Relationship Details

This document is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice issued by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on May 19, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe No. 103 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-CV-80309) in the Southern District of Florida. The order dismisses the case following a stipulation by the parties and notes that the court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties' settlement.

Legal document filed on May 18, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida stipulating the dismissal with prejudice of a civil lawsuit (Case No. 10-CV-80309) brought by Jane Doe No. 103 against Jeffrey Epstein. The document indicates that a settlement was reached between the parties, with the court retaining jurisdiction to enforce its terms.

This document is an agreed motion for an extension of time filed on April 22, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe No. 103 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-80309-WJZ). Plaintiff's counsel, Katherine W. Ezell, requests an extension until May 13, 2010, to file a response to Epstein's motion to dismiss because she is leaving for a vacation in Italy the following day. The motion notes that Epstein's counsel, Robert Critton, agrees to the extension, and the document includes a service list of attorneys involved in this and related cases.

A court order from the Southern District of Florida dated April 1, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe No. 103 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-80309). The order grants the Plaintiff's Motion to Transfer the case to Judge Marra's Division to be consolidated with eleven similar pending actions under the lead case Doe No. 2 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 08-80119).

This document is an agreed motion filed on May 13, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida by Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 103 against Defendant Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff requests a one-week extension to file a response to Epstein's motion to dismiss because the parties are in the process of resolving the matter via settlement, which would render the motion moot. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing legal counsel for Epstein, Co-Defendant Sarah Kellen (represented by Bruce Reinhart), and plaintiffs in several related cases.

This document is an unopposed motion filed on March 23, 2010, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, requesting an extension of time for Jeffrey Epstein to respond to a complaint filed by Jane Doe No. 103. Epstein's legal team requests the deadline be moved from March 26 to April 5, 2010, citing workload from 'several other cases' filed in the same court in which Epstein is a defendant. The plaintiff's counsel agreed to this extension.

This document is a Court Order from the Southern District of Florida dated March 9, 2010, in the case of Jane Doe No. 103 vs. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge William J. Zloch grants the plaintiff's motion to proceed anonymously and orders the permanent sealing of her identity, while directing that the complaint itself be unsealed.

This document is a court order (likely a proposed order attached as an exhibit, given the blank signature and 'Document 16-1' header) from the case Jane Doe No. 103 v. Jeffrey Epstein in the Southern District of Florida. It grants the Plaintiff's agreed motion for an extension of time, setting a new deadline of May 13, 2010, to file a response to Epstein's motion to dismiss Count VI.

A court order from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 103 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-80309-CIV-MARRA). Judge Kenneth A. Marra orders counsel to confer, file a joint scheduling report, and file a joint discovery report, outlining specific deadlines and procedural rules for the pretrial phase.

This document is a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida in the case of Jane Doe No. 103 vs. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 10-CV-80309). Judge Kenneth A. Marra dismissed the case in May 2010 following a stipulation by the parties, noting that the court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of a settlement reached between the plaintiff and Epstein.