Trove
Sign In Sign Up

[Redacted AUSA]

Person
Mentions
24
Relationships
16
Events
18
Documents
12
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
16 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person [Redacted Recipient]
Legal representative
3
3
View
person Geoffrey Berman
Business associate
2
2
View
person Alex Acosta
Business associate
2
2
View
person Martin G. Weinberg
Opposing counsel
2
2
View
person Gary Bloxsome
Opposing counsel
1
1
View
person [Redacted Case Agent]
Legal representative
1
1
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Prosecutor subject
1
1
View
person Jeffrey Epstein
Investigator target
1
1
View
person [REDACTED SENDER]
Business associate
1
1
View
person Jill Greenfield
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Bert Ocariz
Friend
1
1
View
person Roberta Kaplan
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Martin Weinberg
Opposing counsel
1
1
View
location UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented by
1
1
View
person [REDACTED Respondent]
Business associate
1
1
View
person Jack Scarola
Legal representative
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
2021-03-10 N/A Scheduled conference call between Defense Counsel (Menninger) and SDNY Prosecutors. Teleconference View
2020-05-21 N/A Phone call coordination regarding Epstein investigation Phone View
2020-02-06 N/A Phone call between Jill Greenfield and SDNY Assistant U.S. Attorney regarding the investigation. Phone Call View
2020-01-01 N/A Planned second interview between SDNY/FBI and witness via phone. Remote (Phone) View
2019-10-15 N/A Meeting with a witness Unknown View
2019-10-15 N/A Call/Meeting regarding forfeiture question Phone View
2019-09-16 N/A Meeting with another case team Unknown View
2019-09-10 N/A Meeting between Joe Nascimento and Prosecutors. Hilton West Palm Beach View
2019-07-12 N/A Initial Meeting West Palm Beach (implied) View
2019-07-12 N/A First meeting between Joe Nascimento and Prosecutors. Hilton West Palm Beach View
2019-07-12 N/A In-person meeting between Nascimento, his client, and prosecutors (implied by July 13 email sayin... Hilton, 600 Okeechobee Blvd... View
2019-05-29 N/A Proposed meeting date between SDNY, Isidro Garcia, and the witness. Likely New York (SDNY) View
2019-05-22 N/A Phone conversation between Isidro Garcia and Assistant U.S. Attorney (referenced as 'yesterday' i... Phone View
2016-09-18 N/A Meeting Unspecified View
2014-04-21 N/A Scheduled meeting Unknown (Sender leaves at 5... View
2008-03-01 N/A Trip to New York by the lead AUSA from the Southern District of Florida New York View
2007-10-12 N/A Negotiation and revision of the 'Addendum to the Non-Prosecution Agreement' regarding victim repr... Email Correspondence View
2007-09-11 N/A Transmission of the revised Non-Prosecution Agreement for Jeffrey Epstein. West Palm Beach, FL (Sender... View

EFTA00039001.pdf

This document is an email from April 2023 sent by Daniel Ruzumna, an attorney for the Epstein Estate, to a federal agent. Ruzumna reports that during a court-ordered review of approximately 1,100 videos from Epstein's files, co-counsel discovered a video potentially containing child pornography, which had been sent to Epstein by a convicted sex offender. The review was immediately halted, and the Estate sought guidance from federal authorities.

Email
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00037001.pdf

An email chain from December 17, 2021, involving an Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY) and likely NYPD personnel. The AUSA requests that Theresa Acosta, the court reporter for Ghislaine Maxwell's deposition, be brought to the courthouse during lunch because the prosecution fears the defense might not stipulate (agree) to the deposition as previously promised. The respondent confirms they left a voicemail for Acosta.

Email thread
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00030319.pdf

This document is an email chain from early 2020 between attorneys at Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP (representing a party litigating against Jeffrey Epstein's estate) and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence involves the submission of a 'Touhy letter' by the private firm to request documents from the Department of Justice regarding Epstein. The emails track the initial request in January, the formal submission in February, and a follow-up check-in during April 2020.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00025329.pdf

This document is an email chain between attorney Sigrid McCawley and the SDNY (specifically an Assistant US Attorney, possibly named Boxer) regarding a witness in the Epstein investigation. The correspondence, dating from January to May 2020, discusses the provision of the witness's journal entries from late 1995 and early 1996, which detail a trip to New York, a visit to Epstein's house, and a movie outing with him. The SDNY expresses confidence in the witness's truthfulness and requests a follow-up interview to review her experiences again.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00024742.pdf

An email chain from October 2020 between the SDNY and the NYPD/FBI Child Exploitation Human Trafficking Task Force regarding an attempt to interview a former Epstein employee living on Long Island. Investigators visited the subject's home, where his daughter translated due to his poor English; they acknowledged the inquiry was about Epstein but referred investigators to their attorney, Aitan Gohlman. The emails also mention that Gohlman represents another witness of interest.

Email chain
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00019938.pdf

This document is an email chain between attorney Joe Nascimento and an Assistant U.S. Attorney (SDNY) regarding a client who was a former employee of Jeffrey Epstein (2004-2005). The correspondence begins on July 6, 2019, when the client is served a grand jury subpoena. Key discussions involve scheduling meetings in West Palm Beach, clarifying financial compensation the client received from Epstein (including a cash lump sum and perks like gym/English classes), and addressing the client's lack of a U.S. passport despite being a citizen.

Email chain / correspondence log
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00019651.pdf

This document is a subpoena issued on July 19, 2021, by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. It commands an unnamed individual to appear at 40 Foley Square, Courtroom 906, to testify in the criminal case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (20 Cr. 330). The subpoena was issued under the authority of US Attorney Audrey Strauss.

Court subpoena
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00014669.pdf

This document is an email thread from May 2021 regarding the case US v. Maxwell. An Assistant United States Attorney contacts Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team (Laura Menninger, et al.) to dispute a claim made in a recent filing that the defense had made multiple unanswered attempts to confer with the government regarding specific photographs. The AUSA requests the defense either identify these communications or correct the representation to the Court. The thread includes the underlying email from Laura Menninger to Judge Nathan's chambers submitting the filing in question.

Email correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00014576.pdf

This document is a legal letter dated August 1, 2019, from Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Martin Weinberg, Reid Weingarten, Michael Miller) to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. It supplements a previous discovery request, specifically demanding the preservation and production of documents from the lead prosecutor (name redacted) who investigated Epstein in 2006-2008 in the Southern District of Florida. The request focuses on communications regarding investigations in New York in 2008, a March 2008 trip to New York by said prosecutor, and communications with victim witnesses regarding their rights.

Legal correspondence / discovery request
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00013538.pdf

A letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (Southern District of Florida), signed on behalf of Alexander Acosta, to Jeffrey Epstein's attorney Jay Lefkowitz. The letter aggressively rebuts Lefkowitz's allegations of misconduct, specifically denying a conflict of interest regarding the potential appointment of Bert Ocariz and defending the office's handling of the Non-Prosecution Agreement and victim notifications. The author expresses surprise at the attacks given previous cooperation and asserts that the office made significant concessions to Epstein during negotiations.

Legal correspondence / letter
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00011526.pdf

This document is an email summary of an attorney proffer dated March 1, 2021, involving attorneys Mariann Wang and Gloria Allred and an AUSA. It details new information provided by their client regarding interactions with Jeffrey Epstein between December 2018 and July 2019, contradicting the idea that contact ceased in 2017. The summary alleges Epstein lured the client to various locations (Paris, Florida, NY, VI) under the guise of employment or medical help (dental), manipulated the client into feeling indebted, sexually abused the client in Florida and the Virgin Islands, and tasked the client with recruiting or vetting young women, including a specific instance in Russia.

Email / attorney proffer / memorandum of interview
2025-12-25
Analysis Source

EFTA00010240.pdf

Email exchange between attorney Jack Scarola and an Assistant US Attorney regarding a motion filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense. The defense is seeking to subpoena information from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund regarding a specific (redacted) individual. The AUSA states their intention to file a motion to quash this subpoena to protect the victim's information.

Email correspondence
2025-12-25
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
76
As Recipient
61
Total
137

Re: Sensitive correspondence

From: Gary Bloxsome
To: [Redacted AUSA]

Accepting implicit non-disclosure from previous email. Proposing call for Monday 27th July.

Email
2020-07-22
Communication Source

Re: Sensitive correspondence

From: [Redacted AUSA]
To: Gary Bloxsome

Confirming availability for call on Monday July 27 at 4:00 PM GMT+1. Clarifying that confidentiality applies to the 'Negotiation Period'.

Email
2020-07-22
Communication Source

Re: Sensitive correspondence

From: [Redacted AUSA]
To: Gary Bloxsome

Proposing a 'Negotiation Period' ending July 28, 2020, to discuss a voluntary interview under strict confidentiality terms.

Email
2020-07-14
Communication Source

Re: Sensitive correspondence

From: Gary Bloxsome
To: [Redacted AUSA]

Complaining that Berman and Strauss have made improper public comments. Requesting confidentiality undertaking before interview discussions.

Email
2020-07-13
Communication Source

Re: Sensitive correspondence

From: [Redacted AUSA]
To: Gary Bloxsome

Stating client has not agreed to voluntary interview. SDNY will pursue compelled interview via MLAT if no voluntary agreement. Reassuring standard confidentiality practices.

Email
2020-07-10
Communication Source

RE: SDNY investigation

From: [Redacted AUSA]
To: John Reynolds

Thanking Reynolds for chatting; noting appreciation for Mr. [Redacted]'s cooperation; stating expectation to call him as a witness at a Maxwell trial; providing contact info for the full team.

Email
2020-07-10
Communication Source

RE: Epstein investigation

From: Louise Scott
To: [Redacted AUSA]

Confirming BlueJeans call details for Thursday at 2pm UK time.

Email
2020-07-07
Communication Source

Re: Sensitive correspondence

From: Gary Bloxsome
To: [Redacted AUSA]

Expressing disappointment at lack of response and 'cultural differences'. Complaining about leaks and requesting protections against 'media circus'. Criticizing MLAT process vs voluntary cooperation.

Email
2020-07-06
Communication Source

RE: Epstein investigation

From: [Redacted AUSA]
To: Jill Greenfield

Checking in to proceed with investigation in light of pandemic; asking for a call.

Email
2020-07-06
Communication Source

Re: [Redacted] - Epstein

From: Joe Nascimento
To: [Redacted AUSA]

Nascimento expresses comfort at the quick response regarding his client's status following Ghislaine Maxwell's arrest.

Email
2020-07-02
Communication Source

Re: Sensitive correspondence

From: [Redacted AUSA]
To: Gary Bloxsome

Stating nothing is under active consideration because Bloxsome made no proposal. accusing Bloxsome of issuing misleading public release. Threatening compelled interview via formal request.

Email
2020-07-02
Communication Source

RE: [Redacted] - Epstein

From: [Redacted AUSA]
To: Joe Nascimento

AUSA confirms they appreciate the client's cooperation and that her status has not changed from their perspective.

Email
2020-07-02
Communication Source

Re: [Redacted] - Epstein

From: Joe Nascimento
To: [Redacted AUSA]

Nascimento checks in after seeing reports of Ghislaine's arrest.

Email
2020-07-02
Communication Source

Sensitive correspondence

From: Gary Bloxsome
To: [Redacted AUSA]

Chasing response to June 8th email. Suggesting telephone conference.

Email
2020-07-01
Communication Source

FW: Application for Search Warrant

From: Arraignment NYSD (Vinc...
To: [Redacted AUSA]

Sending the signed warrant.

Email
2020-06-26
Communication Source

Re: Application for Search Warrant

From: Gorenstein NYSD Chambers
To: [Redacted AUSA]

Judge reviewed materials, requested a call, and noted an error regarding Epstein's arrest date year.

Email
2020-06-25
Communication Source

Unknown/Blank

From: [Redacted AUSA]
To: [REDACTED]

AUSA from EDNY requesting a copy of the confidentiality agreement signed by OCME regarding the 'investigation into the murder of Jeffrey Epstein' to use as a template for a current inmate death investigation.

Email
2020-06-11
Communication Source

bank records

From: [Redacted AUSA]
To: [REDACTED]

Requesting assistance to print/provide bank subpoena returns (FirstBank Puerto Rico) for a case agent to pick up at 1 Saint Andrews.

Email
2020-06-01
Communication Source

RE: quick call re: Epstein investigation?

From: [Redacted AUSA]
To: Roberta Kaplan

Requesting a 5-minute phone call regarding a quick question about the Epstein investigation.

Email
2020-05-21
Communication Source

RE: quick call re: Epstein investigation?

From: Roberta Kaplan
To: [Redacted AUSA]

Of course; on a call with Kate right now; we will call you when we are done

Email
2020-05-21
Communication Source

use this version

From: [Redacted AUSA]
To: [REDACTED]

All done—this should have everything. Thanks!

Email
2020-05-14
Communication Source

RE: [Redacted] follow-up request

From: [Redacted AUSA]
To: Sigrid McCawley

Discussing interview duration (approx 90 mins).

Email
2020-05-08
Communication Source

RE: [Redacted] follow-up request

From: Sigrid McCawley
To: [Redacted AUSA]

Proposing 11:00 EST for call; noting client is in Texas.

Email
2020-05-08
Communication Source

RE: [Redacted] follow-up request

From: [Redacted AUSA]
To: Sigrid McCawley

Confirming call logistics; checking with agents.

Email
2020-05-08
Communication Source

RE: [REDACTED] follow-up request

From: [Redacted AUSA]
To: Sigrid McCawley

Requesting an additional interview with the witness to go through experiences again; expressing belief in her candor.

Email
2020-05-07
Communication Source

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search