Flatley
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Questioner (Q.)
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Questioning Attorney (Q)
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Pomerantz
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
JEFFREY
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Acquaintance |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. POMERANTZ
|
Direct examination |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Employment |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Stella McCartney
|
Coordinator |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Female Attorney
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MS. MENNINGER
|
Cross examiner witness |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Unidentified Attorney
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Evidence (Hard Drives)
|
Chain of custody |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Witness Flatley received a box containing three hard drives with broken evidence tape. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Cross-examination testimony of witness Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Examination of a hard drive by witness Flatley. | Lab/Office | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Direct examination of Mr. Flatley regarding metadata in Word documents, specifically Government E... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of witness Flatley regarding the location of a desktop computer used to create ... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Direct examination of a witness named Flatley by an attorney named Ms. Pomerantz regarding Govern... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Direct examination of witness Flatley. Government Exhibit 418B was admitted into evidence, and Go... | Courtroom in the Southern D... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Cross-examination | Cross-examination of a witness named Flatley regarding the creation of a digital image from a clone. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of witness Flatley regarding access to a computer with a user account for Ghisl... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Flatley regarding digital files (Government Exhibits 418, 420, 421,... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Cross-examination | Cross-examination of witness Flatley regarding the technical details of how author information is... | Courtroom in the Southern D... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of a witness named Flatley regarding the analysis of a hard drive. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Flatley in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Recross-examination of witness Mr. Flatley concludes, and the court announces a mid-morning break. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Mr. Flatley regarding Government Exhibits 54 and 419. Mr. Flatley i... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of witness Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz regarding Government Exhibit 422, a do... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination of witness Flatley regarding forensic review | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Identification/Presentation of Government Exhibits 420, 421, and 422 | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Conclusion of recross-examination of witness Flatley. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court filing date for the transcript of the trial proceedings in US v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Admission of Government Exhibits 420, 421, and 422 into evidence during the trial. | Courtroom (SDNY) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Court testimony regarding the authentication of digital evidence. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Cross-examination of witness Flatley regarding forensic analysis of a computer hard drive, specif... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Direct examination of witness Flatley in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. | Courtroom (Southern District) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | N/A | Filing date of the court transcript document. | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00013095.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It records the end of the recross-examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by attorney Ms. Pomerantz regarding technical details of how email clients populate messages when connected to the internet. Following the questioning, the Court excuses Mr. Flatley and dismisses the jury for a 15-minute break.
DOJ-OGR-00013093.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The testimony centers on a computer which had only one non-default user account belonging to Ghislaine Maxwell. The questioning attorney attempts to establish that other people could have accessed the computer, but the witness repeatedly states they do not know who had access or where the computer was located.
DOJ-OGR-00013092.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning focuses on the creation of a document, with the attorney trying to establish that the witness does not know who created it, where the computer was, or if a person named 'gmax' was present. The witness confirms their lack of knowledge on these points, while an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, repeatedly objects to the line of questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00013090.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The testimony focuses on computer forensics, establishing that file metadata like 'created date' is automatically generated by the computer's system clock, not by a user. Flatley explains that their team accessed data from a password-protected computer not by logging in, but by creating a cloned image of the hard drive and analyzing it with forensic software, thereby bypassing the operating system's security.
DOJ-OGR-00013089.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The testimony clarifies that the 'author' metadata in a Microsoft Word document is derived from the user profile that set up the software, not necessarily the individual creating a specific file. An example is cited where the computer account name was 'Ghislaine' and the corresponding author name in Word was 'gmax'.
DOJ-OGR-00013088.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning focuses on digital forensics, specifically establishing that the witness cannot determine the physical 'geo location' (whether Florida, New York, or elsewhere) of a desktop computer used to create specific exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00013087.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley, who testifies about creating a bit-for-bit digital 'image' of a 'clone'. Flatley confirms the image is identical to the clone it was made from but admits to not knowing the origin of the clone or if it was an identical copy of another source.
DOJ-OGR-00013086.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The questioning focuses on a hard drive Flatley examined, establishing that it originated from a desktop computer and was a clone of another hard drive. The questioning culminates in the attorney asking if the witness, therefore, created a "clone of a clone".
DOJ-OGR-00013084.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The testimony concerns the chain of custody for a specific hard drive seized in July 2007. Flatley admits that when he received the evidence box containing three copies of the drive, the evidence tape was already broken and the box featured a xerox of a different hard drive on the front.
DOJ-OGR-00013082.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. Mr. Flatley is instructed to read passages from Government Exhibit 422, which describe a close, long-term relationship between individuals named Jeffrey and Ghislaine, portraying them as an intelligent and inseparable couple.
DOJ-OGR-00013080.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz. The testimony reviews documentary evidence identifying 'John and Mary Alessi' as full-time workers and discusses 'Palm Beach House Maintenance' details, including a FedEx account number (114420816). Significantly, the testimony analyzes digital metadata for a document labeled '418B,' revealing that the author and last saver was 'gmax' (referencing Ghislaine Maxwell) and that the document was created and printed on January 29, 2002.
DOJ-OGR-00013079.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. The questioning focuses on the metadata and titles of government exhibits, specifically establishing creation and modification dates in September 2002. The witness identifies the titles of two documents as "PB New Shampoo and Massage Products" (Exhibit 420) and "Palm Beach House Workers" (Exhibit 418R).
DOJ-OGR-00013078.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz regarding the metadata of a Microsoft Word document (Exhibit 420B). The witness testifies that the document's author and 'last saved by' user are listed as 'gmax,' a digital alias associated with the defendant.
DOJ-OGR-00013075.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz regarding the authentication of Government Exhibits 420, 421, and 422, which are identified as Word documents printed from Government Exhibit 54. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, offers no objection, and the exhibits are admitted into evidence by the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00013074.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a portion of the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. Flatley testifies that he reviewed evidence using forensic software, and Ms. Pomerantz successfully enters Government Exhibit 418B into evidence without objection from opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger. Ms. Pomerantz then prepares to present additional exhibits (420, 421, and 422) for the witness's review.
DOJ-OGR-00013066.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley, by an attorney, Ms. Pomerantz. Mr. Flatley identifies Government Exhibit 419 as software registry information derived from Government Exhibit 54 and explains that a registry is a database used by Windows. The exhibit is subsequently admitted into evidence by the court without objection from the opposing counsel, Ms. Menninger.
DOJ-OGR-00013061.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Flatley. Flatley identifies themselves as the CART (Computer Analysis Response Team) coordinator and a digital forensic examiner for the FBI with over 16 years of experience. The questioning is interrupted by an objection from Ms. Menninger regarding the scope of the testimony relative to Rule 702 (expert vs. fact testimony).
DOJ-OGR-00013029.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It details a conversation between the judge, government counsel (Mr. Rohrbach), and opposing counsel (Ms. Menninger) regarding the scope of testimony for a witness named Mr. Flatley. The government agrees not to question Mr. Flatley about 'CDs' on direct examination, resolving the issue and making prior preparation on the topic moot for the time being.
Computer forensics and data access
A questioner cross-examines a witness named Flatley about how file metadata (created/modified dates) is generated by a computer system and how data was accessed from a password-protected computer using a cloned hard drive image and forensic software, bypassing the operating system.
Direct Examination
Questions regarding Flatley's background, role in CART, and experience.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity