DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018664.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz regarding the metadata (creation, save, and print dates in September 2002) and titles of specific evidence documents. The documents discussed are titled 'PB New Shampoo and Massage Products' (Exhibit 420) and 'Palm Beach House Workers' (Exhibit 418R), linking the evidence to operations at a Palm Beach residence.
DOJ-OGR-00018659.jpg
This document is page 61 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz regarding the review of evidence using forensic software. During the proceedings, Government Exhibit 418B is admitted without objection from Ms. Menninger, and Exhibits 420, 421, and 422 are presented for identification.
DOJ-OGR-00018658.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) is questioning a witness named Mr. Flatley regarding Government Exhibit 418B, which contains the metadata properties for Exhibit 418. The court also admits Exhibit 418 under seal due to the presence of third-party telephone numbers.
DOJ-OGR-00018655.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Flatley. The testimony focuses on an email exchange from May 25, 2001, sent by 'Sally' to 'Ms. Maxwell' regarding a 'PB manual' (likely Palm Beach manual) and a conversation with 'John'.
DOJ-OGR-00018653.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz, focusing on the authentication and admission of Government Exhibit 424, which is described as an email. The defense attorney, Ms. Menninger, offers no objection, and the Judge admits the exhibit into evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00018648.jpg
This document is page 50 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz regarding forensic evidence. Flatley identifies Government Exhibit 54 as a hard drive he examined, noting its unique identifier 'NYC024350', and begins describing the forensic process involving a write blocker.
DOJ-OGR-00018647.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Flatley by Ms. Pomerantz. Flatley provides technical definitions for digital evidence, computers, and hard drives, and confirms that he examined digital evidence relevant to the case, noting that forensic examiners usually know nothing about the case details while analyzing data.
DOJ-OGR-00018642.jpg
This document is a page from a cross-examination transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. A witness named Meder is being questioned about their role in copying and reviewing large sets of photographs (approx. 18,000 to 20,000) from CDs and black binders. The questioning attorney establishes that Meder has no personal knowledge of who took the photos or how they were placed on the CDs, despite Meder noting that some binders contained initials.
DOJ-OGR-00018641.jpg
This page is a transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), specifically the cross-examination of Ms. Meder by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. The testimony focuses on identifying Ms. Meder's handwriting on exhibit 3531-12 and establishing the immense volume of photographs she reviewed during the investigation, totaling tens of thousands across different sets.
DOJ-OGR-00018639.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named Meder by an attorney. The questioning focuses on clarifying the source of certain photographs, with the attorney confirming that Meder's testimony was that the photos were taken from CDs, not from a wall where they might have been displayed in a house.
DOJ-OGR-00018633.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness (likely Meder) by prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding the admission of Government Exhibits 317 and 318. Both exhibits are identified as photographs showing Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein together, retrieved from a CD logged as evidence number 1B75.
DOJ-OGR-00018625.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed August 10, 2022) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Meder by prosecutor Ms. Comey. The witness identifies a CD (logged as 1B78) containing a photograph (Exhibit GX-333) of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell standing together. The court admits this exhibit into evidence, and the prosecution proceeds to introduce a second exhibit (GX-337) from a different CD (logged as 1B63).
DOJ-OGR-00018624.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Comey is examining a witness named Meder regarding photos stored on a CD (evidence number 1B75) gathered during the Epstein and Maxwell investigation. The witness identifies a photograph (Government Exhibit 325) showing Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein standing together.
DOJ-OGR-00018621.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Meder by prosecutor Ms. Comey, wherein the witness identifies Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell in photographs derived from a CD (logged as 1B75) seized during their investigation. Government Exhibit 321 is formally admitted into evidence during this exchange.
DOJ-OGR-00018604.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge and Prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding witness conduct, specifically whether witnesses were instructed not to confer with one another. Ms. Moe confirms it is standard practice to instruct witnesses not to speak to each other, and discloses a meeting 'last night' with a witness named Brian, who revealed he had spoken with another witness, Jane.
DOJ-OGR-00018596.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. The transcript records a discussion ending an evidentiary session where an attorney argues against humiliating women with naked photographs in the courtroom. The court considers an item labeled '309' before adjourning proceedings until December 7, 2021.
DOJ-OGR-00018592.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger argues against admitting a topless photograph of a female subject found in Jeffrey Epstein's possession in 2019, stating the photo dates to 2002 when the subject was of age. Menninger argues that introducing the photo creates a '403 problem' (prejudice) because the prosecution will not call the subject to testify due to her 'credibility problems.'
DOJ-OGR-00018588.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Moe discusses the admissibility of two photographs (Government Exhibits 309 and 332); Exhibit 309 depicts a witness named Kate who testified earlier, while Exhibit 332 depicts a non-testifying victim. The discussion clarifies that a previously admitted version of Exhibit 332 was cropped to show only the face, and the government is now seeking to discuss the full photograph.
DOJ-OGR-00018587.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecution attorney Ms. Moe argues that photographs are relevant evidence because they demonstrate a long-term, close relationship between Maxwell and Epstein, evidenced by their aging and changing hairstyles, countering the defense's narrative that Maxwell was merely a distanced personal assistant. The Judge overrules the defense's objection regarding the lack of date stamps on the photos.
DOJ-OGR-00018582.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed Aug 10, 2022), likely from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger is arguing to exclude photographic evidence (Exhibits 332 and 332B), claiming they are manipulated 'PSD files' (Photoshop) rather than original photos. She argues that metadata titles were manually affixed by a person, creating hearsay issues, and that mere possession of a CD found in a home does not authenticate the images.
DOJ-OGR-00018581.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger argues to the Court (outside the presence of the jury) regarding the admissibility of government exhibits (specifically GX304 and GX309), which contain photographs of Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein. Menninger objects to the lack of foundation for these photos, specifically mentioning a photo of Maxwell lying on a boat at an unknown time and location.
DOJ-OGR-00018578.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Meder, likely an FBI forensic examiner, regarding the processing of physical CDs containing photos. The testimony details how the witness copied data from CDs to an FBI computer, reviewed the images for case relevancy, and verified the accuracy of Government Exhibit 1101, a chart mapping exhibit numbers to CD names.
DOJ-OGR-00018576.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of an FBI Staff Operations Specialist named Meder by Ms. Comey. Meder testifies to having 10 years of experience at the FBI, currently working on the child exploitation and human trafficking squad, and begins to explain how FBI case files and evidence are organized.
DOJ-OGR-00018573.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Maguire (likely an FBI agent) in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony focuses on the handling of evidence, specifically CDs and items found in a safe during a search. Maguire confirms that an attorney named Mr. Khan later returned items (in suitcases) that had been missing from the safe after the initial search, and that nothing appeared to be missing from that returned inventory on 'the 11th'.
DOJ-OGR-00018566.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named Maguire. Maguire confirms serving as the leader of the Evidence Collection Team during a search of a residence on July 6th and 7th. The testimony details that multiple warrants were obtained because items seen during an initial protective sweep were not covered by the first warrant, necessitating a broader subsequent warrant.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity