Sloman
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Villafaña
|
Business associate |
22
Very Strong
|
20 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Business associate |
19
Very Strong
|
16 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
28 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Professional |
11
Very Strong
|
30 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Professional |
9
Strong
|
5 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Subordinate supervisor |
8
Strong
|
4 | |
|
person
Menchel
|
Professional |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Lourie
|
Business associate |
7
|
3 | |
|
person
Belohlavek
|
Professional |
7
|
2 | |
|
person
Mr. Herman
|
Business associate |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional supervisory |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Acosta
|
Subordinate supervisor |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
Roy Black
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Professional collegial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Villafaña
|
Friend |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
victim's attorney (former law partner)
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sanchez
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Alexander Acosta
|
Professional advisory |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
A victim's attorney
|
Business associate |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lourie
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Belohlavek
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Oosterbaan
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Lefkowitz
|
Adversarial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
West Palm Beach FBI squad supervisor
|
Professional |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Sanchez
|
Defense prosecution negotiation |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Discussion and agreement on the addendum's terms after a draft was sent and a phone call occurred. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Federal investigation resolved through a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sloman briefly left the USAO and entered private practice specializing in plaintiffs' sexual abus... | Miami | View |
| N/A | N/A | Menchel made substantive changes to Villafaña's draft letter concerning Epstein's plea deal, incl... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Early meeting with Acosta, Sloman, and Menchel where Villafaña raised victim consultation issue a... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | John Roth handled Starr's letter and reviewed materials related to the Epstein matter, limiting h... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Defense counsel arguing against victim notification letters | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Sloman met with Dershowitz and informed him of USAO's opposition to early termination and transfe... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Prosecution of Epstein | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Victim notification process regarding Epstein's case. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Trial considerations for Epstein case, including victim trauma and evidentiary challenges | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR interviews regarding Epstein's case and sentencing discussions. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | Acosta anticipated leaving USAO and considered employment with Kirkland & Ellis, leading him to r... | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | The defense team rejected Acosta's December 19, 2007, NPA modification letter. | N/A | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR Interviews conducting a retrospective review of the case handling. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | OPR Interviews with prosecutors involved in the Epstein case. | Unknown | View |
| N/A | N/A | Internal USAO discussions regarding the viability of federal prosecution vs. a negotiated plea deal. | USAO | View |
| N/A | N/A | Discussions regarding the two-year plea deal resolution. | USAO (implied) | View |
| N/A | N/A | Villafaña reports Epstein is at the Stockade instead of Main Detention Center. | Palm Beach | View |
| N/A | Legal dispute | Dispute between the prosecution (Sloman) and defense (Starr, Lefkowitz) over the notification of ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Investigation | OPR questioned Lourie, Menchel, Sloman, and Acosta about the timeline for reviewing a prosecution... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Interview | OPR conducted interviews with Acosta, Lourie, Menchel, Sloman, and Villafaña about the origins of... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Meeting | A meeting to discuss how to proceed with the Epstein case, where the FBI insisted on lifetime sex... | USAO in Miami | View |
| N/A | Conversation | Sloman told Villafaña that pre-charge resolutions do not require victim notification. | N/A | View |
| N/A | Legal process | Discussions regarding whether to contact victims about the potential resolution of the case befor... | N/A | View |
DOJ-OGR-00023132.jpg
This page from a DOJ OPR report details the delays in Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea following the signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It describes legal maneuvering by Epstein's defense team, including Kenneth Starr calling senior DOJ official Alice Fisher, and disagreements between the USAO and defense regarding the timeline for the plea entry, which was eventually set for January 4, 2008. The document also highlights internal communications regarding Epstein's failure to use 'best efforts' to comply with the NPA timeline.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019230.jpg
This document is page 7 of a letter addressed to Honorable Mark Filip, dated May 19, 2008. It details allegations that Assistant U.S. Attorney David Weinstein leaked confidential information regarding the Epstein case and plea negotiations to New York Times reporter Landon Thomas. The text criticizes the U.S. Attorney's Office, specifically First Assistant Sloman and U.S. Attorney Acosta, for their handling of these leaks and the subsequent internal review.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019229.jpg
This document is page 6 of a letter to the Honorable Mark Filip, dated May 19, 2008, detailing complaints about the conduct of federal prosecutors in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The text alleges that prosecutors made unprecedented financial demands, including a requirement for Epstein to pay $150,000 to alleged victims (most of whom were later found to be adults, not minors) and to fund a specific civil attorney chosen by the prosecution. It further alleges a conflict of interest where an Assistant U.S. Attorney recommended a civil lawyer connected to their boyfriend, and notes that First Assistant Sloman's former law partner, Mr. Herman, began filing civil suits against Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023129.jpg
This document, part of a House Oversight collection, contains text from a news report analyzing the fallout of the Jeffrey Epstein non-prosecution agreement. It features quotes from prosecutor Sloman admitting terms should have been harsher but denying corruption, and details former US Attorney Acosta's 2011 defense of the deal against Epstein's 'army of legal superstars.' The text also highlights the victims' lawsuit against the government for sealing the deal and includes criticism from law professor Marci Hamilton regarding the failure to charge co-conspirators.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013084.jpg
This document is page 168 of an academic text titled 'General Intelligence in the Everyday Human World'. It discusses theoretical concepts of 'naive physics', specifically focusing on events, processes, causality, states of matter, and surfaces. It cites researchers Gibson and Sloman. The page bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013084' stamp, indicating it was produced as part of a House Oversight Committee investigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013014.jpg
This document presents a high-level architecture of a human-like mind (Figure 5.1), detailing subsystems for perception, action, memory, and processing. The text discusses the rationale behind the architectural choices, comparing them to Sloman's diagram and the LIDA architecture, while explaining modifications such as the explicit inclusion of language and reinforcement components.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025358.jpg
This document is page 6 of a letter to the Honorable Mark Filip, dated May 19, 2008, likely from Jeffrey Epstein's legal defense team. It outlines complaints against federal prosecutors, alleging they made unprecedented financial demands ($150,000 per alleged victim), attempted to control the selection of civil attorneys for the victims, and engaged in conflicts of interest involving an Assistant U.S. Attorney. The text also highlights a connection between a civil attorney suing Epstein (Mr. Herman) and a First Assistant prosecutor (Sloman), noting they were former law partners.
Decision making process
Stated Acosta made decision with Mandelker.
Deadline Postponement
Notified that the plea deadline was postponed pending DOJ review.
Communication protocol and NPA deadline
Stated Acosta would not respond personally; set June 2 deadline for NPA compliance.
Fwd: CEOS review of the Epstein matter
Sloman forwarded his email to Lefkowitz to Villafaña, who responded by questioning why Epstein would be allowed to keep his deal after the discovery of 6 new girls.
CEOS review of the Epstein matter
Sloman informed Lefkowitz that CEOS was ready to proceed with the review and outlined the consequences depending on CEOS's decision regarding federal prosecution of Mr. Epstein.
Written notification requirement
Discussed the notification prepared by Villafaña.
Civil litigation against Epstein and state's investigation
Attorney planned to file civil litigation, expressed frustration with state's investigation, asked about USAO filing criminal charges. Sloman declined to answer.
Plea hearing postponement
Confirmed plea hearing postponed because facts did not fit proposed state charge
Postponement of Epstein's plea hearing
Sloman reported that Assistant State Attorney Belohlavek confirmed the plea hearing was postponed because the facts 'did not fit the proposed state charge,' a reason given by Epstein's attorney Goldberger.
Postponement of Epstein's plea hearing
Sloman reported that Assistant State Attorney Belohlavek confirmed the plea hearing was postponed because the facts 'did not fit the proposed state charge,' a reason given by Epstein's attorney Goldberger.
Report on call with Belohlavek
Reporting on conversation with Belohlavek regarding Goldberger and state charges
N/A
Asked if there was anything she or agents should be doing; mentioned 'Catch 22' regarding victim notification and unrelated OPR investigations.
Hearing postponement
Asked whether to put off a September 12, 2007 hearing; Sloman told her to do so.
Epstein plea hearing and victim notification
Sanchez advised Sloman of Epstein's plea hearing date (Jan 4, 2008) and requested the USAO 'hold off' sending victim notification letters until further discussion.
Instruction to hold victim notification letter
Sloman responded to Villafaña's request by instructing her to 'Hold the letter.'
Unknown
Advising of Jan 4 plea hearing and requesting USAO 'hold off' sending victim letters.
Hold the letter
Instruction to hold notification to victims about state court plea hearing
Unknown
Instruction to 'Hold the letter.'
Complaint about victim notification
Complaining about plan to notify victims about § 2255 provision
Confirmation of Epstein's plea agreement terms
Sloman requested confirmation that Epstein would abide by the agreement for an 18-month sentence of continuous confinement in the county jail.
Complaint about private investigators
Sloman complained to Lefkowitz that private investigators for Epstein were contacting victims about financial settlements.
Concern about cross-examination
Villafaña expressed concern that if charges were filed, cross-examination would focus on the government telling victims they were entitled to damages upon conviction.
Work Release Eligibility
Krischer stated Epstein was eligible for work release because registration hadn't taken place.
Continuous Confinement
Sloman argued NPA required continuous confinement; warned USAO would investigate if exception was granted.
Correspondence restricting USAO communication
Sloman noted to Lefkowitz, "Your recent correspondence attempting to restrict our Office from communicating with the State Attorney's Office . . . raises concern."
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity