Department of Justice (DOJ)
OrganizationRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
Congress
|
Advisory lobbying |
9
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration |
9
Strong
|
2 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Interagency collaboration |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Interagency collaboration |
8
Strong
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency disagreement and deference |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Advisory legislative commentary |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
United States Government
|
Advisory policy recommendation |
7
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
|
Inter agency jurisdictional dispute collaboration |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency policy disagreement and cooperation |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Adversarial collaborative |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Attorney General
|
Hierarchical |
6
|
1 | |
|
organization
Congress
|
Adversarial collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency coordination and jurisdictional negotiation |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Human Trafficking Task Forces
|
Funder and trainer |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Proposed legislation (Mann Act expansion, Sections 222, 223)
|
Unknown |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of State
|
Inter agency disagreement |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Non-government organizations (NGOs)
|
Potential conflict of interest |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
HHS and DHS
|
Collaborative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
FBI, DOL, DHS
|
Inter agency collaboration jurisdiction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
DHS/FBI/DOL
|
Inter agency coordination |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
|
Inter agency collaboration jurisdiction |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
US States
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
National Advocacy Center, National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Human Trafficking Task Forces
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and opposition to subsection (d)(5) of a proposed Act, specifically the term 'shall ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to subsection (d)(6) which would create a guardian ad litem program, citing confli... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to strike the 2% cap on funding for training and technical assistance under 22... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ recommendation to amend Section 203 of the 2005 version of an Act to ensure DOJ and DHS are i... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ recommends adding 'endeavor to' after 'shall' in subsection (c)(3)(A)(ii) to avoid creati... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis and response to proposed legislative changes in Sections 202 and 203 of a bill relat... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and recommendations on proposed legislative changes in Secti... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes extending continued presence for trafficking victims for the duration of a civil ... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 202(a) that would legislate the existence of the 'Trafficking... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the 120-day deadline in Section 202(f) as unreasonable. | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes language in Section 203 that would remove the Attorney General's role in determin... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Annual conferences where human trafficking laws concerning minor victims are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | Conferences where human trafficking laws are discussed. | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on human trafficking, including discussion on using various criminal statutes. | National Advocacy Center an... | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ training on using various criminal statutes in human trafficking cases. | Annual conferences, the Nat... | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ expresses opposition to expanding the Mann Act to federalize criminal prosecution of pand... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes a proposed subsection (g) that would expand sex tourism offenses to include illic... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ states its belief that the addition of 18 U.S.C. § 2423A is unnecessary. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ opposes the expansion of jurisdiction over offenses involving non-Americans committed out... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The DOJ criticizes Section 223, which relates to 'pimping' an alien, for removing a requirement f... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ analysis of and opposition to proposed legislative changes in Sections 205, 211, and 213 of a... | Not specified | View |
| N/A | N/A | The Department of Justice's analysis and statement of opposition/deference regarding proposed leg... | Not applicable | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | DOJ opposition to proposed changes in Section 205 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, specifi... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00011627.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Comey addresses the Court regarding an issue where the defense has subpoenaed the attorney representing 'Minor Victim 4' to testify at trial. The government argues they cannot understand what admissible testimony this attorney could offer that isn't covered by attorney-client privilege and indicates they will move to preclude it.
DOJ-OGR-00011610.jpg
This page from a court transcript details the abuse inflicted upon a victim named Carolyn by the defendant, specifically noting that the defendant exploited Carolyn's past trauma. It further describes a broader pattern of criminal conduct by Ms. Maxwell and Epstein involving the victimization of multiple underage girls and acknowledges the bravery of the victims who testified at trial.
DOJ-OGR-00011582.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on July 22, 2022. It features a victim impact statement from a woman, now a psychologist, who describes her silence for two decades due to shame and fear of professional ruin. She addresses Judge Nathan directly, urging her to consider the ongoing suffering of victims and the systemic effects of the crimes when sentencing Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00011573.jpg
This page from a court transcript (case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) details sentencing proceedings for Ms. Maxwell. The Judge rejects the claim that Maxwell is indigent, citing $22 million in assets reported in 2020 and a lack of documentation regarding her marriage/divorce, and states an intention to impose a fine. The Judge also notes the government is not seeking restitution, finds no grounds for downward departures from sentencing guidelines, and calls for a lunch break.
DOJ-OGR-00011559.jpg
This document is page 40 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on July 22, 2022, related to the sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell (the defendant). The judge overrules a defense objection regarding sentencing enhancements, affirming that the defendant engaged in a pattern of prohibited sexual conduct with a minor and rejecting the argument that a finding of 'continuing danger to the public' is required by the Guidelines. The judge cites legal precedents (United States v. Sash, NLRB v. SW General) to prioritize the clear text of the Guidelines over background commentary or legislative history.
DOJ-OGR-00005907.jpg
This document is page 40 of a court filing (Exhibit 397-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 29, 2021. The content is an excerpt from an academic paper (page 296, likely by S. Craven et al.) analyzing the psychology of sex offenders, focusing on how they manipulate children into feeling guilt, the role of empathy in the grooming process, and the concept of 'cognitive deconstruction' which allows offenders to justify their actions. The document bears a Department of Justice discovery stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00005897.jpg
This document is a court exhibit filed on October 29, 2021, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It consists of a page from the *Journal of Interpersonal Violence* containing a bibliography of academic papers regarding child sexual abuse, incest, and pedophilia, followed by an author biography for Dr. Park Dietz. Dr. Dietz is identified as a forensic psychiatrist and president of Park Dietz & Associates, specializing in child sexual abuse litigation and misconduct prevention.
DOJ-OGR-00005896.jpg
This document is page 29 of 35 from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on 10/29/21. It appears to be the end matter (Funding, Notes, References) of an academic paper or expert witness report by 'Dietz' regarding child sexual abuse and the terminology of 'grooming.' The page lists numerous psychological and psychiatric references ranging from 1907 to 2018.
DOJ-OGR-00005895.jpg
This document is a page from the 'Journal of Interpersonal Violence' filed as an exhibit (Document 397-1) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330) on October 29, 2021. The text discusses the psychological concepts of 'grooming' versus 'seduction' in the context of child sexual abuse, citing researchers Johnston (1979), Summit (1983), and Lanning (2018) to argue that behaviors often mislabeled as 'seductive' by children are actually 'affection-seeking' attempts to meet unmet emotional needs. The document bears a DOJ bates stamp, indicating it was processed by the Department of Justice.
DOJ-OGR-00005891.jpg
This document is an excerpt from the Journal of Interpersonal Violence, filed as an exhibit in the US v. Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330). It contains a graph and text analyzing the historical usage and evolution of the term 'grooming' in professional literature regarding child sexual abuse. The text highlights how offenders groom not just victims, but also parents and communities to maintain a 'nice guy' persona, citing experts like Ken Lanning and Ann Burgess.
DOJ-OGR-00002751.jpg
This document is Page 4 of a court filing (Document 165) in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on March 9, 2021. The text is the Government's argument opposing the defendant's third request for bail, citing her extreme flight risk, substantial foreign ties (including citizenship in a non-extradition country), and lack of candor regarding finances. The Government argues that the defendant's offer to renounce citizenship and place assets in monitorship is insufficient to assure her appearance in court.
DOJ-OGR-00002749.jpg
This document is Page 2 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) dated March 9, 2021, arguing that the District Court lacks jurisdiction to grant the Defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) Third Bail Motion because an appeal regarding her Second Bail Motion is already pending with the Second Circuit. The text details the defendant's offers to renounce French and British citizenship and sequester spousal assets to secure bail, reiterating the court's previous finding that she poses a significant flight risk.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031766.jpg
This document is a news summary or report excerpt detailing the resignation of RNC deputy finance chair Elliott Broidy following a $1.6 million hush money payment facilitated by Michael Cohen. It further details investigations into Broidy's lobbying activities involving the Malaysian government (specifically regarding Jho Low and the 1MDB scandal) and Chinese interests regarding exile Guo Wengui. The text also mentions Broidy's lawsuit against Qatar for alleged email hacking.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031764.jpg
This document is an email chain from August 2018 in which Reid Weingarten forwards a Washington Post article to Jeffrey Epstein (Jeffrey E.). The article details a DOJ investigation into GOP fundraiser Elliott Broidy regarding alleged influence peddling with the Trump administration involving China and Malaysia. The email is marked with 'High' importance.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024119.jpg
This document is page 13 of a regulatory compliance guide authored by the consulting firm Protiviti, included in the House Oversight Committee's investigation (Bates stamp 024119). It outlines the U.S. regulatory framework for Anti-Money Laundering (AML), defining legal standards of knowledge such as 'Reckless Disregard' and 'Willful Blindness,' and listing the authorities responsible for enforcement including FinCEN, the DOJ, and the Federal Reserve. While no specific individuals are named, this document likely serves as evidence regarding the compliance standards that financial institutions were expected to uphold regarding high-risk clients.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022212.jpg
This newspaper page from The Virgin Islands Daily News (March 2, 2019) features a lead article detailing the political fallout of Alex Acosta's involvement in Jeffrey Epstein's 2008 plea deal. While many Democrats and some Republicans called for investigations or Acosta's resignation following a judge's ruling that the deal violated victims' rights, Rep. Matt Gaetz defended the prosecutorial discretion used, calling second-guessing 'dangerous.' The page also includes a secondary article about the White House's 2020 campaign strategy focusing on 'socialism,' along with local advertisements.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021143.jpg
This document is an excerpt from the book 'Siege' (likely by Michael Wolff), produced as a House Oversight exhibit (Bates HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021143). It details the tumultuous tenure of White House Counsel Don McGahn, focusing on his abusive relationship with President Trump and his role as a buffer between the White House and the Department of Justice regarding the Mueller investigation. The text highlights Trump's attempts to fire Mueller in June 2017 and his belief that he personally owned the Justice Department.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033474.jpg
This document is a raw JSON data file, likely metadata for a web article or CMS entry, stamped with Bates number HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033474. It contains formatting configurations (fonts, margins) and content strings for a news item titled 'U.S. Justice Department to discuss consumer protection at social media meeting,' updated on September 24, 2018. The data includes a caption for a file photo of the DOJ logo taken by Reuters photographer Carlo Allegri in 2013.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030261.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a report or legal analysis produced by the House Oversight Committee regarding the Mueller investigation into Donald Trump. It details the dismissal of Andrew McCabe, legal theories surrounding the potential indictment of a sitting president, and the conflicting views between the Mueller team and the White House (supported by Alan Dershowitz) regarding obstruction of justice and executive privilege. While likely included in a larger dataset due to the mention of Alan Dershowitz (Epstein's former lawyer), the content focuses entirely on the 2017-2018 political and legal conflict between the Trump administration and the DOJ.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028330.jpg
This document is a news-style report, likely an exhibit labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028330', detailing the role of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein during the early Trump administration. It focuses on his involvement in the firing of FBI Director James Comey and his subsequent appointment of Robert Mueller as special counsel for the Russia investigation in May 2017. The document is about US political events and is not related to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026250.jpg
This document is a memorandum from the HPSCI Majority Staff, dated January 18, 2018, regarding alleged abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) by the DOJ and FBI. It details an investigation into the FISA warrant obtained for electronic surveillance on Carter Page, a former Trump campaign advisor, and lists the high-level officials who signed the surveillance applications. Please note, this document is commonly known as the 'Nunes Memo' and is unrelated to Jeffrey Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022463.jpg
This newspaper article from December 8, 2018, reports that over two dozen U.S. lawmakers are demanding an investigation into Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta for his role as a former federal prosecutor in brokering a lenient 2008 plea deal for multimillionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. The call for a probe, spurred by a Miami Herald investigation, highlights how the deal granted Epstein immunity, hid the proceedings from his underage victims, and allowed him to serve only 13 months in jail.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022255.jpg
This document, an article or report excerpt from circa July 2009, discusses Jeffrey Epstein completing his lenient house arrest for soliciting a minor. It highlights his vast wealth, settlements with victims, and connections to powerful figures like Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew. The text also notes that despite a non-prosecution agreement, the Department of Justice and FBI were actively investigating Epstein for more serious federal crimes, including child trafficking.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012383.jpg
This document is a Department of Justice (DOJ) analysis of proposed legislation concerning trafficking victims. The DOJ opposes several provisions, including the creation of a guardian ad litem program and a confidentiality section that could impede law enforcement, and recommends changes to language that would create a legal obligation for government-funded counsel. The DOJ also recommends striking a 2% funding cap for training and ensuring that both the DOJ and DHS are involved with HHS in the development of a $5 million pilot program.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012382.jpg
This document is a page from a Department of Justice (DOJ) legislative analysis, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012382'. The DOJ expresses its opposition to several subsections of proposed legislation (Sections 234 and 236) concerning child trafficking and the management of unaccompanied minors, arguing the proposals are burdensome, based on unreliable findings, and too restrictive. The department advocates for greater flexibility for agencies like DHS and HHS and opposes granting HHS access to sensitive law enforcement databases.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity