DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018560.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022. It records the direct examination of a witness named Maguire, who testifies about examining the contents of suitcases. Maguire confirms recognizing the items and states they appeared to be all the items that were previously located in a safe.
DOJ-OGR-00018549.jpg
This page is a transcript from the trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct examination of Special Agent Maguire by prosecutor Ms. Moe. The testimony focuses on identifying a 'massage room' and a wooden shelving unit depicted in Government Exhibits 917-R and 928-R. Both exhibits are received into evidence without objection from defense attorney Mr. Everdell.
DOJ-OGR-00018546.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness named Maguire by prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding the admission of Government Exhibits 902-R and 903-R, which are identified as photographs of an entryway and the interior of a 'massage room.' Defense attorney Mr. Everdell offers no objections to the admission of these exhibits.
DOJ-OGR-00018540.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Maguire. Maguire describes the execution of a search warrant at a residence, detailing the 'knock and announce' procedure, the subsequent forced entry when no response was received, and the conducting of a 'protective sweep' to ensure officer safety. The witness also explains the process of photographing the scene and labeling rooms with alphabet letters to document where items were found.
DOJ-OGR-00018535.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details a discussion between the defense (Mr. Everdell), the prosecution (Ms. Moe), and the Court regarding Exhibit 913, which contains photos of children and other individuals found on a desk; the parties agree to file it under seal due to privacy interests. Following this discussion, the jury enters, and the government calls Special Agent Kelly Maguire as a witness.
DOJ-OGR-00018534.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It records a dialogue between The Court and counsel Ms. Moe regarding the redaction of Exhibit 911, specifically debating whether to redact a painting over a mantel or a small photograph of an individual on a table. Ms. Moe agrees to unredact the painting and instead redact the photograph to protect potential privacy interests or witness identity.
DOJ-OGR-00018531.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecutor, Ms. Moe, explains why they did not show certain evidence to victims 'Jane' and 'Kate' during interviews to preserve the integrity of their memories against defense challenges. The Judge challenges the relevance of introducing photos taken in 2019 of 'movable objects' (specifically schoolgirl outfits) to prove a conspiracy that ended 15 years earlier.
DOJ-OGR-00018529.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving a legal argument over the admissibility of photo exhibits dated from 2019. The prosecution (Ms. Moe) argues the photos demonstrate Jeffrey Epstein's sexual preference for schoolgirls, while the defense (Mr. Everdell) and the Judge question the relevance given the time gap and location discrepancies (New York vs. Palm Beach) relative to the charged conspiracy. The text mentions testimony from a witness named 'Kate' regarding schoolgirl outfits.
DOJ-OGR-00018526.jpg
This document is page 189 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It documents the conclusion of the redirect examination of a witness named McHugh, who is then excused. The presiding officer subsequently dismisses the jury for a 15-minute afternoon break.
DOJ-OGR-00018492.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct testimony of a witness named McHugh. The testimony details a financial transaction occurring on June 18th involving an internal transfer of $7,400,000 from DDA account 6312 to DDA account 4324. The proceedings also introduce Government Exhibit 506, identified as a 'Morgan account signature card.'
DOJ-OGR-00018481.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. A witness named McHugh, presumably a JPMorgan employee, is under direct examination regarding the bank's record-keeping practices and the authentication of Government Exhibits 501, 502, 504, 505, 506, and 509. McHugh confirms that JPMorgan maintains digital images of account statements and that he verified the exhibits by comparing them against the bank's internal system of record on dual screens.
DOJ-OGR-00018475.jpg
This document is page 138 of a court transcript from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim cross-examines a witness named Kate regarding her memory of being asked to wear a uniform and an alleged conversation with Ghislaine about 'St. Trinian's,' which the witness does not recall. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) successfully objects to questions about costumes as being 'beyond the scope' of redirect.
DOJ-OGR-00018468.jpg
Excerpt from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Rohrbach seeks clarification from the Judge regarding testimony about a search of the New York residence. The discussion confirms that while the government will not introduce physical exhibits of nude photos or photos of Epstein with celebrities, the witness is permitted to testify about observing these items and 'nude artwork' in the house.
DOJ-OGR-00018465.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim argues for the admission of evidence showing the dates a female witness ('she') maintained contact via email with a male subject ('him') to prove a relationship existed after the events in question. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) argues that the witness already admitted to the dates, making the evidence cumulative.
DOJ-OGR-00018463.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument between defense attorney Ms. Sternheim and the Court regarding the admissibility of evidence—specifically an email—under the doctrine of 'past recollection recorded.' The Judge questions what specific details the witness failed to recall that would necessitate admitting the prior record.
DOJ-OGR-00018462.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It details a legal exchange between Ms. Sternheim (Defense) and Ms. Pomerantz (Prosecution) regarding an exhibit labeled 'Defendant's K-8' or '3513-019'. Ms. Pomerantz begins a legal argument citing the 'recorded recollection rule' as an exception to hearsay.
DOJ-OGR-00018461.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim and prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz discuss the admissibility and origin of two exhibits: a visa application bearing the name 'Kate' (Exhibit K-9) and emails between a witness and Mr. Epstein (Exhibit K-7). Ms. Pomerantz clarifies that the visa form was provided by the witness's counsel during a previous meeting to discuss visa status.
DOJ-OGR-00018444.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Kate in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The witness admits to initiating contact with Jeffrey Epstein in 2011, asking to stay with him in New York, and maintaining contact with him via email over the years. Conversely, the witness confirms she had no email correspondence with Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00018443.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Kate, who admits to initiating email contact with Jeffrey Epstein to arrange a meeting and asking to stay at his residence in New York. Ms. Pomerantz objects to several lines of questioning during the proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00018442.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. It details the cross-examination of a witness named 'Kate' by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim. The questioning focuses on establishing that the witness maintained email correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein in 2008 (regarding pictures) and in 2011, even after he had been in jail.
DOJ-OGR-00018432.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on an incident where Kate missed a flight from the US to London, met a man named Kevin, and went to his home. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) objects to this line of questioning on grounds of relevance, leading the judge to call for a sidebar.
DOJ-OGR-00018429.jpg
This document is page 92 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on Kate's history of 'periodic drug abuse' (cocaine, alcohol, sleeping pills) and her sobriety. It establishes that Kate met Ghislaine Maxwell at a home with a red door on Kinnerton Street around 1994, when Kate was approximately 17 years old.
DOJ-OGR-00018428.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The defense attorney questions Kate's memory reliability due to a ten-year period of substance abuse. Kate counters that her testimony relates to times she was sober, specifically stating she was required to not take drugs or be drunk when around Ghislaine and Jeffrey.
DOJ-OGR-00018424.jpg
This document is page 87 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on a television appearance Kate made with approximately six other women to discuss allegations against Jeffrey Epstein. The attorney questions the nature of their interaction, suggesting they appeared as a 'sisterhood' or were affectionate, while Kate clarifies she had only met the other women the day prior at a court appearance.
DOJ-OGR-00018415.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on her past modeling work in Europe (Milan, Paris, London) and her subsequent move to the United States on an 'extraordinary ability' visa.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity