Doe
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Indyke
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Brad
|
Legal representative |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Paul G. Cassell
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan M. Dershowitz
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Author
|
Professional expert witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Prince Andrew
|
Accuser accused |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Dershowitz
|
Accuser accused |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Alleged abuser victim |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bill Clinton
|
Alleged sexual contact |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Bin Laden
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Alleged victim abuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alan M. Dershowitz
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Accuser accused |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
PAUL G. CASSELL
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Abuser victim sex trafficker |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Abuser procurer |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Defendant victim |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
ALAN DERSHOWITZ
|
Abuser |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
JANE DOE #4
|
Proposed co plaintiffs new victims |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1988-01-01 | Legal case | The Second Circuit case, Doe v. Federal Grievance Committee, 847 F.2d 57 (2nd Cir. 1988), address... | Connecticut | View |
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014085.jpg
This document is a legal response filed on March 24, 2015, by Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 in the Southern District of Florida. They are responding to Alan Dershowitz's supplement for intervention, arguing that he has failed to provide specific evidence refuting Jane Doe #3's allegations that he sexually molested her, despite his public claims on Fox Business to the contrary.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021524.jpg
This newspaper clipping details the legal battles surrounding Jeffrey Epstein, specifically focusing on civil lawsuits filed by two 'Jane Doe' plaintiffs. It highlights a family conflict where the mother of the first Jane Doe is trying to halt the lawsuit filed by the father, citing the daughter's estrangement from him. The article also mentions Epstein's high-profile connections (Clinton, Trump, Prince Andrew), the defense strategy led by Alan Dershowitz involving Myspace evidence, and attorney Herman's press conference at the bridge used to transport recruited girls.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014116.jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal letter dated February 25, 2015, regarding discovery disputes in the case Edwards and Cassell v. Dershowitz. The text criticizes the Defendant (Dershowitz) for providing evasive, incomplete, or legally unfounded responses to interrogatories concerning his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein, statements made about Bradley Edwards, and potential witnesses. It specifically notes that Dershowitz refused to provide details based on flight logs or the deposition status of Jane Doe #3, and lists Thomas and Joanne Ashe as individuals identified by the Defendant.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014109.jpg
This legal document is a response by a Defendant to document requests in the case *Jane Doe No. 1 v. United States* (Case 9:08-cv-80736). The Defendant objects to providing travel records from 1998-2007, limiting the scope to 1999-2002 based on Jane Doe #3's allegations that she was Epstein's 'sex slave' during that period before escaping to Australia. The Defendant also objects to producing communications with Jeffrey Epstein from late 2014 to 2015 regarding the sexual misconduct allegations, claiming attorney-client privilege and lack of relevance.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014108.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing filed on March 24, 2015, in the Southern District of Florida (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM). It contains the Defendant's responses to specific requests for production of documents. The requests seek evidence supporting the Defendant's assertions that attorney Paul G. Cassell acted unethically, corruptly, or in a 'sleazy' manner, and failed to investigate allegations made by Jane Doe #3.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014107.jpg
This is page 24 of a legal filing from Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM, dated March 24, 2015. The Defendant is responding to document requests regarding Jane Doe #3's alleged history of prostitution and perjury, as well as requests for evidence supporting the Defendant's previous assertions that attorney Bradley J. Edwards is 'sleazy,' 'unethical,' and 'corrupt.' The Defendant objects to the prostitution request as unduly burdensome but agrees to produce documents regarding Jane Doe #3's alleged lying.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014106.jpg
This document is page 23 of a legal filing (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) containing the Defendant's responses to specific document requests. The requests specifically seek evidence regarding allegations that Jane Doe #3 had sex with President Bill Clinton on Jeffrey Epstein's Little Saint James Island. The Defendant agrees to produce non-privileged documents regarding the Clinton allegations but objects to producing copies of their passports.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014104.jpg
This document is page 21 of a legal response entered on March 24, 2015, in the Florida Southern District Court. The Defendant (referencing Alan Dershowitz) agrees to produce documents supporting the claim that 'Jane Doe #3 is a serial liar.' However, regarding the request for documents proving President Clinton never visited Little Saint James, the Defendant objects, clarifying that his declaration relied on information regarding Secret Service records, and states he personally has no responsive documents to produce on that matter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014103.jpg
This document is a legal response filed on March 24, 2015, in the Southern District of Florida, containing a Defendant's responses to discovery requests regarding Jeffrey Epstein. The requests seek documents proving the presence of the Defendant's nephew and Epstein's legal team on Epstein's private plane, as well as flight manifests linking the Defendant to Epstein. The Defendant objects to requests regarding the legal team by citing allegations from 'Jane Doe #3' regarding her abuse between 1999 and 2002, arguing that post-2002 travel records are irrelevant to the specific action.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | British Tabloid | Doe | $0.00 | Payment for selling her story. | View |
Information regarding abuse/Dershowitz
Jane Doe No. 3 provided information related to the subject of abuse by Dershowitz.
Various
Statements reflected in the media.
Allegations
Information referencing Dershowitz by name concerning allegations.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity