[Redacted AUSA]
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
[Redacted Recipient]
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Geoffrey Berman
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Alex Acosta
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Martin G. Weinberg
|
Opposing counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Gary Bloxsome
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[Redacted Case Agent]
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor subject |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Investigator target |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED SENDER]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jill Greenfield
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Bert Ocariz
|
Friend |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Roberta Kaplan
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Martin Weinberg
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Represented by |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
[REDACTED Respondent]
|
Business associate |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jack Scarola
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-10 | N/A | Scheduled conference call between Defense Counsel (Menninger) and SDNY Prosecutors. | Teleconference | View |
| 2020-05-21 | N/A | Phone call coordination regarding Epstein investigation | Phone | View |
| 2020-02-06 | N/A | Phone call between Jill Greenfield and SDNY Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding the investigation. | Phone Call | View |
| 2020-01-01 | N/A | Planned second interview between SDNY/FBI and witness via phone. | Remote (Phone) | View |
| 2019-10-15 | N/A | Meeting with a witness | Unknown | View |
| 2019-10-15 | N/A | Call/Meeting regarding forfeiture question | Phone | View |
| 2019-09-16 | N/A | Meeting with another case team | Unknown | View |
| 2019-09-10 | N/A | Meeting between Joe Nascimento and Prosecutors. | Hilton West Palm Beach | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | Initial Meeting | West Palm Beach (implied) | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | First meeting between Joe Nascimento and Prosecutors. | Hilton West Palm Beach | View |
| 2019-07-12 | N/A | In-person meeting between Nascimento, his client, and prosecutors (implied by July 13 email sayin... | Hilton, 600 Okeechobee Blvd... | View |
| 2019-05-29 | N/A | Proposed meeting date between SDNY, Isidro Garcia, and the witness. | Likely New York (SDNY) | View |
| 2019-05-22 | N/A | Phone conversation between Isidro Garcia and Assistant U.S. Attorney (referenced as 'yesterday' i... | Phone | View |
| 2016-09-18 | N/A | Meeting | Unspecified | View |
| 2014-04-21 | N/A | Scheduled meeting | Unknown (Sender leaves at 5... | View |
| 2008-03-01 | N/A | Trip to New York by the lead AUSA from the Southern District of Florida | New York | View |
| 2007-10-12 | N/A | Negotiation and revision of the 'Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement' regarding victim repr... | Email Correspondence | View |
| 2007-09-11 | N/A | Transmission of the revised Non-Prosecution Agreement for Jeffrey Epstein. | West Palm Beach, FL (Sender... | View |
EFTA00039001.pdf
This document is an email from April 2023 sent by Daniel Ruzumna, an attorney for the Epstein Estate, to a federal agent. Ruzumna reports that during a court-ordered review of approximately 1,100 videos from Epstein's files, co-counsel discovered a video potentially containing child pornography, which had been sent to Epstein by a convicted sex offender. The review was immediately halted, and the Estate sought guidance from federal authorities.
EFTA00037001.pdf
An email chain from December 17, 2021, involving an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and likely NYPD personnel. The AUSA requests that Theresa Acosta, the court reporter for Ghislaine Maxwell's deposition, be brought to the courthouse during lunch because the prosecution fears the defense might not stipulate (agree) to the deposition as previously promised. The respondent confirms they left a voicemail for Acosta.
EFTA00030319.pdf
This document is an email chain from early 2020 between attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (representing a party litigating against Jeffrey Epstein's estate) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence involves the submission of a 'Touhy letter' by the private firm to request documents from the Department of Justice regarding Epstein. The emails track the initial request in January, the formal submission in February, and a follow-up check-in during April 2020.
EFTA00025329.pdf
This document is an email chain between attorney Sigrid McCawley and the SDNY (specifically an Assistant US Attorney, possibly named Boxer) regarding a witness in the Epstein investigation. The correspondence, dating from January to May 2020, discusses the provision of the witness's journal entries from late 1995 and early 1996, which detail a trip to New York, a visit to Epstein's house, and a movie outing with him. The SDNY expresses confidence in the witness's truthfulness and requests a follow-up interview to review her experiences again.
EFTA00024742.pdf
An email chain from October 2020 between the SDNY and the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force regarding an attempt to interview a former Epstein employee living on Long Island. Investigators visited the subject's home, where his daughter translated due to his poor English; they acknowledged the inquiry was about Epstein but referred investigators to their attorney, Aitan Gohlman. The emails also mention that Gohlman represents another witness of interest.
EFTA00019938.pdf
This document is an email chain between attorney Joe Nascimento and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) regarding a client who was a former employee of Jeffrey Epstein (2004-2005). The correspondence begins on July 6, 2019, when the client is served a grand jury subpoena. Key discussions involve scheduling meetings in West Palm Beach, clarifying financial compensation the client received from Epstein (including a cash lump sum and perks like gym/English classes), and addressing the client's lack of a U.S. passport despite being a citizen.
EFTA00019651.pdf
This document is a subpoena issued on July 19, 2021, by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It commands an unnamed individual to appear at 40 Foley Square, Courtroom 906, to testify in the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The subpoena was issued under the authority of US Attorney Audrey Strauss.
EFTA00014669.pdf
This document is an email thread from May 2021 regarding the case US v. Maxwell. An Assistant United States Attorney contacts Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Laura Menninger, et al.) to dispute a claim made in a recent filing that the defense had made multiple unanswered attempts to confer with the government regarding specific photographs. The AUSA requests the defense either identify these communications or correct the representation to the Court. The thread includes the underlying email from Laura Menninger to Judge Nathan's chambers submitting the filing in question.
EFTA00014576.pdf
This document is a legal letter dated August 1, 2019, from Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Martin Weinberg, Reid Weingarten, Michael Miller) to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. It supplements a previous discovery request, specifically demanding the preservation and production of documents from the lead prosecutor (name redacted) who investigated Epstein in 2006-2008 in the Southern District of Florida. The request focuses on communications regarding investigations in New York in 2008, a March 2008 trip to New York by said prosecutor, and communications with victim witnesses regarding their rights.
EFTA00013538.pdf
A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (Southern District of Florida), signed on behalf of Alexander Acosta, to Jeffrey Epstein's attorney Jay Lefkowitz. The letter aggressively rebuts Lefkowitz's allegations of misconduct, specifically denying a conflict of interest regarding the potential appointment of Bert Ocariz and defending the office's handling of the Non-Prosecution Agreement and victim notifications. The author expresses surprise at the attacks given previous cooperation and asserts that the office made significant concessions to Epstein during negotiations.
EFTA00011526.pdf
This document is an email summary of an attorney proffer dated March 1, 2021, involving attorneys Mariann Wang and Gloria Allred and an AUSA. It details new information provided by their client regarding interactions with Jeffrey Epstein between December 2018 and July 2019, contradicting the idea that contact ceased in 2017. The summary alleges Epstein lured the client to various locations (Paris, Florida, NY, VI) under the guise of employment or medical help (dental), manipulated the client into feeling indebted, sexually abused the client in Florida and the Virgin Islands, and tasked the client with recruiting or vetting young women, including a specific instance in Russia.
EFTA00010240.pdf
Email exchange between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant US Attorney regarding a motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense. The defense is seeking to subpoena information from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund regarding a specific (redacted) individual. The AUSA states their intention to file a motion to quash this subpoena to protect the victim's information.
RE: US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view ev...
Requesting a call to discuss requests contained in a previous letter.
US v. Maxwell - 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) - Request to view eviden...
Sending attached correspondence.
Suppression Opp
Discussion regarding edits to 'Motion_to_Suppress_Opp_v5.docx' suggested by 'the chiefs' and timeline for review.
RE: Ghislaine Maxwell- URGENT
Confirming receipt of voicemail and providing availability for a call.
Ghislaine Maxwell- URGENT
Request for a phone call.
RE: Wednesday's WebEx
Sending fully executed proffer agreement with agent's initials.
RE: Wednesday's WebEx
Outlining topics for upcoming interview with FBI agents, specifically focusing on CBP employees assisting Epstein in the Virgin Islands.
RE: Wednesday's WebEx
Checking in before Thursday's meeting to ensure client is fully prepared and asking for any additional granularity on topics.
RE: Wednesday's WebEx
Scheduling interview for 11/12. Details inquiry into a specific CBP employee in St. Thomas who had the witness in his phone contacts.
RE: Wednesday's WebEx
Confirming meeting for Thursday 11/12 at 1pm. Specifies topic: Mr. [Redacted]'s interactions with a CBP employee in St. Thomas who had Mr. [Redacted] in their phone, and any interactions that employee had with Epstein.
RE: Wednesday's WebEx
Proposing times for the meeting (11/10 or 11/12) and asking for an overview of topics to prepare the client.
RE: Wednesday's WebEx
Requesting to schedule a second interview with Mr. [Redacted] via WebEx for the week of Nov 9th. Expects it to be shorter than the first (max 2 hours).
RE: Wednesday's WebEx
Requesting a second interview (proffer) via WebEx for the week of Nov 9th.
RE: Wednesday's WebEx
Attaching fully executed copy (of proffer agreement).
RE: Wednesday's WebEx
Attaching signed proffer agreement. Mentions 'nice seeing everyone yesterday'.
RE: Wednesday's WebEx
Sending signed proffer agreement.
Wednesday's WebEx
Asking to forward WebEx invite to colleagues and IT support (Josh Morrissey).
RE: SDNY investigation
Asking for a brief call regarding 'Mr. [Redacted]'.
RE: SDNY investigation
Confirming availability for a call.
RE: SDNY investigation
Sending a link to a NY Post article: 'This is the article I mentioned'.
RE: SDNY investigation
Confirming he spoke to 'Mr. [Redacted]' and asking for a call back.
RE: SDNY investigation
Informing Reynolds she called his office but he was busy; asking him to call her cell.
Re: Sensitive correspondence
Providing dial-in numbers and guest PIN for a conference call.
Re: Sensitive correspondence
Accepting conference number and confirming call on Monday.
Re: Sensitive correspondence
Confirming call at 4pm LDN time on Monday 27th July 2020. Asking about dial-in logistics due to lockdown.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity