| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
13
Very Strong
|
13 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient
|
Legal representative |
12
Very Strong
|
12 | |
|
person
Recipient
|
Business associate |
8
Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
GHISLAINE MAXWELL
|
Prosecutor defendant |
8
Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Judge Nathan
|
Legal representative |
8
Strong
|
8 | |
|
person
Redacted Recipient
|
Business associate |
7
|
7 | |
|
person
MAXWELL
|
Legal representative |
6
|
6 | |
|
person
law enforcement agent
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Opposing counsel |
5
|
5 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Legal representative |
4
|
4 | |
|
person
Laura Menninger
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Bobbi C. Sternheim
|
Opposing counsel |
3
|
3 | |
|
organization
Nathan NYSD Chambers
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
BRAD EDWARDS
|
Legal representative |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Arraignment Unit Clerk
|
Professional |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Ms. Maxwell
|
Prosecutor defendant |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Judge Parker
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Robert Glassman
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
jeevacation@gmail.com; other redacted recipients
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
USANYS Recipient
|
Business associate |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
Judge Berman
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
organization
FBI
|
Investigative cooperation |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
MV-4
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
CHRISTIAN EVERDELL
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
MOSES
|
Legal representative |
2
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-19 | N/A | Internal SDNY discussion request regarding response to Defense Motion in Limine 4 (MIL 4) concern... | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-10-15 | N/A | Deadline for government response to Judge Nathan. | New York | View |
| 2021-10-15 | N/A | Deadline for SDNY to respond to Maxwell's counsel's letter by 5 pm. | Court | View |
| 2021-10-12 | N/A | Assistant US Attorney (SDNY) attempts to retrieve an expired NBC News video interview regarding a... | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-10-09 | N/A | Internal DOJ correspondence regarding the review, redaction, and stamping of '3500 material' (wit... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-10-04 | N/A | Request for background checks (rap sheets) on potential witnesses for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. | New York | View |
| 2021-09-30 | N/A | Phone call between AUSA and Callie Meier regarding subpoena. | Phone | View |
| 2021-09-28 | N/A | Email sent regarding ESI exhibits and potential Rule 404(b) evidence. | New York, NY | View |
| 2021-09-28 | N/A | Email correspondence regarding subpoena compliance. | Southern District of New Yo... | View |
| 2021-09-21 | N/A | Call with an unnamed individual (likely a witness or source) documented by an Assistant US Attorney. | New York (Sender location) | View |
| 2021-09-21 | N/A | Filing of 3500 material (Jencks Act material) related to the Ghislaine Maxwell case. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-09-02 | N/A | Filing of a letter on ECF (Docket No. 332) and submission of proposed redactions via email. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-08-04 | N/A | Review of Epstein search warrant database by AUSA identifying a potential Joint Defense Agreement... | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-07-29 | N/A | Scheduled interview with a witness in the Maxwell case. | New York (implied SDNY office) | View |
| 2021-07-29 | N/A | Phone call request regarding an ongoing SDNY case. | New York (SDNY) | View |
| 2021-07-14 | N/A | Meeting/Prep Session | Recipient's office | View |
| 2021-07-13 | N/A | Video-conference meeting between the AUSA and the Sergeant. | Virtual (Video-conference) | View |
| 2021-06-21 | N/A | Phone call between the AUSA and the recipient regarding the subpoena. | Unknown | View |
| 2021-06-01 | N/A | Interview with [Redacted Subject] by US Attorney's Office | Unknown | View |
| 2021-05-31 | N/A | An Assistant US Attorney received a call from an individual wanting to discuss 'treason, Epstein,... | New York, NY (implied) | View |
| 2021-05-22 | N/A | Government submission of opposition memorandum to defense's supplemental pretrial motions. | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-05-13 | N/A | Discussion regarding the pretrial schedule | Unknown (likely phone or em... | View |
| 2021-05-12 | N/A | Call between SDNY AUSA and Katya Jestin regarding a wealthy client's offer to fund Epstein victims. | New York (via phone) | View |
| 2021-04-20 | N/A | Filing of Government response to April 19 Order | Southern District of New York | View |
| 2021-04-19 | N/A | Drafting of Government response to April 19 Order | Southern District of New York | View |
This document contains an email chain forwarding a Notice of Electronic Filing from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York regarding the case USA v. Epstein (1:19-cr-00490-RMB). The docket text details a status conference held on July 8, 2019, before Judge Richard M. Berman, where Jeffrey Epstein was present with his defense team (Weinberg, Weingarten, Fernich). The entry notes that a bail hearing was scheduled for July 15, 2019, and sets deadlines for bail submissions and government replies.
This document is an email chain from March 2021 between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns a request for a list of all 'Jeffrey Epstein-related FOIA lawsuits' to assist with a 'criminal discovery matter.' The chain confirms the existence of two specific cases: one involving the NY Times before Judge Engelmayer, and one involving Radar Online before Judge Gardephe (Case 17 Civ. 3956).
This document is an email dated April 14, 2021, from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to defense counsel regarding the case US v. Maxwell. The email serves as a transmittal for discovery materials, specifically an additional photograph and a cover letter, which are being prepared on a drive for the client (Ghislaine Maxwell) to review at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC).
An email chain from November 2021 between Assistant United States Attorneys in the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The discussion concerns finding legal work product or precedents arguing that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is not considered part of the 'prosecution team' for discovery purposes. The emails reference the 'MCC guard case' (likely the prosecution of Epstein guards Tova Noel and Michael Thomas) and attach a 2020 opposition brief related to a motion to compel by 'Thomas'.
This document is an email thread between Assistant United States Attorneys (SDNY) dated November 2021, preparing for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The discussion focuses on the testimony of Paul Kane (likely an FBI agent or expert) regarding business records (specifically PCS phone records) dating back to 1997. Key strategic points include establishing the admissibility of records not created by the holding company and ensuring the protection of 'MV1' (Minor Victim 1) by not reading identifying information aloud in open court.
This document is an email chain between the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel (Cohen & Gresser LLP) regarding discovery disputes in early 2021. The correspondence details logistical issues with providing Maxwell access to 4TB hard drives at the MDC, disputes over unredacted FBI reports from 2006 found on Jeffrey Epstein's devices, and missing metadata/Bates ranges. The defense specifically notes missing 'flight logs' from a redacted provider and questions the unsealing of a search warrant affidavit referenced in a Daily Beast article. No actual flight data is contained in the document, only a reference to missing logs.
This document is an Opinion and Order from a U.S. District Court case related to Jeffrey Epstein. It details the history of Epstein's sexual abuse of minor girls, including Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2, from 1999 to 2007 in Palm Beach, Florida, and internationally. The document outlines the investigation by the PBPD and FBI, and the subsequent discussions and negotiations between the U.S. Attorney's Office and Epstein's legal team from 2006 to 2007, including efforts to secure a plea agreement and manage press coverage.
This document contains a series of internal emails between SDNY prosecutors from November to December 2020, outlining a 'to-do' list and agenda for the upcoming trial (likely Ghislaine Maxwell's). The tasks include reviewing 'GM emails' in Relativity, identifying witnesses from Interlochen and the Professional Children's School, coordinating with the Palm Beach Police Department (PBPD) regarding evidence from the Palm Beach house search, and scheduling interviews with various witnesses, including Jo Jo Fontanella and individuals who were on flights. The document also references a discussion about 'superseder timing,' implying a superseding indictment was being considered.
This document is an email dated July 2, 2020, from an Assistant US Attorney in the SDNY to Judge Nathan regarding the case 'United States v. Maxwell'. The email submits a memorandum in support of detention for Ghislaine Maxwell and notes that a copy is being provided to the Magistrate Judge in New Hampshire for proceedings occurring that afternoon. Defense counsel Jeff Pagliuca is copied on the correspondence.
This document is a series of emails from October 2020 concerning discovery production in the 'US v. Maxwell' case. The correspondence details the delivery and pickup of hard drives, the sending of Ms. Maxwell's drive to the MDC, and the scheduling of a prison visit for Ms. Maxwell to review a secure laptop. The emails involve legal teams from the Southern District of New York, Cohen Gresser, and HMFLAW, discussing logistical arrangements for evidence exchange and client access.
This document is an email from an Assistant United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York concerning the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. It provides details about the courtrooms, timing of proceedings, and expresses a strong belief in justice for the victims of Maxwell's alleged sexual exploitation of underage girls. Redactions are present for the sender and recipient.
This document is an internal email chain among USANYS officials from late June to July 1, 2021, discussing the FOIA release of Jeffrey Epstein's autopsy report. The conversation focuses on coordinating redactions, specifically regarding photographs of Epstein's hyoid bone on pages 12 and 13 of the report, following consultation with the Office of Chief Medical Examiner (OCME). The officials confirm the decision to ask the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to redact the specific photo and give final clearance for the release.
This document contains an email chain from October 2020 between an Assistant United States Attorney and an Arraignment Unit Clerk at the Southern District of New York (SDNY). The correspondence concerns the filing of a signed application/affidavit related to the Epstein case, specifically rectifying missing exhibits for the court file and the transmission of signed warrants.
This document is an unexecuted template of a Proffer Agreement ('Queen for a Day' letter) from the Office of the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, dated January 14, 2019. The agreement outlines the terms under which a client provides information to the government, specifying that it is not a cooperation agreement and establishing limited use immunity for statements made during the meeting, with exceptions for impeachment, rebuttal, and derivative leads.
An email from an Assistant United States Attorney in the Southern District of New York to Ghislaine Maxwell's legal counsel dated March 29, 2021. The email serves to notify the defense of a superseding indictment (S2) returned by a grand jury that day and proposes times for a meeting the following day to discuss discovery issues and potential supplemental briefings regarding pretrial motions.
An email dated August 2, 2021, from an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York to attorneys with '@epllc.com' email addresses. The email notifies the recipients of a recent order by Judge Nathan regarding Local Criminal Rule 23.1, emphasizing that it applies to attorneys associated with the case, including attorneys for witnesses. The document likely pertains to the Ghislaine Maxwell trial proceedings.
This document is an internal email chain from June 2020 involving an Assistant US Attorney in the SDNY preparing for a Grand Jury presentation. The attorney requests the creation of presentation slides featuring specific excerpts from Ghislaine Maxwell's deposition transcripts (denying knowledge of underage recruitment and massages) and specific flight records from dates between 1994 and 1998.
This document is an email chain from July 16, 2019, between members of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The team is finalizing a detention submission letter regarding 'JE' (Jeffrey Epstein), evidenced by the attachment filename. A critical email reveals that an Assistant United States Attorney contacted the Judge's chambers and was informed by the clerk that the Judge refused to view photographs without explanation, leading the prosecution to exclude them from the submission.
This document contains an email chain from May 2021 between the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York and defense counsel regarding the scheduling of the trial for United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The emails confirm that jury selection was scheduled for the week of November 15, 2021, with the trial set to begin on November 29, 2021. The correspondence includes discussions about checking for scheduling conflicts prior to submitting a proposal to the Court.
A legal motion filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Case 08-8068-LRJ) requesting to seal a search warrant application. The motion, submitted under U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta, cites an ongoing grand jury investigation and the risk that public disclosure would jeopardize the case or notify targets. The specific Assistant U.S. Attorney's identity and contact details are redacted.
This document is an email chain from April 29, 2021, involving the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York regarding the Ghislaine Maxwell case. It discusses an order issued by Judge Nathan directing the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) to take specific actions by April 30, 2021. The emails coordinate the filing and transmission of this order to the Judge's chambers.
This document is an email thread from November 2021 among staff at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York regarding the opening of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The emails discuss logistical details such as courtroom locations and timing, confirm the selection of the jury, and include a motivational message contrasting the SDNY's willingness to prosecute with Florida prosecutors' previous handling of related cases. The text emphasizes the goal of holding Maxwell accountable for sexually exploiting underage girls.
A formal letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to attorney Roberta Kaplan providing documents in response to a request regarding the case Doe v. Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. The enclosed documents include reports of grand jury subpoenas served on Jane Doe, a biographical report on Jane Doe, FBI contact reports, and evidence retrieved from Epstein's residences in New York (2019) and Palm Beach (trash pull in 2005).
This legal document describes the process of two separate grand jury proceedings related to indictments against an individual named Maxwell. It details that on June 29, 2020, and March 29, 2021, grand juries heard testimony from an FBI agent and an NYPD detective, respectively, who presented hearsay evidence summarizing the government's investigation. The document outlines the exhibits presented and the subsequent indictments returned by the juries.
Cover letter submitting encrypted zip files containing account documentation for ASW Holdings, Financial Trust Company, Jeffrey Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell.
Request referenced in the cover letter leading to this production.
Requesting help adding items to the next Discovery folder and a folder for Amazon subpoena returns.
Requesting strike lists by noon tomorrow to compile joint submission outlining four categories of juror numbers for the Court.
Thank you.
We've conferred with the defense, and they would prefer to do the evidence inspection at the proffer rooms at 500 Pearl immediately following the conference on Monday, 11/1.
Please give me a call.
Thanks very much. To confirm, are do you mean Friday, 10/29, or Friday, 11/5? And is there a particular time that she will arrive at the court?
Defense counsel has requested that we schedule an evidence inspection this week with the defendant present... We are scheduling this with defense attorneys who are flying in from out of state...
Friday works best for us. I will be in contact tomorrow to coordinate.
AUSA requests a call to follow up on a records custodian testifying at trial.
AUSA states they will loop back in a couple of months to update on status.
Paralegal apologizes for delay, confirms they can testify if needed.
AUSA requests identification of a records custodian to testify; references attached 2008 cover letter/certification.
Requesting travel steps for a witness interview scheduled for July 29th in the Maxwell case.
Confirms records seem to be FedEx's. Asks if this is regarding "'the' Jeffrey Epstein?"
Clarifies the request is for an affidavit or testimony for the Ghislaine Maxwell trial starting in November in NY.
Sends FedEx records; notes they were originally subpoenaed by SD of Florida in Feb 2008.
Caller gave his name and stated he wanted to discuss treason, Epstein, and Maxwell. AUSA declined to discuss and referred him to the main line.
AUSA acknowledges receipt of materials and asks for a color copy of a photograph on page 87.
Summary of the videoconference notes.
Acknowledging receipt, mentioning reading about exploits in the Times, and wishing good luck.
Sending attached order regarding trial date.
Confirmation that requested changes are 'all set'.
Instructions to delete specific folders, merge folders for individuals identified as the same person, and handle files for a 'testifying witness'.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity