Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Mr. Leopold

Person
Mentions
126
Relationships
31
Events
57
Documents
60
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
31 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person the witness
Professional
10 Very Strong
5
View
person MR. TEIN
Professional
10 Very Strong
11
View
person MR. TEIN
Opposing counsel
10 Very Strong
7
View
person the witness
Client
9 Strong
4
View
person witness
Client
8 Strong
4
View
person the witness
Legal representative
7
3
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Legal representative
7
2
View
person Unnamed witness
Professional
7
2
View
person MR. TEIN
Professional adversarial
7
3
View
person Mr. Goldberger
Professional
7
3
View
person MR. TEIN
Legal representative
6
2
View
person Mr. Goldberger
Legal representative
6
2
View
person MR. TEIN
Adversarial professional
6
2
View
person Mr. Goldberger
Adversarial
5
1
View
person Unnamed Deponent
Professional
5
1
View
person MR. TEIN
Professional adversarial
5
1
View
person MR. TEIN
Adversarial opposing counsel
5
1
View
person Unnamed female witness
Client
5
1
View
person Mr. Pincus
Professional
5
1
View
person Unnamed witness
Legal representative
5
1
View
person MR. TEIN
Professional adversarial
5
1
View
person Jack
Professional
5
1
View
person MR. TEIN
Professional adversarial
5
1
View
person MR. TEIN
Professional opposing counsel
5
1
View
person Unnamed witness
Client
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Lawsuit filing Mr. Leopold filed a lawsuit in federal court seeking fifty million dollars from Jeffrey Epstein o... federal court View
N/A Hearing A hearing that Mr. Leopold allegedly claimed to have, which prevented him from being available. M... N/A View
N/A N/A Deposition argument regarding a break and obstruction. Unknown (likely Florida bas... View
N/A Meeting A meeting to prepare for the day's deposition. N/A View
N/A N/A Five-minute recess/break taken during deposition. Deposition room View
N/A N/A Cancelled Hearing Unknown Court View
N/A N/A Deposition hearing Unknown (likely Florida bas... View
N/A N/A Deposition of a witness Unknown (Likely Florida bas... View
N/A N/A Termination of deposition due to attorney conflict. Unknown (Transcription serv... View
N/A N/A Deposition testimony regarding witness credibility. Unknown View
N/A N/A Deposition Recess Deposition Room View
N/A N/A Deposition/Legal Proceeding Unknown View
N/A N/A Legal deposition where a dispute arises regarding the spelling of a word and the marking of Exhib... Unknown (Reporting firm bas... View
N/A N/A Deposition of a witness (Ms. [Redacted]). Unknown View
2022-04-01 N/A Evidentiary Hearing Court View
2017-07-26 Deposition An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about lying about their age on MySpace pages, referenc... N/A View
2017-07-26 Deposition/testimony Questioning of a witness by Mr. Tein regarding what she told Epstein about her age, with objectio... N/A View
2017-07-26 Deposition A deposition is being conducted where Mr. Tein is questioning an unnamed deponent about a photogr... N/A View
2017-07-26 N/A Mr. Leopold filed a lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein in federal court. Federal Court View
2017-07-26 Deposition A question and answer session with an unidentified witness, as part of a legal proceeding. N/A View
2017-07-26 Legal proceeding A contentious exchange between attorneys during a deposition or hearing. Mr. Tein attempts to ask... N/A View
2017-07-26 Legal testimony A witness is questioned about their past interactions with detectives. N/A View
2017-07-26 Deposition A deposition is being conducted where Mr. Tein is questioning a witness, and Mr. Leopold is prese... N/A View
2017-07-26 Deposition A contentious exchange during a legal deposition where an attorney (Mr. Leopold) instructs a witn... N/A View
2017-07-26 Deposition A deposition where Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness about allegedly lying and visiting a 'cr... N/A View

DOJ-OGR-00033041.jpg

This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about how much money she hopes to receive from a Mr. Epstein. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, repeatedly objects on the grounds of attorney-client privilege and instructs his client not to answer, leading to a certified question.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033040.jpg

This document is page 52 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. A witness is being questioned by Mr. Tein about whether they received a victim notification letter (confirmed) and if they provided physical evidence to law enforcement. The witness denies providing physical evidence initially, but then clarifies they gave their cell phone to a woman named Michelle Pagan approximately three or four years prior to the deposition.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033039.jpg

This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding on July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unidentified witness about their knowledge of potential financial compensation from the government for a criminal case and whether they ever received a victim notification letter. The witness denies knowledge of these matters, and another attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the form of the questions.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033037.jpg

This document is page 49 of a deposition transcript from July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about conversations they had with their aunt concerning a lawsuit and a 'Mr. Herman'. The witness states that Tiffany Rich never had a conversation with Mr. Herman in their presence, and only answered the door before leaving.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033034.jpg

This is page 46 of a deposition transcript involving an unnamed witness, questioned by Mr. Tein and defended by Mr. Leopold. The witness confirms that attorney Jeffrey Herman was the lawyer who first sued Jeffrey Epstein on their behalf. The questioning turns to whether Herman advanced the witness's family any money, at which point Mr. Leopold objects on the grounds of attorney-client privilege.

Legal deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033031.jpg

This document is page 43 of a legal deposition transcript (Page 2718 of the larger record). An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a conversation with a woman named Hayley regarding earning money by visiting 'Epstein's house' every weekend. The witness denies making the comment, attributing it to Hayley instead. The testimony also covers the group leaving Epstein's house with money and going to a Marshall's store, with the witness denying they spent the money personally.

Legal deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033027.jpg

This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a tense exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, over the propriety of a question. The witness testifies that a "Mr. Epstein" asked her to do more than just massage him, specifically alleging he asked her to take off her bra.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033025.jpg

This document is page 37 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness who confirms they lied to Jeffrey Epstein about their age, pretending to be 18 when they were not. The witness also confirms telling Epstein they went to school in Wellington.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033024.jpg

This document is page 36 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions an unnamed witness about a prior statement she made to Detective Pagan, suggesting she lied to a person named Epstein about her age. The witness denies the specific phrasing but admits to telling someone that she told Epstein she was 18, while attorneys Ms. Belohlavek and Mr. Leopold repeatedly object to the line of questioning.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033022.jpg

This document is page 34 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a contentious exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Mr. Tein attempts to question a witness about a past conversation at "Epstein's house," while Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the questioning, citing procedural issues like lack of foundation and predicate.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033021.jpg

This document is page 33 of a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An unnamed witness is questioned about their interactions with a man named Jeff, specifically whether they told Jeff's assistant about their background, which the witness denies. The transcript also captures a procedural argument between two other parties, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein, regarding objections and the proper way to refresh a witness's memory.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033016.jpg

This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a tense and adversarial exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, during the questioning of a witness. A third attorney, Mr. Goldberger, intervenes to clarify a procedural point amidst the escalating argument.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033015.jpg

This document is page 27 of a legal transcript dated July 26, 2017, from Consor & Associates. It captures a heated, adversarial exchange between two individuals, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein, presumably attorneys. Mr. Leopold objects strongly to Mr. Tein's questioning of an unnamed female witness, accusing him of unprofessional conduct, browbeating, and harassment, and threatens to end the proceeding.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033014.jpg

This document is page 26 of a deposition transcript involving a heated exchange between attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. The witness is questioned about whether anyone persuaded them to engage in sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein for money before arriving at his house, which the witness denies. The document features a significant procedural argument where Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of 'coaching the witness' during the testimony.

Legal deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033010.jpg

This document is page 22 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. It captures a heated, adversarial exchange between two individuals, likely attorneys named Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, regarding the proper procedure for making objections. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of obstruction, while Mr. Leopold defends his actions by citing the requirements of judges in West Palm Beach.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033009.jpg

This document is page 21 of a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. Attorney Mr. Tein questions a witness who admits to sending a message to a friend calling the deposition 'stupid court s-h-i-t'. Another attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects to the line of questioning.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033008.jpg

This document is page 20 of a deposition transcript produced by Censor & Associates. It captures a contentious exchange between attorneys Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. Leopold asks the witness to spell a word for the record (the witness begins spelling 'N-i-g-g' before being cut off), leading to an objection by Tein and a subsequent argument regarding whether a document (identified as Exhibit 31-001) was properly marked and identified.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033005.jpg

Page 17 of a deposition transcript recorded by Consor & Associates. The text captures a tense procedural argument between attorneys Leopold, Tein, and Goldberger regarding a break, lateness (9 a.m. vs after 2 p.m.), and professional demeanor. Following a recess, Mr. Tein resumes questioning a witness (whose name is redacted) about the seriousness of the deposition and introduces Exhibit 31-001. The document bears a footer date of 07/26/17 and a DOJ-OGR stamp.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033004.jpg

A transcript page from a deposition involving attorneys Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein. The text captures a heated exchange where Leopold requests a break, which Tein resists, accusing Leopold of obstructing the deposition. Leopold explicitly requests that the audio of the deposition be preserved.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033002.jpg

This document is a page from a legal deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017. An attorney, Mr. Tein, questions a witness about a photograph from a press conference related to the witness's lawsuit, which features the witness's father, stepmother, and a Mr. Herman. The witness's attorney, Mr. Leopold, objects, leading to a procedural argument with another attorney, Mr. Goldberger, about the grounds for making objections.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033001.jpg

This document is a page from a deposition transcript involving a witness (Ms. [Redacted]) being questioned by Mr. Tein, with Mr. Leopold raising objections. The questioning focuses on confirming that an attorney named Mr. Herman filed a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein on the witness's behalf and subsequently held a press conference. The document includes a DOJ Bates stamp and a processing date of 07/26/17.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00033000.jpg

This document is page 12 of a deposition transcript involving attorneys Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold. Mr. Tein questions a witness (whose name is redacted) about whether they are aware that a lawyer named Jeffrey Herman filed a lawsuit on their behalf. Mr. Leopold objects based on attorney-client privilege, specifically referencing conversations between himself and the witness, as well as an 'attorney from Miami'.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00032999.jpg

This document is a page from a deposition transcript involving attorneys Leopold, Goldberger, and Tein, dated July 26, 2017 (based on the footer stamp). The text captures a contentious exchange where Mr. Leopold defends his objections regarding 'improper foundation,' while Mr. Goldberger and Mr. Tein accuse him of wasting time and obstructing the process. Mr. Tein specifically reprimands Leopold for failing to appear earlier in the morning after a separate hearing was cancelled, allegedly breaking a prior agreement.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00032998.jpg

This document is page 10 of a deposition transcript from July 26, 2017. It captures a legal dispute between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, during the questioning of a witness. Mr. Leopold instructs his client not to answer a question based on attorney-client privilege, leading to a heated argument about procedural rules and 'speaking objections'.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00032997.jpg

This document is a page from a deposition transcript dated July 26, 2017, in which attorney Mr. Tein questions an unnamed witness. The questioning centers on the witness's awareness of a fifty-million-dollar lawsuit filed against Jeffrey Epstein by their attorney, Mr. Leopold. Mr. Leopold repeatedly objects to the line of questioning, instructing his client not to reveal any information learned through their privileged attorney-client conversations.

Deposition transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
7
As Recipient
2
Total
9

Deposition Break and Evidence Preservation

From: Mr. Leopold
To: MR. TEIN

Verbal argument regarding taking a recess and preserving audio recordings of the deposition.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Availability for a hearing

From: Mr. Leopold
To: ["Mr. Tein's co-counsel"]

Mr. Tein alleges that Mr. Leopold lied in a letter to his co-counsel, stating he was unavailable for a morning hearing when he was not.

Letter
N/A
Communication Source

Questioning tactics and volume of voice

From: Mr. Leopold
To: MR. TEIN

Argument regarding repetitive questioning, yelling, and a mistaken identity of Mr. Tein's first name.

Verbal dispute
N/A
Communication Source

Deposition Preparation

From: Mr. Leopold
To: witness

Preparation for the deposition testimony.

Meeting
N/A
Communication Source

Spelling a word for the record

From: Mr. Leopold
To: the witness

Leopold asks witness to spell a word; Witness begins spelling 'N-i-g-g'; Tein interrupts.

Deposition
N/A
Communication Source

Unknown

From: Marie Villafona
To: Mr. Leopold

Question asked if FBI agents told witness these two had spoken. Witness answered 'No'.

Meeting/conversation
N/A
Communication Source

Deposition Objections

From: Mr. Leopold
To: Mr. Goldberger, Mr. Tein

Verbal argument regarding the validity of objections and scheduling conflicts during a deposition.

Meeting
2017-07-26
Communication Source

Deposition Preparation

From: Jane Doe
To: Mr. Leopold

Met 'this morning' to prepare for deposition.

Meeting
2008-02-20
Communication Source

Deposition Scheduling

From: Mr. Leopold
To: JACK A. GOLDBERGER

Agreement to schedule Jane Doe No. 1's deposition for Feb 20, 2008 and accept service.

Written agreement
2008-02-07
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search