Alison Moe
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Co counsel prosecution |
15
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Business associate |
14
Very Strong
|
22 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Adversarial |
11
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
17 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
AUDREY STRAUSS
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
14 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Business associate |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
location
USA
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Nicole Simmons
|
Professional adversarial |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
location
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
3 | |
|
person
Geoffrey S. Berman
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
|
Subordinate superior |
7
|
3 | |
|
location
USA
|
Employment representation |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Christian R. Everdell
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Appellant's counsel (filer)
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Prosecutor defendant |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A pretrial conference was held where counsel for the government and defendant made their appearan... | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | Legal stipulation | The prosecution and defense formally agreed that Government Exhibits 52A, 52D, 52E, 52F, 52G, and... | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| N/A | Pretrial conference | A final pretrial conference was held to discuss outstanding issues and the plan for jury selection. | Courtroom | View |
| 2023-06-29 | N/A | Submission of legal filing concluding that the judgment of conviction should be affirmed. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Sentencing Hearing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-07-22 | N/A | Sentencing hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing of Ghislaine Maxwell | District Court | View |
| 2022-06-28 | N/A | Sentencing held for Ghislaine Maxwell on Counts 1ss, 3ss, 4ss, 5ss, 6ss. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-06-28 | Sentencing | Sentencing hearing for the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-26 | Court filing | The Government submitted a motion filed by Kate's attorney. | United States District Cour... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Sentencing Submission filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. | SDNY | View |
| 2022-06-22 | Legal filing | The U.S. Government filed its sentencing memorandum in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. | UNITED STATES DISTRICT COUR... | View |
| 2022-06-22 | N/A | Filing of Government's sentencing recommendation conclusion. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-06-15 | Legal document service | Christian R. Everdell served a memorandum via ECF upon four individuals. | N/A | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 661 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-05-11 | N/A | Filing of Document 660 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | Legal filing | Document 650 was filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-04-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 652 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-03-15 | N/A | Filing of Government's opposition to defendant's motion for a new trial. | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-03-11 | Court hearing | A hearing was held regarding the defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically focusing on Jur... | Court (unspecified) | View |
| 2022-03-08 | Court proceeding/appearance | A court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, with a list of a... | New York, N.Y., Southern Di... | View |
| 2022-03-01 | N/A | Filing of Document 635 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-25 | N/A | Filing of Government's response to defendant's post-trial motions | New York, New York | View |
| 2022-02-24 | N/A | Filing of Document 617 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-02-16 | Court filing | Document 603 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Southern District of New York | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008235.jpg
This is page 2 of a legal filing (Document 526) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 3, 2021. It serves as the signature page for the prosecution, submitted by U.S. Attorney Damian Williams and signed by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach of the Southern District of New York.
DOJ-OGR-00008224.jpg
This legal document, filed on December 5, 2021, is a request from the U.S. Government to the Court in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The Government proposes a specific limiting instruction for the jury to be read before a witness, identified as "Witness-3," testifies. The instruction aims to prevent prejudice by clarifying that any testimony about sexual conduct between Witness-3 and Mr. Epstein is not part of the charged crimes and cannot be used to judge the character or propensity of either Mr. Epstein or Ms. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00001846.jpg
A legal letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison Nathan regarding United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government consents to defense requests to redact the identities of proposed bail cosigners to protect their privacy but objects to holding a sealed 'in camera' hearing for the bail application, citing the public's and victims' right to observe proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00001845.jpg
This court order, dated December 2, 2020, addresses the individualized detention conditions of Ms. Maxwell, noting concerns about the lack of redress for serious conditions. It directs Warden Tellez to provide a first-hand accounting to the Court and counsel regarding these conditions. Additionally, MDC legal counsel is ordered to submit a letter to the Court by December 4, 2020, for review to determine if further information is needed.
DOJ-OGR-00001836.jpg
This document is the second page of a filing from the United States Attorney's Office regarding the conditions of confinement for a defendant (implied to be Ghislaine Maxwell based on the case number) at the MDC. It details the schedule for legal calls, discovery review, and isolation, asserting that the defendant has more access than other inmates and that the Government is actively communicating with defense counsel regarding any concerns.
DOJ-OGR-00001831.jpg
This legal document is a filing by the U.S. Government in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, requesting an extension for producing approximately 1.2 million documents seized from Epstein's residences. The Government asks to move the deadline to November 23, 2020, and to extend the motions schedule. Judge Alison J. Nathan grants the request in an order dated November 9, 2020, setting new deadlines for motions into early 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00001815.jpg
This document is the final page of a Government filing (dated Oct 30, 2020) regarding the detention conditions and discovery process for the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC). The Government argues against the need for a court order regarding MDC issues, citing that protocols are already in place for passing papers, COVID-19 safety (Plexiglas barriers), and laptop viewing. The filing asserts that the defendant has access to discovery materials for approximately 13 hours a day—more than any other inmate—and details technical efforts to resolve file viewing issues mentioned in a footnote.
DOJ-OGR-00001794.jpg
This document is the conclusion page (page 8) of a legal filing in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated October 7, 2020. Submitted by Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant US Attorneys Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz to Judge Alison J. Nathan, the text affirms the Government's commitment to its disclosure obligations following representations made at an initial conference.
DOJ-OGR-00001786.jpg
This document is page 3 of a legal filing submitted on October 7, 2020, by the Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant US Attorneys (Comey, Moe, Pomerantz) in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Government argues against the premature disclosure of witness identities and sensitive materials to the defense, citing risks to the ongoing investigation and the potential to deter other victims from coming forward. They request the Court to approve a delay in disclosing these materials pursuant to Rule 16(d).
DOJ-OGR-00001781.jpg
This document is the final page (Page 3) of a legal filing (Document 60) submitted on October 6, 2020, in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Government, represented by Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and Assistant US Attorneys Comey, Moe, and Pomerantz, requests a delay in disclosing witness identities and sensitive materials to the defense to prevent jeopardizing the ongoing investigation and to encourage victims to come forward. The filing cites Rule 16(d) as the legal basis for this protective measure.
DOJ-OGR-00001740.jpg
This document is the final page of a legal filing from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 21, 2020. The Government respectfully requests that the Court schedule a date approximately 180 days in the future for them to provide an update on their position regarding the sealing of documents in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. The filing is submitted by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss and her assistants Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, and Lara Pomerantz.
DOJ-OGR-00001736.jpg
This is the final page (page 5) of a legal filing by the US Attorney's Office in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Government argues that the defendant's request to use criminal discovery materials in separate civil cases should be denied because the materials are irrelevant to the civil litigation and the request attempts to bypass a protective order. The Government asserts the defendant is attempting to use these materials merely to attack the Government in a forum where it cannot respond.
DOJ-OGR-00001723.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 13, 2020, is a response from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to a defendant's requests regarding housing and access to discovery. The prosecution argues that the defendant's application is moot because the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) has already granted the defendant extensive daily access to discovery materials from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. The document concludes by requesting that the defendant's application be denied.
DOJ-OGR-00001711.jpg
This document is an affidavit filed on August 10, 2020, by Christian R. Everdell, an attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Everdell certifies that the defense counsel has conferred with the prosecution regarding a request to disclose the identities of 'Victims 1-3'. The government denied the immediate request, indicating the identities would be disclosed later as part of the standard discovery process.
DOJ-OGR-00001670.jpg
This legal document, filed on July 28, 2020, is the U.S. Government's response to a defendant's motion in a criminal case. The Government argues against the defendant's attempt to restrict its use of gathered materials and to impose restrictions on third parties, calling the request unprecedented and without legal basis. The filing, submitted by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss to Judge Alison J. Nathan, urges the court to deny the defendant's motion and implement the Government's own proposed protective order.
DOJ-OGR-00001663.jpg
This document is a letter filed on July 27, 2020, by the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The Government requests time to respond to a defense motion for a protective order, noting that discussions on the matter were ongoing as of the previous evening. At the bottom of the document, Judge Nathan orders a schedule for the response (due July 28) and reply (due July 29), and mandates the parties meet and confer by phone.
DOJ-OGR-00001662.jpg
This legal document is a letter dated July 27, 2020, from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The prosecution requests an opportunity to respond to a motion for a protective order filed that morning by the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell. The letter notes that the defense's filing was a surprise, as the Government believed discussions to jointly propose a protective order were still ongoing.
DOJ-OGR-00001660.jpg
This document is an Affidavit of Certification filed on July 27, 2020, by Christian R. Everdell, defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell. Everdell certifies that the defense has conferred with federal prosecutors (Moe, Rossmiller, and Comey) regarding a protective order but remains in dispute regarding restrictions on government witnesses' use of discovery materials.
DOJ-OGR-00001629.jpg
This document is the conclusion page of a legal filing (Document 22) dated July 13, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Government argues that the defendant poses an extreme flight risk and requests that any application for bail be denied. It is signed by Assistant US Attorney Alison Moe on behalf of Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss and colleagues Alex Rossmiller and Maurene Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00001611.jpg
This document is the cover page for the Government's Reply Memorandum in Support of Detention regarding the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It was filed on July 13, 2020, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The filing lists Audrey Strauss as the Acting U.S. Attorney, along with Assistant U.S. Attorneys Alison Moe, Alex Rossmiller, and Maurene Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00001557.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed on July 8, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN. Nicole Simmons certifies the electronic service of the 'Declaration of Jeffrey S. Pagliuca in Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice' to three attorneys at the U.S. Attorney's Office in the Southern District of New York: Alex Rossmiller, Alison Moe, and Maurene Comey.
DOJ-OGR-00001552.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed on July 8, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (related to Ghislaine Maxwell). Nicole Simmons certifies that she electronically served a Declaration by attorney Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, regarding his admission Pro Hac Vice, to Assistant US Attorneys Alex Rossmiller, Alison Moe, and Maurene Comey at the SDNY.
DOJ-OGR-00001550.jpg
This document is a Certificate of Service filed in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN on July 8, 2020. In it, Nicole Simmons certifies that she electronically served a 'Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice' to Alex Rossmiller, Alison Moe, and Maurene Comey at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY).
DOJ-OGR-00001539.jpg
Page 2 of a court filing (Document 9) dated July 7, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Assistant United States Attorneys (Rossmiller, Moe, Comey) inform Judge Nathan that they have conferred with defense counsel (Everdell and Cohen), who consent to a request regarding the timeline for discovery production.
DOJ-OGR-00001530.jpg
This document is a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court of New Hampshire regarding a removal hearing for Ghislaine Maxwell held on July 2, 2020. The minute entry indicates that Maxwell appeared before Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone, waived her identity hearing, and was advised that her detention hearing would be held in the prosecuting district (SDNY). The document lists the attorneys present for both sides and confirms electronic service to DOJ personnel.
Requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense co...
Request for extension of time.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
Requesting until 5 p.m. tomorrow to respond to defense counsel's letter.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
Request for extension until 5 p.m. the following day.
Requesting time to respond to defense counsel's letter
No preview available
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity