DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018770.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony covers Carolyn's 2007 statements to the FBI, confirming she received $300 from Epstein and left his house with Ms. Roberts. The questioning focuses on discrepancies regarding how she obtained Epstein's phone number and the specifics of a phone call she made to 'Sarah' to schedule a massage, noting that someone from Epstein's house (not Epstein himself) returned the call.
DOJ-OGR-00018767.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-00330) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by Mr. Pagliuca. The testimony covers a 2007 statement Carolyn gave to the FBI regarding an unidentified older woman, and details a specific incident at Epstein's house where Ms. Roberts (Virginia Roberts Giuffre) led Carolyn upstairs and instructed her to massage Epstein's legs while Roberts massaged his back.
DOJ-OGR-00018762.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the resumption of proceedings after a lunch break, where the jury returns and the witness, 'Carolyn,' takes the stand to continue cross-examination by defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The judge reminds the witness she is under oath and instructs the attorney to adjust his microphone.
DOJ-OGR-00018760.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues to the judge that he should be permitted to cross-examine a witness named Carolyn about her extensive psychiatric history and ongoing drug abuse, claiming she minimized these issues during direct examination. He specifically mentions her history of schizophrenia and having her children removed from her custody.
DOJ-OGR-00018748.jpg
This document is page 150 of 264 from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The page captures the very end of a session where the judge dismisses the jury for a one-hour lunch break. The header indicates the witness 'Carolyn' was under cross-examination.
DOJ-OGR-00018746.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) recording the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The testimony details how a woman named Roberts (also identified as Virginia) arranged a meeting between the witness and Mr. Epstein. The witness describes being at Virginia's house with individuals named Sean and Tony, where Virginia dressed the witness 'provocatively' before driving her in a white car to Mr. Epstein's home.
DOJ-OGR-00018745.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. The testimony establishes that Carolyn met Virginia Roberts when Roberts was 18 and accompanied her to Jeffrey Epstein's house in May or June of 2002. Carolyn confirms she had never met Epstein or visited his house prior to this event and did not know his name until they arrived.
DOJ-OGR-00018741.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony details how Ms. Roberts (Virginia Roberts Giuffre) recruited Carolyn, instructed her to dress 'provocatively' or 'sexy,' and drove her to Palm Beach to meet Jeffrey Epstein for the purpose of making money. Carolyn testifies that Roberts participated in the massage to make her feel comfortable and gave instructions about removing clothing while inside the massage room.
DOJ-OGR-00018739.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding statements she made to the FBI in August 2007. The questioning focuses on whether 'Ms. Roberts' (Virginia) told Carolyn she could make $300 by massaging a man (Epstein) in Palm Beach; Carolyn denies being told this initially, stating she was told only upon arriving at Mr. Epstein's house.
DOJ-OGR-00018737.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. A witness named Carolyn is being cross-examined by Mr. Pagliuca regarding a 2007 statement she gave to the FBI. The attorney reads a portion of a report stating Virginia approached Carolyn at a party to offer her $300; Carolyn corrects the record, stating the FBI got it wrong and the interaction actually occurred at Virginia's house, not a party.
DOJ-OGR-00018735.jpg
This document is page 137 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. The text details the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn regarding her social circle in approximately 2002. The testimony establishes that Carolyn was friends with Virginia Roberts, whom she met through her then-boyfriend Sean, and that the group (including a man named Tony who lived with Virginia) frequently socialized at Tony and Virginia's apartment, consuming alcohol and marijuana.
DOJ-OGR-00018731.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, likely from the U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330). Prosecutor Ms. Comey is examining a witness named Carolyn regarding her prior testimony from December 2009. Carolyn confirms that while she cannot recall specific dates of her visits to Epstein's home, she remembers the events clearly, and states that Epstein did not contact her directly, but rather had 'Sarah or Maxwell' call her.
DOJ-OGR-00018730.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) detailing a sidebar conference during the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues that reading only two lines of a prior statement removes necessary context. The Court rules that the witness can read the 'whole thing,' and prosecutor Ms. Comey agrees, coordinating specific line numbers (136, line 23 through line 6) with the defense.
DOJ-OGR-00018716.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn by Ms. Comey. Carolyn testifies about being 15 or 16 years old when she brought three friends (Amanda, Tatum, and Julie, aged 15-17) to Jeffrey Epstein's house at his specific request for girls her age or younger. She describes entering the home through the kitchen and proceeding upstairs to the massage room.
DOJ-OGR-00018709.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. She describes the routine of visiting Epstein's house, going upstairs to his bathroom to set up a massage table, and removing her clothing. She testifies that while she initially kept her underwear on during massages, this eventually changed to her being 'fully nude.'
DOJ-OGR-00018699.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn by Ms. Comey. The testimony focuses on the logistics of scheduling massage appointments at Jeffrey Epstein's house. Carolyn testifies that for the first year or two, Ghislaine Maxwell would call to schedule appointments, after which Sarah Kellen or Carolyn herself would handle the scheduling. Carolyn also notes that even after Sarah took over scheduling, Maxwell was still seen at Epstein's house, specifically in an office area off the kitchen.
DOJ-OGR-00018695.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Page 97 of 264) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. The testimony describes an incident where Carolyn and Virginia massaged Mr. Epstein; Carolyn testifies that she watched from a couch while Virginia had sex with Epstein on the massage table. Carolyn states she was not touched by Epstein during this specific instance but received $300 in cash left on a sink in the bathroom afterward.
DOJ-OGR-00018692.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of direct testimony by a witness named Carolyn. She describes her first visit to Jeffrey Epstein's house, accompanied by a person named Virginia. Upon entering the kitchen, they were greeted by Ms. Maxwell, whom the witness describes as an older lady with an accent and shoulder-length black hair.
DOJ-OGR-00018688.jpg
This page is a transcript from the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Carolyn testifies about meeting a neighbor named Shawn in West Palm Beach and dating him when she was 13 and he was 17. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) introduces Government Exhibit 20 containing Shawn's full name, which is admitted under seal to protect his identity.
DOJ-OGR-00018678.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley by attorney Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on a specific computer, establishing that Ghislaine Maxwell held the only non-default user account on the device. The defense attorney attempts to establish doubt about who physically accessed the computer, suggesting it could have been in a common area (like a kitchen) and used by others via Maxwell's logged-in account.
DOJ-OGR-00018676.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley in the case United States v. Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on technical forensic details, specifically regarding computer clones, passwords, metadata, and the creation date of a specific Word document (Government Exhibit 418) which was established as January 29, 2002. The witness confirms they did not verify the physical location of any person on that specific date based on the metadata.
DOJ-OGR-00018675.jpg
This page is a transcript from the cross-examination of a forensic expert named Flatley in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The testimony focuses on technical details of how computer file dates are auto-populated by the system clock and how forensic examiners access data via cloned images and forensic software to bypass operating system password protections.
DOJ-OGR-00018671.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Flatley. The testimony focuses on the forensic examination of a hard drive, confirming it originated from a desktop computer rather than a laptop, and establishing that the drive examined was a 'clone' of another hard drive. An objection regarding the transport of desktops on airplanes was sustained by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00018668.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed 08/10/22) featuring the testimony of a Mr. Flatley. Ms. Pomerantz concludes her questioning after Flatley reads a statement describing Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell as 'great partners' and 'best of friends' who complement each other well. Ms. Menninger then begins cross-examination, establishing that a hard drive (Exhibit GX54) was found in Mr. Epstein's New York home.
DOJ-OGR-00018665.jpg
This page documents the direct examination of a witness named Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz. The witness is asked to read specific details from documents, including names of workers (John and Mary Alessi), information about 'Palm Beach House Maintenance' and a FedEx account, and metadata (author 'gmax' and 2002 timestamps) from a digital file labeled 418B.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity