Sigrid McCawley

Person
Mentions
190
Relationships
55
Events
43
Documents
95

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
55 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person David Boies
Business associate
10 Very Strong
6
View
person Annie Farmer
Client
7
3
View
person Ellen Brockman
Business associate
6
2
View
person GHISLAINE MAXWELL
Client
5
1
View
person Claimant (Redacted)
Professional
5
1
View
person Virginia L. Giuffre
Client
5
1
View
person Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
Employment
5
1
View
person EMMA ROSEN
Professional
5
1
View
organization The government
Professional
5
1
View
organization LLP
Professional
5
1
View
person Meredith Schultz
Professional
5
1
View
person Robert S. Glassman
Professional alliance
5
1
View
person Joshua Schiller
Business associate
5
1
View
person David Boies
Professional
5
1
View
person [REDACTED] witness
Client
4
4
View
person Ms. [Redacted]
Client
3
3
View
person [REDACTED WITNESS]
Client
3
3
View
person [Redacted Recipient]
Legal representative
2
2
View
person Victim-2
Legal representative
2
2
View
person Peter Skinner
Business associate
2
2
View
person James E. Hill
Professional
2
2
View
person Teresa Helm
Legal representative
2
2
View
person Virginia Roberts
Client
2
2
View
person Redacted Witness
Client
2
2
View
person Jane Doe 1000
Legal representative
2
2
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Alleged timeframe for the 'extortion plot' against Les Wexner claimed by Dershowitz. Unspecified View
N/A N/A Motion to Compel the Production of Documents and Testimony Southern District of Florida View
2025-08-05 N/A Submission of letter regarding unsealing of Grand Jury Transcripts New York, NY (SDNY) View
2025-08-05 Legal filing A memo was filed and endorsed regarding the unsealing of grand jury transcripts in the Epstein an... U.S. District Court for the... View
2021-12-09 Legal proceeding appearances Listing of appearances by legal counsel and other personnel for the Plaintiff and Defendant in ca... N/A View
2021-11-26 N/A Conversation between AUSA and David Boies/Sigrid McCawley regarding press conduct during trial. N/A View
2021-04-23 N/A Upcoming arraignment/conference (implied date based on context of 'upcoming') SDNY Court View
2021-04-21 N/A Arraignment Conference Court (Physical and Phone) View
2020-12-15 N/A Coordination of legal filing Email correspondence View
2020-10-29 N/A Planned meeting regarding DOJ invites/Epstein victims. Unknown (Sigrid plans to at... View
2020-10-03 Legal event A claimant executed a General Release. N/A View
2020-06-19 N/A Joint Stipulation submitted by parties New York, New York View
2020-06-17 N/A Conversation between the redacted sender and Attorney Sigrid McCawley regarding the Epstein case. Unknown View
2020-06-12 N/A Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Staying Action filed Southern District of New York View
2020-06-12 N/A Filing of Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Staying Action New York, New York View
2020-05-21 N/A Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order filed and signed by counsel for both pa... New York, New York View
2020-05-21 N/A Filing of Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Protective Order New York, New York View
2020-05-09 N/A Scheduled conference call/interview Phone (Witness in Texas, At... View
2020-03-26 N/A Email discussion regarding a Daily Beast article about a lawsuit filed against the Epstein estate... Email Correspondence View
2020-03-18 N/A Sigrid McCawley receives information about Ghislaine Maxwell's indemnification action in USVI. Email View
2020-03-18 N/A Sigrid McCawley receives and forwards information regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's USVI indemnificat... Email View
2020-03-04 N/A Meeting between Sigrid McCawley, her client (Ms. [Redacted]), and the Assistant U.S. Attorney. New York (SDNY Building imp... View
2020-03-04 N/A Interview/Meeting regarding Epstein investigation 1 St. Andrews Plaza, New Yo... View
2020-02-24 N/A Phone conversation between Sigrid McCawley and SDNY prosecutors Phone View
2020-02-24 N/A Proposed meeting between SDNY and Ms. [Redacted] New York View

DOJ-OGR-00000766.jpg

This is a memo dated August 5, 2025, from the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP to federal judges Richard M. Berman and Paul A. Engelmayer. The firm, writing on behalf of victim Annie Farmer, responds to a notice about the potential unsealing of grand jury transcripts for Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The memo strongly criticizes the U.S. Government for not pursuing further criminal investigations, despite admitting there were over a thousand victims, calling this inaction a 'cowardly abdication' of its duties.

Legal document (memo endorsed)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020658.jpg

This document is a court docket log (SDNY CM/ECF) from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings between April 22 and April 23, 2021. It details procedural exchanges regarding electronic devices in the courtroom (denied), suppression motions, adjournment requests, and proposed redactions to protect third-party privacy (granted). The document lists key legal teams for both the defense (Boies Schiller Flexner) and the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach), and includes Judge Alison J. Nathan's rulings on these procedural matters.

Court docket / case log (sdny cm/ecf)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00020418.jpg

This document is a court docket sheet from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell, covering filings from April 21-22, 2021. It details legal maneuvers regarding pretrial scheduling, the severance of perjury counts from non-perjury counts, and the deferral of suppression motions. Judge Alison J. Nathan grants government requests for redactions to protect the privacy of third parties and alleged victims.

Court docket sheet
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00015177.jpg

This document is a signature and notary page for a "General Release" legal document, executed on October 3, 2020. The claimant's name has been redacted by the Department of Justice (DOJ), but their attorney is identified as Sigrid McCawley. The document was notarized by Yanet Alvarado in Travis County, Texas on the same date.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002381.jpg

This document is the signature page of a legal filing dated March 4, 2016, associated with Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (Virginia Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It is submitted by the law firm Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP, specifically signed by Sigrid McCawley, and lists contact information for attorneys David Boies and Ellen Brockman. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp (DOJ-OGR-00002381).

Legal filing signature page
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002381(1).jpg

This document is the signature page of a legal filing dated March 4, 2016, submitted by the law firm Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP. It lists attorneys Sigrid McCawley, David Boies, and Ellen Brockman with their respective office addresses in Florida and New York. The header indicates this document relates to civil case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS (Giuffre v. Maxwell) and was later filed as an exhibit in criminal case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (USA v. Maxwell).

Legal filing (signature page)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00019493.jpg

This page from a legal filing dated July 21, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan, argues that government officials (Ms. Strauss and FBI Agent William Sweeney) and private attorneys (David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, and Bradley Edwards) made prohibited, prejudicial public statements regarding Ghislaine Maxwell. The document cites specific quotes comparing Maxwell to a 'snake' and 'villain,' as well as speculation about her potential cooperation with prosecutors to implicate other 'wealthy and influential people.' The filing asserts these comments violate Local Rule 23.1.

Legal filing / letter to judge
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002725.jpg

This legal document, filed on February 4, 2021, is a request for the production of documents related to defense motions in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. It seeks all communications concerning the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) with Jeffrey Epstein, including those between various government agencies and Epstein's lawyers. The request also demands communications from meetings in 2016 and 2018 where attorneys for Epstein's victims urged the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) to launch a criminal investigation into both Epstein and Maxwell.

Legal document
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00002879.jpg

This document is page 3 of a legal filing arguing that a subpoena issued by a defendant should be quashed. The filing contends that the subpoena fails to meet the specificity requirements of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c), as established in the case United States v. Nixon, because it is an overly broad "fishing expedition" seeking "all communications" with various individuals from the law firm Boies, Schiller, Flexner, LLP.

Legal document
2025-11-20

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017976.jpg

A page from a Miami Herald article (part of a court filing) discussing the private investigation efforts by lawyers representing Jeffrey Epstein's victims. It highlights a defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Roberts against Ghislaine Maxwell in 2015, which resulted in a confidential but 'sizable' settlement in 2017. The text criticizes federal authorities in New York for failing to open new investigations despite evidence provided by private investigators.

News article (miami herald) / court filing exhibit
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017962.jpg

This document is the final signature page (page 28) of a legal complaint filed on April 16, 2019, in Case 1:19-cv-03377. It includes a prayer for relief in excess of $75,000 and a formal Jury Demand. The document is signed by attorneys Joshua Schiller and Sigrid McCawley of the law firm Boies Schiller Flexner LLP. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was part of a document production to Congress.

Legal court filing (complaint/pleading - signature page)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017813.jpg

A Miami Herald article (filed as a court exhibit in 2019) discussing the efforts of victims' lawyers to investigate Jeffrey Epstein when prosecutors would not. It highlights Virginia Roberts' defamation lawsuit against Ghislaine Maxwell, which alleged they operated an international sex trafficking ring, noting the suit was settled in 2017. The document features a photograph of Virginia Roberts holding a picture of her younger self.

News article / court filing exhibit
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018032.jpg

This document is a page from a declaration filed in court (likely 2019) detailing interactions between Alan Dershowitz and attorney David Boies in 2015. The declarant disputes Dershowitz's claims that Boies was convinced of Dershowitz's innocence regarding sexual allegations made by Virginia Roberts. It outlines meetings in May, June, and July 2015 where Dershowitz attempted to provide travel records to prove he could not have been present at the alleged locations, though Boies noted gaps in the evidence.

Court filing / declaration / affidavit
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015542.jpg

This document is the signature page (Page 12 of 12) of a legal filing (Case 1:15-cv-07433) dated September 21, 2015. It contains a formal Jury Demand by the Plaintiff and is signed by attorneys David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, and Ellen Brockman of the law firm Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp.

Legal filing / court document (signature page)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015529.jpg

A Daily Mail article from October 2015 detailing allegations by Virginia Roberts (Giuffre) against Jeffrey Epstein, Prince Andrew, and Alan Dershowitz. The document includes a prominent photograph of Prince Andrew with Roberts, discusses her recruitment by Ghislaine Maxwell in 1999, and quotes her lawyer regarding the nature of sexual trafficking laws. The page bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.

News article (web printout)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016201.jpg

This document is a page from a legal affidavit (likely by Paul Cassell) discussing the legal strategies and settlements involving Virginia Giuffre, Bradley Edwards, and Alan Dershowitz. The narrator refutes Dershowitz's claims that a previous settlement exonerated him, clarifying that Giuffre stands by her allegations and that the settlement was a tactical decision regarding the Crime Victims' Rights Act case. It also explicitly denies Dershowitz's allegations that attorneys David Boies and Sigrid McCawley were involved in an 'extortion plot' against Les Wexner in 2014.

Legal affidavit / declaration (page 5 of 6)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016199.jpg

This document is an affidavit (page 3 of 6) filed in July 2019, detailing how attorneys (the affiant and Mr. Edwards) connected with witness Virginia Roberts Giuffre in 2014 for the CVRA case. It describes a May 2014 interview in Fort Lauderdale where the attorneys determined Giuffre's allegations of sexual abuse by Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz were credible. Due to limited resources, the attorneys sought the assistance of David Boies and his firm to handle potential civil lawsuits against Epstein's 'rich and powerful friends'.

Legal affidavit / court filing (page 3 of 6)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021825.jpg

This document is Page 2 of a rough draft transcript for the videotaped deposition of Paul G. Cassell, taken on October 16, 2015, in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The deposition relates to the lawsuit 'Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell versus Alan M. Dershowitz.' The transcript lists the legal appearances, including counsel for the plaintiffs, counsel for defendant Alan Dershowitz, and counsel for Virginia Roberts (Sigrid McCawley).

Legal deposition transcript (rough draft)
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014119.jpg

This document is page 2 of a legal declaration signed by attorney Sigrid McCawley on October 21, 2016. It lists sealed exhibits 5 through 11 submitted to the court, which include deposition excerpts of Jeffrey Epstein, Tony Figuerora, and two redacted individuals, as well as banking records and nude photographs. The document appears to be part of the discovery or evidence submission process in civil litigation involving Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.

Legal declaration / list of exhibits
2025-11-19

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014118.jpg

This document is a sealed declaration filed by attorney Sigrid McCawley in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on behalf of plaintiff Virginia Giuffre. The declaration supports a motion to compel discovery from Jeffrey Epstein and authenticates four attached exhibits. These exhibits include redacted phone records, Jeffrey Epstein's contact list, message pad excerpts, and a document related to 'Ghislaine' (presumably Maxwell).

Legal declaration (court filing)
2025-11-19
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
53
As Recipient
55
Total
108

RE: [Redacted] follow-up request

From: Sigrid McCawley
To: [Redacted AUSA]

Providing journal pages and context about fading colored pencil entries.

Email
2020-01-16

RE: [Redacted] follow-up request

From: [Redacted] (AUSA)
To: Sigrid McCawley

Confirming receipt of information.

Email
2020-01-16

RE: [Redacted] follow-up request

From: Sigrid McCawley
To: [Redacted] AUSA

Providing journal pages and explanation. Notes entries from 12/95, 01/07/1996 (NY trip/Epstein's house), and 01/25/1996 (movies).

Email
2020-01-16

[Redacted] follow-up request

From: Assistant US Attorney
To: Sigrid McCawley

Initial request for journal entries mentioned during a previous interview. Notes receipt of photographs.

Email
2020-01-10

follow-up request

From: Redacted (SDNY)
To: Sigrid McCawley

Requesting review of journal entries mentioned by witness during previous interview that refreshed her recollection of Epstein and Maxwell.

Email
2020-01-10

[REDACTED] follow-up request

From: [Redacted AUSA]
To: Sigrid McCawley

Initial request for journal entries mentioned by witness in a previous interview regarding Epstein and Maxwell.

Email
2020-01-10

[Redacted] follow-up request

From: [Redacted] AUSA
To: Sigrid McCawley

Initial request for journal entries to refresh recollection of events involving Epstein and Maxwell.

Email
2020-01-10

RE: [Redacted] follow-up request

From: [Redacted] (AUSA)
To: Sigrid McCawley

Acknowledging receipt of photos; requesting journal entries.

Email
2020-01-10

RE: [Redacted] follow-up request

From: [Redacted AUSA]
To: Sigrid McCawley

Initial request for journal entries and documents following a previous interview.

Email
2020-01-10

[Redacted] follow-up request

From: [Redacted] (AUSA)
To: Sigrid McCawley

Initial request to review journal entries mentioned by the witness during a previous interview regarding Epstein and Maxwell.

Email
2020-01-10

RE: [Redacted] follow-up request

From: Sigrid McCawley
To: [Redacted] (AUSA)

Confirming she will ask the witness about the journal; mentions witness shared pictures from time with Epstein/Maxwell.

Email
2020-01-10

RE: [Redacted] follow-up request

From: [Redacted] (AUSA)
To: Sigrid McCawley

Acknowledging receipt of photos and confirming interest in journal entries.

Email
2020-01-10

RE: [Redacted] follow-up request

From: Sigrid McCawley
To: [Redacted] (AUSA)

Confirming she will ask the witness about the journal ASAP.

Email
2020-01-10

[Redacted] follow-up request

From: [Redacted] (AUSA)
To: Sigrid McCawley

Initial follow-up request after an interview a few months prior, specifically asking for journal entries mentioned by the witness that refresh her recollection of events with Epstein/Maxwell.

Email
2020-01-10

RE: [Redacted] follow-up request

From: [Redacted] (AUSA)
To: Sigrid McCawley

Acknowledging receipt of photos; requesting journal entries.

Email
2020-01-10

RE: Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23

From: Sigrid McCawley
To: Assistant United State...

Update on victim visa issues; one victim decided not to travel but willing to do video conference.

Email
2019-10-17

RE: Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23

From: Assistant United State...
To: Sigrid McCawley

Confirming holding slot; agreeing to video conference for one victim; asking for dates/times.

Email
2019-10-17

RE: Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23

From: Sigrid McCawley
To: Assistant United State...

Discussing logistics for a victim driving in; proposing partner accompany her.

Email
2019-10-15

RE: Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23

From: Sigrid McCawley
To: Assistant United State...

Detailed breakdown of potential victim interviews, including specific mentions of Epstein bringing a victim to the US.

Email
2019-10-15

RE: Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23

From: Assistant United State...
To: Sigrid McCawley

Confirming 2pm-4pm slot on 10/22; noting schedule tightness for other slots.

Email
2019-10-15

RE: Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23

From: Assistant United State...
To: Sigrid McCawley

Acknowledging scheduling difficulties; willing to reshuffle.

Email
2019-10-15

RE: Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23

From: Sigrid McCawley
To: Assistant United State...

Proposing interview times for multiple victims. Discussing logistics, visa issues for one victim, and Skype attendance for another.

Email
2019-10-15

RE: Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23

From: Assistant United State...
To: Sigrid McCawley

Confirming meeting with one victim on 10/22 at 2pm; noting schedule conflicts for other proposed times.

Email
2019-10-15

Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23

From: Assistant United State...
To: Sigrid McCawley

Initial outreach regarding victims being in NY on 10/22 and 10/23 for interviews.

Email
2019-10-10

Interviews - 10/22 and 10/23

From: Assistant United State...
To: Sigrid McCawley

Inquiring about availability of McCawley's clients for interviews while in NY.

Email
2019-10-10

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity