lawyers
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
plaintiff
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jury
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
accusers
|
Client |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Proffer sessions | Past meetings where lawyers for certain people were present and communicated with the government. | Offices | View |
| N/A | Trial | A legal trial during which these instructions are given to the jury. The document outlines the ru... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Trial | A legal trial is in progress, during which these instructions are given to the jury. | courtroom | View |
| N/A | Trial | The underlying legal trial during which Conrad served as a juror. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interrogation | Lawyers and the FBI repeatedly questioned Jane, suggesting alternative details to her story invol... | N/A | View |
| 2025-11-03 | Voir dire | The jury selection process where Juror Conrad gave answers under oath. | N/A | View |
| 2025-03-01 | Legal proceeding | Voir dire for the trial, during which Juror Conrad's answers were given. | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Opening statement | Ms. Sternheim delivers an opening statement in a legal case against Ms. Maxwell, discussing the g... | court | View |
| 2011-07-08 | Legal filing | A memorandum was written or filed, which is the subject of analysis in this document. | N/A | View |
| 2011-07-08 | Filing of legal document | The lawyers submitted a memorandum regarding a new trial motion. | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00008549.jpg
This document is a legal instruction (Instruction No. 4) from a court case, filed on December 18, 2021. The judge directs the jury that they must decide the case based solely on their own recollection of the evidence, not on the arguments, objections, or statements made by the attorneys for the Government or the Defendant. The instruction explicitly states that statements from counsel and the court are not evidence and that the jury's memory of the facts is the ultimate authority.
DOJ-OGR-00016169.jpg
This document is a partial transcript of an opening statement delivered by Ms. Sternheim on August 10, 2022, in a case against Ms. Maxwell. Ms. Sternheim argues that the government is mischaracterizing lawful conduct as 'grooming' and highlights that witnesses testifying for the government have received substantial payments from the Epstein Victim Compensation Fund, suggesting a potential motive for their testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00002356(1).jpg
This document, a legal filing from February 2021, discusses the handling of confidential material under a Protective Order and details events surrounding Maxwell's April and July 2016 depositions. It notes Maxwell's agreement to testify without invoking self-incrimination privilege and Giuffre's subsequent motion to compel further answers. A footnote also highlights concerns about the misuse and leaking of confidential information by the plaintiff and her lawyers to the media, other claimants, and the government.
DOJ-OGR-00014588.jpg
This document is a page from a jury charge in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. A judge is instructing the jury on how to properly interpret courtroom proceedings, specifically warning them not to draw inferences from lawyers' objections, the judge's rulings, or sidebar discussions. The judge emphasizes that the jury's own recollection of the facts is what governs their decision-making and that they are the sole determiners of fact.
DOJ-OGR-00005360.jpg
This document is a page of jury instructions from a court case filed on October 22, 2021. It outlines the defendant's rights, including the presumption of innocence and the right not to testify, and clarifies that the government holds the burden of proof. The instructions strictly forbid jurors from consuming any media, conducting independent research (including on the internet), or discussing the case with anyone—including family, colleagues, and fellow jurors—until deliberations officially begin.
DOJ-OGR-00008713.jpg
This document is a legal instruction, specifically "Instruction No. 2: Role of the Jury," from a trial filed on December 19, 2021. The judge outlines the jury's responsibilities as the exclusive finders of fact, who must weigh evidence, determine witness credibility, and make decisions based solely on the evidence presented. The instruction explicitly distinguishes what constitutes evidence (witness answers, exhibits, stipulations) from what does not (lawyers' statements, questions, and the judge's own comments or rulings).
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity