| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Client |
75
Very Strong
|
88 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
19
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Business associate |
11
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
Bobbi C Sternheim
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
MARK S. COHEN
|
Business associate |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Co counsel |
10
Very Strong
|
10 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Co counsel |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Jeff Pagliuca
|
Co counsel |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
Lara Pomerantz
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
None |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Alison Moe
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
ANDREW ROHRBACH
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Juror 50
|
Lack of relationship |
5
|
1 | |
|
organization
Cohen & Gresser LLP
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Assistant United States Attorney
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell - implied by Case ID)
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
ALEX ROSSMILLER
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
MAURENE COMEY
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Mark Cohen
|
Co counsel |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Ms. Sternheim
|
Professional |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-11 | N/A | Filing of Criminal Notice of Appeal | USDC SDNY | View |
| 2020-12-30 | N/A | Drafting of a joint letter to the Court regarding redactions. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2020-12-30 | N/A | Correspondence regarding Judge Nathan's opinion and order denying bail. | View | |
| 2020-12-19 | N/A | Filing of Renewed Bail Motion Reply Memorandum and Exhibits in U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell. | New York (SDNY) | View |
| 2020-12-08 | N/A | Filing of Renewed Bail Motion and Exhibits (Under Seal) | Federal Court (implied SDNY... | View |
| 2020-12-08 | N/A | Submission of Renewed Bail Motion and Exhibits O, P, S, W, X under seal in U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxw... | New York (Southern District... | View |
| 2020-12-08 | N/A | Submission of Renewed Bail Motion and Exhibits O-X (unredacted) under seal in U.S. v. Ghislaine M... | New York (SDNY) | View |
| 2020-12-04 | N/A | Submission of letter to Judge Nathan regarding briefing schedule. | New York (SDNY) | View |
| 2020-11-18 | N/A | Government agreed to create a new hard drive for discovery production. | Email correspondence | View |
| 2020-11-09 | N/A | Discovery Production | MDC | View |
| 2020-10-19 | N/A | Hard drives delivered and received | N/A | View |
| 2020-09-29 | N/A | Phone call between Christian Everdell and the AUSA regarding discovery materials. | Phone Call | View |
| 2020-07-20 | N/A | Call between defense counsel and Government | Phone/Virtual | View |
| 2020-07-17 | N/A | Defense counsel sends proposed Protective Order to Government counsel. | View | |
| 2020-07-06 | N/A | Email coordination regarding pretrial interview for Ghislaine Maxwell | View | |
| 2020-07-06 | N/A | Pretrial Interview coordination request | Email correspondence | View |
| 2020-07-06 | N/A | Email coordination regarding pretrial interview. | View |
This document is an appearance list for a court proceeding in the case of United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell, held on March 8, 2022, in the Southern District of New York. It details the presiding judge, Hon. Alison J. Nathan, and lists all attorneys representing the United States, the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, and Juror 50. The document also includes the case number and the court reporting agency.
This document is a portion of a juror questionnaire for case 20-cr-000389-AEN, filed on March 24, 2022. The respondent, identified as Juror ID 50, attests that they do not personally know and have had no dealings with any of the listed defense attorneys or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The juror's negative responses indicate no known conflicts of interest with the key legal figures in the case.
This document is a portion of a juror questionnaire from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 9, 2022. Juror ID 50 attests that they do not know and have no past or present dealings with any of the listed defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Bobbi Sternheim) or the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The responses indicate no declared conflicts of interest between the potential juror and the key legal figures in the case.
This document is a Certificate of Service filed on February 4, 2021, associated with Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Attorney Christian Everdell certifies that on January 25, 2021, he served a memorandum and exhibits via email to Assistant U.S. Attorneys Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach at the SDNY office.
This is the final signature page (page 17 of 17) of a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The page contains proposed jury instructions (Paragraph 67) regarding the prohibition of electronic communications and social media usage by jurors during the trial. It is signed by the prosecution team (US Attorney's Office) and the defense counsel for Ghislaine Maxwell, dated October 11, 2021.
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated October 22, 2021, containing proposed voir dire questions (21-25) for the jury selection in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. It lists the specific legal teams for both the defense (led by Everdell, Menninger, Pagliuca, Sternheim) and the prosecution (led by US Attorney Damian Williams and AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach). The document includes margin comments highlighting a dispute between the prosecution and defense regarding whether to refer to Maxwell as 'the defendant' or 'the accused'.
This document is page 10 of a juror questionnaire from the legal case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 22, 2021. The questionnaire asks potential jurors to disclose any personal acquaintance or dealings with key individuals involved in the case, including the defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, the prosecution team, the defense team, and the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan. The purpose is to identify potential biases that could prevent a juror from being fair and impartial.
This document is page 19 of a juror questionnaire for a legal case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on October 22, 2021. It asks potential jurors to disclose any personal connections or dealings with the defense attorneys (Christian Everdell, Jeffrey Pagliuca, Laura Menninger, Bobbi Sternheim) and their respective law firms. It also asks about any connections to the presiding judge, Alison J. Nathan, or her staff, to assess potential bias for jury selection.
This is a legal document filed on February 4, 2021, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York for the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Dated January 25, 2021, the document is a 'Notice of Motion' from Maxwell's legal team at Cohen & Gresser LLP, stating their intent to file a motion to strike 'surplusage' from the superseding indictment against her. This is identified as Pretrial Motion #6.
This document is a Certificate of Service filed in federal court case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN on February 4, 2021. It certifies that on January 25, 2021, Christian Everdell served a memorandum and exhibits via email to four individuals at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York: Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach.
This document is a legal filing from the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York, dated January 25, 2021. It serves as a notice of motion from Maxwell's defense team, led by the law firm Cohen & Gresser LLP, requesting a bill of particulars and other pretrial disclosures from the prosecution. The document also requests oral argument on the motion.
This document is a transcript of the defense's opening statement in the criminal trial of Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on August 10, 2022. The defense attorney, Ms. Sternheim, argues that the jury must focus solely on whether the government can prove the charges against Maxwell, not on the actions of Epstein. She characterizes the prosecution's case as weak, asserting it relies on the testimony of four accusers whose memories are unreliable, corrupted over 25 years, and motivated by a desire for money.
Email address ceverdell@cohengresser.com is provided for attorney Christian Everdell.
Reading of a legal stipulation regarding the testimony of Sergeant Michael Dawson concerning a cardboard box recovered during a search.
Support memorandum filed by defense.
Confirming the correct document is attached.
Instructions to refer to Dkt. No. 474 for filing the redacted letter.
Submission of defense response regarding self-authentication of birth certificates of alleged Minor Victims, filed under temporary seal.
Informing Chambers that the defense has no redactions to add to the government's proposed redactions and is awaiting instructions.
Submitting Maxwell's response to the government's Nov 11 letter regarding self-authentication of birth certificates of alleged Minor Victims under temporary seal.
Follow-up asking if the revised stipulation is acceptable to the government.
Asking for a quick cell phone call.
Proposing specific wording for a stipulation regarding a witness's trial testimony transcript given on February 26.
Submission of Ms. Maxwell's response to government letters dated Nov 5 and Nov 7, 2021, regarding Accuser-3's evidence. Submitted under temporary seal.
Sending draft letter regarding logistics relating to pseudonyms; asking for position language by tomorrow evening.
Stating understanding that the government was supposed to handle victim notifications and report to the Court.
Attached is the defense Rule 16 disclosure.
Confirming letter will be sent later; requests extra drives be brought to the hearing.
Agreeing to drop hard drives at the security tent.
Suggesting drop off at security tent next door to office to avoid delays.
Discussing logistics of handing off 4 hard drives; suggests meeting paralegal at 40 Foley side entrance.
Listing three joint letters due to court tomorrow regarding pseudonyms, limiting instructions, and voir dire procedures. Requests proposals by COB.
Attached is the defense Rule 16 disclosure.
Attached is the defense Rule 16 disclosure.
Planning to send strikes by noon but requesting simultaneous exchange of strike lists.
Sending draft joint letter.
Confirming Gov incorporated defense redactions. Opposing additional Gov redactions. Stating defense will file motions/exhibits.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity