SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00018910.jpg
This document is a page from the court testimony of a witness named Shawn in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Shawn testifies about being with an individual named Carolyn in West Palm Beach when Carolyn received a package from New York containing lingerie and a movie. Shawn also confirms visiting Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach house with Carolyn, Virginia, Tony, and two other unidentified individuals.
DOJ-OGR-00018909.jpg
This document is a transcript page from the direct examination of a witness named Shawn in the case US v. Maxwell. The testimony focuses on a girl named Carolyn, described as a 14-year-old middle school dropout who visited Jeffrey Epstein's house. The witness confirms Carolyn knew 'Maxwell' but could not pronounce her first name, and the questioning begins to address gifts or money Carolyn received.
DOJ-OGR-00018907.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Shawn. Shawn testifies about multiple occasions where he accompanied a woman named Carolyn to Jeffrey Epstein's house, waiting outside for over an hour while she went inside and came out with hundred-dollar bills. Shawn also recounts his single, brief meeting with Epstein in the driveway of the house.
DOJ-OGR-00018905.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Shawn by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Shawn testifies about receiving phone calls from three women—one named Sarah, one with an English accent, and one with a French-sounding accent. The purpose of these calls was to convey a message that a person named Jeffrey was requesting someone named Carolyn to work.
DOJ-OGR-00018904.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Shawn, filed on August 10, 2022. Shawn testifies about his past relationship with a woman named Carolyn, stating they visited Jeffrey Epstein's house in Palm Beach about every two weeks. He indicates that Carolyn stopped visiting when they moved to Georgia, at which time she was sixteen, and that their relationship ended in 2005.
DOJ-OGR-00018903.jpg
This document is page 41 of a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) featuring the direct examination of a witness named Shawn. Shawn testifies about accompanying Virginia and Carolyn to Jeffrey Epstein's home in Palm Beach, describing the house as originally pink and later white. The witness states they waited outside while Virginia and Carolyn went inside for over an hour, emerging with money in hundred dollar bills.
DOJ-OGR-00018902.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Shawn. The witness identifies the location of Jeffrey Epstein's house as El Brillo Way on Palm Beach Island and contrasts the affluence of Palm Beach with West Palm Beach, where they lived. The witness explains they rarely visited Palm Beach because they lacked money.
DOJ-OGR-00018901.jpg
This document is a court transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Shawn. Shawn testifies that he was present when a woman named Virginia recruited another woman, Carolyn, to perform massages for Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach for 'a couple hundred dollars'. Shawn confirms that Carolyn accepted and that he, Carolyn, Virginia, and a man named Tony all went to Jeffrey Epstein's house together.
DOJ-OGR-00018900.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination from a court case filed on August 10, 2022. The witness, Shawn, testifies about their relationship with Virginia Roberts, whom they knew from Survivors Charter School around 2001. The testimony establishes that an unnamed woman met Jeffrey Epstein through Virginia Roberts, and describes the witness's social activities with Roberts and her boyfriend, Tony Figueroa.
DOJ-OGR-00018899.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) dated August 10, 2022. A witness named Shawn testifies about his past relationship with a girl named Carolyn, stating they began dating when she was 14 and he was 17. Shawn testifies that Carolyn only held two jobs: one at Arby's and the other working for Jeffrey Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00018898.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness named Shawn by Ms. Comey. Shawn testifies about his background, stating he was born in Akron, Ohio, grew up in West Palm Beach, Florida, and attended Wellington High School and Survivors Charter School. He also identifies his girlfriend at the time, Carolyn.
DOJ-OGR-00018897.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the beginning of the direct examination of a witness named Shawn by an attorney, Ms. Comey. During the testimony, Shawn spells his first name and identifies Government Exhibit 20 as a copy of his ID.
DOJ-OGR-00018896.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the transition between witnesses in a trial. The court excuses a witness, Ms. Gill, and the government's attorney, Ms. Comey, calls the next witness, "Shawn." The judge explains that Shawn is testifying under a pseudonym to protect a prior witness's identity and instructs courtroom sketch artists not to draw Shawn's likeness before Ms. Comey begins her direct examination.
DOJ-OGR-00018894.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of a trial. It captures the moment an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, concludes his questioning of a witness, Gill Velez, by pointing the jury to an exhibit labeled "father of child." Subsequently, another attorney, Ms. Sternheim, begins her cross-examination of the same witness.
DOJ-OGR-00018893.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a case dated August 10, 2022. In it, an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, questions a witness, Ms. Gill (Gill Velez), about a personnel action notice for an individual named Sky Roberts, which is entered as Government Exhibit 823. The key information established from the document is that Sky Roberts' date of hire was April 11, 2000.
DOJ-OGR-00018892.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct examination of a witness, Ms. Gill Velez. The testimony concerns the authentication of Government Exhibit 823, which is identified as a personnel action notice regarding the original hiring of Sky Roberts at Mar-a-Lago. The exhibit is admitted into evidence over an objection by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim.
DOJ-OGR-00018890.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). It features the direct examination of Gill Velez, the Human Resources Director for Florida Properties Management, which manages the Mar-a-Lago Club. Velez testifies about their 15-year tenure, duties involving employment processes, and the storage of employee records in physical paper files.
DOJ-OGR-00018889.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures the beginning of court proceedings for the day, where the government's attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, calls witness Janine Gill Velez to the stand. The transcript records the witness being sworn in and the start of the direct examination.
DOJ-OGR-00018887.jpg
This document is page 25 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Attorney Mr. Rohrbach argues to the Court regarding the reliability of forms filled out by Mr. Roberts, an employee of Mar-a-Lago, concerning his dependents and insurance coverage. The argument centers on whether Mr. Roberts had a business duty to be truthful to his employer, distinguishing the situation from the precedent set in United States v. Lieberman, though the Court remains skeptical.
DOJ-OGR-00018886.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a procedural discussion between the judge and counsel (Mr. Rohrbach and Ms. Comey) about Exhibit 52. After confirming no further witnesses will testify about the exhibit, Mr. Rohrbach informs the court of his plan to submit a letter that evening arguing for its admission. The judge instructs him to confer with defense counsel on the matter before the court takes a recess.
DOJ-OGR-00018885.jpg
This document is page 23 of a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The dialogue involves a debate between the prosecution (Mr. Rohrbach) and defense (Ms. Sternheim) regarding the admissibility of 'record 824' and the implications of testimony provided by Juan Alessi concerning the year 2001. The proceedings are paused by the Judge to wait for a juror experiencing train issues.
DOJ-OGR-00018883.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Menninger argues against the admission of a school record (Government Exhibit 761) which identifies Mr. Epstein as a financial guarantor for a family, arguing the school did not verify that specific piece of information. The Court explains that the evidence was admitted to show that the family indicated Epstein was providing financial assistance at the time.
DOJ-OGR-00018882.jpg
This document is a partial transcript from a court proceeding dated August 10, 2022, discussing legal arguments related to factual records, employer practices, and the admissibility of evidence. Key points include an objection to Government Exhibit 761, a Professional Children's School application for Jane, due to unverified financial guarantor information, and the Court's ruling on the relevance of Mr. Epstein's alleged financial assistance to a witness's family. The discussion also touches upon legal precedents for adoptive business records.
DOJ-OGR-00018880.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, documents a legal discussion between the Court and Ms. Sternheim about the 'Lieberman' case precedent. The core issue is the distinction between a form's existence and its content, with the Court stating that for the content to be admissible, there must be evidence of verification by the employer. Ms. Sternheim further argues that the current witness lacks the personal knowledge to testify about the procedures in question.
DOJ-OGR-00018879.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a legal debate between attorneys Rohrbach and Sternheim before a judge regarding the admissibility of an insurance form containing a statement by a 'Mr. Roberts'. The discussion centers on whether the act of providing insurance and paying medical bills through Mar-a-Lago constitutes a course of conduct, and whether a witness can be questioned about practices that occurred before their time of involvement.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity