Rodgers
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Flight crew |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Flight crew |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
LARRY VISOSKI
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Employee |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Friend |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein's attorney
|
Professional document transfer |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sarah Kellen
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Flight crew |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
SARAH KELLEN
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Direct examination of the witness. | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Review of Government's Exhibit 662 (Pilot Logbook). | Courtroom | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussion of standard operating procedures for scheduling Epstein's flights. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Hiring of Rodgers by Jeffrey Epstein | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Witness's initial estimated date of meeting Jane (later corrected). | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Handover of records | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight from Traverse City to Cahokia (CPS) for maintenance. | Traverse City to Cahokia | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight from Columbus to Traverse City (TBC). | Columbus to Traverse City | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flights involving an unnamed female estimated to be 18 or 19 years old. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Atlantic crossing flights to Europe. | Atlantic Ocean/Europe | View |
| N/A | N/A | Rodgers visited Maxwell's 59th Street apartment | 59th Street near Columbus C... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Refurbishment of first aid kits | Maxwell's residences | View |
| N/A | N/A | Flight planning and logistics discussions. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Visit to Interlochen Center for the Arts. | Traverse City, Michigan | View |
| N/A | N/A | Employment of Rodgers by Epstein | Various (Flight crew) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Testimony provided by pilots Visoski, Alessi, and Rodgers. | Court | View |
| N/A | Discussion | The witness (Rodgers) recalls being present to discuss the acquisition of a G2B aircraft. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Employment | Visoski and Rodgers were employed as Epstein's pilots over the same time period as the counts of ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Flight | The witness (Rodgers) is being questioned about flights they piloted for Epstein. | in-flight | View |
| N/A | Flight | Seven flights were taken to Interlochen. | Interlochen | View |
| N/A | Introduction | Mr. Epstein would sometimes introduce passengers, particularly special guests, to the witness (Ro... | cockpit | View |
| N/A | Passenger interaction | Mr. Epstein would sometimes introduce passengers, including special guests, to the witness (Rodge... | Cockpit of a plane | View |
| N/A | Flight | The witness, Rodgers, stated he took an unnamed male on seven flights to Interlochen. | To Interlochen, Michigan (v... | View |
| N/A | Flight | A series of flights to Interlochen that occurred in August, with one exception in July. The year ... | Interlochen | View |
| N/A | Service visit | Witness would visit Ms. Maxwell's residences to pick up and return first aid kits that needed to ... | Ms. Maxwell's residences | View |
DOJ-OGR-00013414.jpg
This document is a transcript from a legal proceeding filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers. The questioning focuses on flight number 916, which occurred on November 11, 1996. The witness confirms the flight was on a Gulf Stream G2B from Palm Beach, Florida, to Teterboro, New Jersey, and that both Jeffrey Epstein and a woman identified only as "Jane" were passengers.
DOJ-OGR-00013413.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Rodgers. Rodgers testifies that he first met a passenger, referred to as 'Jane', on a flight on November 11, 1996, and saw her a total of four times on Jeffrey Epstein's planes. He also states that Jane flew with both Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
DOJ-OGR-00013411.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The judge confirms with attorneys Ms. Comey and Mr. Everdell that there are no outstanding matters before instructing for the jury to be brought in and for the witness, Mr. Rodgers, to take the stand.
DOJ-OGR-00013410.jpg
This document is page 1837 of a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. It is part of the direct examination of an individual named Rodgers and notes that the subsequent pages (1838-1843) are sealed. The court reporting agency is identified as Southern District Reporters, P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00013409.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, related to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. It details a discussion between the Judge, prosecutor Ms. Comey, and defense attorney Mr. Everdell regarding a specific jury instruction for a witness named Rodgers. The Judge agrees to instruct the jury that alleged physical contact between the witness, Epstein, and Maxwell in New Mexico was not 'illegal sexual activity,' and the parties agree to discuss a separate 'Rule 412' issue at sidebar.
DOJ-OGR-00013408.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from the afternoon session of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell trial). Defense attorney Mr. Everdell requests edits to a limiting instruction for the jury regarding an upcoming witness, specifically changing the phrase 'sexual conduct' to 'physical contact' regarding interactions with Jeffrey Epstein in New Mexico. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) and defense confer and agree on the language before the judge approves it.
DOJ-OGR-00013407.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), Defense Attorney Pagliuca, and Prosecutor Comey regarding the admissibility of evidence connected to the testimony of Mr. Alessi and an anticipated witness. The discussion concludes with the court taking a recess.
DOJ-OGR-00013406.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between the Judge ('The Court') and Ms. Comey regarding 'Government Exhibit 52' and whether the defense had an opportunity to cross-examine a witness named Mr. Alessi. The Judge notes a potential misunderstanding about the defense's opportunity to cross-examine, while Ms. Comey asserts that extensive examination and voir dire of Mr. Alessi occurred.
DOJ-OGR-00013403.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Witness Rodgers testifies about a logbook containing initials 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein) and 'GM' (Ghislaine Maxwell) before the court breaks for lunch. After the jury leaves, defense attorney Mr. Everdell raises a procedural objection regarding the government's practice of referring to other flight passengers simply as 'and others' without naming them.
DOJ-OGR-00013402.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) containing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony confirms that on August 20, 1994, Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell flew together on 'Flight 574' from Traverse City, Michigan, to Teterboro, New Jersey, along with a third passenger. The witness also mentions visiting the Interlochen Center for the Arts while in Michigan.
DOJ-OGR-00013401.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers testifies about being a pilot for Jeffrey Epstein, specifically recalling a flight on August 18, 1994, from Aspen, Colorado, to Traverse City, Michigan, on a Gulfstream 2B (G1159B). He also states he flew Epstein to Traverse City seven times between 1991 and 1998, usually in August.
DOJ-OGR-00013400.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. Rodgers testifies about the procedures for logging passengers on Jeffrey Epstein's airplanes, explaining that unknown passengers were recorded as 'PAX' (an abbreviation for passenger) in the logbook. Rodgers confirms that if a passenger's name was learned on a subsequent flight, their name would not be retroactively added to previous flight logs where they were listed as 'PAX'.
DOJ-OGR-00013399.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (direct examination of witness Rodgers) filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony concerns a specific flight on July 26, 1991, piloted by Rodgers from Teterboro, NJ to Palm Beach, FL, carrying Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and two other passengers. The witness also describes general procedures for how they were informed of passenger manifests by a secretary.
DOJ-OGR-00013398.jpg
This document is a court transcript page from a direct examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. Rodgers discusses a flight log, detailing "flight number one" on an HS125-700 aircraft (N404CB) from Wilmington, DE, to Teterboro, NJ, which was a repositioning flight after the aircraft was purchased. Rodgers also states that when they began working for Jeffrey Epstein, Epstein lived in an apartment in Manhattan.
DOJ-OGR-00013397.jpg
This document is a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from the case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers, who is being questioned about entries in a flight log. Rodgers identifies a specific flight on July 26, 1991, which he 'took for Jeffrey Epstein' on a Hawker HS125 aircraft, and explains that he recorded passenger names in the log's 'remarks' column.
DOJ-OGR-00013396.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers is explaining the structure of a document, likely a flight log, by describing the information contained within its columns, including date, aircraft make, model, registration number, departure and arrival points, and flight number.
DOJ-OGR-00013395.jpg
A transcript page from a court proceeding dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers by Ms. Comey. The examination focuses on Government Exhibit 662 (GX-662), identified as a logbook containing a 'date' column. There is a brief confusion regarding whether to look at exhibit 661 or 662, which is resolved by Ms. Comey withdrawing the request for 661.
DOJ-OGR-00013394.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. A witness named Rodgers, identified as a pilot, testifies to the authenticity of their flight logbook, stating entries were made within 30 minutes of flights. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) successfully moves to admit the logbook as evidence (Exhibit 662 under seal and 662-R redacted) with no objection from the defense (Mr. Everdell).
DOJ-OGR-00013393.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript involving the direct examination of a pilot named Rodgers. Rodgers testifies about a personal logbook he kept separate from official records, which tracked destinations, flight times, and passenger names for flights where he served as a crew member on Mr. Epstein's planes. The prosecution introduces 'Government Exhibit 662' for identification.
DOJ-OGR-00013392.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a pilot named Rodgers who worked for Jeffrey Epstein. Rodgers describes the record-keeping procedures for the flights, including passenger manifests, aircraft logs (for maintenance), and a personal logbook. Crucially, Rodgers testifies that he turned over the passenger manifests to one of Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00013389.jpg
This document is a transcript of testimony from a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. Rodgers describes a large townhouse in Manhattan where Ms. Maxwell lived and discusses the relationship between Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein between 1991 and 2004, stating it was initially romantic but later ceased to be. The witness also explains that Ms. Maxwell would provide notice of Mr. Epstein's upcoming flights via beeper and later cell phone, typically 24 hours to three days in advance.
DOJ-OGR-00013388.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers by an attorney, Ms. Comey. The questioning centers on Rodgers' recollection of conversations with Ms. Maxwell regarding the timeline of her residential moves after her father's death in November 1991. The transcript includes legal objections by another attorney, Mr. Everdell, on the grounds of foundation and hearsay, and subsequent rulings by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00013387.jpg
A page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) dated August 10, 2022. During the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers, attorney Mr. Pagliuca objects to a line of questioning, arguing that moving to a smaller apartment does not prove a lack of money. The Court overrules the objection.
DOJ-OGR-00013386.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript featuring a sidebar discussion during the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) argues that evidence of Maxwell's father's death and her subsequent financial decline—followed by Epstein buying her a townhouse—establishes a financial motive for her participation in Epstein's crimes. The defense (Mr. Everdell) objects, claiming the events occurred three years before the alleged conspiracy and are irrelevant.
DOJ-OGR-00013385.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers describes a large apartment in Manhattan, located at 59th Street near Columbus Circle, and testifies that Ms. Maxwell moved from there to a studio apartment in late 1991 or early 1992. The testimony is interrupted by an objection from an attorney, Mr. Everdell, regarding the relevance of the questioning, which is then debated in court.
unspecified
The witness (Rodgers) confirms speaking to Sarah Kellen often enough to have her number programmed in their phone.
Needing something
Early on, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness by beeper if she needed something.
Upcoming flight on one of Mr. Epstein's planes
After beepers were no longer used, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness via cell phone to provide information about an upcoming flight.
Upcoming flight information
Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via beeper to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
Upcoming flight information
After beepers were no longer used, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via cell phone to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
G2B aircraft purchase, renovations, and staff at the Palm...
A questioner asks the witness, Rodgers, about conversations with Mr. Epstein regarding renovations for a G2B aircraft purchased in 1994. Rodgers is also asked about travel to Michigan and to identify staff who worked at the Palm Beach house in the 1990s.
Upcoming flight on one of Mr. Epstein's planes
Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness via beeper to provide information about an upcoming flight.
Logbook Initials
Rodgers confirms that 'JE' stands for Jeffrey Epstein and 'GM' stands for Ghislaine Maxwell in the logbook.
Life events and moves
Conversations serving as the basis for the witness's knowledge about Maxwell's moves.
General communication
Communication via cell phones
Flight Scheduling
Instructions regarding Epstein needing to fly somewhere.
First meeting with Jane
Rodgers stated he recalled meeting Jane around the year 2000, give or take a year or two.
Needs/requests
Communication via beeper if she needed something
Pilot Logbook
Rodgers confirms he did not send his pilot logbook to Ghislaine.
Flight manifests
The witness, Rodgers, confirms sending flight manifests periodically (about every month) to Epstein's office in New York. The witness explicitly denies sending these manifests to Ghislaine.
Events in Ms. Maxwell's life, including her father's deat...
The transcript details a court examination where the witness, Rodgers, is asked about conversations they had with Ms. Maxwell regarding when she moved between various apartments and a townhouse after her father's death.
Flight scheduling
During the 1990s, Rodgers would usually speak to Epstein's secretary in New York to schedule flights.
Flight scheduling
After receiving a page, Rodgers would call back Epstein's office and speak with his secretary or assistant about the flight.
Flight manifests
The witness, Rodgers, confirms sending flight manifests periodically (usually at the end of the month) to Epstein's office in New York. It is explicitly stated that these manifests were not sent to Ghislaine.
First meeting with Jane
Rodgers stated he recalled meeting Jane around the year 2000, give or take a year or two.
Cross-examination
Questioning regarding flight rules, mingling with passengers, and cockpit procedures.
Redirect Examination
Rodgers confirms meeting a person in photos in Sept 2003 and meeting Jane in Nov 1996 based on his logbook.
Logbook and manifest recording practices
An unnamed questioner cross-examines witness Rodgers about how passengers were recorded in flight logbooks. Rodgers confirms that for frequent, recognized passengers on Epstein's planes, initials were sometimes used instead of full names to save space.
Relationships and travel arrangements of Epstein's associ...
A questioner cross-examines witness Rodgers about Shelly Lewis's romantic involvement with Epstein and Ghislaine's share in a charter plane during the 1990s versus flying on Epstein's plane in the 2000s.
Cross-examination regarding individuals associated with J...
A witness named Rodgers is cross-examined about their knowledge of various individuals connected to Jeffrey Epstein, including Henry Drecky, Marvin Minsky, Alberto Pinto, and Emmy Taylor. The questioning touches on their roles, associations with institutions like Yale and MIT, and their representation by initials in logs.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity