| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Flight crew |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Flight crew |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
LARRY VISOSKI
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Employee |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Friend |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein's attorney
|
Professional document transfer |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sarah Kellen
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Flight crew |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
SARAH KELLEN
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of the witness. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Review of Government's Exhibit 662 (Pilot Logbook). | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of standard operating procedures for scheduling Epstein's flights. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hiring of Rodgers by Jeffrey Epstein | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness's initial estimated date of meeting Jane (later corrected). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Handover of records | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight from Traverse City to Cahokia (CPS) for maintenance. | Traverse City to Cahokia | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight from Columbus to Traverse City (TBC). | Columbus to Traverse City | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flights involving an unnamed female estimated to be 18 or 19 years old. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Atlantic crossing flights to Europe. | Atlantic Ocean/Europe | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rodgers visited Maxwell's 59th Street apartment | 59th Street near Columbus C... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Refurbishment of first aid kits | Maxwell's residences | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight planning and logistics discussions. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visit to Interlochen Center for the Arts. | Traverse City, Michigan | View |
| N/A | N/A | Employment of Rodgers by Epstein | Various (Flight crew) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony provided by pilots Visoski, Alessi, and Rodgers. | Court | View |
| N/A | Discussion | The witness (Rodgers) recalls being present to discuss the acquisition of a G2B aircraft. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Employment | Visoski and Rodgers were employed as Epstein's pilots over the same time period as the counts of ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Flight | The witness (Rodgers) is being questioned about flights they piloted for Epstein. | in-flight | View |
| N/A | Flight | Seven flights were taken to Interlochen. | Interlochen | View |
| N/A | Introduction | Mr. Epstein would sometimes introduce passengers, particularly special guests, to the witness (Ro... | cockpit | View |
| N/A | Passenger interaction | Mr. Epstein would sometimes introduce passengers, including special guests, to the witness (Rodge... | Cockpit of a plane | View |
| N/A | Flight | The witness, Rodgers, stated he took an unnamed male on seven flights to Interlochen. | To Interlochen, Michigan (v... | View |
| N/A | Flight | A series of flights to Interlochen that occurred in August, with one exception in July. The year ... | Interlochen | View |
| N/A | Service visit | Witness would visit Ms. Maxwell's residences to pick up and return first aid kits that needed to ... | Ms. Maxwell's residences | View |
Court transcript of witness Rodgers testifying about interactions with Ghislaine Maxwell between 1991 and 2004. Rodgers details visiting four specific residences of Maxwell's (59th St, Upper East Side studio, 84th St, and 65th St townhouse) primarily to maintain and refurbish first aid kits identical to those kept on Epstein's aircraft. Communications evolved from beepers to cell phones during this period.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. The witness testifies about first meeting Ms. Maxwell in July 1991, describes her physical appearance and personality at the time, and states she was 'number two' below Jeffrey Epstein. The witness then positively identifies Ms. Maxwell, the defendant, in the courtroom.
This document is a court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers, who flew planes for Jeffrey Epstein. The testimony focuses on the period between 1994 and 2004, describing how Rodgers received information about upcoming flights from Epstein, his secretary, or Ghislaine Maxwell. Rodgers also details Maxwell's significant role in Epstein's operations, describing her as a property manager, office manager, and purchaser for his homes and aircraft.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Rodgers regarding his employment with Jeffrey Epstein. Rodgers explains he was hired in July 1991 as a pilot after being recruited from his previous job flying a Hawker for a real estate developer in Columbus, Ohio. He served as Epstein's chief pilot, captain, and flight engineer for the period between 1991 and 2019.
This document, a legal filing from February 25, 2022, discusses the defendant's arguments regarding the availability and completeness of phone records and flight manifests in a criminal case. The defendant claims that Carolyn's testimony could have been disproven by phone records and that flight manifests would have helped challenge Jane's recollections, but the document refutes these claims, citing testimony from Visoski and Rodgers about the handling and incompleteness of flight manifests.
This legal document, filed on July 22, 2022, discusses the extensive nature of a criminal conspiracy, identifying Epstein and the defendant as knowing participants. It notes that Sarah Kellen joined the conspiracy in 2002 and that minor victims were recruited through Virginia and Carolyn starting around 2001. The document also details the roles of unknowing participants, such as Epstein employee Juan Alessi and pilots Visoski and Rodgers, whose services were directed by the defendant and were necessary for the criminal scheme.
The witness (Rodgers) confirms speaking to Sarah Kellen often enough to have her number programmed in their phone.
Early on, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness by beeper if she needed something.
After beepers were no longer used, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness via cell phone to provide information about an upcoming flight.
Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via beeper to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
After beepers were no longer used, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via cell phone to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
A questioner asks the witness, Rodgers, about conversations with Mr. Epstein regarding renovations for a G2B aircraft purchased in 1994. Rodgers is also asked about travel to Michigan and to identify staff who worked at the Palm Beach house in the 1990s.
Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness via beeper to provide information about an upcoming flight.
Rodgers confirms that 'JE' stands for Jeffrey Epstein and 'GM' stands for Ghislaine Maxwell in the logbook.
Conversations serving as the basis for the witness's knowledge about Maxwell's moves.
Communication via cell phones
Instructions regarding Epstein needing to fly somewhere.
Rodgers stated he recalled meeting Jane around the year 2000, give or take a year or two.
Communication via beeper if she needed something
Rodgers confirms he did not send his pilot logbook to Ghislaine.
The witness, Rodgers, confirms sending flight manifests periodically (about every month) to Epstein's office in New York. The witness explicitly denies sending these manifests to Ghislaine.
The transcript details a court examination where the witness, Rodgers, is asked about conversations they had with Ms. Maxwell regarding when she moved between various apartments and a townhouse after her father's death.
During the 1990s, Rodgers would usually speak to Epstein's secretary in New York to schedule flights.
After receiving a page, Rodgers would call back Epstein's office and speak with his secretary or assistant about the flight.
The witness, Rodgers, confirms sending flight manifests periodically (usually at the end of the month) to Epstein's office in New York. It is explicitly stated that these manifests were not sent to Ghislaine.
Rodgers stated he recalled meeting Jane around the year 2000, give or take a year or two.
Questioning regarding flight rules, mingling with passengers, and cockpit procedures.
Rodgers confirms meeting a person in photos in Sept 2003 and meeting Jane in Nov 1996 based on his logbook.
An unnamed questioner cross-examines witness Rodgers about how passengers were recorded in flight logbooks. Rodgers confirms that for frequent, recognized passengers on Epstein's planes, initials were sometimes used instead of full names to save space.
A questioner cross-examines witness Rodgers about Shelly Lewis's romantic involvement with Epstein and Ghislaine's share in a charter plane during the 1990s versus flying on Epstein's plane in the 2000s.
A witness named Rodgers is cross-examined about their knowledge of various individuals connected to Jeffrey Epstein, including Henry Drecky, Marvin Minsky, Alberto Pinto, and Emmy Taylor. The questioning touches on their roles, associations with institutions like Yale and MIT, and their representation by initials in logs.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity