DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00018409.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a sidebar discussion regarding '3500 material' where a prosecutor argues for the right to ask redirect questions about a witness's history as a domestic violence victim if defense attorney Ms. Sternheim raises the issue. The judge agrees, the witness is recalled, and the jury is brought back in.
DOJ-OGR-00018402.jpg
This page is a transcript from the direct examination of a witness named Kate in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Kate testifies that she stopped spending time with Maxwell around age 24. She also details her past addiction to alcohol, cocaine, and sleeping pills, stating she achieved sobriety on May 1st, 2003, and affirms that her past substance use has not affected her memories.
DOJ-OGR-00018400.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Kate. Kate testifies that when she was 23 or 24, Ghislaine Maxwell invited her to 'the island' and asked her to massage Jeffrey Epstein, confirming that sexualized massages took place. She also recalls seeing a very young blond girl on the island and states that she initially associated with Maxwell and Epstein because she sought a friendship with Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00018398.jpg
This document is a page from the direct examination testimony of a witness named Kate in the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Kate testifies that she found a schoolgirl outfit on her bed in Palm Beach and was told by Ghislaine Maxwell to wear it to serve tea to Jeffrey Epstein. Kate explains she complied because she was isolated in Florida and feared the consequences of refusing.
DOJ-OGR-00018385.jpg
This document is a page from the direct examination of a witness named Kate in the trial against Ghislaine Maxwell. Kate testifies that Maxwell closed the door to a room where Kate then gave Epstein a massage that escalated into a sex act initiated by Epstein. Kate further testifies that immediately after the encounter, she went downstairs and Maxwell praised her, asking if she had fun and stating that Epstein liked her.
DOJ-OGR-00018378.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Kate. She testifies about a visit to Ghislaine Maxwell's townhouse where she was introduced to Jeffrey Epstein. Maxwell described Kate's talents and small physical size (95 lbs) to Epstein, then instructed Kate to squeeze Epstein's feet to demonstrate her strength.
DOJ-OGR-00016907.jpg
This page is a transcript from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Ms. Menninger argues that prior testimony from Jeffrey Epstein regarding his move to 9 East 71st Street (which he stated was around 1996) is relevant because a witness named 'Jane' claimed he lived there in 1994. The Court sustains an objection to this line of argument, referencing a prior ruling regarding the 'motive to develop' testimony.
DOJ-OGR-00016904.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely US v. Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger argues regarding the admissibility of evidence concerning Jeffrey Epstein's lease violations and residency at a specific property in late 1995 and early 1996. She references a witness hired in December 1995 who confirmed Epstein was not living at the property for the first three weeks of his employment.
DOJ-OGR-00016897.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the afternoon session of the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Comey informs the court that stipulations have been reached and the case is nearing conclusion, though one disputed issue remains. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger begins to address the court regarding this disputed fact.
DOJ-OGR-00016896.jpg
This document is page 167 of a court transcript (Document 763) filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The page captures the moment a recess is called immediately after Ms. Sternheim acknowledges a statement regarding a 'right to testify or not testify.' The majority of the page is blank as the proceedings continued on the next page.
DOJ-OGR-00016883.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) involving a dispute between the defense (Mr. Everdell) and prosecution (Ms. Moe) regarding the late disclosure of a witness. The defense introduces Kevin Moran, the owner of the Nags Head Pub located across the street from Ms. Maxwell's residence at 44 Kinnerton Street, as a witness regarding the timing of her residence there. The prosecution objects, citing a lack of prior notice and missing '26.2 material' (witness statements).
DOJ-OGR-00016882.jpg
This page is a transcript from a court proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, likely Ghislaine Maxwell's trial). Attorney Mr. Everdell is explaining to the Court why a potential witness was not disclosed earlier, stating they were still verifying the witness's utility. They discuss '26.2 material' (Jencks Act material) and reference a conversation from 'yesterday' (December 16th) regarding the trial schedule, aiming for closing arguments on the following Monday.
DOJ-OGR-00016877.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Ms. Menninger (defense) explains the delay in reviewing materials due to the volume of '3500 material,' mentioning approximately 500 nontestifying witnesses. The Court questions why an application to enforce a subpoena for a potential defense witness was filed late at night (11:54) despite the witness being disclosed for months.
DOJ-OGR-00016875.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a sidebar or discussion between the Judge, defense attorney Ms. Menninger, and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding '3500 material' (discovery) received on October 11th. The conversation focuses on the scope of testimony concerning a person named 'Kelly,' alleged involvement in massages, and the cross-examination of a witness referred to as 'Jane'.
DOJ-OGR-00016874.jpg
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) where defense attorney Ms. Menninger discusses efforts to subpoena a witness. The defense argues that a victim referred to as 'Jane' previously told the government that a woman named 'Kelly' could corroborate her story. The Judge requests specific details regarding the defense team's attempts to contact this witness.
DOJ-OGR-00016872.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It records the conclusion of testimony by a witness named Ms. Healy, the dismissal of the jury for lunch, and a subsequent procedural discussion regarding the release of AUSA Alex Rossmiller from a defense subpoena.
DOJ-OGR-00016869.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Healy. The witness denies knowing another 'Michelle' in the office, denies involvement in 'group sexualized massages' with 'Jane' or Jeffrey Epstein, and confirms having been contacted by the FBI regarding the case.
DOJ-OGR-00016855.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of Dr. Dubin. The questioning focuses on Dubin's personal life in the 1990s (birth of a child in 1997) and pivots to her observations of the relationship between Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca raises objections regarding hearsay and vague time frames, which the Court partially sustains, leading the questioner to narrow the focus to the period between 1994 and 2000.
DOJ-OGR-00016371.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, documenting the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by Ms. Menninger. The questioning focuses on a prior statement Farmer made to government agents on May 9, 2020, regarding a massage involving Epstein; the defense attempts to establish that Farmer previously characterized the event as 'awkward and uncomfortable' but 'not explicitly sexual,' which the witness disputes as being the agents' notes rather than her exact words. The witness confirms she felt Epstein could see her during the massage.
DOJ-OGR-00016366.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, US v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger is cross-examining witness A. Farmer regarding potential inconsistencies between her testimony about being nude during a massage and statements she made to Mr. Baker of The New York Times. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) objects to the line of questioning, and the Judge sustains the objection, ruling it is not a prior inconsistent statement.
DOJ-OGR-00016364.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The questioning focuses on a specific interaction involving a foot massage given by Jeffrey Epstein, whether the witness recalled it being sexualized at the time she spoke to the government in May 2020, and whether any private body parts were touched. The witness clarifies that while there was no touching of private parts, she considered the interaction sexualized.
DOJ-OGR-00016361.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed August 10, 2022) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer by defense attorney Ms. Menninger. The testimony focuses on an incident in a New Mexico movie theater where Jeffrey Epstein held the witness's hand. The defense establishes that while Ghislaine Maxwell was sitting on the other side of Epstein, the witness does not know if Maxwell saw the contact, and Maxwell did not comment on it afterward.
DOJ-OGR-00016359.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, concerning Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) is being cross-examined by Ms. Menninger about a 2006 visit from agents and the presence of holiday decorations. The prosecution (Ms. Pomerantz) objects to the defense attempting to show the witness an exhibit marked AF10.
DOJ-OGR-00016354.jpg
This page is from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) featuring the cross-examination of witness A. Farmer. The questioning focuses on a past event where the witness went shopping and horseback riding, specifically establishing that Jeffrey Epstein bought her cowboy boots. The defense attorney highlights that the witness kept these boots for 25 years and wore them in recent years.
DOJ-OGR-00016348.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of witness A. Farmer (Annie Farmer) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The questioning focuses on a visit Farmer made to the New Mexico ranch in April 1996, specifically asking if she is aware of flight log entries for Maxwell or Epstein during that time (she is not). The defense also questions her recollection of staff at the ranch, including a driver, ranch hands, and a chef, and introduces a 2006 document (3514-001) to refresh her memory.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity