| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Interview subject journalist |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Deposition testimony regarding legal inferences drawn from invoking the Fifth Amendment. | Legal Setting | View |
| N/A | N/A | Interview or Q&A session | Not specified | View |
| 2020-05-01 | N/A | Deposition/Testimony | Unknown | View |
| 2019-04-09 | N/A | Deposition of Ghislaine Maxwell. | Unknown | View |
| 2010-03-08 | N/A | Deposition of Jeffrey Epstein | Unknown | View |
| 2007-01-01 | N/A | Interview with Jeffrey Epstein in New York City. | New York City | View |
| 2006-11-15 | N/A | Interview/Notes regarding 'JE' | Unknown | View |
| 2006-07-19 | N/A | Grand Jury Testimony / Interview | Unknown (Law Enforcement Of... | View |
| 2006-01-04 | N/A | Interview of former houseman Alfredo Rodriguez. | Unknown | View |
| 0022-07-01 | Phone call | A phone call occurred where Brune discussed his strategy for presenting facts related to a waiver... | N/A | View |
This document is page 18 of a legal filing (Document 615) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on February 24, 2022. It argues that 'Juror 50' made an honest mistake rather than a deliberate falsehood when failing to disclose their history of sexual abuse on the jury questionnaire (specifically Question 48). The text cites transcripts where the juror claims they 'flew through' the form and genuinely did not remember the specific question asking about personal victimization.
This document appears to be page 22 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated March 11, 2022. It details a transcript or account of an interview where 'Juror No. 50' is challenged regarding the accuracy of his jury questionnaire responses concerning sexual abuse victimization (specifically question 48). The text notes the juror's physical reaction (flushing red) and his verbal defense claiming honesty. It transitions to a section regarding the juror's social media activity involving Annie Farmer and journalist Ms. Osborne-Crawley.
This document is a page from a deposition transcript where an unidentified witness is being questioned about potential grooming or recruitment for sexual activity with Jeffrey Epstein. The questioning focuses on whether individuals named Hayley, Zack Bryan, or Anthony Figueroa, or anyone else, communicated via phone or internet to persuade the witness to engage in sexual acts before they arrived at Epstein's house. The witness denies any such communications occurred and states they do not know who Anthony Figueroa is.
This document appears to be a scanned page from a book (likely by James Patterson, published by Hachette) included in House Oversight Committee evidence. It features a specific exchange from a 2007 interview in New York City where an interviewer compares Jeffrey Epstein to Icarus, and Epstein deflects with a quip about massages.
This document is the copyright page (dated October 2016) for a book by James Patterson (identified by ISBN 978-0-316-27405-0 as 'Filthy Rich'). It contains standard publishing details from Little, Brown and Company. On the facing page, there is a fragment of an interview transcript between an interviewer and Jeffrey Epstein. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation.
This document appears to be a page from an interview with Daniel Pipes (referred to as DP) conducted by 'TB' (likely Tom Bethell given the context of 'The American Spectator'). The text discusses Pipes' academic career, the distinction between traditional Islam and political Islamism, and the geopolitical landscape post-9/11. While the document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' stamp, there is no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, or their immediate network on this specific page.
This document appears to be a page from a transcript of an interview with a high-ranking Saudi official (addressed as 'Your Highness,' likely MBS), produced as evidence for the House Oversight Committee. The text covers the privatization of the Saudi health and transport sectors as part of a broader vision, and addresses controversies regarding increased fees for Hajj and Umrah visas, which the speaker defends as targeting repeat visitors while keeping the first pilgrimage free. The document bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023656.
This document is a transcript of an interview with a Saudi leader, almost certainly Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, discussing the country's economic strategy. The conversation covers public debt management, the expansion of the Public Investment Fund (PIF) through the Aramco IPO, and plans to localize military spending and develop the mining sector as part of Vision 2030. The document bears a House Oversight Committee stamp.
This document appears to be a transcript of an interview with a high-ranking Saudi official (likely Mohammed bin Salman given the context of Vision 2030 initiatives) sourced from House Oversight Committee files. The text discusses economic strategies to reduce the deficit, the contribution of the Public Investment Fund to the state treasury, and contingency plans for oil prices dropping below $30 or $50. It also details the 'Citizen Account' welfare program designed to offset energy price hikes for low-to-middle income citizens and outlines a six-month timeline for measuring the impact of new programs on unemployment.
This document is an excerpt from an article or interview featuring former Australian Prime Minister Paul Keating. Keating critiques the Australian Labor Party's recent leadership (Rudd and Gillard) for failing to provide a narrative framework for the country's transition. He also offers critical commentary on international leaders like Barack Obama and Angela Merkel, while promoting themes from his book 'After Words'. The document bears a House Oversight footer, indicating it was part of a document production, likely related to a larger investigation.
This document is page 5 of a rough draft transcript from a deposition or hearing bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. A former judge is being questioned about their current pro bono work through the University of Utah and their admission *pro hac vice* in the Southern District of Florida. The questioning focuses on the witness's past judicial conduct, specifically whether they ever struck pleadings for being impertinent or scandalous; the witness recalls referring attorneys to the Bar in two such instances rather than striking pleadings immediately.
This document is a page from a rough draft transcript of a deposition, likely part of a House Oversight investigation. A witness (a former judge from 2002-2007 and University of Utah professor) testifies about their professional background and current affiliation as special counsel with the law firm Hatch James and Dodge. The testimony pivots to the witness's involvement in the 'underlying CVRA case' (Crime Victims' Rights Act), with the witness clarifying that this specific case is not being handled through their law firm.
Juror 50 stated he 'flew through' the questionnaire and did not recall being asked about his own history of sexual abuse.
Discussion regarding the strategy if the US vetoes the Palestinian bid in the Security Council, potential upgrade in the General Assembly, and the future of the Palestinian Authority.
Discussed laying false trails.
Discussed mental confinement vs physical confinement.
A form signed by Carolyn detailing substance use history, which defines the scope of the cross-examination.
Detailed Q&A regarding military strategy, political initiatives, and diplomatic relations.
Discussion regarding private sector stimulation, taxes, foreign investment, and privatization.
Discussion on the failures of the Rudd/Gillard governments and the future of the Labor Party.
Discussion covering Saudi-Egyptian relations, the Muslim Brotherhood, the King Salman Bridge, Tiran/Sanafir islands, and relations with Iran.
Discusses the history of emergency powers and COG.
Discussed building and testing the data hub simultaneously due to time constraints.
Defendant was asked 'did you do that' and answered 'no', leading to perjury charges.
Discussion regarding the efficacy of the Palestinian Authority, the lack of a peace partner, and the moral implications of the status quo.
Snowden provided data on secret sources and methods used by NSA and GCHQ.
Advice on how to evade surveillance, warnings about UK fiber cables.
Snowden provided specific data about secret sources and methods used by NSA and GCHQ, warning against routing through the UK.
Comments on Citigroup jet purchase and bonuses.
Discussion regarding whether autocrats like Qadhafi are deluded and the role of narcissism in their leadership style.
Discussion regarding whether autocrats like Qadhafi are deluded and the role of narcissism in their leadership style.
Comments on Citigroup jet purchase and bonuses.
Bradshaw confirms the deputy went inside Epstein's house.
Q&A regarding the privatization of the Saudi health sector, municipal services, and controversy regarding Hajj/Umrah visa fees.
Discussion of plans to stage attacks to blame Cuba.
Q&A regarding the timeline of the Aramco sale, production ceilings, political vs economic decisions in oil production, and government support for local companies.
Discussion about show cancellation, Al Franken, and Louis C.K.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity