Event Details
February 24, 2022
Description
Ms. Brune testifies under direct examination about her process for handling information about jurors during jury selection. She admits she knew she could have asked Judge Pauley to question jurors to clarify discrepancies but did not do so.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ms. Brune | person | 82 | View Entity |
| Unnamed Questioner (Lawyer) | person | 0 | View Entity |
| THE COURT (Presiding Judge) | person | 0 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009327.jpg
This document is a court transcript from February 24, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness, Ms. Brune. She is being questioned about her jury selection process, specifically regarding why she did not ask Judge Pauley to clarify discrepancies found in "Google-type information" about jurors. Ms. Brune admits she was aware she could have requested the judge to inquire further but chose not to.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding her knowledge and actions during the voir dire process.
Date unknown • Court (implied)
Voir dire, the process of jury selection, is discussed.
Date unknown • Court (implied)
The writing of a legal brief by Edelstein and Ms. Brune.
Date unknown
Redirect examination of Ms. Brune by Mr. Davis, during which Government Exhibit 28 (a letter from Ms. Brune) is admitted into evidence.
Date unknown • The Court
A discussion between Edelstein and Ms. Brune about what information to include or omit in a legal brief concerning Catherine Conrad.
Date unknown
Edelstein and Ms. Brune specifically decided what information to include or exclude from a legal brief.
Date unknown
Ms. Brune, her firm, or defendant Parse acknowledged being differently situated than other defendants during a telephone call on July 22nd.
Date unknown
Discussion between the speaker, Ms. Edelstein, and Ms. Brune regarding Catherine Conrad and a Westlaw report.
Date unknown
The jury selection process for a trial that was expected to be very long. A key issue was the availability of jurors. A potential juror with a criminal record (turnstile jumping, lookout for burglary) was considered but not challenged.
Date unknown
A three-month long trial for which the jury selection discussed in the document was conducted.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event