Rodgers
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employee |
13
Very Strong
|
19 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
7 | |
|
person
MR. EPSTEIN
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Ghislaine
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
11 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Acquaintance |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Professional |
10
Very Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Flight crew |
10
Very Strong
|
6 | |
|
person
Ms. Comey
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
JANE
|
Flight crew |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
LARRY VISOSKI
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Professional |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Epstein
|
Employee |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jane
|
Acquaintance |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Unnamed Questioner
|
Legal representative |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Friend |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Employment |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein's attorney
|
Professional document transfer |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Sarah Kellen
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Everdell
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Epstein
|
Flight crew |
6
|
1 | |
|
person
Questioner
|
Professional |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
SARAH KELLEN
|
Acquaintance |
6
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Flight Number One | Wilmington, DE to Teterboro... | View |
| N/A | Service visit | Witness would visit Ms. Maxwell's residences to pick up and return first aid kits that needed to ... | Ms. Maxwell's residences | View |
| N/A | Flight | A round-trip flight from Traverse City to Cahokia, Illinois (CPS) and back with no passengers. | Traverse City to Cahokia, I... | View |
| N/A | Employment | Visoski and Rodgers were employed as Epstein's pilots over the same time period as the counts of ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interview | An interview of Rodgers conducted by the FBI. The document states it was 'roughly almost 15 years... | N/A | View |
| 2025-08-01 | N/A | Gulfstream began flying after paint/interior work | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-22 | N/A | Court filing date of the transcript document. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Cross-examination of witness Rodgers regarding their memory of flights. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | Cross-examination of witness Rodgers regarding the production of his flight logs in a past civil ... | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Rodgers regarding flight logbook entries. | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Cross-examination | A cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers regarding the job responsibilities of an unnamed f... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Rodgers regarding passengers on Epstein's planes. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Rodgers by defense attorney Mr. Everdell. | Courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Rodgers by Mr. Everdell. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Direct examination of a witness named Rodgers regarding passenger logging procedures. | Court | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers regarding the flight on May 3rd, 1998. The document ... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Rodgers regarding Eva Dubin and a flight log. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Cross-examination | A witness named Rodgers is cross-examined in a legal proceeding about the common practice of usin... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers regarding Jeffrey Epstein's ownership and control of... | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | Cross-examination of witness Rodgers regarding transportation arrangements and communications wit... | courtroom | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court testimony | Redirect examination of witness Rodgers regarding being shown defense photographs (LV3A and LV3B)... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court proceeding | A direct examination of a witness named Rodgers, during which Mr. Pagliuca makes an argument that... | Courtroom (implied) | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Legal proceeding | Cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers regarding their flight logs. | N/A | View |
| 2022-08-10 | Court hearing | A witness named Rodgers was questioned to authenticate their pilot logbook. The government, repre... | Courtroom | View |
DOJ-OGR-00014791.jpg
This document is a page from the sentencing transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell (filed August 22, 2022). The judge establishes factual findings for sentencing enhancements, noting that Maxwell partially owned the jet, directed pilots (Visoski, Alessi, Rodgers) to transport victims, and acted as 'Epstein's number one' by managing his households and staff. The text explicitly mentions Sarah Kellen as Maxwell's personal assistant and applies sentencing guidelines based on Maxwell's leadership role in the conspiracy between 1994 and 2004.
DOJ-OGR-00014790.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) discussing the legal definition of 'extensive' criminal activity for sentencing purposes. It details the hierarchy of the conspiracy, naming Epstein and the defendant as knowing participants, noting Sarah Kellen joined in 2002, and identifying Virginia and Carolyn as recruiters of minors starting in 2001. It also credits testimony from employee Juan Alessi regarding his unknowing facilitation of sexualized massages under the defendant's instructions and mentions pilots Visoski and Rodgers.
DOJ-OGR-00001276.jpg
This legal document, a page from a court filing dated March 22, 2021, discusses the legal standard for a defendant's third motion for release on bail. The central issue is whether the court has jurisdiction to decide the motion while the defendant's separate bail appeal is pending, with the document citing case law and the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure to outline the court's authority in such a situation.
DOJ-OGR-00001245.jpg
This legal document is a filing, likely by the government, arguing that the district court should deny the defendant's 'Third Bail Motion'. The primary argument is that the court lacks jurisdiction because the defendant has a simultaneous bail appeal pending in the Second Circuit. A secondary argument is that even if jurisdiction existed, the motion should be denied because the court has already twice found the defendant to be a flight risk.
DOJ-OGR-00000866.jpg
This legal document is a court filing from September 22, 2021, detailing the procedural history of a defendant's third motion for release on bail. It outlines the dates of the defendant's motion, the government's opposition, and the defendant's reply. The document then discusses the legal standard regarding the court's jurisdiction to rule on the bail motion while the defendant's bail appeal is pending in a higher court.
DOJ-OGR-00019061.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a brief procedural exchange between the judge (THE COURT) and Ms. Comey about bringing the jury and a witness, identified as Rodgers, into the courtroom. After Ms. Comey agrees to the procedure, the judge gives the order to proceed.
DOJ-OGR-00019060.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a moment during a trial where the judge calls for a mid-afternoon break. The cross-examination of witness Rodgers by defense attorney Everdell is paused, and the jury and witness are dismissed. The attorneys for the government (Ms. Comey, Ms. Moe) and defense (Mr. Everdell) confirm they have no immediate matters to discuss, with Mr. Everdell noting he is less than halfway through his questioning.
DOJ-OGR-00019057.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony focuses on Rodgers' annual flights to the Interlochen Arts Camp between 1991 and 1998 while employed by Mr. Epstein, and confirms Mr. Epstein had a cabin, referred to as a lodge, at that location.
DOJ-OGR-00019056.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers. After a series of questions about aircraft ownership were objected to by Ms. Comey and sustained by the court, the questioning shifts to Mr. Rodgers' familiarity with a place called Interlochen, described as a summer arts camp for musicians and singers.
DOJ-OGR-00019054.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Jeffrey Epstein's assets, specifically helicopters owned by a company called Air Ghislaine, Inc., and whether Epstein controlled these companies. The witness's employment history prior to being hired by Epstein is also questioned, with a mention of a company named Glimcher.
DOJ-OGR-00019053.jpg
This document is page 191 of a court transcript from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony confirms that while Jeffrey Epstein controlled the aircraft, the Boeing 727 was legally owned by 'JEGE, Incorporated' and the Gulfstream by 'Hyperion Air.' The witness also estimates that Epstein purchased a Bell helicopter in November 2002.
DOJ-OGR-00019052.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers, a pilot. Rodgers testifies that he kept his own personal pilot logbook and did not send it to Ghislaine (Maxwell), nor did he have reason to believe she reviewed flight manifests or knew which passengers were on flights she did not attend. The questioning then shifts to the ownership of Mr. Epstein's planes (a Gulfstream and a Boeing) between 1994 and 2004, specifically regarding their ownership by LLCs.
DOJ-OGR-00019051.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. Rodgers confirms sending flight manifests, which were separate from the logbook, to Epstein's New York office on a monthly basis. The witness explicitly denies ever sending these manifests to Ghislaine.
DOJ-OGR-00019049.jpg
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers confirms that their practice for keeping flight logbooks on Epstein's planes was to use initials for frequent passengers they recognized, such as 'SK', in order to save space. This establishes that initials in the logbook signify a recognized, repeat passenger.
DOJ-OGR-00019048.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a pilot named Rodgers. The testimony focuses on Rodgers' specific habit of manually copying passenger names from official manifests into his personal pilot logbook. It also details his method for recording unnamed passengers using terms like 'one PAX' or noting their gender ('one female', 'one male') when specific names were unavailable.
DOJ-OGR-00019047.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a pilot named Rodgers. The testimony focuses on the pilot's practice of maintaining passenger manifests and keeping track of passenger counts, distinguishing between FAA requirements and his personal practice. It specifically references 'Government's Exhibit 662,' which is identified as the witness's pilot logbook.
DOJ-OGR-00019046.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning establishes that Rodgers, likely a pilot or flight crew member, was not always provided with the full names of passengers on flights. Rodgers confirms that passenger names were not considered critical information and that no airline regulations required them to collect this data.
DOJ-OGR-00019045.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' recollection of Sarah Kellen's phone number and the general logistical protocols for scheduling flights for Jeffrey Epstein, specifically regarding necessary details like destination and departure time.
DOJ-OGR-00019044.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on communications in the 2000s, specifically confirming that the witness used cell phones to communicate about flights with a Mr. Visoski and that they had Sarah Kellen's number programmed in their phone. The court briefly interrupts to admonish the speakers for talking over one another.
DOJ-OGR-00019043.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed Aug 10, 2022) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony confirms that Sarah Kellen became Jeffrey Epstein's primary assistant in late 2001. It details her responsibilities, which included coordinating flight schedules with Larry Visoski and arranging luggage transfers to and from various residences.
DOJ-OGR-00019041.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers (likely pilot David Rodgers). The questioning focuses on the role of Sarah Kellen in late 2001, specifically whether she was acting as an assistant to Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, or both. The witness confirms Kellen worked for both but expresses uncertainty about whether she was Epstein's 'primary' assistant at that specific time.
DOJ-OGR-00019040.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' interactions with Sarah Kellen in the early 2000s concerning flight scheduling. Rodgers states that another individual, Larry, the chief pilot, handled most of these communications and confirms that he first met Kellen in September 2001.
DOJ-OGR-00019039.jpg
This document is a page from the cross-examination transcript of a witness named Rodgers (likely a pilot) in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The testimony establishes the protocol for scheduling flights during the 1990s and 2000s: Rodgers only coordinated directly with Ghislaine when she was a passenger; otherwise, he coordinated with Epstein's secretaries. The testimony specifically identifies Lesley Groff as Epstein's secretary who handled these duties in the 2000s.
DOJ-OGR-00019038.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on the communication methods used in the 1990s to schedule flights for someone named Epstein. It establishes that Rodgers and a colleague, Larry Visoski, would be contacted via beeper by Epstein's office and would then call back to speak with a secretary or assistant to arrange the flight.
DOJ-OGR-00019037.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony focuses on the procedures for scheduling flights for Mr. Epstein during the 1990s. Rodgers confirms that while he occasionally spoke with Mr. Epstein or Ghislaine directly, the primary point of contact for scheduling was typically Epstein's secretary in New York.
Pilot Logbook
Rodgers confirms he did not send his pilot logbook to Ghislaine.
Needs/requests
Communication via beeper if she needed something
General communication
Communication via cell phones
First meeting with Jane
Rodgers stated he recalled meeting Jane around the year 2000, give or take a year or two.
Upcoming flight on one of Mr. Epstein's planes
Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness via beeper to provide information about an upcoming flight.
Flight manifests
The witness, Rodgers, confirms sending flight manifests periodically (about every month) to Epstein's office in New York. The witness explicitly denies sending these manifests to Ghislaine.
Upcoming flight information
Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via beeper to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
Upcoming flight information
After beepers were no longer used, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness (Rodgers) via cell phone to convey information about upcoming flights on Mr. Epstein's planes.
Flight scheduling
After receiving a page, Rodgers would call back Epstein's office and speak with his secretary or assistant about the flight.
Upcoming flight on one of Mr. Epstein's planes
After beepers were no longer used, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness via cell phone to provide information about an upcoming flight.
G2B aircraft purchase, renovations, and staff at the Palm...
A questioner asks the witness, Rodgers, about conversations with Mr. Epstein regarding renovations for a G2B aircraft purchased in 1994. Rodgers is also asked about travel to Michigan and to identify staff who worked at the Palm Beach house in the 1990s.
Events in Ms. Maxwell's life, including her father's deat...
The transcript details a court examination where the witness, Rodgers, is asked about conversations they had with Ms. Maxwell regarding when she moved between various apartments and a townhouse after her father's death.
Flight scheduling
During the 1990s, Rodgers would usually speak to Epstein's secretary in New York to schedule flights.
Flight manifests
The witness, Rodgers, confirms sending flight manifests periodically (usually at the end of the month) to Epstein's office in New York. It is explicitly stated that these manifests were not sent to Ghislaine.
unspecified
The witness (Rodgers) confirms speaking to Sarah Kellen often enough to have her number programmed in their phone.
Needing something
Early on, Ms. Maxwell would contact the witness by beeper if she needed something.
Logbook Initials
Rodgers confirms that 'JE' stands for Jeffrey Epstein and 'GM' stands for Ghislaine Maxwell in the logbook.
Life events and moves
Conversations serving as the basis for the witness's knowledge about Maxwell's moves.
Flight Scheduling
Instructions regarding Epstein needing to fly somewhere.
First meeting with Jane
Rodgers stated he recalled meeting Jane around the year 2000, give or take a year or two.
Rodgers' employment with Jeffrey Epstein
An unidentified questioner interviews Rodgers about the circumstances of his hiring by Jeffrey Epstein in 1991, his role as a pilot, and his previous employment.
A series of aircraft flights
An unnamed questioner cross-examines witness Rodgers about flights from Columbus to TBC and a round trip from Traverse City to Cahokia, Illinois. The questioning covers the passengers on the first flight and the purpose of the second, which was for aircraft maintenance.
Cross-examination
Questioning regarding flight rules, mingling with passengers, and cockpit procedures.
Redirect Examination
Rodgers confirms meeting a person in photos in Sept 2003 and meeting Jane in Nov 1996 based on his logbook.
Explanation of flight log columns
A witness, Rodgers, is questioned about the meaning of various columns in a document. Rodgers explains how the date, aircraft make/model, registration number, departure/arrival points, and flight number are recorded.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity