| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Flight crew |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Flight crew |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
LARRY VISOSKI
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Employee |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Friend |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein's attorney
|
Professional document transfer |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sarah Kellen
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Flight crew |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
SARAH KELLEN
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of the witness. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Review of Government's Exhibit 662 (Pilot Logbook). | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of standard operating procedures for scheduling Epstein's flights. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hiring of Rodgers by Jeffrey Epstein | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness's initial estimated date of meeting Jane (later corrected). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Handover of records | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight from Traverse City to Cahokia (CPS) for maintenance. | Traverse City to Cahokia | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight from Columbus to Traverse City (TBC). | Columbus to Traverse City | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flights involving an unnamed female estimated to be 18 or 19 years old. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Atlantic crossing flights to Europe. | Atlantic Ocean/Europe | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rodgers visited Maxwell's 59th Street apartment | 59th Street near Columbus C... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Refurbishment of first aid kits | Maxwell's residences | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight planning and logistics discussions. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visit to Interlochen Center for the Arts. | Traverse City, Michigan | View |
| N/A | N/A | Employment of Rodgers by Epstein | Various (Flight crew) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony provided by pilots Visoski, Alessi, and Rodgers. | Court | View |
| N/A | Discussion | The witness (Rodgers) recalls being present to discuss the acquisition of a G2B aircraft. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Employment | Visoski and Rodgers were employed as Epstein's pilots over the same time period as the counts of ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Flight | The witness (Rodgers) is being questioned about flights they piloted for Epstein. | in-flight | View |
| N/A | Flight | Seven flights were taken to Interlochen. | Interlochen | View |
| N/A | Introduction | Mr. Epstein would sometimes introduce passengers, particularly special guests, to the witness (Ro... | cockpit | View |
| N/A | Passenger interaction | Mr. Epstein would sometimes introduce passengers, including special guests, to the witness (Rodge... | Cockpit of a plane | View |
| N/A | Flight | The witness, Rodgers, stated he took an unnamed male on seven flights to Interlochen. | To Interlochen, Michigan (v... | View |
| N/A | Flight | A series of flights to Interlochen that occurred in August, with one exception in July. The year ... | Interlochen | View |
| N/A | Service visit | Witness would visit Ms. Maxwell's residences to pick up and return first aid kits that needed to ... | Ms. Maxwell's residences | View |
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a portion of a trial. A lawyer, Mr. Everdell, is cross-examining a witness, Mr. Rodgers, and requests that both the witness and the jury view evidence labeled LV3A and LV3B, which are photos. Mr. Everdell specifically instructs the witness that he knows the person's name in the photos but should not say it aloud in court.
This document is page 205 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers by attorney Mr. Everdell. The questioning focuses on challenging Rodgers' memory of a meeting with a person named 'Jane' on November 11, 1996, establishing that the date is derived solely from flight logs which only list a first name—a name shared by others in Epstein's circle, including an assistant. The page concludes with the introduction of sealed exhibits LV3A and LV3B to the jury.
This document is a page from the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely a pilot) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330). Rodgers admits that his previous statement to the government—that he first met 'Jane' around 2000—was based on memory without researching his logbooks and was 'a couple of years off.' The attorney points out that flight logs from 1996, 1997, and 1998 show a passenger with Jane's first name, establishing an earlier connection than Rodgers initially recalled.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' past interviews with the FBI in 2006 and with prosecutors in 2020 regarding flights he piloted for Epstein. The interrogator specifically asks about an entry in Rodgers' flight log for a person named 'Jane' and whether she was discussed in the initial FBI interview.
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of witness Rodgers) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on establishing that the witness's memory of meeting 'Jane' on Epstein's plane on November 11, 1996, is derived solely from reviewing flight logs rather than independent recollection. The flight log entry for that date reportedly lists only a first name, which matches 'Jane's' true first name.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of a trial. The judge calls for a mid-afternoon break during the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers by defense attorney Mr. Everdell. After a recess, Mr. Everdell informs the court that he is not yet halfway through his questioning, indicating the examination will continue for some time.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning establishes that Rodgers' testimony about the number and timing of flights, including those to Interlochen, is not based on independent memory but on a 'refreshed recollection' from reviewing flight records and logbooks.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on establishing that Rodgers flew an unnamed male to Interlochen, Michigan, on seven separate occasions between 1991 and 1997. The trips were typically in August for the purpose of watching end-of-the-year performances.
This document is page 194 from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers. The testimony initially covers legal liability regarding aircraft ownership, during which prosecutor Ms. Comey successfully objects multiple times. The questioning then shifts to specific flights and the witness's familiarity with Interlochen, described as a summer arts camp for musicians and singers.
This document is a page from a court transcript (cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony establishes that helicopters were owned by 'Air Ghislaine, Inc.' and purchased by Jeffrey Epstein from Sikorsky. The questioning attorney attempts to establish that Epstein controlled the companies owning the aircraft, and questions the witness's employment history prior to working for Epstein.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony confirms that Jeffrey Epstein controlled the companies that owned his aircraft: JEGE, Incorporated owned the Boeing 727, and Hyperion Air owned the Gulfstream. The witness also estimates that Epstein purchased a Bell helicopter in November 2002.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers confirms sending flight manifests, which were separate from the flight logbook and also held by Larry Visoski, to Epstein's New York office on a monthly basis. The witness explicitly denies sending these same manifests to Ghislaine.
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers. Rodgers confirms the procedures for logging passengers on a plane associated with Epstein, stating that frequent passengers like Sarah Kellen were abbreviated by initials, while new passengers' full names were used. He also affirms that Epstein's friends, acquaintances, and family would fly on the plane with him, sometimes just for a 'lift'.
This document is a transcript of a cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' practices for recording passengers in flight logbooks for 'Epstein's planes'. Rodgers confirms that for frequent, recognized passengers, they would often use initials instead of full names to save space, citing 'SK' as an example of such an entry.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' personal practice as a pilot of transcribing passenger names from manifests into a personal logbook. It also explores how Rodgers would record passengers whose names were unknown, using placeholders like "one passenger" or "one PAX," and sometimes noting their gender.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a pilot named Rodgers. The testimony focuses on the pilot's practice of maintaining passenger manifests and logbooks (specifically Government's Exhibit 662), distinguishing between FAA requirements versus personal practice, particularly regarding international flights and customs clearance.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely a pilot) regarding flight protocols. Rodgers testifies that he was not always told the names of all passengers, did not always meet them, and that airline regulations did not require him to gather passenger names.
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of a witness named Rodgers in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The testimony covers Rodgers' inability to recall Sarah Kellen's phone number despite seeing it in a binder, and shifts to discuss the logistical requirements for scheduling flights for Jeffrey Epstein, specifically the need for destination and departure time.
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on transportation arrangements, confirming the witness handled their own, and their communications in the 2000s, specifically confirming they used cell phones to discuss flights and spoke with an individual named Sarah Kellen frequently enough to have her number saved.
This document is a page from a court transcript involving the cross-examination of a pilot named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on flight scheduling protocols in the early 2000s, establishing that Sarah Kellen primarily coordinated flights with the chief pilot, Larry, rather than Rodgers. Rodgers confirms that he first met Sarah Kellen in September 2001, which coincides with her first appearance on his flight logs.
This court transcript excerpt details the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers regarding flight scheduling procedures. The witness confirms that in the 1990s, they would coordinate with Ghislaine if she was flying, or otherwise with one of Epstein's secretaries. The witness then identifies Lesley Groff as Epstein's secretary in the 2000s with whom they would have coordinated.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers testifies about the process of scheduling flights during the 1990s, stating that while they occasionally spoke directly with Mr. Epstein or Ghislaine, the primary point of contact was typically Epstein's secretary in New York.
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, who was a pilot for Epstein. Rodgers testifies to never observing any evidence of sexual activity on the flights, such as discarded clothes, sex toys, or condoms, and states they have no reason to believe Epstein engaged in sexual activity with underage girls or women on the flights they piloted. The questioning then begins to explore the flight scheduling process, mentioning that Rodgers and a Larry Visoski would be alerted before a flight.
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of a pilot named Rodgers (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The testimony focuses on the layout of Gulfstream and Boeing aircraft, specifically regarding pilot access to restrooms and coffee, and whether the pilot ever observed sexual activity in the passenger cabin (which the witness denies). The questioning also touches on pilot responsibilities for cleaning the cabin after flights.
This document is a transcript page from the cross-examination of a pilot named Rodgers in the case involving Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The questioning focuses on the lack of rules regarding the pilot's interaction with passengers and other staff, as well as the logistics of leaving the cockpit to use the restroom on a Gulfstream jet during long flights to Europe.
A questioner asks the witness, Rodgers, about conversations with Mr. Epstein regarding renovations for a G2B aircraft purchased in 1994. Rodgers is also asked about travel to Michigan and to identify staff who worked at the Palm Beach house in the 1990s.
During the 1990s, Rodgers would usually speak to Epstein's secretary in New York to schedule flights.
The witness, Rodgers, confirms sending flight manifests periodically (usually at the end of the month) to Epstein's office in New York. It is explicitly stated that these manifests were not sent to Ghislaine.
The witness (Rodgers) confirms speaking to Sarah Kellen often enough to have her number programmed in their phone.
Early on, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness by beeper if she needed something.
Rodgers confirms that 'JE' stands for Jeffrey Epstein and 'GM' stands for Ghislaine Maxwell in the logbook.
Conversations serving as the basis for the witness's knowledge about Maxwell's moves.
Instructions regarding Epstein needing to fly somewhere.
Rodgers stated he recalled meeting Jane around the year 2000, give or take a year or two.
Rodgers confirms he did not send his pilot logbook to Ghislaine.
Communication via beeper if she needed something
Communication via cell phones
Rodgers stated he recalled meeting Jane around the year 2000, give or take a year or two.
Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness via beeper to provide information about an upcoming flight.
The witness, Rodgers, confirms sending flight manifests periodically (about every month) to Epstein's office in New York. The witness explicitly denies sending these manifests to Ghislaine.
Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via beeper to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
After beepers were no longer used, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via cell phone to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
After receiving a page, Rodgers would call back Epstein's office and speak with his secretary or assistant about the flight.
After beepers were no longer used, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness via cell phone to provide information about an upcoming flight.
The transcript details a court examination where the witness, Rodgers, is asked about conversations they had with Ms. Maxwell regarding when she moved between various apartments and a townhouse after her father's death.
Questioning regarding flight rules, mingling with passengers, and cockpit procedures.
A questioner cross-examines Rodgers, who confirms that an unnamed woman had extensive responsibilities including managing properties, hiring staff, overseeing renovations, and making purchases for residences and planes.
Rodgers confirms meeting a person in photos in Sept 2003 and meeting Jane in Nov 1996 based on his logbook.
Q&A regarding Mr. Alessi's role and the details of flight 979 on May 9, 1997.
A witness named Rodgers is cross-examined about their knowledge of various individuals connected to Jeffrey Epstein, including Henry Drecky, Marvin Minsky, Alberto Pinto, and Emmy Taylor. The questioning touches on their roles, associations with institutions like Yale and MIT, and their representation by initials in logs.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity