SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
OrganizationRelationship Network
DOJ-OGR-00018998.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It features the direct examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers, who was the pilot of a Gulf Stream G2B. He testifies regarding flight number 916 on November 11, 1996, confirming a trip from Palm Beach, Florida, to Teterboro, New Jersey, carrying passengers including Jeffrey Epstein and a person identified only as 'Jane'.
DOJ-OGR-00018996.jpg
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures the direct examination of a witness, Mr. Rodgers, by an attorney, Ms. Comey. Mr. Rodgers testifies that he recalls one female passenger on Mr. Epstein's planes who he understood attended 'Interlochen'. Ms. Comey then instructs Mr. Rodgers to silently identify the passenger's full name using Government Exhibit 12.
DOJ-OGR-00018995.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The transcript captures a brief exchange where the judge (THE COURT) confirms with Ms. Comey and Mr. Everdell that there are no other matters before deciding to bring in the jury and addressing the witness, Mr. Rodgers.
DOJ-OGR-00018994.jpg
This document is page 132 of a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. The page contains a brief portion of the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers and indicates that the following pages (1838-1843) are sealed. The transcript was produced by Southern District Reporters, P.C.
DOJ-OGR-00018992.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between the judge, Ms. Comey (for the government), and Mr. Everdell. The attorneys agree on two edits to a limiting jury instruction for an upcoming witness's testimony concerning an alleged incident with Mr. Epstein in New Mexico. The key change is replacing the term "sexual conduct" with "physical contact" to describe the alleged event.
DOJ-OGR-00018991.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge, defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca, and government attorney Ms. Comey. The discussion centers on the procedural issue of raising a new argument that was not addressed during a witness's examination, specifically in relation to the testimony of Mr. Alessi. The judge explains their position while affirming they will keep an open mind to future arguments from both sides before the court goes into recess.
DOJ-OGR-00018990.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022. It captures a dialogue between an attorney, Ms. Comey, and the judge regarding whether the defense had an adequate opportunity to cross-examine a witness named Mr. Alessi. The judge also mentions a planned briefing on "Government Exhibit 52" as indicated by a Mr. Rohrbach.
DOJ-OGR-00018989.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the examination of a witness named Rodgers. The proceedings involve a discussion between the Court, Ms. Comey, and Mr. Everdell regarding the redaction of a name ('Carolyn') and phone numbers from evidence. Mr. Everdell also coordinates the placement of folders for the jury ahead of cross-examination, and the parties agree to discuss an 'in limine instruction' after the lunch break.
DOJ-OGR-00018988.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge (THE COURT) and two attorneys, Mr. Everdell and Ms. Comey. The judge rules that document redactions are overly broad and must be narrowed. Ms. Comey agrees, noting the task will be time-intensive, and receives permission from the Court to complete the work over an upcoming long weekend.
DOJ-OGR-00018987.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) during the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers confirms that the initials 'JE' and 'GM' in a logbook refer to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, respectively. Following the dismissal of the jury for lunch, defense attorney Mr. Everdell raises a procedural issue regarding the government's practice of referring to other flight passengers as 'and others' without naming them.
DOJ-OGR-00018986.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Rodgers, filed on August 10, 2022. The testimony focuses on two flights, 573 and 574, that occurred in 1994. The witness confirms that Jeffrey Epstein was a passenger on flight 573, and that both Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell were passengers on flight 574 from Traverse City, Michigan, to Teterboro, New Jersey, on August 20, 1994.
DOJ-OGR-00018985.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers testifies about being a pilot for Jeffrey Epstein, specifically recalling a flight on August 18, 1994, from Aspen, Colorado, to Traverse City, Michigan, on a Gulfstream 2B aircraft. He also states that he flew Epstein to Traverse City seven times between 1991 and 1998, typically in August.
DOJ-OGR-00018984.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers explains the protocol for logging passengers on Jeffrey Epstein's planes, stating that crew members often did not know passengers' names and would use the abbreviation "PAX" (for passenger) in the logbook. He clarifies that a name appearing in the logbook for the first time did not necessarily mean it was that individual's first flight, as they may have flown previously as an unidentified "PAX".
DOJ-OGR-00018983.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers, a pilot, describes a flight on July 26, 1991, from Teterboro, NJ, to Palm Beach, FL, confirming that Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, and two other individuals were passengers. The witness also states that Epstein owned a home on Palm Beach Island.
DOJ-OGR-00018982.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony concerns a flight log for an HS125-700 aircraft with tail number N404CB. Rodgers describes 'flight number one' as a repositioning flight from Wilmington, Delaware, to Teterboro, New Jersey, immediately following the purchase ('closing') of the airplane. Rodgers also notes that at the start of their employment, Jeffrey Epstein lived in an apartment in Manhattan.
DOJ-OGR-00018979.jpg
This document is a page from the court transcript of the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). Prosecutor Ms. Comey is conducting a direct examination of a witness named Mr. Rodgers. They are discussing Government Exhibit 662, which is identified as a logbook, and Ms. Comey asks the witness to explain the columns in the logbook, starting with the date.
DOJ-OGR-00018978.jpg
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers authenticates their pilot logbook, confirming it is an accurate record kept in the regular course of their duties. The government attorney, Ms. Comey, successfully moves to admit the logbook into evidence as a sealed exhibit (662) and a redacted public version (662-R), which the court accepts without objection from opposing counsel, Mr. Everdell.
DOJ-OGR-00018977.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers, a former employee and crew member for Mr. Epstein, describes a personal logbook they maintained, which recorded flight dates, destinations, flight times, and passenger names for only the flights they personally worked on. The witness is then directed to examine a document identified as Government Exhibit 662.
DOJ-OGR-00018976.jpg
This document is an excerpt from a deposition transcript dated August 10, 2022, where a pilot named Rodgers is questioned about flight records. Rodgers states that he kept passenger manifests, aircraft logs, and a personal logbook for flights he piloted for Jeffrey Epstein. He confirms that he turned over the passenger manifests for Epstein's planes to one of Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys.
DOJ-OGR-00018975.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) featuring the direct testimony of a pilot named Rodgers. Rodgers describes the fleet of aircraft owned by his employer between 1991 and 2004, specifically listing a Hawker Siddeley 125, Gulfstream G2B, Cessna 421, and Boeing 727. The questioning focuses on the physical layout of the Gulfstream and Boeing aircraft, establishing that doors separating the cockpit from the passenger areas prevented the pilot from observing passenger activities.
DOJ-OGR-00018974.jpg
This document is a transcript of court testimony from August 10, 2022, where a witness named Rodgers, identified as a pilot for Jeffrey Epstein, is questioned about Epstein's and Ms. Maxwell's travel between 1994 and 2004. Rodgers states that Epstein almost always flew private, except for occasional Concorde flights to Europe, and that his plane was down for maintenance annually. The witness also testifies that Ms. Maxwell possessed a 'Raytheon Travel Air card' which allowed her to charter private jets.
DOJ-OGR-00018973.jpg
This document is a transcript of a direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. Rodgers describes a large townhouse in Manhattan, the nature of the relationship between Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein between 1991 and 2004 as changing from romantic to not romantic, and the process by which Ms. Maxwell would provide 24-72 hours notice for flights on Mr. Epstein's planes via beeper or cell phone.
DOJ-OGR-00018972.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, featuring the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers by Ms. Comey. The testimony focuses on establishing a timeline of Ghislaine Maxwell's residences (moving from a larger apartment to a studio, then to 84th Street, then a townhouse) and mentions the death of her father in November 1991. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell raises objections regarding foundation and hearsay, which are ruled upon by the Court.
DOJ-OGR-00018971.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, from the direct examination of a witness named Rodgers. The transcript captures an exchange where an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, argues against the notion that moving into a smaller apartment implies poverty, an argument the court overrules. The testimony also references a point in time when an unnamed female first met Mr. Epstein.
DOJ-OGR-00018970.jpg
This document is a transcript of a sidebar conference during the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. The defense (Mr. Everdell) argues against admitting evidence regarding the death of Maxwell's father and her subsequent move to a smaller apartment, claiming it predates the alleged conspiracy by three years. The prosecution (Ms. Comey) argues this evidence is relevant to establish motive, specifically that Maxwell was not wealthy and participated in crimes with Jeffrey Epstein in exchange for financial support, including the purchase of a large townhouse.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity