpg
This document is page 210 of a court transcript (Document 767) filed on August 10, 2022, in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains the judge's charge to the jury specifically defining the legal standards for 'aiding and abetting' regarding Counts Two, Four, and Six. The text explains that mere presence at a crime scene is insufficient for conviction; the government must prove the defendant willfully sought to help the crime succeed.
DOJ-OGR-00014602.jpg
This page contains jury instructions (Instruction No. 20) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell regarding Count Four of the indictment. The judge explains the legal definition of 'transportation of an individual under the age of 17 to engage in illegal sexual activity,' specifically relating to a victim identified as 'Jane' during the period of 1994 to 1997. The text clarifies that the government must prove Maxwell knowingly facilitated this travel, such as by purchasing tickets, even if she did not personally transport the victim across state lines.
DOJ-OGR-00014598.jpg
This document is page 198 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It contains the Judge's charge to the jury regarding Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically defining legal concepts such as 'acting knowingly,' 'interstate commerce,' and 'intent' in the context of Count Two: Enticement to engage in illegal sexual activity. The text outlines the government's burden of proof regarding Maxwell's intent for individuals to engage in criminal sexual activity under New York law.
DOJ-OGR-00014567.jpg
This document is page 167 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), featuring a rebuttal argument by prosecutor Ms. Comey. She argues that flight records from March and April 1996 corroborate the prosecution's timeline regarding Epstein and Maxwell traveling to Santa Fe. Additionally, Comey attempts to discredit defense attorney Ms. Menninger's cross-examination of a witness named Jane, characterizing the defense's questioning as misleading 'riddles' and 'nonsense.'
DOJ-OGR-00005873.jpg
This document is Page 6 of 43 from Exhibit 397-1, filed on October 29, 2021, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains a page from an academic text (page 961) titled 'Grooming in Child Sexual Abuse' which presents a table and analysis of various academic definitions and subtypes of 'grooming.' The text cites numerous researchers (Leberg, Craven, Salter, etc.) to discuss the psychological tactics involved in grooming, such as gaining trust and preventing disclosure, noting the difficulties in defining these terms for forensic use.
DOJ-OGR-00005793.jpg
This legal filing (Document 397 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) argues for the admissibility of expert testimony regarding sex trafficking, coercive control, and the psychological relationship between pimps and victims. It cites several precedents (Kelly, Torres, Randall, Dupigny) where such testimony was permitted. Specifically, it defends the qualifications of Dr. Rocchio, a Brown University professor with 25 years of clinical experience, noting that the defendant does not contest her expertise.
DOJ-OGR-00002925.jpg
This document is a legal letter dated April 15, 2021, from defense attorney Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim requests a continuance of the July 12th trial, arguing that a new superseding indictment significantly expands the scope of the case from a four-year period in the 1990s to an eleven-year period (1994-2004). The letter claims the government is responsible for the delay by filing late charges based on a witness known to them since the Florida investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00002846.jpg
This document is page 4 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated March 29, 2021. It outlines allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell, stating that between 1994 and 2004, she facilitated Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minors, sometimes participating in the abuse herself. The document lists four specific locations where victims were groomed and abused: Epstein's properties in New York, Palm Beach, and Santa Fe, as well as Maxwell's residence in London.
DOJ-OGR-00002833.jpg
This document is page 12 of a court filing (Document 859) dated March 24, 2021, from a criminal case involving a defendant named Schulte (likely Joshua Schulte, though found in a DOJ release). The text outlines the court's rejection of the defendant's arguments regarding venue impropriety, affirming that it is constitutional to indict in one courthouse (White Plains) and try in another (Manhattan) within the same district. The court cites the COVID-19 pandemic delays in Summer 2020 as further justification for the procedural flexibility.
DOJ-OGR-00025230.jpg
This document is a page from a DOJ/BOP internal review report (page 13) detailing procedural failures at MCC New York surrounding Jeffrey Epstein's death. It highlights significant lapses in securing Attorney Log Books as evidence, noting they were left unsecured, contained errors, and lacked a control system. The report also documents failures in AED accountability, officers failing to sign post orders or attend mandatory SHU training in mid-2019, and the elimination of a drug abuse program position in 2018.
DOJ-OGR-00025223.jpg
This page from a DOJ report details the timeline and circumstances of Jeffrey Epstein's death on August 10, 2019. It highlights a failure by staff to conduct required 30-minute rounds at 3:00 a.m. and 5:00 a.m., the discovery of his unresponsive body at 6:33 a.m., and the subsequent medical response ending in his death pronouncement at 7:36 a.m. The document also begins a psychological analysis of suicide risk factors specific to sex offenders.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity