Event Details

Prior to jury verdict

Description

Discovery of material facts mentioned in line 25.

Participants (1)

Name Type Mentions
Ms. Brune person 82 View Entity

Source Documents (1)

DOJ-OGR-00010039.jpg

Deposition Transcript / Court Filing • 454 KB
View

This is a page from a deposition transcript involving a witness named Ms. Brune (likely an attorney). She is being questioned about a discrepancy between facts presented in a July 21st letter and a legal brief, and a subsequent conference call with Judge Pauley on July 22nd where the Judge expressed unhappiness with the conflicting information. Brune expresses regret for 'missing' something in the brief.

Related Events

Events with shared participants

Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding her knowledge and actions during the voir dire process.

Date unknown • Court (implied)

View

Voir dire, the process of jury selection, is discussed.

Date unknown • Court (implied)

View

The writing of a legal brief by Edelstein and Ms. Brune.

Date unknown

View

Redirect examination of Ms. Brune by Mr. Davis, during which Government Exhibit 28 (a letter from Ms. Brune) is admitted into evidence.

Date unknown • The Court

View

A discussion between Edelstein and Ms. Brune about what information to include or omit in a legal brief concerning Catherine Conrad.

Date unknown

View

Edelstein and Ms. Brune specifically decided what information to include or exclude from a legal brief.

Date unknown

View

Ms. Brune, her firm, or defendant Parse acknowledged being differently situated than other defendants during a telephone call on July 22nd.

Date unknown

View

Discussion between the speaker, Ms. Edelstein, and Ms. Brune regarding Catherine Conrad and a Westlaw report.

Date unknown

View

The jury selection process for a trial that was expected to be very long. A key issue was the availability of jurors. A potential juror with a criminal record (turnstile jumping, lookout for burglary) was considered but not challenged.

Date unknown

View

A three-month long trial for which the jury selection discussed in the document was conducted.

Date unknown

View

Event Metadata

Type
Unknown
Location
Unknown
Significance Score
5/10
Participants
1
Source Documents
1
Extracted
2025-11-20 23:54

Additional Data

Source
DOJ-OGR-00010039.jpg
Date String
Prior to jury verdict

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event