DOJ
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-01 | N/A | Justice Department launched probe into prosecutor misconduct | Washington D.C. | View |
DOJ-OGR-00019428.jpg
A page from a legal filing (Case 20-3061) dated September 24, 2020. The text argues that the government failed to follow proper procedures to access court-protected documents from a civil case. It highlights Ms. Maxwell's unique position as the only individual involved in all six related judicial proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00019425.jpg
This document is page 21 (filed as page 26) of a legal brief in Case 20-3061, filed on September 24, 2020. It argues that a writ of mandamus is appropriate because Judge Nathan abused her discretion regarding a protective order and Judge Preska's unsealing order relies on inconsistent decisions within the Southern District of New York. The text discusses the unsealing of deposition materials and claims prejudice against Ms. Maxwell, though specific details are heavily redacted.
DOJ-OGR-00019416.jpg
This page from a legal brief (filed Sept 24, 2020) argues against the government's stance that the court lacks jurisdiction to hear Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal. The text discusses the 'collateral order doctrine' in criminal cases, citing precedents like Midland Asphalt Corp. and Flanagan, and asserts that Maxwell simply seeks permission to share facts under seal with another judge. A footnote references the Miami Herald's involvement in the related civil case Brown v. Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00019411.jpg
This is page 12 of 58 from a court filing dated September 24, 2020 (Case 20-3061). The document is heavily redacted, with only a single sentence fragment visible at the bottom stating that Ms. Maxwell asked Judge Preska to briefly stay something (likely a court order or proceeding). The document bears a DOJ-OGR Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00019404.jpg
This document is page 5 of a 58-page legal filing (Document 60, Case 20-3061) dated September 24, 2020. It is a table of authorities, listing legal cases, federal rules of procedure, and statutes that are cited within the larger document. The page numbers provided indicate where each authority is referenced.
DOJ-OGR-00019392.jpg
A Notice of Defective Filing from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit regarding the case 'United States of America v. Maxwell' (Docket 20-3061). The notice indicates that a letter submitted on behalf of the Appellant on September 23, 2020, did not comply with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure (FRAP) or Local Rules, though the specific reason is not checked on this page. The document lists Judge Nathan as the District Court Judge.
DOJ-OGR-00019388.jpg
This document is page 22 of a legal filing (Case 20-3061) dated September 16, 2020. It contains the conclusion of the Government's argument, signed by AUSA Maurene Comey, requesting that the Court dismiss Maxwell's appeal for lack of jurisdiction and deny her motion to consolidate appeals regarding an Order by Judge Nathan.
DOJ-OGR-00019377.jpg
This document is page 11 of a legal filing (Case 20-3061) dated September 16, 2020. It presents legal arguments regarding the 'collateral-order doctrine' and protective orders in criminal cases, arguing that such orders are generally not subject to interlocutory appeal. The text cites various precedents (Firestone, Caparros, Pappas) to support the argument that restricting the dissemination of discovery materials does not violate First Amendment rights and that challenges to such orders should await final judgment.
DOJ-OGR-00019366.jpg
This is a Certificate of Compliance filed on September 16, 2020, for Case 20-3061. It certifies that the associated motion/opposition contains 5,099 words, adhering to Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and is signed by Assistant US Attorney Maurene Comey on behalf of Acting US Attorney Audrey Strauss.
DOJ-OGR-00019363.jpg
This document is page 21 of a legal filing (Case 20-3061) dated September 16, 2020. The Government argues that the Court should deny Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to consolidate two separate appeals (one civil regarding unsealing, one criminal regarding a protective order). The text asserts that Maxwell's strategy is procedurally improper and attempts to litigate the Government's evidence-gathering methods in the wrong forum.
DOJ-OGR-00019356.jpg
This page from a legal brief (Case 20-3061, dated Sept 16, 2020) argues that Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal should be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The text contends that Judge Nathan's refusal to modify a Protective Order is not an 'immediately appealable collateral order' and does not fall under categories allowing prejudgment appeals in criminal cases.
DOJ-OGR-00019353.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, specifically Case 20-3061, dated September 16, 2020. It argues against the immediate appeal of a district court's pretrial decision, asserting that any potential harm to the defendant, Punn, can be adequately remedied through the standard appellate process after a final judgment. The text cites several legal precedents, including Mohawk Indus. and United States v. Hitchcock, to support the principle that post-conviction review is sufficient to protect a defendant's rights, even in cases involving purportedly ill-gotten evidence.
DOJ-OGR-00019352.jpg
This document is page 10 of a legal filing (Case 20-3061, dated September 16, 2020) related to United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Second Circuit. The text consists of legal arguments regarding the 'collateral-order doctrine' and cites multiple Supreme Court precedents (such as Stack v. Boyle and Sell v. United States) to define when pretrial orders in criminal cases can be appealed immediately. The document argues that exceptions allowing for interlocutory appeals are rare.
DOJ-OGR-00019339.jpg
This is a legal notice from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, dated September 15, 2020, regarding the case of United States of America v. Maxwell (Docket # 20-3061). The document officially announces that the case manager assigned to the matter has been changed. It provides a phone number for any inquiries related to the case.
DOJ-OGR-00019335.jpg
This document is page 2 of a legal filing by the Government to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated August 21, 2020, in the criminal case against a defendant (implied Ghislaine Maxwell, Case 1:20-cr-00330). The Government opposes the defendant's request to use criminal discovery materials—specifically regarding grand jury subpoenas issued to an unnamed 'Recipient' during the Epstein investigation—in separate civil litigation. The Government argues this violates the protective order which restricts discovery material solely for the defense of the criminal action.
DOJ-OGR-00019333.jpg
This document is the cover page for 'Exhibit G', which is part of Document 24 filed in Case 20-3061 on September 10, 2020. The page includes a Department of Justice (DOJ) control number, indicating its origin or processing by that agency.
DOJ-OGR-00019331.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, outlines a procedural history concerning sealed information from civil matters. The Government successfully modified a protective order in one court (Court-1) but not another (Court-2) to obtain materials for a grand jury investigation, which were then turned over by a 'Recipient'. The current court is now permitting the Defendant, who learned of this through discovery, to provide the sealed information back to Court-1 and Court-2 for their own determination of relevance.
DOJ-OGR-00019326.jpg
This document is the final page of a court order from the Southern District of New York, signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on August 12, 2020. The order addresses a request by Ms. Maxwell for a 'stay of the unsealing process,' stating that she may renew this request if the protective order in a parallel criminal action is modified to allow disclosure of relevant information. The document bears a DOJ Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00019323.jpg
A letter to Judge Loretta A. Preska from Laura A. Menninger regarding procedural requests for the unsealing of documents in the case involving Ms. Maxwell. The letter proposes amendments to the unsealing protocol to prevent errors, requests a 7-day window for appeals to the Second Circuit, and suggests a specific list of five docket entries for the next round of review.
DOJ-OGR-00019310.jpg
This is page 8 of a court order (Protective Order) filed on July 30, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text outlines strict protocols for the Defendant's review of discovery materials, mandating the presence of counsel or BOP officials. It also establishes rules for showing materials to potential witnesses without providing them copies and begins defining 'Highly Confidential Information' produced by the Government.
DOJ-OGR-00019308.jpg
Page 6 of a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, related to Ghislaine Maxwell) detailing the protocol for handling 'Confidential Information' during discovery. It defines such information as including the identities of victims and witnesses, while noting that publicly self-identified victims are not confidential. It also establishes a mechanism for Defense Counsel to challenge the Government's confidentiality designations.
DOJ-OGR-00019304.jpg
This is page 2 of a court order filed on July 30, 2020, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The document outlines strict protocols for handling 'Discovery' materials, mandating that the Defendant (referred to as 'her') and Defense Counsel use the materials solely for this criminal action and not for civil proceedings. It restricts the Defendant from copying or transmitting materials to anyone other than her counsel.
DOJ-OGR-00019280.jpg
This document is a Notice of Appearance filed on September 10, 2020, in the case of United States v. Maxwell (Docket Case 20-3061). Maurene Comey of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York formally enters the case as additional counsel for the Appellee (United States), working alongside co-counsel Won S. Shin.
DOJ-OGR-00019266.jpg
This document is page 3 of a criminal docket for the case USA v. Maxwell (Case #: 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It lists the defendant, Ghislaine Maxwell, her defense attorneys, and pending conspiracy counts related to enticing minors to engage in illegal sex acts.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity